Aims: Cardiovascular risk persists despite intensive lipid lowering therapy using statins. Serum levels of lipoprotein (a) Lp(a) can be a residual cardiovascular risk for adverse events. Aim of the ...present study was to evaluate the impact of Lp(a) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with statin after percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods: We prospectively enrolled 3507 consecutive CAD patients who underwent a first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1997 and 2011 at our institution. We identified 1768 patients (50.4%) who had treated with statin during PCI. Eligible 1336 patients were stratified to two groups according to Lp(a) levels (median Lp (a) 21.5 mg/dL). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death and non-fatal acute coronary syndrome.Results: MACE occurred 144 (10.8%) including 34 (2.5%) cardiac death and 110 (8.7%) non-fatal ACS during median follow-up period of 1920 days. The cumulative rate of MACE was significantly higher in group with high Lp(a) group (log-rank p=0.0460). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant correlation between Lp (a) levels treated as a natural logarithm-transformed continuous variable and increased MACE (adjusted HR for MACE 1.28, 95%CI 1.04-1.58, p=0.0184)Conclusion: Elevated levels of Lp(a) is significantly associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes among CAD patients who received statin therapy after PCI.
Red cell distribution width (RDW) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and cardiovascular disease. However, the association between ...RDW and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains uncertain. In this study, a total of 2,881 CCS patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and who had available data on pre-procedural RDW between 2002 and 2016 were enrolled. Of these, 1,827 without anemia and severe renal dysfunction were divided into quartiles based on their RDW values. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. As a result, patients in the higher RDW quartile groups were more likely to be older and have chronic kidney disease. During a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 209 (11.4%) events were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the highest RDW quartile group had a clearly higher incidence of the primary endpoint (log-rank P = 0.0002). The highest RDW group had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events compared with the lowest RDW group, even after adjustment for other risk factors (hazard ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.67, P = 0.04). Increasing RDW as a continuous variable was also associated with the incidence of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 1.46 per 1% increase, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.69, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that increased RDW was associated with worse clinical outcomes after elective PCI. Assessing pre-PCI RDW may be useful for risk stratification of CCS.
Background:New criteria for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were proposed in 2000 as a universal definition, in which cardiac troponin (cTn) was the preferred biomarker. A large number ...of patients formerly classified by creatine kinase (CK) as unstable angina are now ruled-in by cTn as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).Methods and Results:The Japanese registry of acute Myocardial INfarction diagnosed by Universal dEfiniTion (J-MINUET) is a prospective and multicenter registry conducted in 28 institutions. We enrolled 3,283 consecutive patients with AMI diagnosed by cTn-based criteria who were admitted to participating institutions within 48 h of symptom onset. There were 2,262 patients (68.9%) with STEMI and 1,021 (31.1%) with NSTEMI. CK was not elevated more than twice the upper limit of normal in 458 patients (44.9%) with NSTEMI (NSTEMI-CK). Although there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality of STEMI and NSTEMI with CK elevation (NSTEMI+CK) patients (7.1% vs. 7.8%, P=0.57), it was significantly lower in patients with NSTEMI-CK than in those with STEMI or NSTEMI+CK (1.7%, P<0.001 for each).Conclusions:J-MINUET revealed the clinical presentation, management and outcomes of Japanese patients with AMI in the current cTn era. We should be aware of the difference between AMI diagnosed by CK-based criteria and AMI diagnosed by cTn-based criteria when using universal definitions for the diagnosis of AMI. (Circ J 2015; 79: 1255–1262)
Background Aggressive lipid lowering by high-dose statin treatment has been established for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). Regarding the low-density lipoprotein ...cholesterol (LDL-C) level, however, the "The lower is the better" concept has been controversial to date. We hypothesized that there is an optimal LDL-C level, i.e., a "threshold" value, below which the incidence of cardiovascular events is no longer reduced. We undertook a subanalysis of the REAL-CAD study to explore whether such an optimal target LDL-C level exists by a novel analysis procedure to verify the existence of a monotonic relationship. Methods For a total of 11,105 patients with CAD enrolled in the REAL-CAD study, the LDL-C level at 6 months after randomization and 5-year cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. We set the "threshold" value of the LDL-C level under which the hazards were assumed to be constant, by including an artificial covariate max (0, LDL-C - threshold) in the Cox model. The analysis was repeated with different LDL-C thresholds (every 