Summary
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted practice in many countries and remains a focus of intense interest in the transplant community. The present study is aimed at ...providing a description of the current situation of DCD in European countries. Specific questionnaires were developed to compile information on DCD practices, activities and post‐transplant outcomes. Thirty‐five countries completed the survey. DCD is practiced in 18 countries: eight have both controlled DCD (cDCD) and uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) programs, 4 only cDCD and 6 only uDCD. All these countries have legally binding and/or nonbinding texts to regulate the practice of DCD. The no‐touch period ranges from 5 to 30 min. There are variations in ante and post mortem interventions used for the practice of cDCD. During 2008–2016, the highest DCD activity was described in the United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, the Netherlands, Belgium and France. Data on post‐transplant outcomes of patients who receive DCD donor kidneys show better results with grafts obtained from cDCD versus uDCD donors. In conclusion, DCD is becoming increasingly accepted and performed in Europe, importantly contributing to the number of organs available and providing acceptable post‐transplantation outcomes.
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can increase the pool of available organs for transplantation. This pilot study evaluates the implementation of a controlled DCD (cDCD) protocol using ...normothermic regional perfusion in Norway.
Patients aged 16 to 60 years that are in coma with documented devastating brain injury in need of mechanical ventilation, who would most likely attain cardiac arrest within 60 minutes after extubation, were eligible. With the acceptance from the next of kin and their wish for organ donation, life support was withdrawn and cardiac arrest observed. After a 5-minute no-touch period, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for post mortem regional normothermic regional perfusion was established. Cerebral and cardiac reperfusion was prevented by an aortic occlusion catheter. Measured glomerular filtration rates 1 year postengraftment were compared between cDCD grafts and age-matched grafts donated after brain death (DBD).
Eight cDCD were performed from 2014 to 2015. Circulation ceased median 12 (range, 6-24) minutes after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Fourteen kidneys and 2 livers were retrieved and subsequently transplanted. Functional warm ischemic time was 26 (20-51) minutes. Regional perfusion was applied for 97 minutes (54-106 minutes). Measured glomerular filtration rate 1 year postengraftment was not significantly different between cDCD and donation after brain death organs, 75 (65-76) vs 60 (37-112) mL/min per 1.73 m
(
= 0.23). No complications have been observed in the 2 cDCD livers.
A protocol for cDCD is successfully established in Norway. Excellent transplant outcomes have encouraged us to continue this work addressing the shortage of organs for transplantation.
Western Norway has the lowest number of actual deceased organ donors per million inhabitants in Norway. We wished to find the total number of potential donors and donor organs during 2 years at ...Haukeland University Hospital, the largest hospital in the region, and evaluate where and why potential donors were lost.
We evaluated all patients who died at Haukeland University Hospital in 2018-19. We checked if intensive care patients, filling the criteria as organ donors after brain death, became donors, and the reasons why potential donors were lost. We also estimated the number of potential donors after circulatory death. We checked if patients transferred from the intensive care units and patients never admitted to intensive care were potential donors. Location, gender, age, and possible number of organs were registered.
Of 1453 in-hospital deaths, 20 brain-dead patients became actual donors. One brain-dead and two other potential donors, one of them discharged to a bed ward, were not evaluated at the intensive care units. Relatives refused in five patients. Three fulfilled the Norwegian criteria from 2021 as organ donors after circulatory death. Ten potential donors after brain death were never admitted to intensive care and died on neurological or neurosurgical wards. If all potential organ donors were realised, the number of donors would double. The number of transplanted organs would increase less, as organs used per donor would drop from 3.50 to 2.90.
Our study cannot explain the low number of donors in our region compared with the rest of Norway. If all potential donations were implemented, the number of actual donors would double. Patients dying outside the intensive care units represent the largest potential source for extra donors, maximally increasing the number of donors by 42%, high-quality livers 44% and kidneys 18%. Introducing organ donation after circulatory death may increase the number of donors by 15% and the number of high-quality livers and kidneys by 12%.
