Zakon o preuzimanju dioničkih društava zahtijeva reformu, a u svakom slučaju bar otvorenu javnu raspravu, o položaju uprave i nadzornog odbora odnosno upravnog odbora ciljnog dioničkog društva u postupku preuzimanja ciljnog društva. Ministarstvo financija osnovalo je Radnu skupinu koja raspravlja i priprema Nacrt Zakona o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o preuzimanju dioničkih društava. Autor kao član radne skupine zauzima stajalište o reformi prava preuzimanja dioničkih društava u dijelu koji se tiče poduzimanja protuponuditeljskih mjera u postupku preuzimanja dioničkih društava te nudi konkretne prijedloge. Razlozi za zaokret temelje se na kritici tvrdoga neutralnog položaja uprave i nadzornog odbora ciljnog društva de lege lata. Ističe se da je kruto pravilo čl. 42. st. 1. ZPDD-a o tzv. neutralnom položaju uprave i nadzornog odbora ciljnog društva u postupku preuzimanja derogiralo temeljno pravilo o vođenju poslova društva iz čl. 252. Zakona o trgovačkim društvima. Spomenuto pravilo treba stoga izmijeniti tako da se u najvećoj mogućoj mjeri uvaže vrijednosti domaćeg prava društava i prava tržišta kapitala. Radikalno isključenje temeljnog standarda vođenja poslova društva u postupku preuzimanju de lege lata nije opravdano. Posebice nije primjereno sa stajališta odmjeravanja međusobno suprotstavljenih pravnopolitičkih interesa. Dobrobit ciljnog društva ne smije se praktički potpuno zatrti zbog tobože prečih interesa prava preuzimanja dioničkih društava. De lege lata dobrobit ciljnog društva nije, najblaže rečeno, dovoljno vrednovana u postupku preuzimanja te se (u tom smislu) nude rješenja de lege ferenda. Dobar primjer za potreban pravnopolitički i pozitivnopravni zaokret nude odredbe njemačkog Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz (nadalje WpÜG) po uzoru na koja je autor ponudio rješenja de lege ferenda. Direktiva 2004/25 EU o ponudama za preuzimanje počiva u tom dijelu na opcijskom modelu. Law on taking over of joint stock companies (Official Gazzette, no. 109/07, 36/09, 108/12, 90/13 and 148/13, hereinafter ZPDD) requires to be reformed, and in any case it requires at least an open public discussion on the position of Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, respectively Management Board of the targeted joint stock company in the procedure of taking over the targeted company. Ministry of Finances established a Working group that discusses and prepares the Draft of the Law on amendments of the Law on taking over of the joint stock companies (Decision CLASS: 011-01/16-01/22 NUMBER: 513-06-03-16-2 of 5th May 2016, hereinafter: Working group). The author, as the member of the working group takes a stand on the reform of the law on taking over joint stock companies in the part that relates to undertaking the counter-offering measures in the procedure of taking over the joint stock companies and offers concrete suggestions de lege ferenda. The reasons for turn are based on the criticisms of strict neutral position of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board of the targeted company de lege lata. The strict regulation of Art. 42. Par. 1. of ZPDD-a on so called neutral position of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board of the targerted company in the procedure of taking over derogated the basic rule on business conduct of the company from Art. 252 of the Companies Act (Official Gazzette, no. 111/93, 34/99, 121/99, 52/00, 118/03, 107/07, 146/08, 137/09, 111/12, 125/11, 68/13, 110/15; hereinafter ZTD). The aforementioned rule should be therefore de lege ferenda changed so that the values of the domestic companies law and law governing capital markets, are in the gretest possible measure taken into account. Radical exclusion of the basic standard of conducting companies business in the procedure of taking over de lege lata is not justified. Particularly it is not appropriate from the position of weighing mutually conflicted political interests. The welfare of the targeted company must not be practicaly completely exterminated becaues of so called better interests of the law on taking over of joint stock companies. De lege lata welfare of the targeted company is not, and to say the least, valued enough in the procedure of taking over and in that respect solutions are offered de lege ferenda. Good example for necessary legal-political and positive legal turn is offered by the provisions of German Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz (hereinafter WpÜG) which model the author took into account while offering solutions de lege ferenda. The Directive 2004/25 EU on takeover bids (hereinafter Directive 2004/25 EU) rests in that part on optional model.