Background
Treatment‐related gonadal dysfunction leading to fertility problems is a frequently encountered late effect in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). This study evaluated reproductive outcomes ...and reproductive health care utilization among male CCSs compared with male siblings.
Methods
A nationwide cohort study was conducted as part of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor LATER study part 1, a questionnaire and linkage study. A questionnaire addressing reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care was completed by 1317 male CCSs and 407 male siblings. A total of 491 CCSs and 185 siblings had a previous or current desire for children and were included in this study.
Results
Fewer CCSs had biological children compared with siblings (65% vs. 88%; p < .001). The type of conception by men who fathered a child was comparable between CCSs and siblings (spontaneous conception of 90% of both groups; p = .86). The percentage of men who had consulted a reproductive specialist because of not siring a pregnancy was higher in CCSs compared with siblings (34% vs. 12%; p < .001). Following consultation, fewer CCSs underwent assisted reproductive techniques (ART) compared with siblings (41% vs. 77%; p = .001). After ART, fewer CCSs fathered a child compared with siblings (49% vs. 94%; p = .001).
Conclusions
More male survivors consult a reproductive specialist, but fewer survivors undergo ART and father a child after ART compared with siblings. This insight is important for understanding potential problems faced by survivors regarding family planning and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between oncologists and reproductive specialists.
This study showed that two‐thirds of male survivors of childhood cancer who had a desire for children fathered a biological child and that children of 90% of male survivors were conceived spontaneously. Compared with male siblings, more male survivors consulted a reproductive specialist because of not siring a pregnancy; however, both the application of and birth rates after assisted reproductive techniques in survivors were lower.
Background
Knowledge of the desire for children among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) is scarce. This study evaluated the desire for children in male CCSs in comparison with male siblings.
Methods
...A nationwide cohort study was conducted as part of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study LATER study: 1317 male CCSs and 407 male sibling controls completed a questionnaire addressing the desire for children. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore the independent association between survivorship status and the desire for children. Furthermore, additional analyses were performed to identify which cancer‐related factors were associated with the desire for children in male CCSs.
Results
After adjustments for the age at assessment, the percentage of men who had a desire for children was significantly lower among CCSs compared with the siblings (74% vs. 82%; odds ratio OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46–0.82; p = .001). The association between survivorship status and the desire for children was attenuated after adjustments for marital status, level of education, and employment status (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61–1.14; p = .250). The percentage of men who had an unfulfilled desire for children remained significantly higher among CCSs compared with the siblings after adjustments for sociodemographic factors (25% vs. 7%; OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 2.48–10.64; p < .001).
Conclusions
The majority of male CCSs have a desire for children. The likelihood of having to deal with an unfulfilled desire for children is 5 times higher among CCSs compared with their siblings. This insight is important for understanding the needs and experienced problems of CCSs regarding family planning and fertility issues.
Male survivors of childhood cancer report a lower desire for children in comparison with male siblings, and this can be explained by differences in marital status, level of education, and employment status. The likelihood of having to deal with an unfulfilled desire is 5 times higher among male survivors compared with siblings, and cancer diagnosis, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and cancer treatment are associated with an unfulfilled desire for children.
Background
Cancer‐related fatigue is a debilitating late effect after treatment for childhood cancer. The prevalence of fatigue in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) and associated factors for fatigue ...has varied widely in previous studies. Two important aspects of cancer‐related fatigue, its severity and chronicity, are often not assessed. This study investigated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, severe chronic fatigue (CF) in a national cohort of Dutch CCSs.
Methods
In this study, 2810 CCSs (5‐year survivors of all childhood malignancies diagnosed between 1963 and 2001 with a current age of 12‐65 years) and 1040 sibling controls were included. CF was assessed with the Short Fatigue Questionnaire and was defined as a score ≥ 18 and persistence of fatigue for ≥6 months. Cancer‐ and treatment‐related characteristics, current health problems, and demographic and lifestyle variables were assessed as potential risk factors for CF via multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results
In adult CCSs and sibling controls (≥18 years old), the prevalence of CF was 26.1% and 14.1%, respectively (P < .001). In adolescent CCSs and sibling controls (<18 years old), the prevalence of CF was 10.9% and 3.2%, respectively. Female gender (odds ratio OR, 2.13; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.73‐2.62), unemployment (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.67‐2.85), having 1 or more health problems (OR for 1‐2, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18‐1.87; OR for >2, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.50‐3.21), and a central nervous system diagnosis (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.17‐2.60) were significantly associated with CF in adult CCSs.
