Contemporarily to the new SARS-CoV-2 mediated COVID-19 pandemic, a rise in patients with acral chilblain lesions has been described. They manifest late after mild disease or asymptomatic exposure to ...SARS-CoV-2. Their pathogenic evolution is currently unknown. In biopsies from three patients with acral partially ulcerating chilblain lesions that occurred associated to the COVID-19 pandemic, we analysed the expression of type I interferon induced proteins and signal transduction kinases. Histology demonstrated perivascular and periadnexal lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and endothelial dominated MxA-staining, as well as pJAK1 activation. Our findings demonstrate induction of the type I IFN pathway in lesional sections of COVID-19-associated chilblain-like lesions. This may indicate a local antiviral immune activation status associated with preceding exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Context: The treatment of allergic reactions to red tattoo dye is challenging in most cases, as local therapy often does not offer long-term improvement and laser therapy is considered relatively ...contraindicated by many authors owing to the risk of generalized side effects. Therefore, surgical removal of these tattoos is favored; shave excision is the method of choice, particularly for the removal of the entire dye. Aims: The aim of this article was to retrospectively analyze the best post-operative outcome after surgical removal of allergic tattoo reactions using different excision techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the different surgical procedures performed on seven patients with single and multiple allergic tattoo reactions treated between 2013 and 2018. Results: The best aesthetic results were achieved by superficial ablation of the inflammatory reaction, partially leaving tattoo remains in the skin. Conclusion: Based on our experience with this small number of patients, a superficial removal of the tattoo without complete removal of the dye is, in most cases, sufficient to achieve healing. The remaining dye residues seem to be better tolerated by the immune system afterwards. Furthermore, the tattoo is often preserved in large parts.
Summary Background Lyme borreliosis develops in 1–5% of individuals bitten by ticks, but with a diagnostic gap affecting up to 30% of patients, a broadly applicable pharmacological prevention ...strategy is needed. Topical azithromycin effectively eradicated Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from the skin in preclinical studies. We assessed its efficacy in human beings. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial done in 28 study sites in Germany and Austria, adults were equally assigned to receive topical 10% azithromycin or placebo twice daily for 3 consecutive days, within 72 h of a tick bite being confirmed. Randomisation numbers, which were stratified by study site, were accessed in study centres via an interactive voice-response system, by pharmacists not involved in the study. The primary outcome was the number of treatment failures, defined as erythema migrans, seroconversion, or both, in participants who were seronegative at baseline, had no further tick bites during the study, and had serology results available at 8 weeks (intention-to-treat ITT population). This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2011-000117-39. Findings Between July 7, 2011, and Dec 3, 2012, 1371 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, of whom 995 were included in the ITT population. The trial was stopped early because an improvement in the primary endpoint in the group receiving azithromycin was not reached. At 8 weeks, 11 (2%) of 505 in the azithromycin group and 11 (2%) of 490 in the placebo group had treatment failure (odds ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·42–2·26, p=0·47). Topical azithromycin was well tolerated. Similar numbers of patients had adverse events in the two groups (175 26% of 505 vs 177 26% of 490, p=0·87), and most adverse events were mild. Interpretation Topical azithromycin was well tolerated and had a good safety profile. Inclusion of asymptomatic seroconversion into the primary efficacy analysis led to no prevention effect with topical azithromycin. Adequately powered studies assessing only erythema migrans should be considered. A subgroup analysis in this study suggested that topical azithromycin reduces erythema migrans after bites of infected ticks. Funding Ixodes AG.
Introduction: Proactive therapy with topical corticosteroids (TCSs) is the standard treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis; however, skin atrophy as TCS side effect ...remains a concern. Methods: This 16-week, evaluator-blinded, within-patient placebo-controlled, randomized study enrolled volunteers with healthy skin conditions. For 12 weeks, their volar forearm and the back of their hand were applied with hydrocortisone acetate 1% cream (HC), methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream (MPA), betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (BMV), or an active agent-free base cream (Dermatop® Basiscreme) once daily twice weekly, and pimecrolimus 1% cream (PIM) twice daily twice weekly. Epidermal and dermal thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography and high-frequency ultrasound, respectively. Furthermore, skin atrophy and telangiectasia were determined by contact dermatoscopic photography (Dermaphot®). Results: After 8 and 12 weeks, only BMV led to significant epidermal thinning on both sites. Four weeks after the end of treatment, epidermal thickness returned to baseline. No dermal thinning, atrophy, or telangiectasia was observed. Conclusions: MPA, HC, and PIM may be more suitable for repeated and prolonged treatment, especially in chronic diseases.
Abrocitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a phase 2b trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and ...safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial (JADE MONO-1), patients (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Investigator Global Assessment score ≥3, Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI score ≥16, percentage of body surface area affected ≥10%, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score ≥4) with a bodyweight of 40 kg or more, were enrolled at 69 sites in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to oral abrocitinib 100 mg, abrocitinib 200 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system, stratified by baseline disease severity and age. Patients, investigators, and the funder of the study were masked to study treatment. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response (score of 0 clear or 1 almost clear with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline), and the proportion of patients who achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) score, both assessed at week 12. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Safety was assessed in all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03349060.
