NUK - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Analysis of the quality ass...
    Bach, È.; Bernabeu, J.; Bhardwaj, A.; Cindro, V.; Crick, B.; Fadeyev, V.; Fernandez-Tejero, J.; Fleta, C.; Gallus, P.; Hara, K.; Hirose, S.; Ishii, T.; Kanda, M.; Kasum, A.; Kroll, J.; Kvasnicka, J.; Lacasta, C.; Mahajan, C.K.; Mandić, I.; Mikestikova, M.; Mikuž, M.; Nakamura, K.; Orr, R.S.; Sato, K.; Slavikova, E.A.; Solaz, C.; Soldevila, U.; Tuma, P.; Ullan, M.; Unno, Y.

    Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, July 2024, 2024-07-00, Volume: 1064
    Journal Article

    The production of strip sensors for the ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) started in 2021. Since then, a Quality Assurance (QA) program has been carried out continuously, by using specific test structures, in parallel to the Quality Control (QC) inspection of the sensors. The QA program consists of monitoring sensor-specific characteristics and the technological process variability, before and after the irradiation with gammas, neutrons, and protons. After two years, half of the full production volume has been reached and we present an analysis of the parameters measured as part of the QA process. The main devices used for QA purposes are miniature strip sensors, monitor diodes, and the ATLAS test chip, which contains several test structures. Such devices are tested by several sites across the collaboration depending on the type of samples (non-irradiated components or irradiated with protons, neutrons, or gammas). The parameters extracted from the tests are then uploaded to a database and analyzed by Python scripts. These parameters are mainly examined through histograms and time-evolution plots to obtain parameter distributions, production trends, and meaningful parameter-to-parameter correlations. The purpose of this analysis is to identify possible deviations in the fabrication or the sensor quality, changes in the behavior of the test equipment at different test sites, or possible variability in the irradiation processes. The conclusions extracted from the QA program have allowed test optimization, establishment of control limits for the parameters, and a better understanding of device properties and fabrication trends. In addition, any abnormal results prompt immediate feedback to a vendor.