Overview of malignant tracheal tumors Madariaga, Maria Lucia L.; Gaissert, Henning A.
Annals of cardiothoracic surgery,
3/2018, Letnik:
7, Številka:
2
Journal Article
Odprti dostop
Malignant airway tumors present particular challenges for surgeons, namely: to distinguish symptoms from those of the more frequent benign airway diseases; to separate metastatic disease from the ...uncommon primary tumors; and to consider curative resection in appropriate candidates. Here, we present a critical review of tracheal malignant obstruction, focusing on the evaluation of a patient with malignant airway tumor, patient selection for resection and the predictors of long-term survival. The new development in primary tracheal tumors is an old story, that of making physicians aware that resection rates in epidemiologic studies remain low, mainly because opportunities for resection are missed.
Pulmonary nodules found incidentally or by lung cancer screening differ in prevalence, risk profile, and diagnostic intervention. The results of surgical intervention for incidental versus screening ...lung nodules during multidisciplinary Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic (PNLCSC) follow-up have not been reported.
All patients evaluated at a PNLCSC from 2012 to 2018 following referral by primary care physicians, specialist physicians, or self-referral after computed tomography (CT) identified nodules on routine diagnostic CT (incidental group) or lung cancer screening CT (screening group) were included. Follow-up interval, invasive intervention, histology, postoperative events, survival, and recurrence were compared.
Of 747 patients evaluated in the PNLCSC, 129 (17.2%) underwent surgical intervention. The surgical cohort consisted of 104 (80.6%) incidental and 25 (19.3%) screening patients followed over a mean of 122 and 70 days, respectively. More benign lesions were excised in the incidental group (20.2%, 21/104)—representing 3.3% (21/632) of all incidental nodules evaluated—than in the screening group (4%, 1/25) (P = .038). Operative mortality was zero. Among 99 patients with primary lung cancer, 87% (screening) and 86.8% (incidental) were pathologic stage Ia. Complete follow-up was available in 725 of 747 (97%), and no patient developed progressive disease. Disease-free survival at 5 years was 74.9% (incidental) and 89.3% (screening) (P = .48).
A unique multidisciplinary PNLCSC for incidental and lung cancer screening–detected nodules with individualized risk assessment reliably identifies primary and metastatic tumors while exposing few patients to diagnostic excision for benign disease. Longer-term outcomes, strategies to limit radiation exposure, and cost control need further study.
Display omitted
There are few data to predict the benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with extrathoracic sarcoma. This study analyzes prognostic factors associated with improved outcomes.
Between June ...2002 and December 2008, 97 patients underwent pulmonary resection for metastatic sarcoma at Massachusetts General Hospital. Eight patients were excluded because of lack of follow-up data. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox model.
Overall 5-year survival for the cohort was 50.1%. Patients who had multiple operations for recurrent pulmonary metastases had better 5-year survival compared with patients who had a single operation (69 versus 41%; p = 0.017). Median disease- free survival (DFS) for the reoperation group was 12.9 months compared with 9.1 months for the single-operation group (p < 0.028). Patients with a disease-free interval (DFI) greater than 12 months from detection of primary sarcoma to pulmonary metastasectomy had improved survival compared with those whose DFI was less than 12 months (p < 0.0001). Patients with bilateral metastasectomy had lower 5-year survival compared with metastasectomy for unilateral disease (22% versus 68% ;p < 0.0001). Two or more metastases were associated with poorer outcome compared with a single metastasis (p = 0.0007). A positive resection margin portended worse survival compared with a negative resection margin (p = 0.004). Patients with lesions larger than 3 cm had decreased survival compared with patients with lesions smaller than 3 cm (p = 0.017) with no difference in median DFS. Histologic type, grade of tumor, and use of chemotherapy had no effect on survival. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a DFI greater than 12 months (p = 0.001), single-sided metastasis (p = 0.001), negative margins (p = 0.002), and multiple operations (p = 0.018) had better survival.
Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma can be associated with prolonged survival. Tumor resectability, DFI, number of metastases, and laterality are important factors in determining patient selection for curative surgical intervention. Repeated pulmonary metastasectomy in select patients may improve survival despite recurrent disease.
Clinical staging of lung cancer may not reliably predict nodal disease, and its accuracy in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database is not described.
Among anatomic ...pulmonary resections for stages I to III lung cancer with complete clinical and pathologic staging (2012-2017), the accuracy of invasive mediastinal staging (IMS) was compared with noninvasive mediastinal staging only. Accuracy, defined as concordance between clinical and pathologic nodal status, was examined using logistic regression to determine factors associated with clinical nodal (cN) accuracy. Variation in accuracy across centers was recorded and categorized.
