Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that strain echocardiography might improve arrhythmic risk stratification in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Background ...Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after MI is challenging. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% is the main parameter for selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Methods In this prospective, multicenter study, 569 patients >40 days after acute MI were included, 268 of whom had ST-segment elevation MIs and 301 non–ST-segment elevation MIs. By echocardiography, global strain was assessed as average peak longitudinal systolic strain from 16 left ventricular segments. Time from the electrocardiographic R-wave to peak negative strain was assessed in each segment. Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation from these 16 time intervals, reflecting contraction heterogeneity. Results Ventricular arrhythmias, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden death during a median 30 months (interquartile range: 18 months) of follow-up, occurred in 15 patients (3%). LVEFs were reduced (48 ± 17% vs. 55 ± 11%, p < 0.01), global strain was markedly reduced (−14.8 ± 4.7% vs. −18.2 ± 3.7%, p = 0.001), and mechanical dispersion was increased (63 ± 25 ms vs. 42 ± 17 ms, p < 0.001) in patients with arrhythmias compared with those without. Mechanical dispersion was an independent predictor of arrhythmic events (per 10-ms increase, hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.5; p < 0.01). Mechanical dispersion and global strain were markers of arrhythmias in patients with non–ST-segment elevation MIs (p < 0.05 for both) and in those with LVEFs >35% (p < 0.05 for both), whereas LVEF was not (p = 0.33). A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain showed the best positive predictive value for arrhythmic events (21%; 95% confidence interval: 6% to 46%). Conclusions Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography predicted arrhythmic events independently of LVEF in this prospective, multicenter study of patients after MI. A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain may improve the selection of patients after MI for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, particularly in patients with LVEFs >35% who did not fulfill current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications.
A unique and highly versatile technique, stress echocardiography (SE) is increasingly recognized for its utility in the evaluation of non-ischaemic heart disease. SE allows for simultaneous ...assessment of myocardial function and haemodynamics under physiological or pharmacological conditions. Due to its diagnostic and prognostic value, SE has become widely implemented to assess various conditions other than ischaemic heart disease. It has thus become essential to establish guidance for its applications and performance in the area of non-ischaemic heart disease. This paper summarizes these recommendations.
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether myocardial strain echocardiography can predict ventricular arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Background Left ...ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is insufficient for selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy after MI. Electrical dispersion in infarcted myocardium facilitates malignant arrhythmia. Myocardial strain by echocardiography can quantify detailed regional and global myocardial function and timing. We hypothesized that electrical abnormalities in patients after MI will lead to LV mechanical dispersion, which can be measured as regional heterogeneity of contraction by myocardial strain. Methods We prospectively included 85 post-MI patients, 44 meeting primary and 41 meeting secondary ICD prevention criteria. After 2.3 years (range 0.6 to 5.5 years) of follow-up, 47 patients had no and 38 patients had 1 or more recorded arrhythmias requiring appropriate ICD therapy. Longitudinal strain was measured by speckle tracking echocardiography. The SD of time to maximum myocardial shortening in a 16-segment LV model was calculated as a parameter of mechanical dispersion. Global strain was calculated as average strain in a 16-segment LV model. Results The EF did not differ between ICD patients with and without arrhythmias occurring during follow-up (34 ± 11% vs. 35 ± 9%, p = 0.70). Mechanical dispersion was greater in ICD patients with recorded ventricular arrhythmias compared with those without (85 ± 29 ms vs. 56 ± 13 ms, p < 0.001). By Cox regression, mechanical dispersion was a strong and independent predictor of arrhythmias requiring ICD therapy (hazard ratio: 1.25 per 10-ms increase, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 1.4, p < 0.001). In patients with an EF >35%, global strain showed better LV function in those without recorded arrhythmias (−14.0% ± 4.0% vs. −12.0 ± 3.0%, p = 0.05), whereas the EF did not differ (44 ± 8% vs. 41 ± 5%, p = 0.23). Conclusions Mechanical dispersion was more pronounced in post-MI patients with recurrent arrhythmias. Global strain was a marker of arrhythmias in post-MI patients with relatively preserved ventricular function. These novel parameters assessed by myocardial strain may add important information about susceptibility for ventricular arrhythmias after MI.
Echocardiography is the key tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of aortic stenosis. Because clinical decision-making is based on the echocardiographic assessment of its severity, it is essential ...that standards are adopted to maintain accuracy and consistency across echocardiographic laboratories. Detailed recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis were published by the European Association of Echocardiography and the American Society of Echocardiography in 2009. In the meantime, numerous new studies on aortic stenosis have been published with particular new insights into the difficult subgroup of low gradient aortic stenosis making an update of recommendations necessary. The document focuses in particular on the optimization of left ventricular outflow tract assessment, low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, a new classification of aortic stenosis by gradient, flow and ejection fraction, and a grading algorithm for an integrated and stepwise approach of aortic stenosis assessment in clinical practice.
