Timely, meticulously researched, and engagingly written, this study challenges many commonly held assumptions about the long-term prospects and pitfalls of the fair trade network's market-driven ...strategy in the era of globalization.
The aim of this study was to Study and ranking the Indexes of Legal-Right protection policies of industrial property rights with a focus on entrepreneurship development. The method of this study was ...survey and the questionnaire was used. A sample of 100 entrepreneurs was selected by the convenience sampling method. The results showed that among the 20 supporting components or policy, the components of the rights to compensate inventors and authors, the ease, transparency, cost reduction and speed of registration and licensing processes, and the right to file trademarks and trade names, the protection of patent patents, Establishing a system for registering, inquiring and reporting online violations and protecting copyright has the highest average. Also important are the components of support rightswere inventors, authors, ease, transparency, cost reduction and speed of registration and licensing processes and trademark rights, trade names, copyright protection (copyright), protection of trademark rights or trademark rights. By its owner, the protection of patents, the protection, acceleration and updating of physical property registration, types of assets, ease of access to loans for the reproduction of products produced, the creation of online counseling services and the ease of prosecution of offenders and robbers, and the transparency and speed of registration processes are the most important Supportive Policy Components of Protecting Industrial Property.
In the pharmaceutical industry, the development of a new invention – a drug, the acquisition of a patent and the introduction into civil circulation by the developers spend significant resources in ...material and time. In this regard, drugs are attractive for falsification, and attempts are also being made to reproduce the imitation of original drugs, which requires special attention to the protection of the rights of patent holders. Obtaining a patent for an invention provides an exclusive right to its owner, being a kind of state gratitude for ensuring innovative progress, and, on the other hand, carries significant threats due to the possible dishonesty of patent owners, which, according to the Author, taking into account the latest challenges of the time, requires no less attention in terms of providing protective mechanisms against abuse. Since the availability of medicines is one of the main tasks of national health care, the Author raised the actual problem of applying one of these mechanisms in domestic law, namely the mechanism for issuing compulsory licenses for medicines as inventions (compulsory licensing). The article contains a brief historical outline of the foreign application of such institutions, analyzes domestic regulation and law enforcement practice, on the basis of which theses are put forward on the need for additional legal regulation.
Native title rights to take resources for unconstrained or commercial purposes were first recognised almost a decade ago, but the significance and uptake of such rights in Australia is now ...heightened. Resource ownership and management are critical components of global sustainable development and Indigenous interest holders play a key role in that space. The gradual acceptance of resource use by traditional owners in a modern economy reflects more developed trends overseas such as in Canada. Reluctance to concede the commercial exercise of native title rights may be due not only to evidential thresholds (required by state governments to enter consensual determinations), but also concerns about the possible consequential legal impacts for those governments and other interest holders. This article considers potential consequences of recognising native title rights to take resources for any purpose in several developing areas of native title jurisprudence including: quantum of native title compensation, the regulation of native title under resource management legislation enacted since the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), competing claims to resource ownership and use, and the risks for government where prior assumptions of resource ownership are displaced by determined native title.
Intellectual property transactions underlie large segments of the global economy, from pharmaceuticals to computing, entertainment to digital content. This first-of-its-kind resource combines ...practical contract drafting and negotiation skills with substantive legal doctrine in the rapidly growing area of intellectual property transactions and licensing. Though primarily designed for classroom use, it is also a must-have legal reference work for every lawyer involved in the technology, biopharma, entertainment, media or financial services industries. It includes practical drafting models and explanations of key contractual provisions such as field of use, exclusivity, milestones, royalties, termination, indemnification and liability, and combines these with discussion of the latest cases interpreting these provisions. Numerous legal doctrines that affect the enforcement of IP agreements are also covered, including exhaustion, first sale, misuse, estoppel, antitrust and bankruptcy law, as well as chapters focusing on specialized fields such as trademark law, music licensing, technical standardization, and IP pooling. This book is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
En el presente artículo se reflexiona sobre la procedencia de los derechos de propiedad intelectual como garantía de operaciones comerciales en la República de Cuba, específicamente las marcas y ...patentes. Se analizan, además, las regulaciones específicas para generar este tipo de garantía en Cuba, concretamente el Decreto Ley 14/2020 “De la prenda y la hipoteca”.
El objetivo principal de este artículo es determinar el grado de eficiencia y eficacia de la vía administrativa alternativa frente a la vía contencioso-administrativa en relación con la resolución de ...los conflictos por nombres de dominio .MX y la protección de los derechos marcarios y de propiedad industrial. Para determinar la eficiencia y eficacia, es decir, el costo, tiempo y logro del resultado, se realiza una ponderación basada en las ventajas y desventajas de la utilización de ambas vías, las cuales tienen características particulares. Lo que permite la comparación y determinación de sus características es su similitud teórica, legal y procesal. Diversos teóricos han mostrado que la resolución de los conflictos es compleja, tiene un alto costo y poca celeridad en la vía contenciosa o jurisdiccional; por otro lado, es sencilla, económica y rápida en la vía alternativa, lo que es de suma importancia estudiar y determinar. La solución a los conflictos por nombres de dominio .MX que vulneran derechos de terceros se puede dar en distintas vías. En este caso, en la vía administrativa alternativa o extrajurisdiccional, a través de los mecanismos alternativos de solución de controversias en materia de propiedad intelectual que señala la legislación mexicana y los métodos alternativos ofrecidos por los proveedores de servicios de resolución de disputas, así como la vía contencioso-administrativa o jurisdiccional, que tiene lugar después de haber agotado una vía previa, acorde al fundamento de la Ley Federal de Protección a la Propiedad Industrial. El resultado de la ponderación ha mostrado que ambas vías tienen eficiencia y eficacia, sin embargo, una en mayor grado que la otra, tomando en cuenta las características e indicadores determinados en este artículo.
Not only do advanced artificially intelligent (AI) systems play an increasingly important role in modern society, but they also significantly enhance industrial and economic development. AI systems ...are already capable of generating outputs, which, had they been created by humans, would be eligible for patent protection. Polish patent regime has yet to determine how it will address inventive computational results. This paper aims at addressing a question whether AI-generated outputs can be considered patentable inventions under Polish legal framework and if so, who would be recognized as the inventor. The author draws conclusions de lege lata and briefly outlines de lege ferenda observations. The author argues that vesting the inventor status in one of the persons who contributed to the AI-generated result offers a reasonable incentive to actors involved in the innovation process and, at the same time, leaving aside vexed problem of computational personhood, does not undermine established legal paradigms, in particular the traditional notion of human creator (inventor).
PDF