We included 39,516 patients with stages I to III pulmonary cancer (adenocarcinoma, 66%; squamous, 23%; neuroendocrine, 5%; mixed, 3.3%; other, 2.4%), of whom 90.4% had cN0 disease. IMS was performed in 32.4%. The IMS group had more central tumors (14.8% vs 6.0%, P < .001) and cN1-2 (15.7% vs 6.8%, P < .001). Nodal accuracy was 79.8%. Although IMS had a lower nodal accuracy for cN0-2 disease (74.6% vs 82.6%, P < .001), IMS had higher accuracy when comparing patients with cN1-2 disease (53.9% vs 46.9%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis central tumors (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.51) and >cN0 disease (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.29) were associated with lower accuracy. Accuracy of IMS in the top 20 centers was 94.4% and in the bottom 20, 70.9%.
Staging accuracy in lung cancers selected for initial resection declines with >cN0 and central tumors. Noninvasive staging in tumors without cN involvement misses nearly 20% of cN1-2. Center-specific accuracy is a target for quality improvement.
Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is associated with worse prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas, particularly in sublobar resection. Intraoperative consultation for STAS has been ...advocated to guide surgical management. However, data on accuracy and reproducibility of intraoperative assessment of STAS remain limited. We evaluated diagnostic yield, interobserver agreement (IOA), and intraobserver agreement (ITA) for STAS detection on frozen section (FS).
A panel of three pathologists evaluated stage 1 lung adenocarcinomas (n = 100) for the presence or absence of STAS and artifacts as reference. Five pulmonary pathologists independently reviewed all cases in two rounds, detecting STAS and artifacts in FS and the corresponding FS permanent and non-FS permanent, with a consensus conference between rounds.
The FS had low sensitivity (44%), high specificity (91%), relatively high accuracy (71%), and overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 for detecting STAS. The average ITA was moderate for both STAS (κmean: 0.598) and artifact (κmean: 0.402) detection on FS. IOA was moderate for STAS (κround-1: 0.453; κround-2: 0.506) and fair for artifact (κround-1: 0.300; κround-2: 0.204) detection on FS. IOA for STAS improved in FS permanent and non-FS permanent, whereas ITA was similar across section types. On multivariable logistic regression, the only significant predictor of diagnostic discordance was the presence of artifacts.
FS is highly specific but not sensitive for STAS detection in stage 1 lung adenocarcinomas. IOA on STAS is moderate in FS and improved only marginally after a consensus conference, raising concerns regarding global implementation of intraoperative assessment of STAS and warranting more precise criteria for STAS and artifacts.
Reintubation after lung cancer resection is an important quality metric because of increased disability, mortality and cost. However, no validated predictive instrument is in use to reduce ...reintubation after lung resection. This study aimed to create and validate the PRediction Of REintubation After Lung cancer resection (PROREAL) score.
The study analyzed lung resection cases from 2 university hospitals. The primary end point was reintubation within 7 days after surgery. Predictors were selected through backward stepwise logistic regression and bootstrap resampling. The investigators used reclassification and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to assess score performance and compare it with an established score for all surgical patients (Score for Prediction of Postoperative Respiratory Complications SPORC).
The study included 2672 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer (1754, development cohort; 918, validation cohort) between 2008 and 2020, of whom 71 (2.7%) were reintubated within 7 days after surgery. Identified score variables were surgical extent and approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, heart failure, renal disease, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. The score achieved excellent discrimination in the development cohort (ROC AUC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94) and good discrimination in the validation cohort (ROC AUC, 0.74, 95% CI; 0.66-0.82), thus outperforming the SPORC in both cohorts (P < .001 and P = .018, respectively; validation cohort net reclassification improvement, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; P = .001). The score cutoff of ≥5 yielded a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 72-95) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI,79-83) in the development cohort.
A simple score (PROREAL) specific to lung cancer predicts postoperative reintubation more accurately than the nonspecific SPORC score. Operative candidates at risk may be identified for preventive intervention or alternative oncologic therapy.
This study sought to define predictors of recurrence after resection of thymic tumors.
A single-institution retrospective study was performed of 179 patients who underwent resection of a thymic tumor ...from 1972 through 2003.
