NUK - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • A phase 3 trial evaluating ...
    Kim, Tae Won; Elme, Anneli; Kusic, Zvonko; Park, Joon Oh; Udrea, Anghel Adrian; Kim, Sun Young; Ahn, Joong Bae; Valencia, Ricardo Villalobos; Krishnan, Srinivasan; Bilic, Ante; Manojlovic, Nebojsa; Dong, Jun; Guan, Xuesong; Lofton-Day, Catherine; Jung, A Scott; Vrdoljak, Eduard

    British journal of cancer, 2016-Nov-08, 20161108, Volume: 115, Issue: 10
    Journal Article

    We assessed the treatment effect of panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC on overall survival (OS) in patients with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and report the first prospective extended RAS analysis in a phase 3 trial. Patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC were randomised 1 : 1 to panitumumab (6 mg kg Q2W) plus BSC or BSC. On-study crossover was prohibited. RAS mutation status was determined by central laboratory testing. The primary endpoint was OS in wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC; OS in wild-type RAS mCRC (KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4) was a secondary endpoint. Three hundred seventy seven patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC were randomised. Median OS was 10.0 months with panitumumab plus BSC vs 7.4 months with BSC (HR=0.73; 95% CI=0.57-0.93; P=0.0096). RAS ascertainment was 86%. In wild-type RAS mCRC, median OS for panitumumab plus BSC was 10.0 vs 6.9 months for BSC (HR=0.70; 95% CI=0.53-0.93; P=0.0135). Patients with RAS mutations did not benefit from panitumumab (OS HR=0.99; 95% CI=0.49-2.00). No new safety signals were observed. Panitumumab significantly improved OS in wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC. The effect was more pronounced in wild-type RAS mCRC, validating previous retrospective analyses.