AbstractAim and background. The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry (NLTR) accounts for all liver transplants performed in the Nordic countries since the start of the transplant program in 1982. Due to ...short waiting times, donor liver allocation has been made without considerations of the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. We aimed to summarize key outcome measures and developments for the activity up to December 2013. Materials and methods. The registry is integrated with the operational waiting-list and liver allocation system of Scandiatransplant (www.scandiatransplant.org) and accounted at the end of 2013 for 6019 patients out of whom 5198 were transplanted. Data for recipient and donor characteristics and relevant end-points retransplantation and death are manually curated on an annual basis to allow for statistical analysis and the annual report. Results. Primary sclerosing cholangitis, acute hepatic failure, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are the five most frequent diagnoses (accounting for 15.3%, 10.8%, 10.6%, 9.3% and 9.0% of all transplants, respectively). Median waiting time for non-urgent liver transplantation during the last 10-year period was 39 days. Outcome has improved over time, and for patients transplanted during 2004-2013, overall one-, five- and 10-year survival rates were 91%, 80% and 71%, respectively. In an intention-to-treat analysis, corresponding numbers during the same time period were 87%, 75% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion. The liver transplant program in the Nordic countries provides comparable outcomes to programs with a MELD-based donor liver allocation system. Unique features comprise the diagnostic spectrum, waiting times and the availability of an integrated waiting list and transplant registry (NLTR).
In order to meet the increasing demand for donor organs, the concept of donation after circulatory death (DCD) was reintroduced in Norway, first as a pilot study, followed by the use of DCD as ...institutional practice. We report the current Norwegian experience with liver transplant after DCD.
After acceptance from next of kin, life support was withdrawn from patients with devastating brain injury and cardiac arrest observed. After a 5-minute “no-touch” period, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for post mortem normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) by extracorporeal membrane oxygenator circuit was established. Data from all liver transplant recipients receiving controlled DCD (cDCD) livers in Oslo were analyzed.
From 2015 to 2017, a total of 8 patients underwent liver transplant with cDCD and NRP liver grafts in Norway. Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 26 (range, 6–40). There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft loss. Seven patients have reached 1 year of follow-up, and 1 patient has reached 6 months. Two patients have recurrence of primary disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis and steatohepatitis). All patients had normalized liver function at last follow-up.
Two patients underwent procedures for biliary complications. In 1 patient, leakage from the cystic duct was successfully handled endoscopically by stenting. In the other patient, a suspected stricture on magnetic resonance imaging led to an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which did not confirm signs of biliary stenosis. There was 1 instance of hepatic artery stenosis, which was managed with endovascular technique.
The results after liver transplant using cDCD with NRP are good. The rate of complications seems to be within the same range as when using conventional donation after brain death grafts.
Summary
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. An increasing number of countries and centres ...are performing NRP, a technically and logistically challenging procedure. This consensus document provides evidence‐based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. This consensus document provides evidence‐based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.
Organ shortage has resulted in an increased use of expanded criteria donors for transplantation, in particular kidneys from older donors. There is limited data on the impact of donor age more than 75 ...years on kidney transplant outcome.
A retrospective single-center analysis on deceased donors more than 75 years and kidney transplant outcome in an old for old setting was performed. Histologic findings (global kidney score) in graft biopsies and deceased-donor scores were evaluated to observe if this information could be helpful in predicting outcome.
Evaluation of data from 54 single kidney transplantations from 29 donors more than 75 years (median 77.5, range 75.2-86.1) were assessed. Ninety-three percent of the donors died of intracranial bleeding, and 69% had a history of hypertension or cardiovascular event(s). Median recipient age was 70.1 (range 50.6-82.4). Fifty-two grafts (96%) had posttransplant function. Death censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. Patient survival was 81%, 75%, and 59% at the same time points. At follow-up at median 23 months (range 6-144 months), thirty-five recipients were alive with a median serum creatinine of 163 micromol/ L (range 103-348). Global kidney score and deceased donor score did not predict graft outcome.
Kidney transplants from deceased donors more than 75 years perform acceptable as single transplants and should be considered for use in older recipients.
AbstractNormothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. An increasing number of countries and centres ...are performing NRP, a technically and logistically challenging procedure. This consensus document provides evidence-based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.
PDF
