The epidermal skin barrier and lipids that are integral to its structure are impaired in atopic dermatitis (AD). Current treatment guidelines include proactive therapy.
This study assessed the effect ...of 12 weeks of proactive treatment with tacrolimus ointment 0.1% (TAC) compared with mometasone furoate cream (MF) on specific skin barrier lipids in patients with AD who previously received 10 days of reactive treatment with either agent.
This was an open-label, non-interventional study. In the reactive phase, forearm lesions in 20 patients were treated with either TAC or MF twice daily for 10 days. In the subsequent proactive phase, patients applied TAC or MF twice weekly for 12 weeks (n = 16 patients).
Over the 12-week proactive treatment period, the mean local SCORAD significantly decreased in the TAC and MF treatment group. Levels of total and individual ceramides increased in both groups. Normalized intercellular lipid lamellae values were significantly higher with proactive TAC treatment than MF and undistinguishable from healthy skin.
The results show that proactive treatment with TAC is superior in restoring the skin barrier.
It is unclear if there are any distinct AK patient populations that might respond best to a given treatment.
To identify if a distinct subgroup of patients with AK might respond better to treatment ...with ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) versus diclofenac sodium (DS).
Complete clearance of AK and mean lesion reduction at end of first treatment course and week 17 were evaluated within subgroups.
502 patients (255 IngMeb; 247 DS) were included in the analysis. At week 17, complete clearance was achieved by more patients treated with IngMeb versus DS within the majority of patient subgroups, including patients with <6 lesions and ≥6 lesions at baseline, aged ≥65 years, males, females, Fitzpatrick skin types II and III, and facial lesions. Mean lesion reduction at week 17 was greater with IngMeb than DS within the same subgroups, and in patients with scalp lesions.
This responder analysis did not identify any distinct population that responded more optimally than others with IngMeb or DS. More patients achieved complete clearance and higher lesion reduction of AK with IngMeb compared with DS in most subgroups.
Introduction
Dupilumab has significantly improved the signs, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in randomised, controlled clinical trials. ...However, there is a need to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in real-world clinical practice. The PROLEAD study was designed to examine the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in moderate-to-severe AD in a real-world setting in Germany. Here, we present 12-week effectiveness and safety results with dupilumab from PROLEAD.
Methods
PROLEAD is a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study being conducted at 126 routine care sites across Germany. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD who require systemic therapy were treated with dupilumab as indicated by the Summary of Product Characteristics. Data collected included physician assessments (EASI, BSA, SCORAD, and IGA) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs POEM, DLQI, EQ-5D-5L, Peak Pruritus NRS and MOS Sleep Scale).
Results
Of 839 patients assessed for eligibility, 828 were included. The full analysis and safety analysis sets comprised 775 and 818 patients, respectively. The number of patients receiving concomitant therapy decreased from baseline to Week 12. Mean (standard deviation SD) percentage change in EASI score from baseline to Week 12 was –67.5% (48.4%) and was comparable across the four body regions. The proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 was 59.4% at Week 12. Mean (SD) Peak Pruritus NRS decreased from 7.4 (2.3) at baseline to 3.4 (2.6) at Week 12. Improvements from baseline to Week 12 were reported in all PROs assessed. No new safety signals were observed.
Discussion
Improvements in efficacy outcomes and adverse event rates in a real-world setting were more favourable than in phase 3 clinical trials.
Conclusions
The 12-week findings of PROLEAD demonstrate that treatment with dupilumab is effective and well tolerated, with rapid onset of action in signs, symptoms and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe AD in the real world.
Trial Registration Number
DUPILL08907; NIS-Nr. 433.