Conclusions
This study shows that CCSs, regardless of their cancer diagnosis, report CF more often than sibling controls. This study provides new evidence for the prevalence of fatigue in CCSs.
One in 4 childhood cancer survivors reports chronic fatigue. Current health problems increase the risk of reporting chronic fatigue.
Background
This study compares a comprehensive range of psychosocial outcomes of adult childhood cancer survivors (CCS) to general population‐based references and identifies sociodemographic and ...medical risk factors.
Methods
CCS from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS)‐LATER cohort (diagnosed 1963–2001) part 2 (attained age ≥18 years, diagnosed <18 years, ≥5 years since diagnosis) completed the Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer, Self‐Rating Scale for Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder, and the Short Form‐36 (Health Related Quality of Life). CCS’ scores were compared with references using analysis of variances and logistic regression analysis, controlling for age and sex (p < .05). Risk factors for worse psychosocial outcomes were assessed with regression analyses (p < .05).
Results
CCS, N = 1797, mean age 35.4 years, 49.0% female, all ≥15 years since diagnosis, participated. Three percent reported posttraumatic stress disorder because of childhood cancer and 36.6% experienced clinical distress. CCS did not differ from references on self‐esteem and anxiety but were less depressed (d = −.25), and scored poorer on all health‐related quality of life scales, except for bodily pain (.01 ≤ d ≥ −.36). Female sex, lower educational attainment, not being in a relationship, and being unemployed were negatively associated with almost all psychosocial outcomes. Except for a central nervous system tumor diagnosis, few medical characteristics were associated with psychosocial outcomes.
Conclusion
CCS appear resilient regarding mental health but have slightly poorer health‐related quality of life than references. Sociodemographic characteristics and central nervous system tumors were related to most psychosocial outcomes, but no clear pattern was observed for other medical factors. Future studies should address additional factors in explaining CCS’ psychosocial functioning, such as coping, social support, and physical late effects.
Adult childhood cancer survivors appear resilient regarding mental health but have slightly poorer health‐related quality of life than reference patients. Sociodemographic characteristics and central nervous system tumors were related to most psychosocial outcomes, but no clear pattern was observed for other medical factors.
Background
The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, overweight, and obesity in Dutch childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) compared with sibling ...controls and the Dutch general population. Other aims were to assess associated factors of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, overweight, and obesity and to identify subgroups of CCSs at risk for these unhealthy statuses.
Methods
The authors included 2253 CCSs and 906 siblings from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study‐Late Effects After Childhood Cancer cohort, part 1, and added data from the Dutch general population. Questionnaire data were collected on overweight and obesity (body mass index >25.0 kg/m2), meeting physical activity guidelines (>150 minutes per week of moderate or vigorous exercises), excessive alcohol consumption (>14 and >21 alcoholic consumptions per week for women and men, respectively), daily smoking, and monthly drug use. Multivariable logistic regression analyses and two‐step cluster analyses were performed to examine sociodemographic‐related, health‐related, cancer‐related, and treatment‐related associated factors of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and to identify subgroups of CCSs at risk for multiple unhealthy behaviors.
Results
CCSs more often did not meet physical activity guidelines than their siblings (30.0% vs. 19.3%; p < .001). Married as marital status, lower education level, nonstudent status, and comorbidities were common associated factors for a body mass index ≥25.0 kg/m2 and insufficient physical activity, whereas male sex and lower education were shared associated factors for excessive alcohol consumption, daily smoking, and monthly drug use. A subgroup of CCSs was identified as excessive alcohol consumers, daily smokers, and monthly drug users.
Conclusions
The current results emphasize the factors associated with unhealthy behaviors and the potential identification of CCSs who exhibit multiple unhealthy lifestyle behaviors.
The results of this study indicate a higher prevalence of physical inactivity in childhood cancer survivors compared with sibling controls and the Dutch population, emphasizing the necessity for personalized health behavior interventions in childhood cancer survivors. These findings can be used in clinical practice to create awareness and to identify subgroups of childhood cancer survivors who need special attention regarding health behaviors.
