Blockade of the programmed death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis using antibodies against the associated receptors and ligands has yielded good clinical responses and improved ...overall survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Once patients show a response to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody, the median duration of response is often longer than that achieved using existing cytotoxic agents and even some molecular targeted agents. However, the response rates to these antibodies are only 15% to 20% in unselected patients with NSCLC and the cost of this therapy is high. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective predictive biomarkers to identify patients likely to benefit. PD-L1 expression, which can be detected by immunohistochemical analysis, is a rational biomarker for selecting responders to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatments, and this selection method has been introduced into clinical practice. However, the response rate to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in PD-L1–expressing patients with NSCLC is only 15% to 45%, response can occur in PD-L1–negative patients, and predictability based on PD-L1 expression may differ between nonsquamous NSCLC and squamous cell NSCLC. In addition, the methods of immunohistochemical analysis and evaluation of its results differ for different anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents. This article reviews the existing data on predictive markers for the efficacy of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in NSCLC.
Summary Background Alectinib, a potent, highly selective, CNS-active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), showed promising efficacy and tolerability in the single-arm phase 1/2 AF-001JP ...trial in Japanese patients with ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Given those promising results, we did a phase 3 trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of alectinib and crizotinib. Methods J-ALEX was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that recruited ALK inhibitor-naive Japanese patients with ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer, who were chemotherapy-naive or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, from 41 study sites in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system using a permuted-block method stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, treatment line, and disease stage to receive oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review facility. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The study is ongoing and patient recruitment is closed. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (number JapicCTI-132316). Findings Between Nov 18, 2013, and Aug 4, 2015, 207 patients were recruited and assigned to the alectinib (n=103) or crizotinib (n=104) groups. At data cutoff for the second interim analysis, 24 patients in the alectinib group had discontinued treatment compared with 61 in the crizotinib group, mostly due to lack of efficacy or adverse events. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff date Dec 3, 2015), an independent data monitoring committee determined that the primary endpoint of the study had been met (hazard ratio 0·34 99·7% CI 0·17–0·71, stratified log-rank p<0·0001) and recommended an immediate release of the data. Median progression-free survival had not yet been reached with alectinib (95% CI 20·3–not estimated) and was 10·2 months (8·2–12·0) with crizotinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred at a greater frequency with crizotinib (54 52% of 104) than alectinib (27 26% of 103). Dose interruptions due to adverse events were also more prevalent with crizotinib (77 74% of 104) than with alectinib (30 29% of 103), and more patients receiving crizotinib (21 20%) than alectinib (nine 9%) discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event. No adverse events with a fatal outcome occurred in either treatment group. Interpretation These results provide the first head-to-head comparison of alectinib and crizotinib and have the potential to change the standard of care for the first-line treatment of ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer. The dose of alectinib (300 mg twice daily) used in this study is lower than the approved dose in countries other than Japan; however, this limitation is being addressed in the ongoing ALEX study. Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.
Driver oncogenes are defined as oncogenes showing mutations that are responsible for the development and proliferation of malignant neoplasms. Driver mutations represent the Achilles heel of tumors, ...because tumor proliferation is dramatically suppressed once these gene products are inhibited using specific molecular targeted therapy. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was initially sub-classified into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma based on microscopic findings. However, new information on a driver oncogene called epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and its specific inhibitor changed the sub-classification of NSCLC. After the discovery of EGFR mutation and its specific inhibitor, several other driver oncogenes and their specific inhibitors were also discovered, adding to the sub-classification of NSCLC. Consequently, testing for driver oncogenes became essential for selecting the optimal treatment for advanced NSCLC. Earlier, these driver oncogenes were tested for individually, but next-generation sequencing technology - which enables multiplex driver oncogene testing - has recently been introduced into daily clinical practice. However, sample quality and quantity are essential in order to obtain complete results of genetic alterations. Treatment with inhibitors against driver oncogenes can shrink tumors dramatically, but tumors become resistant in 10-18 months. Mechanisms underlying resistance to specific inhibitors have been investigated, and novel drugs have been developed to overcome resistance. However, it remains challenging to cure advanced NSCLC with mutations in driver oncogenes. Therefore, immunotherapy should be introduced with the aim of inhibiting cancer progression long-term, and further investigation is warranted in this regard.