10 mg/dl from 40 to 100 mg/dl) and the model fit was assessed by log-likelihood. Results For primary outcomes such as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and unstable angina requiring emergency hospitalization, the model fit assessed by log-likelihood was best when a threshold LDL-C value of 70 mg/dl was assumed. And in the model with a threshold LDL-C greater than or equal to 70 mg/dl, the hazard ratio was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.13) as the LDL-C increased by 10 mg/dl. Therefore, the risk of cardiovascular events decreased monotonically until the LDL-C level was lowered to 70 mg/dl, but when the level was further reduced, the risk was independent of LDL-C. Conclusions Our analysis model suggests that a "threshold" value of LDL-C might exist for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with CAD, and this threshold might be 70 mg/dl for primary composite outcomes. Trial registration Keywords: LDL cholesterol, Target value, Threshold value, Statin, Coronary artery disease, Proportional hazard, Bottoming-out model
Background:The prevalence of and expected bleeding event rate in patients with the Japanese version of high bleeding risk (J-HBR) criteria are currently unknown in real-world percutaneous coronary ...intervention (PCI) practice.Methods and Results:We applied the J-HBR criteria in the multicenter CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-3 that enrolled 13,258 consecutive patients who underwent first PCI. The J-HBR criteria included Japanese-specific major criteria such as heart failure, low body weight, peripheral artery disease and frailty in addition to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-HBR criteria. There were 8,496 patients with J-HBR, and 4,762 patients without J-HBR. The J-HBR criteria identified a greater proportion of patients with HBR than did ARC-HBR (64% and 48%, respectively). Cumulative incidence of the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding was significantly higher in the J-HBR group than in the no-HBR group (14.0% vs. 4.1% at 1 year; 23.1% vs. 8.4% at 5 years, P<0.0001). Cumulative 5-year incidence of BARC 3/5 bleeding was 25.1% in patients with ARC-HBR, and 23.1% in patients with J-HBR. Cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke was also significantly higher in the J-HBR group than in the no-HBR group (6.9% vs. 3.6% at 1 year; 13.2% vs. 7.1% at 5 years, P<0.0001).Conclusions:The J-HBR criteria successfully identified those patients with very high bleeding risk after PCI, who represented 64% of patients in this all-comers registry.
Background:Inter-facility transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from referring facilities to PCI centers causes a significant delay in treatment of ST-segment elevation acute ...myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary PCI. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes of STEMI patients undergoing inter-facility transfer in Japan.Methods and Results:In the CREDO-Kyoto acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registry that enrolled 5,429 consecutive AMI patients in 26 centers in Japan, the current study population consisted of 3,820 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI within 24 h of symptom onset. We compared long-term clinical outcomes between inter-facility transfer patients and those directly admitted to PCI centers. The primary outcome measure was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization. There were 1,725 (45.2%) inter-facility transfer patients, and 2,095 patients (54.8%) with direct admission to PCI centers. The cumulative 5-year incidence of death/HF hospitalization was significantly higher in the inter-facility transfer patients than in those with direct admission (26.9% vs. 22.2%; log-rank P<0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk for death/HF hospitalization was significantly higher (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.40, P<0.001) in the inter-facility transfer patients than in those directly admitted.Conclusions:Inter-facility transfer was associated with significantly worse long-term clinical outcomes for patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1764–1772)
Despite its recommendation by the current guidelines, the role of long-term oral beta-blocker therapy has never been evaluated by randomized trials in uncomplicated ST-segment elevation myocardial ...infarction (STEMI) patients without heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction or ventricular arrhythmia who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
In a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, STEMI patients with successful primary PCI within 24 hours from the onset and with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% were randomly assigned in a 1-to-1 fashion either to the carvedilol group or to the no beta-blocker group within 7 days after primary PCI. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. Between August 2010 and May 2014, 801 patients were randomly assigned to the carvedilol group (N = 399) or the no beta-blocker group (N = 402) at 67 centers in Japan. The carvedilol dose was up-titrated from 3.4±2.1 mg at baseline to 6.3±4.3 mg at 1-year. During median follow-up of 3.9 years with 96.4% follow-up, the cumulative 3-year incidences of both the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the carvedilol and no beta-blocker groups (6.8% and 7.9%, P = 0.20, and 20.3% and 17.7%, P = 0.65, respectively). There also was no significant difference in LVEF at 1-year between the 2 groups (60.9±8.4% and 59.6±8.8%, P = 0.06).