Summary
In anaerobic environments, Staphylococcus aureus increases the transcription of the intercellular adhesin (ica) cluster, leading to increased polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) ...production. The regulatory mechanisms involved in this phenotypic change are mostly unknown. Here we show that the staphylococcal respiratory response regulator, SrrAB, significantly increases icaA transcription under anaerobic growth in S. aureus. Phosphorylated SrrA preferentially bound to a 100 bp DNA sequence located upstream of ica, and dot blot assays revealed little or no PIA expression in S. aureus srrAB deletion‐replacement mutants of strains Sa113 and SH1000, grown anaerobically. The biological relevance of SrrAB for S. aureus was assessed in a phagocytosis assay employing human neutrophils. Sixty‐eight per cent of PIA producing wild‐type cells, but only 19% of srrAB mutant cells survived under anaerobic conditions, suggesting that PIA protected S. aureus against non‐oxidative killing mechanisms of the neutrophils. No protection was observed when S. aureus or S. epidermidis strains, producing PIA also under aerobic conditions, were subjected to phagocytosis under aerobic conditions. These results demonstrate that SrrAB is a major activator of ica expression and PIA production in anaerobic environments, where it contributes to the protection of S. aureus against non‐oxidative defence mechanisms.
Abstract
Previous analyses based on short-term, phase 2 studies reported that baseline biomarkers do not correlate with clinical outcomes following dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic ...dermatitis (AD). This new analysis based on 16-week, phase 3 studies reports whether pretreatment levels of common serum biomarkers can predict treatment response to dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and 2 (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769), two randomized, double-blind studies, included patients ≥18 years-old with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo for 16 weeks. Correlation between change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and log of baseline IgE, CC chemokine ligand 17 CCL17; previously referred to as thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at baseline was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ). At Week 16, change in EASI showed little correlation with baseline total IgE Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ) = –0.14, n = 370 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.03, n = 202 for placebo, baseline CCL17 (ρ = –0.28, n = 369 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.05, n = 201 for placebo) or baseline LDH (ρ = –0.30, n = 370 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.08, n = 202 for placebo). Overall safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Baseline levels of total IgE, CCL17 and LDH do not predict treatment response to dupilumab, as measured by EASI, in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.
Background
The use of ingenol mebutate (IM) as a field-directed therapy over a short period of time has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in randomized Phase III trials.
Objectives
To ...assess the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes for IM as treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) under daily “real-life” practice conditions.
Materials and Methods
A total of 826 adult patients with AK were enrolled by 292 dermatologists in Germany in a prospective, open, non-interventional, non-controlled, multicentre study. All patients were treated with IM and followed for eight weeks.
Results
The mean number of clinically visible AK lesions decreased significantly from 7.1±6.8 to 2.8±4.5 (
p
<0.0001). Most dermatologists (79.0%) rated global efficacy of IM as “very good”/“good” and 82.6% of the patients were “very satisfied” or “rather satisfied” with the efficacy of IM. Patient-reported outcomes showed greater efficacy and treatment comfort with IM compared to any last previous AK treatment with a comparable tolerability profile. Skin-related QoL data revealed a significant improvement of 50.2% after IM treatment (
p
<0.0001). Adverse events were reported in 7.0% of all patients, which were in most cases mild in intensity.
Conclusion
Field-directed treatment with IM over a short period was associated with a high level of treatment satisfaction, as reported by dermatologists and patients. This observational study demonstrates the effectiveness and tolerability of IM in everyday clinical practice in addition to the known efficacy and safety obtained by randomized controlled clinical trials.