Objectives Our objective was to assess whether patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) had reduced endocardial function assessed by layer-specific strain compared with patients ...without significant CAD. Background The left ventricular (LV) wall of the heart comprises 3 myocardial layers. The endocardial layer is most susceptible to ischemic injury. Methods Seventy-seven patients referred to coronary angiography due to suspected non–ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) were prospectively included. Coronary occlusion was found in 28, significant stenosis in 21, and no stenosis in 28 patients. Echocardiography was performed 1 to 2 h before angiography. Layer-specific longitudinal and circumferential strains were assessed from endocardium, mid-myocardium, and epicardium by 2-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). Territorial longitudinal strain (TLS) was calculated based on the perfusion territories of the 3 major coronary arteries in a 16-segment LV model, whereas global circumferential strain (GCS) was averaged from 6 circumferential LV segments in all 3 layers. Results Patients with significant CAD had worse function in all 3 myocardial layers assessed by TLS and GCS compared with patients without significant CAD. Endocardial TLS (mean –14.0 ± 3.3% vs. –19.2 ± 2.2%; p < 0.001) and GCS (mean –19.3 ± 4.0% vs. –24.3 ± 3.4%; p < 0.001) were most affected. The absolute differences between endocardial and epicardial TLS and GCS were lower in patients with significant CAD (Δ2.4 ± 3.6% and Δ6.7 ± 3.8%, respectively) than in those without significant CAD (Δ5.3 ± 2.1% and Δ10.4 ± 3.0%; p < 0.001). This reflects a pronounced decrease in endocardial function in patients with significant CAD. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that endocardial and mid-myocardial TLS were superior to identify significant CAD compared with epicardial TLS (p < 0.05), wall motion score index (p < 0.01), and ejection fraction (EF) (p < 0.001). Conclusions Assessment of layer-specific strain by 2D-STE might identify NSTE-ACS patients with significant CAD. Endocardial function was more affected in patients with significant CAD compared with epicardial function and EF.
Objectives This study sought to investigate whether the duration of left ventricular (LV) early systolic lengthening could accurately identify patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD). ...Background Ischemic myocardium with reduced active force will lengthen when LV pressure rises during early systole before onset of systolic shortening. Methods We included 88 patients with suspected CAD referred to elective diagnostic coronary angiography. Two of these patients were excluded from the study due to evidence of previous myocardial infarction on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Speckle tracking echocardiography was performed before coronary angiography and at follow-up scheduled 1 year after revascularization, and global longitudinal strain and duration of average LV early systolic lengthening were recorded. Results Forty-three of 86 patients had significant CAD. The duration of early systolic lengthening was significantly prolonged in patients with significant CAD compared with patients without significant coronary artery stenoses (76 ± 37 ms vs. 38 ± 23 ms, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, global systolic strain was significantly lower in patients with CAD (−17.7 ± 3.0% vs. −19.5 ± 2.6%, p = 0.003). Prolonged duration of early systolic lengthening showed the best accuracy in detecting CAD, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.83. The area under the curve for global strain was 0.68. At 1-year follow-up, the duration of early systolic lengthening was significantly reduced (64 ± 37 ms vs. 76 ± 37 ms, p = 0.041) in the patients treated with revascularization. Conclusions Duration of myocardial early systolic lengthening was prolonged in patients with significant CAD; this might be a useful parameter to identify patients who might benefit from reperfusion therapy.
Many patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) do not have significant coronary artery disease. The current diagnostic approach of repeated ...electrocardiography and cardiac biomarker assessment requires observation for >6 to 12 hours. This strategy places a heavy burden on hospital facilities. The objective of this study was to investigate whether myocardial strain assessment by echocardiography could exclude significant coronary artery stenosis in patients presenting with suspected NSTE-ACS.
Sixty-four patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected NSTE-ACS without known coronary artery disease, inconclusive electrocardiographic findings, and normal cardiac biomarkers at arrival were enrolled. Twelve-lead electrocardiography, troponin T assay, and echocardiography were performed at arrival, and all patients underwent coronary angiography. Significant coronary stenosis was defined as >50% luminal narrowing. Global myocardial peak systolic longitudinal strain was measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion score index were calculated.
No significant stenosis in any coronary artery was found in 35 patients (55%). Global peak systolic longitudinal strain was superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in distinguishing patients with and without significant coronary artery stenosis (area under the curve, 0.87). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 0.93 and 0.78, respectively, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value as 0.74 and 0.92, respectively. Feasibility of the strain measurements was excellent, with 97% of segments analyzed.
Myocardial strain by echocardiography may facilitate the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenosis among patients presenting with suspected NSTE-ACS with inconclusive electrocardiographic findings and normal cardiac biomarkers.
In patients with aortic stenosis, subtle alterations in myocardial mechanics can be detected by speckle-tracking echocardiography before reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
In ...this prospective study, 162 patients with aortic stenosis with an average aortic valve area of 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2 and a mean LVEF of 60 ± 11% were included. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion (SD of time from Q/R on the electrocardiogram to peak strain in 16 left ventricular segments) were assessed using echocardiography, and all-cause mortality (n = 37) was recorded during 37 ± 13 months of follow-up.
Overall, nonsurvivors had more pronounced mechanical dispersion and worse GLS compared with survivors (74 ± 24 vs 61 ± 18 msec P < .01 and −14.5 ± 4.4% vs −16.7 ± 3.6% P < .01, respectively). In the 42 conservatively treated patients without surgical aortic valve replacement, a similar pattern was observed in nonsurvivors versus survivors (mechanical dispersion, 80 ± 24 vs 57 ± 14 msec P < .01; GLS, −14.0 ± 4.9% vs −17.1 ± 3.8% P = .04, respectively). Mechanical dispersion was significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio per 10-msec increase, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07–1.42; P < .01) in a Cox model adjusted for LVEF and with aortic valve replacement treatment as a time-dependent covariate. Continuous net reclassification improvement showed that mechanical dispersion was incremental to LVEF, GLS, and valvulo-arterial impedance when adjusting for aortic valve replacement treatment in the total population.
Increased mechanical dispersion may be a risk marker providing novel prognostic information in patients with aortic stenosis.
Display omitted
•Strain echocardiography can detect altered myocardial mechanics in patients with AS.•Pronounced mechanical dispersion is associated with worse prognosis in patients with AS.•Mechanical dispersion adds incremental prognostic value to LVEF, atrioventricular impedance, and global longitudinal strain.•Mechanical dispersion predicts mortality independently of LVEF and AVR surgery status.
PDF