Resection was complete in 90% (161/179) of patients. After a median follow-up of 115 months, the recurrence rate was 11% (20/179), the tumor-related death rate was 7.8% (14/179), and the overall death rate was 36.3% (65/179). Tumor recurrence correlated with advanced stage and histology (
P < .0001). The difference in recurrence between Masaoka stage I (0) and II (1.7% 1/59) was insignificant. Recurrence rates correlated with World Health Organization tumor type: A and AB, 0%; B1 and B2, 8% (4/51); B3, 27% (14/51); and C, 50% (2/4;
P < .0001). Tumor size separation into quintiles demonstrated a step-up of recurrence at 8 cm (<8 cm, 1.8% 2/113; ≥8 cm, 28% 18/64;
P < .003). Multivariate Cox modeling demonstrated that Masaoka stage (odds ratio, 5.70;
P < .001), World Health Organization histology (odds ratio, 5.77;
P = .003), and size (odds ratio, 1.16;
P = .001) were independent predictors of recurrence.
The Masaoka staging system could be collapsed to 3 degrees of invasion by combining stages I and II. The World Health Organization histologic type can be simplified for clinical use into A (A, AB), early B (B1, B2), advanced B (B3), and C tumors. Size of 8 cm or larger is an independent risk factor, even when patients with Masaoka stage III tumors are considered alone, and might identify candidates for preoperative therapy.
Early, accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) informs prognosis and therapy, especially in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Current diagnostic methods are imperfect. ...High-resolution computed tomography has limited resolution, and surgical lung biopsy (SLB) carries risks of morbidity and mortality. Endobronchial optical coherence tomography (EB-OCT) is a low-risk, bronchoscope-compatible modality that images large lung volumes
with microscopic resolution, including subpleural lung, and has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopy for ILD diagnosis.
We performed a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of EB-OCT in patients with ILD with a low-confidence diagnosis undergoing SLB. The primary endpoints were EB-OCT sensitivity/specificity for diagnosis of the histopathologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and clinical IPF. The secondary endpoint was agreement between EB-OCT and SLB for diagnosis of the ILD fibrosis pattern.
EB-OCT was performed immediately before SLB. The resulting EB-OCT images and histopathology were interpreted by blinded, independent pathologists. Clinical diagnosis was obtained from the treating pulmonologists after SLB, blinded to EB-OCT.
We enrolled 31 patients, and 4 were excluded because of inconclusive histopathology or lack of EB-OCT data. Twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis (16 men, average age: 65.0 yr): 12 were diagnosed with UIP and 15 with non-UIP ILD. Average FVC and Dl
were 75.3% (SD, 18.5) and 53.5% (SD, 16.4), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of EB-OCT was 100% (95% confidence interval, 75.8-100.0%) and 100% (79.6-100%), respectively, for both histopathologic UIP and clinical diagnosis of IPF. There was high agreement between EB-OCT and histopathology for diagnosis of ILD fibrosis pattern (weighted κ: 0.87 0.72-1.0).
EB-OCT is a safe, accurate method for microscopic ILD diagnosis, as a complement to high-resolution computed tomography and an alternative to SLB.
To estimate the incidence of postoperative oxygenation impairment after lung resection in the era of lung-protective management, and to identify perioperative factors associated with that impairment.
...Registry-based retrospective cohort study.
Two large academic hospitals in the United States.
3081 ASA I-IV patients undergoing lung resection.
79 pre- and intraoperative variables, selected for inclusion based on a causal inference framework. The primary outcome of impaired oxygenation, an early marker of lung injury, was defined as at least one of the following within seven postoperative days: (1) SpO2 < 92%; (2) imputed PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg (1) or (2) occurring at least twice within 24 h; (3) intensive oxygen therapy (mechanical ventilation or > 50% oxygen or high-flow oxygen).
Oxygenation was impaired within seven postoperative days in 70.8% of patients (26.6% with PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg or intensive oxygen therapy). In multivariable analysis, each additional cmH2O of intraoperative median driving pressure was associated with a 7% higher risk of impaired oxygenation (OR 1.07; 95%CI 1.04 to 1.10). Higher median intraoperative FiO2 (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.14 to 1.31 per 0.1) and PEEP (OR 1.12; 95%CI 1.04 to 1.21 per 1 cm H2O) were also associated with increased risk. History of COPD (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.95 to 3.35) and intraoperative albuterol administration (OR 2.07; 95%CI 1.17 to 3.67) also showed reliable effects.
Impaired postoperative oxygenation is common after lung resection and is associated with potentially modifiable pre- and intraoperative respiratory factors.
•Optimal approach to perioperative lung protection remains unknown in lung resection.•Risk scores are designed for PREoperative use and do not inform INTRAoperative care.•We assessed detailed intraoperative physiology during lung resection.•We identified potentially modifiable pre- /intra-operative respiratory risk factors.
PDF
