Interest in right minithoracotomy mitral valve surgery (MVS) is rapidly growing and, to date, different perfusion strategies and aortic clamping techniques are available. However each approach ...carries specific advantages and drawbacks. This retrospective study analyses our experience in right minithoracotomy MVS with different arterial perfusion and aortic clamping strategies, highlighting the results of a patient tailored approach.
Between March 2009 and March 2014, 460 patients with a full preoperative work-up that included also aortoiliac-femoral axis' screening underwent right minithoracotomy MVS. One hundred and eight were redo cases (23.5%), 63 had aortoiliac atheromatous disease or significant tortuosity (13.7%), and 38 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.3%). Based on anatomy and comorbidities, each patient was allocated to the most appropriate of 3 approaches: femoral arterial cannulation with endoaortic balloon (P+EB) (247, 53.7%) or with transthoracic clamp (P+XC) (150, 32.6%), and direct aortic cannulation with endoaortic balloon occlusion (C+EB) (63, 13.7%).
No cases of aortic dissection were reported. Early outcome were similar between the 3 groups; no differences were reported in terms of stroke rate (1.7% in the P+EB, 2% in the P+XC, and no cases in the C+EB group; p = NS) and 30-day mortality (2.1% in the P+EB, 2.7% in the P+XC, and 1.6% in the C+EB group; p = NS). Logistic regression showed no influences of arterial perfusion and aortic clamping techniques on 30-day mortality and stroke.
Right minithoracotomy MVS can routinely be performed with favorable outcomes in all comers when perfusion strategies and clamping techniques are carefully selected after proper evaluation of the patient's preoperative characteristics.
Objective Reports of minimally invasive tricuspid valve operations are rare, and results are often contradictory. This study analyzes our 5-year experience with minimally invasive tricuspid valve ...operations in high-risk patients. Methods Between November 2005 and December 2011, tricuspid valve surgery using a nonsternotomy minimally invasive technique was performed in 64 patients (19 male, 45 female; mean age, 63.2 ± 12.8 years). Mean preoperative European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 7.3 ± 2.9, and predicted mortality was 11.6% ± 11.7%. Tricuspid valve regurgitation cause was functional in 36 patients (56.2%), endocarditis in 2 patients (3.1%), and rheumatic in 24 patients (37.5%). Two patients (3.1%) showed prosthesis dysfunction. Forty patients (62.5%) had undergone previous cardiac surgery. Results Tricuspid valve repair was performed in 35 patients (54.7%). Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthesis was performed in 27 patients (42.2%), and the remaining 2 patients (3.1%) underwent bioprosthetic replacement. Concomitant procedures (48) included mitral valve surgery (42 patients), atrial septal defect closure (5 patients), and myxoma exeresis (1 patient). Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 1 patient (1.6%). Overall hospital mortality was 7.9%. Stroke occurred in 1 patient (1.6%), and 5 patients underwent reoperation for bleeding (7.8%). Mean follow-up time was 21 ± 16 months (range, 1-59 months) and 100% completed. Cumulative Kaplan–Meier estimated 5-year survival was 81.3%, and 5-year freedom from reoperation was 100%. Conclusions The heart-port–based minimally invasive approach seems to be safe, feasible, and reproducible in case of tricuspid valve operations. It ensures low perioperative morbidity, moderate to low rates of tricuspid regurgitation recurrence, and low late mortality. It also seems to have an added value in case of reoperative procedures.
PDF
