This is the sixth instalment in the discussion between Frederik Kortlandt and the author of this article on several problems of historical Slavic accentology. The paper discusses the reflection of pre- and posttonic length (in accentual paradigm a and c ) in Western South Slavic and West Slavic, the reflection of the short neo-acute in Kajkavian and Czech, and the kȍkōt ‘rooster’ type lengthening in accentual paradigm c in Štokavian and Čakavian. A few other topics are also shortly discussed – such as the accent of the genitive plural, the *obőrna ‘defence’ type accent, and the Čakavian črnĩna ‘blackness’ and dvorĩšće ‘courtyard’ type accent. Additionally, the paper deals with some issues concerning Kortlandt’s rather problematic methodology, rhetorics, discussion and presentation style. Ovo je šesti članak u diskusiji između Frederika Kortlandta i autora ovog članka o raznim problemima povijesne slavenske akcentologije. U članku se raspravlja o odrazu prednaglasnih i zanaglasnih dužina (u naglasnoj paradigmi a i c ) u zapadnojužnoslavenskom i zapadnoslavenskom, o odrazu kratkog neoakuta u kajkavskom i češkom i o duženju tipa kȍkōt u naglasnoj paradigmi c u štokavskom i čakavskom. Govori se ukratko i o još nekoliko tema – kao što su naglasak genitiva množine, naglasak prefiksalnih tvorbi poput *obőrna ‘obrana’ te o čakavskim naglasnim tipovima črnĩna i dvorĩšće . Dodatno se u članku raspravlja i o nekim problematičnim pojavama u vezi s Kortlandtovom metodologijom, retorikom, diskutiranjem i načinom prezentacije.