Background
The objective of this study was to compare the health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) of Dutch adult male and female childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) to general population references and ...to study medical determinants.
Methods
CCSs from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study LATER cohort (1963‐2001) part 2, who were 18 years old or older (time since diagnosis ≥ 5 years), were invited to complete the TNO‐AZL Questionnaire for Adult Health‐Related Quality of Life. Domain scores and proportions of CCSs with impaired HRQOL (score < 25th percentile of the reference scores) were compared with references via Mann‐Whitney U tests and logistic regression analyses corrected for age and sex (P < .004). Interactions of group with sex were included if they were significant (P < .05). Moreover, medical determinants were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results
HRQOL scores for 1766 CCSs (mean age, 35.9 years standard deviation, 9.4 years; male, 51%; response rate, 71%) differed from references on most domains with small effect sizes. Both male and female CCSs were more often impaired in gross and fine motor functioning, cognitive functioning, sleep, and vitality with odds ratios (ORs) > 1.4. In addition, female CCSs were more often impaired in daily activities, pain, and sexuality (ORs, 1.4‐1.9) and were less often aggressive (OR, 0.6). CCCs of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, bone tumors, and retinoblastoma and those with cranial, abdominopelvic, or lower extremity radiotherapy were at increased risk of impairment in 1 or more domains.
Conclusions
Dutch adult CCSs, especially females, have impaired HRQOL in several domains; this is most pronounced in cognitive functioning. The vulnerabilities of subgroups at risk, such as CCSs of CNS tumors, were confirmed. Surveillance of HRQOL and multidisciplinary survivor care are recommended.
Lay Summary
The health‐related quality of life in a Dutch nationwide cohort of 1766 survivors of childhood cancer was studied.
Survivors of childhood cancer were found to have lower health‐related quality of life in several domains (eg, motor functioning and vitality) in comparison with the general population.
They most often reported low cognitive functioning (eg, memory and attention).
Females had low health‐related quality of life in more domains than males.
Survivors of brain tumors had low health‐related quality of life in most domains.
Monitoring health‐related quality of life regularly and collaborating between disciplines in survivor care is recommended.
Dutch adult survivors of childhood cancer, especially females and central nervous system tumor survivors, have impaired health‐related quality of life in several domains; this is most pronounced in cognitive functioning. Surveillance of health‐related quality of life and multidisciplinary survivor care are recommended.
Background
The aim of this study is to evaluate how cumulative burden of clinically relevant, self‐reported outcomes in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) compares to a sibling control group and to ...explore how the burden corresponds to levels of care proposed by existing risk stratifications.
Methods
The authors invited 5925 5‐year survivors from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS LATER) cohort and their 1066 siblings to complete a questionnaire on health outcomes. Health outcomes were validated by self‐reported medication use or medical record review. Missing data on clinically relevant outcomes in CCSs for whom no questionnaire data were available were imputed with predictive mean matching. We calculated the mean cumulative count (MCC) for clinically relevant outcomes. Furthermore, we calculated 30‐year MCC for groups of CCSs based on primary cancer diagnosis and treatment, ranked 30‐year MCC, and compared the ranking to levels of care according to existing risk stratifications.
Results
At median 18.5 years after 5‐year survival, 46% of CCSs had at least one clinically relevant outcome. CCSs experienced 2.8 times more health conditions than siblings (30‐year MCC = 0.79; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.74–0.85 vs. 30‐year MCC = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25–0.34). CCSs’ burden of clinically relevant outcomes consisted mainly of endocrine and vascular conditions and varied by primary cancer type. The ranking of the 30‐year MCC often did not correspond with levels of care in existing risk stratifications.
Conclusions
CCSs experience a high cumulative burden of clinically relevant outcomes that was not completely reflected by current risk stratifications. Choices for survivorship care should extend beyond primary tumor and treatment parameters, and should consider also including CCSs’ current morbidity.
Survivors of childhood cancer experience a high cumulative burden of clinically relevant outcomes. Choices for survivorship care should extend beyond primary tumor and treatment parameters and should also consider including the current morbidity of childhood cancer survivors.
Introduction
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether subtypes of chronic fatigue (CF) can be identified in childhood cancer survivors (CCS), and if so, to determine the ...characteristics of participants with a specific subtype.