Long-term carvedilol therapy added on the contemporary evidence-based medications did not seem beneficial in selected STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.
CAPITAL-RCT (Carvedilol Post-Intervention Long-Term Administration in Large-scale Randomized Controlled Trial) ClinicalTrials.gov.number, NCT 01155635.
The detailed causes of death in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have not been adequately evaluated compared to those in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
The ...study population was 6,228 AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (STEMI: 4,625 patients and NSTEMI: 1,603 patients). The primary outcome was all-cause death.
Within 6 months after AMI, the adjusted mortality risk was not significantly different between NSTEMI patients and STEMI patients (HR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.67-1.03, P = 0.09). Regarding the causes of death within 6 months after AMI, mechanical complications more frequently occurred in STEMI patients than in NSTEMI patients, while proportions of post resuscitation status on arrival and heart failure were higher in in NSTEMI patients than in STEMI patients. Beyond 6 months after AMI, the adjusted mortality risk of NSTEMI relative to STEMI was not significantly different. (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.90-1.20, P = 0.59). Regarding causes of death beyond 6 months after AMI, almost half of deaths were cardiovascular causes in both groups, and breakdown of causes of death was similar between NSTEMI and STEMI.
The mortality risk within and beyond 6 months after AMI were not significantly different between STEMI patients and NSTEMI patients after adjusting confounders. Deaths due to post resuscitation status and heart failure were more frequent in NSTEMI within 6 months after AMI.
Background:The effect of body weight (BW) on bleeding and ischemic events has not been adequately evaluated in real-world percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice.Methods and Results:12,690 ...consecutive patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2 were divided into 3 groups according to tertiles of BW stratified by sex (male; Tertile 1 <60.0 kg, 2 60.0–68.0 kg, and 3 >68.0 kg, and female; Tertile 1 <47.9 kg, 2 47.9–55.8 kg, and 3 >55.8 kg). Cumulative 5-year incidences of the primary bleeding (GUSTO moderate/severe) and ischemic (myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke) endpoints increased incrementally with decrease in BW in both strata (male Tertiles 1, 2, and 3: 13.7%, 10.3%, and 8.0%, P<0.001, and 13.9%, 11.3%, and 10.2%, P<0.001; female Tertiles 1, 2, and 3: 17.9%, 12.9%, and 10.1%, P<0.001, and 17.9%, 12.9%, and 10.1%, P<0.001). Compared with Tertile 3, the adjusted risks of Tertile 1 for the primary bleeding and ischemic endpoints remained significant in the female stratum (hazard ratio (HR): 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–1.87, P=0.003, and HR:1.49, 95% CI:1.13–1.95, P=0.004), but not in the male stratum (HR:1.10, 95% CI:0.92–1.32, P=0.31, and HR:1.06, 95% CI:0.90–1.27, P=0.47).Conclusions:Cumulative incidences of bleeding and ischemic events increased incrementally as BW decreased in both men and women. The adjusted risks of underweight relative to overweight for bleeding and ischemic events were significant only in women.
PDF