Abstract
There are limited approved systemic treatment options for children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab is now approved in the United States for patients 6 months and older with ...moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies. European Medicines Agency is evaluating the use of dupilumab in children aged 6 months through 5 years with severe AD only. To report the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the subgroup of children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD (IGA score = 4) at baseline in the LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434 part B). Patients aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD were enrolled in LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (part B), a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Patients were randomized to either dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (200 mg if baseline weight 5 to <15 kg, 300 mg if 15 to <30 kg) or placebo for 16 weeks. All patients initiated standardized treatment with low-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) from day –14. This analysis reports efficacy and quality-of-life endpoints including a 75% reduction from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI, for children aged 4 to <6 years), and Infant’s Dermatitis Quality Of Life (IDQOL, for children <4 years) in children with severe AD. Of the total trial population of 162 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 125 patients with severe AD at baseline were randomized: 63 to the dupilumab + TCS treatment group and 62 to the placebo + TCS treatment group. Baseline demographics were similar. Mean (SD) baseline disease characteristics were also similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups: EASI (38.8 13.7 vs. 35.4 12), body surface area (63.1% 21 vs. 58.9% 21.4), weekly average PP-NRS (7.6 1.4 vs. 7.6 1.6), CDLQI (17.5 5.5 vs. 17.8 6.4) and IDQOL (18.4 5.1 vs. 17.4 5.4). Dupilumab treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase in the proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 compared with placebo treatment by week 4 (27% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.0009). By week 16, this improvement was further increased compared with the placebo group (46% vs. 7%; P < 0.0001). At week 16, dupilumab-treated patients had a significantly greater percent reduction from baseline in PP-NRS compared with the placebo group (LS mean (SE)–41.8 5.4 vs. 0.5 5.4; P < 0.0001). Dupilumab also resulted in significant improvement in quality-of-life outcomes compared with placebo (LS mean SE) change from baseline to week 16 in CDLQI (−9.1 1.1 vs. −2.6 1.2; P < 0.0001); IDQOL (−9.1 1.3 vs. −0.6 1.1; P < 0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 42 (66.7%) patients in the dupilumab group and 45 (73.8%) patients in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate and deemed unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. The most common TEAE was atopic dermatitis in both the dupilumab group (10 15.9%) and placebo group (16 26.2%). Additionally, TEAEs in the conjunctivitis cluster were reported by 4 (6.4%) patients in the dupilumab group and none in the placebo group. In the placebo group, 3 (4.9%) serious adverse events were reported. No dupilumab-related adverse events were serious or led to treatment discontinuation. Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD. The safety profile was consistent with that previously seen in adults, adolescents, and children aged > 6 years of age.
Introduction
Treatment options for children younger than 6 years with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited, as systemic immunosuppressants may present safety concerns in this young age group. ...Dupilumab is the first systemic treatment option approved for infants and young children with severe AD in the European Union. This study reports the efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant low-potency corticosteroids in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD.
Methods
This was a pre-specified subgroup analysis of data for patients aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD at baseline (Investigator’s Global Assessment IGA = 4) from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of dupilumab. Patients were randomised to either subcutaneously administered dupilumab (200/300 mg) or matched placebo every 4 weeks, plus low-potency topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Co-primary endpoints at week 16 were the proportion of patients with IGA ≤ 1 (clear or almost clear skin) and the proportion of patients with ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Secondary endpoints at week 16 included mean changes in EASI, pruritus, skin pain, sleep loss and quality of life.
Results
The analysis included 125 patients (63 receiving dupilumab vs. 62 placebo). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab vs. placebo had achieved IGA ≤ 1 (14.3% vs. 1.6%;
P
= 0.0085) and EASI-75 (46.0% vs. 6.6%;
P
< 0.0001). Significant improvements with dupilumab were observed in all secondary endpoints, including a least squares mean 44.9% reduction in pruritus. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups (66.7% vs. 73.8%). No dupilumab-related AEs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation.
Conclusion
Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD with acceptable safety.
Trial Registration
The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434, part B.
Plain Language Summary
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that is relatively common in infants and young children worldwide. Severe AD causes skin rashes and intense itch that strongly interfere with sleep quality and normal daily activities, thereby affecting the quality of life of patients and their families. When therapies for AD that are applied to the skin do not work, limited options are available to treat severe AD in children younger than 6 years. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD, recruited from various sites in Europe and North America. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (based on the child’s weight) or placebo, together with mild steroids applied to the skin, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, AD severity was greatly improved in patients receiving dupilumab, with 14% of patients achieving almost clear skin. Patients receiving dupilumab also experienced significant improvements in itch intensity, sleep quality, skin pain, and quality of life. Furthermore, dupilumab did not increase the risk of infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab can be effective at treating severe AD in infants and young children, with important benefits for the quality of life of patients and their families.
PDF
