NUK - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Hunting for Answers: Assess...
    Pires, Humberto; Cardoso, Luís; Lopes, Ana Patrícia; Fontes, Maria da Conceição; Santos-Silva, Sérgio; Matos, Manuela; Pintado, Cristina; Roque, Natália; Fonseca, Leonardo Filipe; Morgado, Inês; Dias, Ana Sofia; Figueira, Luís; Matos, Ana Cristina; Mesquita, João Rodrigo; Coelho, Ana Cláudia

    Pathogens (Basel), 03/2024, Volume: 13, Issue: 3
    Journal Article

    Between 2016 and 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the central region of Portugal in order to better understand the epidemiology and public health risks resulting from the handling and consumption of game animals infected with spp. The seroprevalence and risk factors for spp. seropositivity were evaluated. Antibodies against spp. were determined using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Results showed that in the 650 serum samples collected from red deer ( = 298) and wild boars ( = 352) in Portugal, 21.7% ( = 141; 95% CI: 18.6-25.1%) tested positive. Wild boar had a significantly higher prevalence (35.5%; 95% CI: 30.5-40.8%) than red deer (5.4%, 95% CI: 3.1-8.6%; ≤ 0.001). Risk factors for seropositivity were investigated using multivariable logistic regression models. The odds of being seropositive was 8.39 (95% CI: 4.75-14.84; ≤ 0.001) times higher in wild boar than in red deer. Correlations between sex, age, body condition, and seropositivity could not be observed. The higher seroprevalence in wild boar suggests that this species may primarily contribute to the spp. ecology in central Portugal.