New patients are a particularly vulnerable population because they are at high risk of missing a subsequent visit or dropping out of care completely. However, few data exist on what new patients ...value in the beginning of a relationship with a new provider. Persons with HIV infection may be an ideal population to study the drivers of a positive initial patient-provider relationship, as it is a chronic and serious condition that requires a reliable, ongoing relationship with a provider. Informed by patients' real experiences, this study aims to identify what patients see as the most critical elements for building trust and rapport from the outset.
We conducted longitudinal, in-person interviews with 21 patients new to the HIV clinic at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas, from August 2013 to March 2015. Patients were interviewed across three time points: once before their first provider visit, a second time within two weeks after the first visit, and a third time at 6 to 12 months after the first provider visit.
We conducted 61 h of patient interviews. The mean age was 53 years; 52% were non-Hispanic white, 23% were non-Hispanic black and 19% were Hispanic. Patients described significant anxiety and vulnerability not just from HIV itself, but also in starting a relationship as a new patient to a new provider. Our analysis of these experiences revealed five actions providers can take to reduce their patients' anxiety and build trust early in the first visit: 1) provide reassurance to patients, 2) tell patients it's okay to ask questions, 3) show patients their lab results and explain what they mean, 4) avoid language and behaviors that are judgmental of patients, and 5) ask patients what they want i.e., treatment goals and preferences.
Our study incorporates direct input from patients and highlights the unique psychological challenges that patients face in seeking care from a new provider. The actionable opportunities cited by patients have the potential to mitigate patients' feelings of anxiety and vulnerability, and thereby improve their overall health care experience.
Background:
Despite increasing use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), limited data exist regarding its outcomes in high-risk adolescent ...athletes.
Purpose:
To (1) report the outcomes after QT ACLR in adolescent athletes and (2) identify patient-related and surgery-related factors that may influence failure rates after QT ACLR.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
All patients aged 14 to 17 years who underwent primary anatomic, transphyseal, single-bundle QT ACLR between 2010 and 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included for analysis. Demographic and surgical data as well as preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Marx activity scores were collected retrospectively. All patients were also contacted to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including IKDC and Marx activity scores, and return-to-sports (RTS) data. Outcomes of interest included rates of revision ACLR and ipsilateral complications, contralateral ACL tears, difference in pre- and postoperative PROs, and rates of RTS. Patient and surgical characteristics were compared between groups who required revision ACLR versus those who did not.
Results:
A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 89 adolescent athletes (mean age 16.2 ± 1.1 years, 64% female) were included for analysis at mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Postoperative IKDC scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (88.5 vs 37.5; P < .001), whereas Marx activity scores decreased postoperatively (14.3 vs 12.2; P = .011). Successful RTS occurred in 80% of patients at a mean time of 9.7 ± 6.9 months, and 85% of these patients returned to the same or higher level of sports. The most common reasons for failure to RTS included lack of time (n = 7, 70%) and fearing reinjury in the operative knee (n = 5, 50%). The overall revision ACLR rate was 10% (n = 9), and contralateral ACL tears occurred in 14% (n = 12) of patients. The overall ipsilateral knee reoperation rate was 22.5% (n = 20). No statistically significant differences in patient or surgical characteristics were observed between patients who underwent revision ACLR and those who did not.
Conclusion:
At a minimum 2-year follow-up after QT ACLR, adolescent athletes experienced significantly improved postoperative IKDC scores, high rates of RTS, and low rates of graft failure, despite a relatively high ipsilateral reoperation rate. Surgeons may utilize this information when identifying the optimal graft choice for adolescent athletes who have sustained an ACL injury and wish to return to high level of sporting activities.
PDF
