Acute and Late Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Stenting in Comparison With Surgical Revascularization Pawel E. Buszman, Stefan R. Kiesz, Andrzej Bochenek, Ewa Peszek-Przybyla, Iwona Szkrobka, ...Marcin Debinski, Bozena Bialkowska, Dariusz Dudek, Agata Gruzka, Aleksander Zurakowski, Krzysztof Milewski, Miroslaw Wilczynski, Lukasz Rzeszutko, Piotr Buszman, Jan Szymszal, Jack L. Martin, Michal Tendera Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenting is the subject of intense investigation as a potential alternative to bypass surgery. We randomly assigned 105 patients with ULMCA stenosis to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (52 patients) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (53 patients). Patients treated with PCI had favorable early outcomes in comparison with the CABG group. At 1 year, the ejection fraction improved significantly only in the PCI group. Target vessel failure was similar in both groups. After more than 2 years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event-free survival was similar in both groups with a trend toward improved survival after PCI.
The REvascularization in Ischemic HEart Failure Trial (REHEAT) is a nonrandomized, case-controlled, prospective study assessing the hypothesis that surgical and percutaneous revascularizations in ...patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy are associated with comparable improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and functional status 12 months after myocardial revascularization. The study population consisted of 141 patients with LVEFs of <40% and angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease. The primary end point was improvement in LVEF 12 months after intervention. Secondary end points were in-hospital major adverse events, length of hospitalization, exercise tolerance of treadmill stress testing after 12 months, 1-year survival, 1-year event-free survival, angina, and heart failure severity after 12 months. The case-controlled study included 55 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 54 who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The incidence of 30-day major adverse events was higher in the CABG group (40.7% vs 9%, p = 0.0003), whereas duration of hospital stay was shorter in the PCI group (6.8 ± 3.6 vs 9.2 ± 2.1 days, p = 0.00001). Increase in LVEF was comparable after PCI and CABG (6.0 ± 7.2% vs 4.4 ± 9.0% p = 0.12). Long-term functional status based on treadmill stress testing was better after PCI (Student’s t test, p = 0.0003) but, according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society and New York Heart Association classifications, was similar in the 2 treatment arms (Wilcoxon test, p <0.01). Long-term survival was significantly better for patients after PCI (Wilcoxon test, p <0.01); however, major adverse event-free survival was better after CABG (Cox-Mantel test, p = 0.0013). In conclusion, PCI and CABG are associated with comparable improvements in LVEF in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. PCI offers a better 1-year survival rate than CABG, but the incidence of repeat revascularization is lower with CABG.
Abstract Objectives This study has reported 10-year clinical follow-up of patients enrolled in the prospective, randomized LE MANS (Left Main Stenting) trial. Background The very long-term outcome ...after left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization remains unknown. Methods In this prospective, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 105 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with low and medium complexity of coexisting coronary artery disease according to SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting (n = 52) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 53). Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 35%, whereas arterial grafts to the left anterior descending artery were utilized in 81%. Currently, the mean long-term follow-up was collected at 9.8 ± 1.0 years. Follow up for all-cause mortality is complete, whereas the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) was reported from 90% of patients. Ambulatory follow-up was completed in 46 (43.9%) patients. Results At 10 years, there was a trend toward higher ejection fraction in stenting when compared with surgery (54.9 ± 8.3% vs. 49.8 ± 10.3%; p = 0.07). The mortality (21.6% vs. 30.2%; p = 0.41) and MACCE (51.1% vs. 64.4%; p = 0.28) were statistically not different between groups; however, numerically the difference was in favor of stenting. Similarly, there was no difference in the occurrence of myocardial infarction (8.7 vs. 10.4%; p = 0.62), stroke (4.3 vs. 6.3%; p = 0.68), and repeated revascularization rates (26.1% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.64). The probability of very long-term survival up to 14 years was comparable between PCI and CABG (74.2% vs. 67.5%; p = 0.34; hazard ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 3.13); however, there was a trend toward higher MACCE-free survival in the PCI group (34.7% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.06; hazard ratio: 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 2.99). Conclusions In patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with low and medium complexity of coexisting coronary artery disease, stenting offers numerically, but statistically nonsignificant, favorable long-term outcome up to 10 years in terms of safety and efficacy outcome measures, therefore, constitutes an alternative therapy for CABG.
Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate early and late outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA) and to compare ...bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) subgroups. Background PCI is an increasingly utilized method of revascularization in patients with ULMCA. Methods This multicenter prospective registry included 252 patients after ULMCA stenting enrolled between March 1997 and February 2008. Non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 58% of patients; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases were excluded. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 36.2% of patients. Results Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) occurred in 12 (4.8%) patients during the 30-day period, which included 4 (1.5%) deaths. After 12 months there were 17 (12.1%) angiographically confirmed cases of restenosis. During long-term follow-up (1 to 11 years, mean 3.8 years) there were 64 (25.4%) MACCE and 35 (13.9%) deaths. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 78.1% and 68.9%, respectively. Despite differences in demographical and clinical data in favor of BMS patients, unmatched analysis showed a significantly lower MACCE rate in DES patients (25.9% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.039). This difference was strengthened after propensity score matching. The DES lowered both mortality and MACCE for distal ULMCA lesions when compared with BMS. Ejection fraction <50% was the only independent risk factor influencing long-term survival. Conclusions Stenting of ULMCA is feasible and offers good long-term outcome. Implantation of DES for ULMCA decreased the risk of long-term MACCE, and particularly improved survival in patients with distal ULMCA disease.
PDF
