Corporal fibrosis is a process that involves excessive deposition of scar tissue in response to infection, trauma, or ischemia. It does not occur merely as a result of previous IPP surgery. Excessive ...development of corporal fibrosis is certain after extraneous and disastrous events such as priapism or the removal of a device for infection. The usual surgical planes and spaces are obliterated by proliferation of scar both in the tissues overlying the corpora and the space within the corpora previously occupied by erectile tissue. To maximize success, specialized instruments, downsized cylinders, and lots of experience are necessities. Prosthetic urology produces, for the most part, happy patients. Fibrosis guys, to a man are not happy. Let the expert have the unhappy patient!
The development and management of necrotizing cellulitis following penile constriction ring use is described. Devastating injuries such as this can be highly distressing for patients and focused ...counseling is often needed to address concerns regarding cosmetic outcomes. The timeframe and appearance of recovery has not been previously captured. We present a photographic timeline covering the development, management, and postoperative recovery from penile constriction ring injury over the course of 1 month.
Multiple-component inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) consist of paired intracorporal cylinders, a scrotal pump, and an abdominal fluid reservoir. In recent years, ectopic (e.g., non-space of ...Retzius) reservoir insertion techniques have become more popular among implanting urologists. The aim of this study was to describe our technique of sub-external oblique (SEO) placement of IPP reservoirs, and to review our initial experience with this technique. We carried out a retrospective review of the first 50 patients who underwent insertion of a Coloplast Titan
IPP via a scrotal incision, employing a newly developed SEO reservoir insertion technique. All procedures were carried out by a single high-volume surgeon (BBG), and retrospective chart review was carried out. Patients were seen and evaluated on the first post-operative day, then at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, as needed, and periodically thereafter. All 50 patients were available for short-term post-operative follow-up (average 6.6 months, range 3-12 months). The SEO technique was only used if there was no prior inguinal canal surgery, and no evidence of an inguinal hernia. The SEO technique was easy to carry out, and there were no instances of bowel, bladder, blood vessel, nerve, or spermatic cord injury. There were also no cases of reservoir herniation, intraperitoneal insertion, or reservoir visibility. One patient had prolonged pain (4 weeks) related to the reservoir; however, this completely resolved after treatment with non-steroidal analgesics. In asthenic patients, the reservoir could be detected with deep, careful palpation. However, no patients have required or requested IPP revision or removal to date. With short-term follow-up, we found that SEO reservoir insertion has been an easily-performed and safe option for ectopic reservoir insertion. The SEO method has avoided the infrequent but severe complications seen with previously described reservoir insertion techniques. Longer duration of follow-up, and trials by other implanting urologists, will be required to confirm or refute these initial promising results.
Historically, management of inflatable penile prosthesis infection was explantation of the device with delayed reimplantation at a later date. In 1991, this paradigm was challenged when early ...attempts at washout and immediate salvage proved successful. The clinical experiences and data generated over the past 30 years have allowed implanters to refine their salvage procedures to improve patient outcomes. In this article, we review the original Mulcahy technique for salvage and discuss updates to this protocol based on recent data.
Purpose of Review
Priapism is a rare condition that has different presentations, etiologies, pathophysiology, and treatment algorithms. It can be associated with significant patient distress and ...sexual dysfunction. We aim to examine the most up-to-date literature and guidelines in the management of this condition.
Recent Findings
Priapism is a challenging condition to manage for urologists, since the etiology is often multi-factorial and the suggested treatment algorithms are based on small studies and expert anecdotal experience, perhaps due to the rarity of the disorder.
Summary
Ischemic priapism of less than 24 h can be managed non-surgically in most cases with excellent results. Ischemic priapism of more than 36 h is frequently associated with permanent erectile dysfunction. Management of prolonged priapism with penile shunting still may result in poor erectile function, so penile prosthesis can be discussed in these scenarios.
Defining risks associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients undergoing penile prosthesis (PP) implantation remains controversial. This systematic review seeks to assess whether preoperative ...hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) or serum glucose have been shown to predict infection following PP implantation in diabetic men.
A stepwise literature search was performed. Eight and four studies assessing HbA1c and serum glucose respectively were included. Overall, data exploring HbA1c and serum glucose on PP infection were heterogeneous in time period, study design, and patient populations. Contemporary studies did not support either HbA1c nor blood glucose as predictors of PP infection in diabetic men.
Penile prosthesis implantation is the definitive treatment for refractory erectile dysfunction, yet exposure to this procedure during training of urology residents is often limited. To assess the ...effects of resident participation in penile prosthesis surgery, we compared surgical outcomes in a retrospective case series of 253 penile prosthesis surgeries by a single surgeon at the same institution between 2017 and 2020 with the assistance of either a registered nurse first assistant (RNFA) or a resident. Pertinent patient characteristics and surgical complications including device complications, surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding, iatrogenic injury, cardiovascular events, pulmonary events, and urinary retention were documented. Measured outcomes included operative time, Emergency Room (ER) visits, unplanned postoperative visits, pain medication refills, and surgical complications. Compared to RFNAs, resident-assisted penile prosthesis surgery was associated with significant increase in mean operative time (71.4 min vs. 87.9 min, p < 0.01) and postoperative ER visits (3.0% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.03) but not surgical complications (19.7% vs. 20.8%, OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.46 -2.30) or other measured outcomes. Compared to a dedicated RFNA, Resident assistance increased operative time by approximately 17 min, but did not increase post-operative surgical complications, supporting the notion that resident assistance in these procedures may be appropriate as an integral part of training.
