Response to Kochan et al., 2023 Ehrlich, Barbara E.; Vahdat, Linda; DeCillis, Arthur P. ...
Supportive care in cancer,
08/2023, Letnik:
31, Številka:
8
Journal Article
The BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is effective in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) leukemias, but relapse occurs, mainly as a result of the outgrowth of leukemic subclones ...with imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutations. We evaluated dasatinib, a BCR-ABL inhibitor that targets most imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutations, in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Patients with various phases of CML or with Ph-positive ALL who could not tolerate or were resistant to imatinib were enrolled in a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Dasatinib (15 to 240 mg per day) was administered orally in four-week treatment cycles, once or twice daily.
A complete hematologic response was achieved in 37 of 40 patients with chronic-phase CML, and major hematologic responses were seen in 31 of 44 patients with accelerated-phase CML, CML with blast crisis, or Ph-positive ALL. In these two phases, the rates of major cytogenetic response were 45 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Responses were maintained in 95 percent of patients with chronic-phase disease and in 82 percent of patients with accelerated-phase disease, with a median follow-up more than 12 months and 5 months, respectively. Nearly all patients with lymphoid blast crisis and Ph-positive ALL had a relapse within six months. Responses occurred among all BCR-ABL genotypes, with the exception of the T315I mutation, which confers resistance to both dasatinib and imatinib in vitro. Myelosuppression was common but not dose-limiting.
Dasatinib induces hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with CML or Ph-positive ALL who cannot tolerate or are resistant to imatinib. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00064233 ClinicalTrials.gov.).
Neoantigens are critical targets of antitumor T-cell responses. The ATLAS bioassay was developed to identify neoantigens empirically by expressing each unique patient-specific tumor mutation ...individually in
, pulsing autologous dendritic cells in an ordered array, and testing the patient's T cells for recognition in an overnight assay. Profiling of T cells from patients with lung cancer revealed both stimulatory and inhibitory responses to individual neoantigens. In the murine B16F10 melanoma model, therapeutic immunization with ATLAS-identified stimulatory neoantigens protected animals, whereas immunization with peptides associated with inhibitory ATLAS responses resulted in accelerated tumor growth and abolished efficacy of an otherwise protective vaccine. A planned interim analysis of a clinical study testing a poly-ICLC adjuvanted personalized vaccine containing ATLAS-identified stimulatory neoantigens showed that it is well tolerated. In an adjuvant setting, immunized patients generated both CD4
and CD8
T-cell responses, with immune responses to 99% of the vaccinated peptide antigens. SIGNIFICANCE: Predicting neoantigens
has progressed, but empirical testing shows that T-cell responses are more nuanced than straightforward MHC antigen recognition. The ATLAS bioassay screens tumor mutations to uncover preexisting, patient-relevant neoantigen T-cell responses and reveals a new class of putatively deleterious responses that could affect cancer immunotherapy design.
.
We reviewed data from all adjuvant NSABP breast cancer trials that tested regimens containing both doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) to characterize the incidence of subsequent acute myeloid ...leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Six complete NSABP trials have investigated AC regimens (B-15, B-16, B-18, B-22, B-23, and B-25). Six distinct AC regimens have been tested and are distinguished by differences in cyclophosphamide intensity and cumulative dose and by the presence or absence of mandated prophylactic support with growth factor and ciprofloxacin. In all regimens, A was given at 60 mg/m(2) q 21 days x 4. C was given as follows: 600 mg/m(2) q 21 days x 4 ("standard AC"); 1,200 mg(2) q 21 days x 2; 1,200 mg/m(2) q 21 days x 4; 2,400 mg/m(2) q 21 days x 2; and 2,400 mg/m(2) q 21 days x 4. Occurrence of AML/MDS was summarized by incidence per 1,000 patient-years at risk and by cumulative incidence. Rates were compared across regimens, by age, and by treatment with or without breast radiotherapy.