Between Dec 7, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 387 patients were enrolled: 156 were assigned to abrocitinib 100 mg, 154 to abrocitinib 200 mg, and 77 to placebo. All enrolled patients received at least one dose of study treatment and thus were evaluable for 12-week efficacy. Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group than in the placebo group (37 24% of 156 patients vs six 8% of 76 patients; p=0·0037) and in the abrocitinib 200 mg group compared with the placebo group (67 44% of 153 patients vs six 8% of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, compared with the placebo group, the proportion of patients who had achieved an EASI-75 response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group (62 40% of 156 patients vs nine 12% of 76 patients; p<0·0001) and abrocitinib 200 mg group (96 63% of 153 patients vs nine 12% of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 108 (69%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, 120 (78%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and 44 (57%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, five (3%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and three (4%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Monotherapy with oral abrocitinib once daily was effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
Pfizer.
Actinic keratoses (AK) may occur in all sun-exposed skin areas. Those occurring outside the head area are generally more resistant to treatment than those on the face.
To determine efficacy and ...safety of BF-200 ALA versus vehicle in the treatment of mild-to-severe AK located on extremities, trunk, and neck with red light photodynamic therapy (PDT).
This phase III study had an intra-individual design with 50 patients in 6 centers in Germany. Each patient received a maximum of 2 field-directed PDTs. Clinical end points and 1-year follow-up results were recorded.
BF-200 ALA was superior to the vehicle with respect to total lesion clearance rates (86.0% vs 32.9%; P < .0001) and patient complete clearance per patient's side (67.3% vs 12.2%, P < .0001). One-year overall lesion recurrence rate was 14.1% versus 27.4% (BF-200 ALA vs vehicle; P = .0068). Patients were more satisfied by the cosmetic outcome of BF-200 ALA/PDT than the vehicle/PDT. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of BF-200 ALA/PDT.
Small number of severe lesions; limited sample size; unbalanced but representative distribution of AK.
BF-200 ALA showed significantly higher AK clearance rates on extremities, trunk, and neck than the vehicle and was well tolerated.
Introduction: Examination of subungual pigmented lesions is sometimes a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Objectives: The study was aimed to investigate characteristic patterns in optical ...coherence tomography (OCT) of subungual hematomas and determine distinctive features that can differentiate them from subungual melanocytic lesions. Methods: VivoSight® (Michelson Diagnostics, Maidstone, UK) was used to examine 71 subungual hematomas and 11 subungual melanocytic lesions in 69 patients (18 female and 51 male patients). Results: On OCT, bleeding was related to sharply defined black sickle-shaped (p < 0.001) or globular regions (not significant ns) with a hyperreflective margin (0.002), a grey center (0.013), hyperreflective lines in the area (ns) or periphery (p = 0.031), peripheral fading (p = 0.029), and red dots in the area (p = 0.001). In the 1 case of melanoma in situ examined, we found curved vessels with irregular sizes and distribution on the dermis of the nailbed, while subungual hematomas and subungual benign nevi presented as clustered red dots and/or regularly distributed curved vessels. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the use of OCT in addition to dermoscopy provides high-resolution optical imaging information for the diagnosis of subungual hematoma and facilitates the differential diagnosis of subungual hematomas and subungual melanocytic lesions.
Abstract
There are limited approved systemic treatment options for children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab is now approved in the United States for patients 6 months and older with ...moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies. European Medicines Agency is evaluating the use of dupilumab in children aged 6 months through 5 years with severe AD only. To report the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the subgroup of children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD (IGA score = 4) at baseline in the LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434 part B). Patients aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD were enrolled in LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (part B), a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Patients were randomized to either dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (200 mg if baseline weight 5 to <15 kg, 300 mg if 15 to <30 kg) or placebo for 16 weeks. All patients initiated standardized treatment with low-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) from day –14. This analysis reports efficacy and quality-of-life endpoints including a 75% reduction from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI, for children aged 4 to <6 years), and Infant’s Dermatitis Quality Of Life (IDQOL, for children <4 years) in children with severe AD. Of the total trial population of 162 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 125 patients with severe AD at baseline were randomized: 63 to the dupilumab + TCS treatment group and 62 to the placebo + TCS treatment group. Baseline demographics were similar. Mean (SD) baseline disease characteristics were also similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups: EASI (38.8 13.7 vs. 35.4 12), body surface area (63.1% 21 vs. 58.9% 21.4), weekly average PP-NRS (7.6 1.4 vs. 7.6 1.6), CDLQI (17.5 5.5 vs. 17.8 6.4) and IDQOL (18.4 5.1 vs. 17.4 5.4). Dupilumab treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase in the proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 compared with placebo treatment by week 4 (27% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.0009). By week 16, this improvement was further increased compared with the placebo group (46% vs. 7%; P < 0.0001). At week 16, dupilumab-treated patients had a significantly greater percent reduction from baseline in PP-NRS compared with the placebo group (LS mean (SE)–41.8 5.4 vs. 0.5 5.4; P < 0.0001). Dupilumab also resulted in significant improvement in quality-of-life outcomes compared with placebo (LS mean SE) change from baseline to week 16 in CDLQI (−9.1 1.1 vs. −2.6 1.2; P < 0.0001); IDQOL (−9.1 1.3 vs. −0.6 1.1; P < 0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 42 (66.7%) patients in the dupilumab group and 45 (73.8%) patients in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate and deemed unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. The most common TEAE was atopic dermatitis in both the dupilumab group (10 15.9%) and placebo group (16 26.2%). Additionally, TEAEs in the conjunctivitis cluster were reported by 4 (6.4%) patients in the dupilumab group and none in the placebo group. In the placebo group, 3 (4.9%) serious adverse events were reported. No dupilumab-related adverse events were serious or led to treatment discontinuation. Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD. The safety profile was consistent with that previously seen in adults, adolescents, and children aged > 6 years of age.
PDF
