An increasing amount of ligand binding data on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is not compatible with the prediction of the simple mass action law. This may be related to the propensity of most ...GPCRs, if not all, to oligomerize. Indeed, one of the consequences of receptor oligomerization could be a possible cross-talk between the protomers, which in turn could lead to negative or positive cooperative ligand binding. We prove here that this can be demonstrated experimentally. Saturation, dissociation, and competition binding experiments were performed on vasopressin and oxytocin receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary or COS-7 cells. Linear, concave, and convex Scatchard plots were then obtained, depending on the ligand used. Moreover, some competition curves exhibited an increase of the radiotracer binding for low concentrations of competitors, suggesting a cooperative binding process. These data demonstrate that various vasopressin analogs display either positive or negative cooperative binding. Because positive cooperative binding cannot be explained without considering receptor as multivalent, these binding data support the concept of GPCR dimerization process. The results, which are in good accordance with the predictions of previous mathematical models, suggest that binding experiments can be used to probe the existence of receptor dimers.
Accumulating evidence indicates that G protein-coupled receptors can assemble as dimers/oligomers but the role of this phenomenon in G protein coupling and signaling is not yet clear. We have used ...the purified leukotriene B4 receptor BLT2 as a model to investigate the capacity of receptor monomers and dimers to activate the adenylyl cyclase inhibitory Gi2 protein. For this, we overexpressed the recombinant receptor as inclusion bodies in the Escherichia coli prokaryotic system, using a human α5 integrin as a fusion partner. This strategy allowed the BLT2 as well as several other G protein-coupled receptors from different families to be produced and purified in large amounts. The BLT2 receptor was then successfully refolded to its native state, as measured by high-affinity LTB4 binding in the presence of the purified G protein Gαi2. The receptor dimer, in which the two protomers displayed a well defined parallel orientation as assessed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer, was then separated from the monomer. Using two methods of receptor-catalyzed guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay, we clearly demonstrated that monomeric BLT2 stimulates the purified Gαi2β1γ2 protein more efficiently than the dimer. These data suggest that assembly of two BLT2 protomers into a dimer results in the reduced ability to signal.
To identify the binding site of the human V1a vasopressin receptor for the selective nonpeptide antagonist SR49059, we have developed a site-directed irreversible labeling strategy that combines ...mutagenesis of the receptor and use of sulfydryl-reactive ligands. Based on a three-dimensional model of the antagonist docked into the receptor, hypothetical ligand-receptor interactions were investigated by replacing the residues potentially involved in the binding of the antagonist into cysteines and designing analogues of SR49059 derivatized with isothiocyanate or α-chloroacetamide moieties. The F225C, F308C, and K128C mutants of the V1a receptor were expressed in COS-7 or Chinese hamster ovary cells, and their pharmacological properties toward SR49059 and its sulfydryl-reactive analogues were analyzed. We demonstrated that treatment of the F225C mutant with the isothiocyanate-derivative compound led to dose-dependent inhibition of the residual binding of the radio-labeled antagonist 125IHO-LVA. This inhibition is probably the consequence of a covalent irreversible chemical modification, which is only possible when close contacts and optimal orientations exist between reactive groups created both on the ligand and the receptor. This result validated the three-dimensional model hypothesis. Thus, we propose that residue Phe225, located in transmembrane domain V, directly participates in the binding of the V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR49059. This conclusion is in complete agreement with all our previous data on the definition of the agonist/antagonist binding to members of the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family.
Accumulating evidence indicates that G protein-coupled receptors can assemble as dimers/oligomers but the role of this phenomenon in G protein coupling and signaling is not yet clear. We have used ...the purified leukotriene B(4) receptor BLT2 as a model to investigate the capacity of receptor monomers and dimers to activate the adenylyl cyclase inhibitory G(i2) protein. For this, we overexpressed the recombinant receptor as inclusion bodies in the Escherichia coli prokaryotic system, using a human alpha(5) integrin as a fusion partner. This strategy allowed the BLT2 as well as several other G protein-coupled receptors from different families to be produced and purified in large amounts. The BLT2 receptor was then successfully refolded to its native state, as measured by high-affinity LTB(4) binding in the presence of the purified G protein G alpha(i2). The receptor dimer, in which the two protomers displayed a well defined parallel orientation as assessed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer, was then separated from the monomer. Using two methods of receptor-catalyzed guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay, we clearly demonstrated that monomeric BLT2 stimulates the purified G alpha(i2) beta(1) gamma(2) protein more efficiently than the dimer. These data suggest that assembly of two BLT2 protomers into a dimer results in the reduced ability to signal.
To improve our understanding of the functional architecture of G protein-coupled receptors, we have taken advantage of differences among mammalian species in ligand binding to search for the rat ...versus human selectivity determinants of the V2 vasopressin receptor and of its peptide ligands. Our data indicate that residue 2 of species-selective peptide antagonists such as d(CH2)5-d-Ile2,Ile4,Tyr-NH29arginine vasopressin controls their rat versus human selectivity. For species-selective agonists such as desmopressin, residues 1 and 8 modulate the binding selectivity. Among residues different between rat and human V2 receptors, those localized in the upper part of the human V2 receptor have been substituted with their rat V2 homologs. Pharmacological analysis of mutant receptors revealed that residues 202 and 304 fully control the species selectivity of the discriminating antagonists in an independent and additive manner. A third residue (position 100) is necessary to observe an equivalent phenomenon for the discriminating agonists. The substitution of these three residues does not modify the affinity of the nonselective agonists and antagonists. In conclusion, extracellular loops and the top of the transmembrane domains of V2 vasopressin receptors may provide the molecular basis for peptide ligand-binding species selectivity. Very few residues in these regions may control the binding mode of both agonists and antagonists.