The efficacy of gefitinib for patients with non‐adenocarcinoma non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is unclear, because only a small ...percentage of patients enrolled in the clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of gefitinib for tumors harboring EGFR mutation were non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC. A pooled analysis was conducted to clarify the efficacy of gefitinib for non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. A systematic search of the PUBMED databases was conducted to identify all clinical reports that contained advanced non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and treated with gefitinib. The selected patients were advanced non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib and described in reports containing the data of the histology, status of EGFR mutations and response to gefitinib. This study selected 33 patients from 15 reports. Twenty‐seven and three of the 33 patients were squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma, respectively. One patient each had large‐cell carcinoma, pleomorphic carcinoma and spindle cell carcinoma. Twenty‐one patients (64%) had sensitive EGFR mutations. The response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 27%, 67–70% and 3.0 months, respectively. These factors were statistically significantly inferior in the non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations to adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations selected from the same published reports (RR: 27%vs 66%, P = 0.000028; DCR: 67–70%vs 92–93%, P = 0.000014; mPFS: 3.0 vs 9.4 months, P = 0.0001, respectively). Gefitinib is less effective in non‐adenocarcinoma NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations than adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 1032–1037)
ALK, ROS1, and RET kinase fusions are important predictive biomarkers of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) provides a ...noninvasive method to identify gene changes in tumor cells. The present study sought to use cfRNA and cfDNA for identifying fusion genes. A reliable protocol was established to detect fusion genes using cfRNA and assessed the analytical validity and clinical usefulness in 30 samples from 20 cases of fusion‐positive NSCLC. The results of cfRNA‐based assays were compared with tissue biopsy and cfDNA‐based liquid biopsy (Guardant360 plasma next‐generation sequencing NGS assay). The overall sensitivity of the cfRNA‐based assay was 26.7% (8/30) and that of cfDNA‐based assay was 16.7% (3/18). When analysis was limited to the samples collected at chemo‐naïve or progressive disease status and available for both assays, the sensitivity of the cfRNA‐based assay was 77.8% (7/9) and that of cfDNA‐based assay was 33.3% (3/9). Fusion gene identification in cfRNA was correlated with treatment response. These results suggest that the proposed cfRNA assay is a useful diagnostic test for patients with insufficient tissues to facilitate effective administration of first‐line treatment and is a useful tool to monitor the progression of NSCLC for consideration of second‐line treatments.
cfRNA‐ and cfDNA‐based assays are evaluated in 20 cases of fusion‐positive NSCLC. cfRNA assay was superior to cfDNA assay for the detection of gene fusions. The results of the cfRNA assay were consistent with the therapeutic effect.
Anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody therapy is a standard treatment for advanced NSCLC, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is used as a predictive ...biomarker for therapeutic response. However, because not all patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 respond, and some patients with low PD-L1 expression exhibit durable benefit, more accurate predictive biomarkers are needed. Circulating microRNA (miRNA) and miRNA packaged in extracellular vesicles (EVs) are believed to play a role in intercellular communication among immune cells and between immune cells and tumor cells and may represent a good source of mechanism-related biomarkers.
Pretreatment plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 antibody was used in this study. Plasma EVs were isolated using size-exclusion chromatography. Whole plasma and EV-containing RNAs were extracted. The miRNA profile was analyzed with a next-generation sequencing platform.
Samples from 14 responders (patients who exhibited partial response or stable disease ≥6 mo) and 15 nonresponders (patients who exhibited progressive disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were analyzed. In total, 32 miRNAs (p = 0.0030–0.0495) from whole plasma and seven EV-associated miRNAs (p = 0.041–0.0457) exhibited significant concentration differences between responders and nonresponders. The results of some of these circulating miRNAs were validated in a separate cohort with eight responders and 13 nonresponders. The tumor PD-L1 level was also assessed using immunohistochemistry for patients involved in both cohorts.
Specific circulating miRNAs in whole plasma and plasma EVs are differentially expressed between responders and nonresponders and have potential as predictive biomarkers for anti–PD-1/PD-L1 treatment response.