The incidence of AML/MDS was sharply elevated in the more intense regimens. In patients receiving two or four cycles of C at 2,400 mg/m(2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, cumulative incidence of AML/MDS at 5 years was 1.01% (95% confidence interval CI, 0.63% to 1.62%), compared with 0.21% (95% CI, 0.11% to 0.41%) for patients treated with standard AC. Patients who received breast radiotherapy experienced more secondary AML/MDS than those who did not (RR = 2.38, P=.006), and the data indicated that G-CSF does may possibly also be independently correlated with increased risk.
AC regimens employing intensified doses of cyclophosphamide requiring G-CSF support were characterized by increased rates of subsequent AML/MDS, although the incidence of AML/MDS was small relative to that of breast cancer relapse. Breast radiotherapy appeared to be associated with an increased risk of AML/MDS.
BackgroundGEN-011 is a personalized neoantigen-targeted peripheral blood T cell therapy (NPT) developed for the treatment of adult patients (pts) with solid tumors. The proprietary ATLAS™ (Antigen ...Lead Acquisition System) will be used to identify true immunogenic neoantigens from each patient‘s tumor mutanome that are recognized by their own CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells. ATLAS will also identify Inhibigens™, antigen targets of T cells that promote tumor growth.1 Autologous peripheral T cells will be specifically stimulated by up to 30 ATLAS-identified neoantigens, avoiding Inhibigens, to generate an adoptive T cell product. Preliminary data show yields of billions of highly active T cells with 96% neoantigen targeting across 89% of ATLAS selected neoantigens.MethodsTITAN-1 is a multicenter Phase 1 study of GEN-011 NPTs in patients with refractory melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), urothelial carcinoma (UC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), and anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Patients may enter into one of 2 cohorts of 6 DLT-evaluable patients, either a multiple lower dose (MLD) regimen of GEN-011 as an IV infusion at 4-week intervals, up to 5 doses maximum without lymphodepletion, or a single high dose (SHD) regimen of GEN-011 after flu/cy lymphodepletion. Each dose of GEN-011 will be followed by a course of interleukin-2 (IL-2). Patients will be followed for safety, immunogenicity, and anti-tumor activity over approximately a 5-month treatment period. A long-term follow-up will continue through 2 years after the initial dose of GEN-011.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04596033ReferencesLam H, et al. An empirical antigen selection method identifies neoantigens that either elicit broad anti-tumor response or drive tumor growth. Cancer Discovery 2021 March; 11(3):696–713.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Western Institutional Review Board, approval number 1-1078861-1
BackgroundGEN-009 adjuvanted personalized cancer vaccine contains up to 20 neoantigens selected by ATLAS™, an ex vivo bioassay screening autologous T-cells for immune responses against both ...neoantigens and Inhibigens™. Inhibigen-specific T-cells suppress immunity, have been shown to accelerate tumor progression in mice, and are excluded from GEN-009. In cohort A, all patients immunized in the adjuvant setting with GEN-009 monotherapy developed immune responses. Ninety-nine percent of selected peptides were immunogenic: ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ fluorospot responses specific for 51% and 41% of immunized peptides, respectively.1 Six of 8 patients continue without progression with a median follow up >2 years.MethodsGEN-009 was administered to patients with advanced cancer who received standard-of-care (SOC) PD-1 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination therapy during vaccine manufacturing. Five vaccine doses were administered over 24 weeks in combination with single agent anti-PD-1. Patients who progressed prior to vaccination received salvage therapy followed by GEN-009 in combination. Peripheral T-cell responses were measured by ex vivo and in vitro stimulated fluorospot assays. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA levels were evaluated in a subset of patients pre- and post-GEN-009 administration.Results15 patients received GEN-009 in combination with PD-1 inhibitor; 1 patient received GEN-009 monotherapy. Median number of neoantigens per vaccine was 14 (range 5–18). GEN-009-related adverse events were limited to vaccine injection site reactions, mild myalgias or fatigue. Sequential vaccination with GEN-009 had an additive effect on the magnitude of ex vivo T-cell responses, that persisted in some patients for 12+ months post first vaccine dose. An association between proportion of peptides eliciting significant cytokine responses and RECIST response is apparent. Epitope spread was detected in CD8+ T-cells from CPI-sensitive patients, but not refractory patients. Four patients who responded to PD-1 inhibition followed by disease