NUK - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Measurement invariance conv...
    Putnick, Diane L.; Bornstein, Marc H.

    Developmental review, 09/2016, Volume: 41
    Journal Article

    •Measurement invariance assesses the psychometric equivalence of a construct across groups.•Comparison between groups depends first on testing measurement invariance of a construct across those groups.•Current practices for testing and reporting measurement invariance are reviewed in 126 articles with 269 tests of invariance.•Implications for the practice of measurement invariance and areas of research need are discussed. Measurement invariance assesses the psychometric equivalence of a construct across groups or across time. Measurement noninvariance suggests that a construct has a different structure or meaning to different groups or on different measurement occasions in the same group, and so the construct cannot be meaningfully tested or construed across groups or across time. Hence, prior to testing mean differences across groups or measurement occasions (e.g., boys and girls, pretest and posttest), or differential relations of the construct across groups, it is essential to assess the invariance of the construct. Conventions and reporting on measurement invariance are still in flux, and researchers are often left with limited understanding and inconsistent advice. Measurement invariance is tested and established in different steps. This report surveys the state of measurement invariance testing and reporting, and details the results of a literature review of studies that tested invariance. Most tests of measurement invariance include configural, metric, and scalar steps; a residual invariance step is reported for fewer tests. Alternative fit indices (AFIs) are reported as model fit criteria for the vast majority of tests; χ2 is reported as the single index in a minority of invariance tests. Reporting AFIs is associated with higher levels of achieved invariance. Partial invariance is reported for about one-third of tests. In general, sample size, number of groups compared, and model size are unrelated to the level of invariance achieved. Implications for the future of measurement invariance testing, reporting, and best practices are discussed.