After working as a medical doctor specializing in respiratory medicine for 13 years and performing mainly clinical studies and some translational research during graduate courses, I wanted to perform ...basic science research during postdoctoral training in the USA. I worked as a postdoctoral fellow in Dr. David Paul Carbone’s laboratory from May 2015 to January 2019. Dr. Carbone is one of the leading physician scientists who was an erstwhile president of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). In his lab, basic and translational studies are conducted to improve the outcome of the patients with advanced thoracic malignancies. Professor Takahashi, who is the head of the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Juntendo University, supported me in my postgraduate training in Dr. Carbone’s lab. In this article, I have summarized the studies that I did with Dr. Carbone. I have written and published one review article titled “Predictive Markers for the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Lung Cancer,” one case report titled “Lung Cancer Patients with Germline Mutations Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing and/or Liquid Biopsy, ”and two research articles titled “Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy” and “The Effect of LKB1 Activity on the Sensitivity to PI3K/mTOR Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.”
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be identified by precise molecular subsets based on genomic alterations that drive tumorigenesis and include mutations in
, and various
fusions. However, ...despite effective treatments for EGFR and ALK, promising therapeutics have not been developed for patients with
mutations. It has been reported that one way the RAS-ERK pathway contributes to tumorigenesis is by affecting stability and localization of FOXO3a protein, an important regulator of cell death and the cell cycle. This is through regulation of apoptotic proteins BIM and FASL and cell-cycle regulators p21
and p27
We now show that an HDAC inhibitor affects the expression and localization of FOXO proteins and wanted to determine whether the combination of a MEK inhibitor with an HDAC inhibitor would increase the sensitivity of NSCLC with
mutation. Combined treatment with a MEK inhibitor and an HDAC inhibitor showed synergistic effects on cell metabolic activity of
-mutated lung cancer cells through activation of FOXOs, with a subsequent increase in BIM and cell-cycle inhibitors. Moreover, in a mouse xenograft model, the combination of belinostat and trametinib significantly decreases tumor formation through FOXOs by increasing BIM and the cell-cycle inhibitors p21
and p27
These results demonstrate that control of FOXOs localization and expression is critical in
-driven lung cancer cells, suggesting that the dual molecular-targeted therapy for MEK and HDACs may be promising as novel therapeutic strategy in NSCLC with specific populations of
mutations.
.
The prognosis of patients with NSCLC harboring oncogenic driver gene alterations, such as EGFR gene mutations or ALK fusion, has improved dramatically with the advent of corresponding molecularly ...targeted drugs. As patients were followed up for about five years in most clinical trials, the long-term outcomes beyond 5 years are unclear. The objectives of this study are to explore the clinical course beyond five years of chemotherapy initiation and to investigate factors that lead to long-term survival.
One hundred and seventy-seven patients with advanced, EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC who received their first chemotherapy between December 2008 and September 2015 were included. Kaplan Meier curves were drawn for the total cohort and according to subgroups of patients' characteristics.
Median OS in the total cohort was 40.6 months, the one-year survival rate was 89%, the three-year survival rate was 54%, and the five-year survival rate was 28%. Median OS was 36.9 months in EGFR-mutated patients and 55.4 months in ALK-rearranged patients. The OS curve seemed to plateau after 72 months, and most of the patients who were still alive after more than five years are on treatment. Female sex, age under 75 years, an ECOG PS of 0 to 1, ALK rearrangement, postoperative recurrence, and presence of brain metastasis were significantly associated with longer OS.
A tail plateau was found in the survival curves of patients with advanced, EGFR-mutated and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, but most were on treatment, especially with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
Germline mutations in lung cancer Shukuya, Takehito; Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Respiratory investigation,
20/May , Volume:
57, Issue:
3
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Genetic testing for alterations in oncogenic driver genes has become essential and standard in the clinical practice of the treatment of lung cancer. Germline mutations potentially predisposing ...patients to lung cancer are rare; however, with the introduction of next-generation sequencing in the clinical practice of lung cancer, the identification of potentially predisposing germline abnormalities is becoming more common. In addition, liquid biopsy, which analyzes cell-free DNA in blood, increases the possibility of detecting these germline mutations. In this review, we summarize the germline mutations detected in lung cancer patients and briefly describe the future perspectives.
PDF
