Abstract Background Added modular junction has been associated with implant-related failures. We report our experience with a titanium-titanium modular neck-stem interface to assess complications, ...possible clinical factors influencing use of neck modularity, and whether modularity reduced the incidence of dislocation. Methods A total of 809 total hip arthroplasties completed between 2005 and 2012 from a prospectively collected database were reviewed. The mean follow-up interval was 5.7 years (3.3-10.3 years). Forty-five percent were male (360 of 809), and 55% were female (449 of 809). All stems were uncemented PROFEMUR TL (titanium, flat-tapered, wedge) or PROFEMUR Z (titanium, rectangular, dual-tapered) with a titanium neck. Results Increased modularity (anteverted/retroverted and anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus (anteverted/retroverted + anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus) was used in 39.4% (135 of 343) of cases using the posterior approach compared with 6.8% (20 of 293) of anterior and 23.7% (41 of 173) of lateral approaches. Four males sustained neck fractures at a mean of 95.5 months (69.3-115.6 months) after primary surgery. Overall dislocation rate was 1.1% (9 of 809). The posterior approach had both the highest utilization of increased modularity and the highest dislocation rate (2.3%), of which the most were recurrent. The anterior (0.3%) and lateral (0%) approaches had lower dislocation rates with no recurrences. Conclusion At a mean 5.7 years, our experience demonstrates a low neck fracture (0.5%) and a low dislocation rate (1.1%). Use of increased modularity may not improve dislocation risk for the posterior approach. Continued surveillance of this group will be necessary to determine long term survivorship of this modular titanium implant.
Abstract Our initial experience with mobile bearing medial compartment unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) is presented to highlight lessons that have been learned to avoid short-term failures. ...Consecutive cases of the Oxford medial UKA performed between February 2001 and April 2006 were reviewed to derive those cases that were revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 545 patients available with mean age and body mass index of 65.0 and 30.1, respectively. At final follow-up, 32 patients were revised for lateral compartment arthritis, aseptic component loosening, persisting medial or anterior pain and dislocated meniscal bearing. Revisions were performed with primary unconstrained TKA implants with no stems or wedges required. Our results seem to reflect those seen in registries confirming an earlier higher revision rate and highlight the technical issues of overstuffing the compartment, inadequate cementation technique, and strict adherence to patient selection.
Abstract Objective Many people with dysglycemia are unaware that they have the condition. We conducted a study to determine whether a screening program for hospitalized patients could identify new ...cases of unrecognized dysglycemia and affect the actions of attending care providers during hospitalization. Methods We measured A1C in 466 participants with no history of diabetes who had been admitted to hospital for coronary heart disease or elective joint replacement surgery. Participants with A1C <6.0% were considered normoglycemic and those with A1C ≥6.0% were considered dysglycemic. Notifications to care providers were placed on the charts of participants who had dysglycemia, along with recommendations for in-hospital monitoring and care. Oral glucose tolerance tests were completed 6 weeks post-hospitalization for participants with dysglycemia and a subsample of participants who were normoglycemic. Sensitivity and specificity of in-hospital dysglycemia criteria were calculated. Provider practices were determined by chart review. Results In-hospital dysglycemia was present in10.4% of patients with coronary heart disease and 11.4% of participants with elective joint replacement surgery. Attending care providers took few of the recommended actions, despite the chart notification of dysglycemia; glucose monitoring occurred <30% of the time. The in-hospital dysglycemia criterion of ≥6% demonstrated moderate sensitivity (47.5%) and high specificity (96.2%) in detecting dysglycemia based on oral glucose tolerance tests. Conclusions Dysglycemia was a relatively common finding in patients with no history of diabetes who had been admitted for coronary heart disease or elective joint replacement surgery. The in-hospital A1C screening criteria generated a high level of false-negative tests, and a chart notification had limited effects on the practices of attending care providers. Future studies examining lower A1C thresholds and the barriers to and facilitators of attending care providers’ behaviours are warranted.
