NUK - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • Early laparoscopic cholecys...
    Mishima, Kohei; Fujiyama, Yoshiki; Wakabayashi, Taiga; Igarashi, Kazuharu; Ozaki, Takahiro; Honda, Masayuki; Mori, Shozo; Funamizu, Naotake; Tsutsui, Atsuko; Okamoto, Nobuhiko; Marescaux, Jacques; Wakabayashi, Go

    Surgical endoscopy, 08/2023, Volume: 37, Issue: 8
    Journal Article

    Background Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) poses multiple challenges. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) eliminated the time limit (< 72 h) and expanded the surgical indication to severe AC. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ELC for AC following the TG18 in a single high-volume center. Methods From 2019 to 2021, we managed all AC patients with a TG18 flowchart and prospectively enrolled those who underwent ELC within 7 days of symptom onset. The primary outcome was overall morbidity, with a comparison between mild (Grade I) and moderate/severe (Grade II/III) AC. Results During the study period, 201 patients underwent ELC was for Grade I (56.2%), II (40.3%), and III (3.5%) ACs. Mean age was 69 ± 15.2 years and time to surgery from symptom onset was 0 (12.9%), 1–3 (66.7%), and 4–7 days (20.4%). Mean operative time and blood loss were 118.9 ± 42.7 min and 57.8 ± 99.4 mL, respectively. The critical view of safety (CVS) was achieved in 76.1% of patients, and bailout procedures were performed in 21.4%. There were no open conversions or bile duct injuries. Major morbidities (Clavien–Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) were observed in 5.5% of cases and mortality in 0.5%. Comparing Grades II/III to Grade I, operative time was longer (112.3 vs. 127.3 min, p  = 0.014), blood loss was higher (40.3 vs. 80.1 mL, p  = 0.005), the CVS rate was lower (83.2 vs. 67.0%, p  = 0.012), and the major morbidity rate was higher (1.8 vs. 10.2%, p  = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis of Grade II/III, there were no significant differences in major morbidities ( p  = 0.288) between the two groups (0–3 vs. 4–7 days). Conclusion ELC for AC following TG18 is feasible with low morbidity rates. However, ELC for Grade II/III ACs remains challenging, and surgeons must carefully assess intraoperative difficulties and surgical risks before proceeding.