Summary
More than 10 years ago, the first pilot observational study of imatinib discontinuation was reported in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients in deep molecular response (DMR). Several ...studies have been published since then, in patients treated with frontline imatinib, or second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in first or second line but also on second attempt of TKI discontinuation. Our objective was to estimate, through meta‐analyses of the literature data, the probability of molecular recurrence (MolRec) in the time periods of 0–6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18–24 months after a first and second TKI discontinuation and the probability of re‐acquisition of DMR after MolRec. The Medline and Scopus databases were searched up to April 2019. The studies were selected by three independent reviewers. Random‐effect meta‐analyses were conducted using the MetaXL software. The probability of MolRec in the time periods 0–6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18–24 months after the first attempt was respectively 35%, 8%, 3% and 3%, whereas the probability of MolRec in the time periods 0‐6, 6‐12 and 12‐18 after the second attempt was 48%, 27% and 12% respectively. Re‐acquisition of a DMR was observed in 90% of patients. Most of the MolRec occur during the first six months in case of a first attempt, whereas the second MolRec occurs over a larger window of time.
In this study, we have addressed how Lyn kinase signaling mediates nilotinib-resistance by quantitative phospho-proteomics using Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino acid in Cell culture. We have found ...an increased tyrosine phosphorylation of 2 additional tyrosine kinases in nilotinib-resistant cells: the spleen tyrosine kinase Syk and the UFO family receptor tyrosine kinase Axl. This increased tyrosine phosphorylation involved an interaction of these tyrosine kinases with Lyn. Inhibition of Syk by the inhibitors R406 or BAY 61-3606 or by RNA interference restored the capacity of nilotinib to inhibit cell proliferation. Conversely, coexpression of Lyn and Syk were required to fully induce resistance to nilotinib in drug-sensitive cells. Surprisingly, the knockdown of Syk also strongly decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn and Axl, thus uncovering interplay between Syk and Lyn. We have shown the involvement of the adaptor protein CDCP-1 in resistance to nilotinib. Interestingly, the expression of Axl and CDCP1 were found increased both in a nilotinib-resistant cell line and in nilotinib-resistant CML patients. We conclude that an oncogenic signaling mediated by Lyn and Syk can bypass the need of Bcr-Abl in CML cells. Thus, targeting these kinases may be of therapeutic value to override imatinib or nilotinib resistance in CML.
Despite the excellent efficacy of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the response in patients is heterogeneous, which may in part be caused by pharmacogenetic variability. Imatinib has been ...reported to be a substrate of the P-glycoprotein pump. In the current study, we focused on the ABCB1 (MDR1) genotype. We analyzed the 3 most relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms of MDR1 in 90 CML patients treated with imatinib. Among the patients homozygous for allele 1236T, 85% achieved a major molecular response versus 47.7% for the other genotypes (P = .003). For the 2677G>T/A polymorphism, the presence of G allele was associated with worse response (77.8%, TT/TA; vs 47.1%, GG/GA/GT; P = .018). Patients with 1236TT genotype had higher imatinib concentrations. One of the haplotypes (1236C-2677G-3435C) was statistically linked to less frequent major molecular response (70% vs 44.6%; P = .021). Hence, we demonstrated the usefulness of these single nucleotide polymorphisms in the identification of CML who may or may not respond optimally to imatinib.
Several clinical trials have demonstrated that some patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP) who achieve sustained deep molecular responses on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ...therapy can safely suspend therapy and attempt treatment‐free remission (TFR). Many TFR studies to date have enrolled imatinib‐treated patients; however, the feasibility of TFR following nilotinib or dasatinib has also been demonstrated. In this review, we discuss available data from TFR trials and what these data reveal about the molecular biology of TFR. With an increasing number of ongoing TFR clinical trials, TFR may become an achievable goal for patients with CML‐CP.
Treatment‐free remission (TFR) is an emerging treatment goal for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP). Numerous TFR clinical trials have demonstrated that some patients with CML‐CP with sustained deep molecular responses on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy can safely suspend TKI therapy without a loss of response. In this review, we discuss available data from TFR trials in patients with deep molecular responses to TKI therapies, including imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.
Summary
Molecular recurrence (MRec) occurs in about half of all patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in sustained deep molecular response. A ...second TKI discontinuation has been attempted in some patients who regain the discontinuation criteria after resuming treatment. Nilotinib treatment affords faster and deeper molecular responses than imatinib as first‐line therapy. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib (300 mg twice daily) in chronic‐phase CML patients who experienced MRec, after imatinib discontinuation and analysed the probability of TFR after a new attempt in patients treated for 2 years with sustained MR4.5 for at least 1 year. A total of 31 patients were included in the study between 2013 and 2018. Seven (23%) patients experienced serious adverse events after a median of 2 months of nilotinib treatment leading to discontinuation of treatment. One patient was excluded from the study for convenience. Among the 23 patients treated for 2 years with nilotinib, 22 maintained their molecular response for at least 1 year (median: 22 months) and stopped nilotinib. The TFR rates at 24 and 48 months after nilotinib discontinuation were 59.1% (95% confidence interval CI: 41.7%–83.7%) and 42.1% (95% CI: 25%–71%) respectively (NCT #01774630).