stabilization then demonstrated further tumor reduction after GEN-009 vaccination. Seven of 9 CPI responsive patients are progression-free 7 to 18 months after first vaccine dose. Three of 7 CPI-refractory patients have experienced unexpected prolonged stable disease, with 2 PR and 1 SD after vaccination lasting up to 10 months. Plasma ctDNA kinetics mirrored RECIST responses in each tested patient; in some responders, all evidence of ctDNA disappeared, including non-targeted antigens.ConclusionsVaccination with GEN-009 alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 was well tolerated. Preliminary data demonstrate induction of robust, durable neoantigen-specific immune responses and epitope spreading in the presence of PD-1 CPI. Broad immunity against tumor specific targets and encouraging patient outcomes support further study.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03633110ReferencesLam H, et al. An empirical antigen selection method identifies neoantigens that either elicit broad anti-tumor response or drive tumor growth. Cancer Discovery 2021 March;11(3):696–713.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Western Institutional Review Board, approval number 1-1078861-1
BackgroundGEN-009 is an adjuvanted personalized cancer vaccine containing up to 20 neoantigens selected by ATLAS™, an ex vivo bioassay screening autologous T cells to identify both neoantigens as ...well as Inhibigens™ empirically and without in silico predictions. Inhibigen-specific T cells suppress immunity and have been shown to accelerate tumor progression in mice. Inhibigens are avoided in GEN-009. Previous data from patients treated with GEN-009 monotherapy showed 99% of selected peptides generated immune responses including ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ fluorospot responses specific for 51% and 41% of immunized peptides respectively.MethodsGEN-009 is being evaluated in patients (pts) with advanced cancer who received standard-of-care (SOC) PD-1 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination therapy during vaccine manufacturing; they subsequently received 5 vaccine doses over 24 weeks in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor. Patients who progressed prior to vaccination could receive alternate therapy followed by GEN-009 combined with an appropriate salvage regimen. Peripheral T cell responses were evaluated pre-and post-vaccination by dual-analyte fluorospot assays measured both directly ex vivo and after in vitro stimulation.ResultsAs of August 18, 2020, 15 pts received GEN-009 in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor. Their median TMB was 1.37Mut/mb (range 0.31–6.55), with a median of 24 (6–99) neoantigens and 16 (1–86) Inhibigens. The number of neoantigens in each manufactured vaccine ranged from 4–18 (median 13). GEN-009-related adverse events were limited to Grade 1 injection site reactions. Ex vivo T cell responses peaked after the third vaccination for IFNγ and some patients showed evidence of epitope spread. The initial 5 patients are evaluable for antitumor activity with at least 3 months follow up after first vaccination. Three patients experienced early tumor responses followed by stabilization on PD-1 inhibitor SOC and demonstrated a further reduction in tumor volume after GEN-009 vaccination (figure 1). One patient experienced a complete response prior to vaccination and the 5th patient had progression on SOC, but had a Partial Response to salvage and remains stable after vaccination.Abstract 390 Figure 1Individual patient spider plots. Percent change in target lesion diameter over timeConclusionsVaccination with GEN-009 in combination with PD-1 CPI is feasible for patients with advanced solid tumors with little additive toxicity. Preliminary data demonstrate induction of robust, neoantigen-specific immune responses and a potential expansion of stimulatory targets with epitope spreading in the presence of PD-1 inhibitor. Possible additive antitumor activity in combination with PD-1 inhibitors is suggested by tumor shrinkage following GEN-009 dosing. More mature response and immunogenicity data on 10 additional patients is anticipated for November.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov NCT03633110Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Western Institutional Review Board, approval number 1-1078861-1.
The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1, which consists of a mixture of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug (tegafur), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP), and an ...inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase potassium oxonate (oxonic acid), was developed to increase the feasibility and therapeutic index of 5-FU administered orally. The principal objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of administering S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule every 5 weeks, determine the maximum tolerated dose, characterize the pharmacokinetics of S-1, and seek evidence of anticancer activity.
Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of S-1 on a once-daily oral schedule for 28 days every 5 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose in which fewer than two of the first six new patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the tegafur, CDHP, and oxonic acid constituents were characterized.
Twenty patients were treated with 72 courses of S-1 at three dose levels ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2)/day. Diarrhea, which was often associated with abdominal discomfort and cramping, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of S-1 on this protracted schedule. Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, fatigue, and cutaneous effects were also observed but were rarely severe. Myelosuppression was modest and uncommon. A partial response and a 49% reduction in tumor size were observed in patients with fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma. The pharmacokinetic data suggested potent inhibition of 5-FU clearance by CHDP, with resultant 5-FU exposure at least 10-fold higher than that reported from equitoxic doses of tegafur modulated by uracil in the oral fluoropyrimidine UFT.
The recommended dose for Phase II studies of S-1 administered once daily for 28 consecutive days every 5 weeks is 50 mg/m(2)/day. The pharmacokinetic data indicate substantial modulation of 5-FU clearance by CDHP. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, the predictable toxicity profile of S-1, and the low incidence of severe adverse effects at the recommended Phase II dose, evaluations of S-1 on this schedule are warranted in malignancies that are sensitive to the fluoropyrimidines.
In 1989, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated the B-22 trial to determine whether intensifying or intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide in a ...doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination would benefit women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. B-25 was initiated to determine whether further intensifying and increasing the cyclophosphamide dose would yield more favorable results.
Patients (n = 2,548) were randomly assigned to three groups. The dose and intensity of doxorubicin were similar in all groups. Group 1 received four courses, ie, double the dose and intensity of cyclophosphamide given in the B-22 standard therapy group; group 2 received the same dose of cyclophosphamide as in group 1, administered in two courses (intensified); group 3 received double the dose of cyclophosphamide (intensified and increased) given in group 1. All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Life-table estimates were used to determine disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival.
No significant difference was observed in DFS (P =.20), distant DFS (P =.31), or survival (P =.76) among the three groups. At 5 years, the DFS in groups 1 and 2 (61% v 64%, respectively; P =. 29) was similar to but slightly lower than that in group 3 (61% v 66%, respectively; P = 08). Survival in group 1 was concordant with that in groups 2 (78% v 77%, respectively; P =.71) and 3 (78% v 79%, respectively; P =.86). Grade 4 toxicity was 20%, 34%, and 49% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Severe infection and septic episodes increased in group 3. The decrease in the amount and intensity of cyclophosphamide and delays in therapy were greatest in courses 3 and 4 in group 3. The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia increased in all groups.
Because intensifying and increasing cyclophosphamide two or four times that given in standard clinical practice did not substantively improve outcome, such therapy should be reserved for the clinical trial setting.
To determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities(DLTs), and pharmacokinetics of S-1, a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and oxonic acid, administered ...once daily in patients with advanced cancer.
Eighteen patients with refractory malignancies were treated with S-1 administered once daily for 21 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week break. Of 16 evaluable patients, 6 were treated at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)/day, and 10 were treated at 60 mg/m(2)/day.
DLTs were observed in 1 of 6 evaluable patients treated with 50 mg/m(2)/day and in 4 of 10 evaluable patients treated with 60 mg/m(2)/day. DLTs included diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia. The maximum tolerated dose was 50 mg/m(2)/day. Pharmacokinetic data are consistent with potent modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by CDHP, with prolonged half-life and 5-FU AUC at least 10-fold higher than reported in previous studies of equitoxic doses of tegafur modulated by uracil. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated a correlation between diarrhea grade and both 5-FU C(max) (r = 0.57, P < 0.05) and 5-FU area under the curve (r = 0.74, P < 0.01).
The recommended Phase II dose of S-1 administered once daily for 21 consecutive days of 28 is 50 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetic data presented provide evidence of 5-FU modulation by CDHP. Pharmacodynamic analyses suggest that the utility of pharmacology-based dosing of S-1 should be explored in future trials. Evaluation of once-daily dosing of S-1 in malignancies for which fluoropyrimidines have known antitumor activity is warranted.
PDF
