Purpose
To review the evidence on the relative prognostic performance of the available prognostic scores for survival in spinal metastatic surgery in order to provide a recommendation for use in ...clinical practice.
Methods
A systematic review of comparative external validation studies assessing the performance of prognostic scores for survival in independent cohorts was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through Medline and Embase until May 2021. Studies were included when they compared at least four survival scoring systems in surgical or mixed cohorts across all primary tumor types. Predictive performance was assessed based on discrimination and calibration for 3-month, 1-year and overall survival, and generalizability was assessed based on the characteristics of the development cohort and external validation cohorts. Risk of bias and concern regarding applicability were assessed based on the ‘Prediction model study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool’ (PROBAST).
Results
Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and covered 17 scoring systems across 5.130 patients. Several scores suffer from suboptimal development and validation. The SORG Nomogram, developed in a large surgical cohort, showed good discrimination on 3-month and 1-year survival, good calibration and was superior in direct comparison with low risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. Machine learning algorithms are promising as they perform equally well in direct comparison. Tokuhashi, Tomita and other traditional risk scores showed suboptimal performance.
Conclusion
The SORG Nomogram and machine learning algorithms outline superior performance in survival prediction for surgery in spinal metastases. Further improvement by comparative validation in large multicenter, prospective cohorts can still be obtained. Given the heterogeneity of spinal metastases, superior methodology of development and validation is key in improving future machine learning systems.
Outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is typically assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) with levels from 1 (death) to 8 (upper good recovery). Outcome prediction has ...classically been dichotomized into either dead/alive or favorable/unfavorable outcome. Binary outcome prediction models limit the possibility of detecting subtle yet significant improvements. We set out to explore different machine learning methods with the purpose of mapping their predictions to the full 8 grade scale GOSE following TBI. The models were set up using the variables: age, GCS-motor score, pupillary reaction, and Marshall CT score. For model setup and internal validation, a total of 866 patients could be included. For external validation, a cohort of 369 patients were included from Leuven, Belgium, and a cohort of 573 patients from the US multi-center ProTECT III study. Our findings indicate that proportional odds logistic regression (POLR), random forest regression, and a neural network model achieved accuracy values of 0.3-0.35 when applied to internal data, compared to the random baseline which is 0.125 for eight categories. The models demonstrated satisfactory performance during external validation in the data from Leuven, however, their performance were not satisfactory when applied to the ProTECT III dataset.
Background
Several methods have been proposed to measure cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) in traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the lack of a gold standard and the absence of prospective clinical ...data on risks, impact on care and outcomes of implementation of CA-guided management lead to uncertainty.
Aim
To formulate statements using a Delphi consensus approach employing a group of expert clinicians, that reflect current knowledge of CA, aspects that can be implemented in TBI management and CA research priorities.
Methods
A group of 25 international academic experts with clinical expertise in the management of adult severe TBI patients participated in this consensus process. Seventy-seven statements and multiple-choice questions were submitted to the group in two online surveys, followed by a face-to-face meeting and a third online survey. Participants received feedback on average scores and the rationale for resubmission or rephrasing of statements. Consensus on a statement was defined as agreement of more than 75% of participants.
Results
Consensus amongst participants was achieved on the importance of CA status in adult severe TBI pathophysiology, the dynamic non-binary nature of CA impairment, its association with outcome and the inadvisability of employing universal and absolute cerebral perfusion pressure targets. Consensus could not be reached on the accuracy, reliability and validation of any current CA assessment method. There was also no consensus on how to implement CA information in clinical management protocols, reflecting insufficient clinical evidence.
Conclusion
The Delphi process resulted in 25 consensus statements addressing the pathophysiology of impaired CA, and its impact on cerebral perfusion pressure targets and outcome. A research agenda was proposed emphasizing the need for better validated CA assessment methods as well as the focused investigation of the application of CA-guided management in clinical care using prospective safety, feasibility and efficacy studies.
Aims
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common motor neuron degeneration disease with a diagnostic delay of about 1 year after symptoms onset. In ALS, blood neurofilament light chain ...(NfL) levels are elevated, but it is not entirely clear what drives this increase and what the diagnostic performance of serum NfL is in terms of predictive values and likelihood ratios. The aims of this study were to further explore the prognostic and diagnostic performances of serum NfL to discriminate between patients with ALS and ALS mimics, and to investigate the relationship between serum NfL with motor neuron degeneration.
Methods
The diagnostic performances of serum NfL were based on a cohort of 149 serum samples of patients with ALS, 19 serum samples of patients with a disease mimicking ALS and 82 serum samples of disease control patients. The serum NfL levels were correlated with the number of regions (thoracic, bulbar, upper limb and lower limb) displaying upper and/or lower motor neuron degeneration. The prognostic performances of serum NfL were investigated based on a Cox regression analysis.
Results
The associated predictive values and likelihood ratio to discriminate patients with ALS and ALS mimics were established. Serum NfL was associated with motor neuron degeneration driven by upper motor neuron (UMN) degeneration and was independently associated with survival in patients with ALS.
Conclusions
Altogether, these findings suggest that elevated serum NfL levels in ALS are driven by UMN degeneration and the disease progression rate and are independently associated with survival at time of diagnosis.
Impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation (CAR) is common after brain injury, although the pathophysiology remains elusive. The mechanisms of vascular dysregulation, their impact on brain ...function, and potential therapeutic implications are still incompletely understood. Clinical assessment of CAR remains challenging. Observational studies suggest that CAR impairment is associated with worse outcomes, and that optimization of cerebral blood flow (CBF) by individual arterial blood pressure (ABP) targets could potentially improve outcome. We present a porcine closed cranial window model that measures the hemodynamic response of pial arterioles, the main site of CBF control, based on changes in their diameter and red blood cell velocity. This quantitative direct CAR assessment is compared to laser Doppler flow (LDF). CAR breakpoints are determined by segmented regression analysis and validated using LDF and brain tissue oxygen pressure. Using a standardized cortical impact, CAR impairment in traumatic brain injury can be studied using our method of combining pial arteriolar diameter and RBC velocity to quantify RBC flux in a large animal model. The model has numerous potential applications to investigate CAR physiology and pathophysiology of CAR impairment after brain injury, the impact of therapeutic interventions, drugs, and other confounders, or to develop personalized ABP management strategies.
•Collision speed is the most influencing parameter in bicycle-vehicle collisions in terms of head injury criteria.•A 360 degree crank rotation changes the Head Injury Criterion value over 400 % in ...the accident situation.•Underreported bicycle-vehicle accident information is essential for trustworthy accident reconstructions.
This study aimed to reconstruct four real life vehicle-bicycle collisions and evaluates the reconstruction parameters that affect the outcome of head injuries in report based accident reconstructions. A computational model of a car was developed in the multibody software MADYMO (MAthematical DYnamic MOdeling) and was used together with a validated bicycle model and the MADYMO 50 percentile pedestrian model. The accidents were reconstructed through an optimal fit method, based on kinematic and medical information. After the reconstruction, a parametric study on cyclists’ movement and accident conditions was performed on the different cases. The velocity of the car and the angle of impact were found to significantly affect the accident outcome. This was demonstrated in terms of head injury criteria such as the Head Injury Criterion (HIC), the peak linear and peak angular velocity and acceleration. It was shown that the severity of the injury increases exponentially with increasing collision velocities. Additionally, the bicycle’s parameters; crank rotation, handlebar angle and seat position revealed a large heterogeneity in the results. The maximum alteration between the lowest and highest HIC-value found for a complete crank rotation was a 416 % difference. For a handlebar rotation up to 100° or seat height alteration of maximum 34 cm, this value was respectively 169 % and 294 %. These high percentages of change indicate the need for cycling phase information for case-specific vehicle-bicycle accident reconstructions.
Abstract Background With recent advances in oncologic treatments, there has been an increase in patient survival rates and concurrently an increase in the number of incidence of symptomatic spinal ...metastases. Because elderly patients are a substantial part of the oncology population, their types of treatment as well as the possible impact their treatment will have on healthcare resources need to be further examined. Purpose We studied whether age has a significant influence on quality of life and survival in surgical interventions for spinal metastases. Study Design We used data from a multicenter prospective study by the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG). This GSTSG study involved 1,266 patients who were admitted for surgical treatments of symptomatic spinal metastases at 22 spinal centers from different countries and followed up for 2 years after surgery. Patient Sample There were 1,266 patients recruited between March 2001 and October 2014. Outcome Measures Patient demographics were collected along with outcome measures, including European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), neurologic functions, complications, and survival rates. Methods We realized a multicenter prospective study of 1,266 patients admitted for surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. They were divided and studied into three different age groups: <70, 70–80, and >80 years. Results Despite a lack of statistical difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Frankel neurologic score, or Karnofsky functional score at presentation, patients >80 years were more likely to undergo emergency surgery and palliative procedures compared with younger patients. Postoperative complications were more common in the oldest age group (33.3% in the >80, 23.9% in the 70–80, and 17.9% for patients <70 years, p=.004). EQ-5D improved in all groups, but survival expectancy was significantly longer in patients <70 years old (p=.02). Furthermore, neurologic recovery after surgery was lower in patients >80 years old. Conclusions Surgeons should not be biased against operating elderly patients. Although survival rates and neurologic improvements in the elderly patients are lower than for younger patients, operating the elderly is compounded by the fact that they undergo more emergency and palliative procedures, despite good ASA scores and functional status. Age in itself should not be a determinant of whether to operate or not, and operations should not be avoided in the elderly when indicated.
Decisions concerning the rehabilitation process and return to play (RTP) after cervical spine surgery in a general sporting population can be difficult and may be influenced by several factors. ...Moreover, no guidelines are present for this. The aim of this study was to create a consensus on this topic.
A 5-step Delphi analysis with panels of neurosurgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists and physical and rehabilitation medicine practitioners in Belgium was conducted. The first round (R1) was a brainstorm phase. A comprehensive list of answers from R1 was validated in round 2 (R2). In round 3 (R3) experts ranked these items in a chronological order. Next, contraindications and criteria to start each rehabilitation step were linked by experts in round 4 (R4). In round 5 (R5) panellists ranked theses about contraindications and criteria on a 5-point Likert scale.
The response rate was 100% (n=15) for R1, 93% (n=14) for R2, 73% (n=11) for R3, 53% (n=8) for R4 and 67% (n=10) for R5. In R5, 25 theses on absolute and relative contraindications and criteria were endorsed.
This Delphi analysis resulted in contraindications and criteria for the rehabilitation process and return to play after cervical surgery. Tentative guidelines and timetable are proposed.