NUK - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Multicentre comparison of q...
    Muenchhoff, Maximilian; Mairhofer, Helga; Nitschko, Hans; Grzimek-Koschewa, Natascha; Hoffmann, Dieter; Berger, Annemarie; Rabenau, Holger; Widera, Marek; Ackermann, Nikolaus; Konrad, Regina; Zange, Sabine; Graf, Alexander; Krebs, Stefan; Blum, Helmut; Sing, Andreas; Liebl, Bernhard; Wölfel, Roman; Ciesek, Sandra; Drosten, Christian; Protzer, Ulrike; Boehm, Stephan; Keppler, Oliver T

    Euro surveillance : bulletin européen sur les maladies transmissibles, 06/2020, Volume: 25, Issue: 24
    Journal Article

    Containment strategies and clinical management of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients during the current pandemic depend on reliable diagnostic PCR assays for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we compare 11 different RT-PCR test systems used in seven diagnostic laboratories in Germany in March 2020. While most assays performed well, we identified detection problems in a commonly used assay that may have resulted in false-negative test results during the first weeks of the pandemic.