Methods
Participants were included from the nationwide DCCSS LATER cohort. The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) was completed to assess fatigue. Participants with CF (scored ≥35 on the fatigue severity subscale and indicated to suffer from fatigue for ≥6 months) were divided into subgroups using two‐step cluster analysis based on the CIS concentration, motivation, and physical activity subscales. Differences between groups on demographics, psychosocial, lifestyle, and treatment‐related variables were determined using ANOVA and chi‐square analyses (univariable) and multinomial regression analysis (multivariable).
Results
A total of 1910 participants participated in the current study (n = 450 with CF; n = 1460 without CF). Three CF subgroups were identified: Subgroup 1 (n = 133, 29% of participants) had CF with problems in physical activity; Subgroup 2 (n = 111, 25% of participants) had CF with difficulty concentrating; and Subgroup 3 (n = 206, 46% of participants) had multi‐dimensional CF. Compared to Subgroup 1, Subgroup 2 more often reported sleep problems, limitations in social functioning, and less often have more than two comorbidities. Subgroup 3 more often reported depression, sleep problems, a lower self‐esteem, and limitations in social functioning and a lower educational level compared to Subgroup 1.
Conclusion
Different subgroups of CCS with CF can be identified based on fatigue dimensions physical activity, motivation and concentration. Results suggest that different intervention strategies, tailored for each subgroup, might be beneficial.
Background
The aim was to evaluate self‐reported reproductive characteristics and markers of ovarian function in a nationwide cohort of female survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia ...(ALL), because prior investigations have produced conflicting data.
Procedure
Self‐reported reproductive characteristics were assessed by questionnaire among 357 adult 5‐year survivors, treated between 1964 and 2002, and 836 controls. Ovarian function was assessed by serum levels of anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH), and inhibin B and by antral follicle count (AFC). Differences between controls and (subgroups of) survivors (total group, chemotherapy CT‐only group, CT and radiotherapy RT group) were analyzed.
Results
Survivors treated with CT only do not differ from controls regarding timing of menarche, virginity status, desire for children, or pregnancy rates. Compared to controls, the CT+RT group was at significantly increased risk of a younger age at menarche (P < .01), virginity, an absent desire for children, and lower pregnancy rates (odds ratio OR 95% CI: 0.3 CI 0.1‐0.6, 0.5 0.3‐0.9, and 0.4 0.2‐0.9, respectively). Survivors in the CT‐only group were significantly younger at the birth of their first child. Pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between any (sub)groups. Survivors treated with total body irradiation (TBI) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at increased risk of abnormal markers of ovarian function.
Conclusion
Reproductive function of ALL survivors treated with CT only does not differ from controls. However, survivors additionally treated with RT seem to be at an increased risk of certain adverse reproductive outcomes. Providing personalized counseling about (future) reproductive health risks in this group is imperative.
Objectives
Childhood cancer may negatively impact childhood cancer survivors' (CCS) sexuality. However, this is an understudied research area. We aimed to describe the psychosexual development, ...sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction of CCS, and identify determinants for these outcomes. Secondarily, we compared the outcomes of a subsample of emerging adult CCS to the Dutch general population.
Methods
From the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study LATER cohort (diagnosed 1963–2001), 1912 CCS (18–71 years, 50.8% male) completed questions on sexuality, psychosocial development, body perception, mental and physical health. Multivariable linear regressions were used to identify determinants. Sexuality of CCS age 18–24 (N = 243) was compared to same‐aged references using binomial tests and t‐tests.
Results
One third of all CCS reported hindered sexuality due to childhood cancer, with insecure body the most often reported reason (44.8%). Older age at study, lower education, surviving central nervous system cancer, poorer mental health and negative body perception were identified as determinants for later sexual debut, worse sexual functioning and/or sexual satisfaction. CCS age 18–24 showed significantly less experience with kissing (p = 0.014), petting under clothes (p = 0.002), oral (p = 0.016) and anal sex (p = 0.032) when compared to references. No significant differences with references were found for sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction, neither among female CCS nor male CCS age 18–24.
Conclusions
Emerging adult CCS reported less experience with psychosexual development, but similar sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction compared to references. We identified determinants for sexuality, which could be integrated in clinical interventions for CCS at risk for reduced sexuality.
PDF