The substitution, in the human V2 vasopressin receptor, of the aspartate at position 136 by alanine leads to agonist‐independent activation of this mutant V2 receptor. Pharmacological studies of the ...D136A V2 receptor helped us in characterizing different V2 receptor antagonists. SR‐121463A and OPC‐31260, two non‐peptide antagonists, behaved as inverse agonists, while two cyclic peptides d(CH2)5d‐Tyr(Et)2,Val4,Tyr‐NH2
9AVP and d(CH2)5d‐Ile2,Ile4,Tyr‐NH2
9AVP known to be V2 antagonists, demonstrated clear partial agonist properties. The finding of a constitutively activated human V2 receptor represents a useful tool in characterizing V2 receptor antagonist ligands.
Fluoresceinyl and rhodamyl groups have been coupled by an amide link to side-chain amino groups at positions 1, 6, and 8 of pseudo-peptide linear vasopressin antagonists (Manning et al. Int. J. Pept. ...Protein Res. 1992, 40, 261−267) through different positions on the fluorophore, to give tetraethylrhodamyl-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Arg-Pro-Arg-Tyr-NH2 (2), 4-HOPh(CH2)2CO-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Lys(5-carboxyfluoresceinyl)-Pro-Arg-NH2 (4), 4-HOPh(CH2)2CO-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Lys(5- or 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamyl)-Pro-Arg-NH2 (5, 6), 4-HOPh(CH2)2CO-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Arg-Pro-Lys(5- or 6- carboxyfluoresceinyl)-NH2 (8, 9), and 4-HOPh(CH2)2CO-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Arg-Pro-Lys(5- or 6- carboxytetramethylrhodamyl)-NH2 (10, 11). The closer to the C-terminus the fluorophore, the higher the affinities of the fluorescent derivatives for the human vasopressin V1a receptor transfected in CHO cells. The compound 10 has a K i of 70 pM, as determined by competition experiments with 125I-4-HOPhCH2CO-dTyr(Me)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Arg-Pro-Arg-NH2. It showed a good selectivity for human V1a receptor versus human OT (K i = 1.2 nM), human vasopressin V1b (K i ≈ 27 nM), and human vasopressin V2 (K i > 5000 nM) receptor subtypes. All fluorescent analogues were antagonists as shown by the inhibition of vasopressin induced inositol phosphate accumulation. These fluorescent ligands are efficient for labeling cells expressing the human V1a receptor subtype, as shown by flow cytofluorometric experiments or fluorescence microscopy. They are also appropriate tools for structural analysis of the vasopressin receptors by fluorescence.
We investigated the mechanisms that regulate the efficacy of agonists in the arginine-vasopressin (AVP)/oxytocin (OT) receptor system. In this paper, we present evidence that AVP, a full agonist of ...the vasopressin receptors, acts as a partial agonist on the oxytocin receptor. We also found that AVP becomes a full agonist when two aromatic residues of the oxytocin receptor are replaced by the residues present at equivalent positions in the vasopressin receptor subtypes. Our results indicate that these two residues modulate the response of the oxytocin receptor to the partial agonist AVP.
We report on the pharmacological properties of a potent and selective linear vasopressin (AVP) V1a receptor antagonist HO-Phenylacetyl1-D-Tyr(Me)2-Phe3-Gln4-Asn5-Arg6-Pro7-Arg8-NH2 (HO-LVA). ...Iodinated on the phenolic substituent at position 1, 125I-HO-LVA displayed the highest affinity for rat liver V1a receptors (8 pM) ever reported. Furthermore, affinities of HO-LVA and I-HO-LVA for V1b, V2 and oxytocin (OT) receptors was 400- to 1,000-fold lower than for V1a receptors, rendering it a highly selective ligand. Both HO-LVA and its iodinated derivative are V1 antagonists, they potently inhibited AVP-induced inositol-phosphate accumulation in WRK1 cells, and also, although with a much lower potency, the AVP-induced ACTH release from freshly prepared pituitary cells. Using autoradiography 125I-HO-LVA appeared to be the first radioligand to successfully identify and localize the presence of V1a receptors in rat liver and blood vessel walls. Moreover, several new brain regions expressing V1a receptors could be identified, in addition to those brain regions that were previously identified with other radiolabelled AVP analogues.
To identify receptor functional domains underlying binding of the neurohypophysial hormones vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT), we have constructed a three-dimensional (3D) model of the V1a ...vasopressin receptor subtype and docked the endogenous ligand AVP. To verify and to refine the 3D model, residues likely to be involved in agonist binding were selected for site-directed mutagenesis. Our experimental results suggest that AVP, which is characterized by a cyclic structure, could be completely buried into a 15-20-A deep cleft defined by the transmembrane helices of the receptor and interact with amino acids located within this region. Moreover, the AVP-binding site is situated in a position equivalent to that described for the cationic neurotransmitters. Since all mutated residues are highly conserved in AVP and OT receptors, we propose that the same agonist-binding site is shared by all members of this receptor family. In contrast, the affinity for the antagonists tested, including those with a structure closely related to AVP, is not affected by mutations. This indicates a different binding mode for agonists and antagonists in the vasopressin receptor.
PDF
