Pulsed field ablation uses electrical pulses to cause nonthermal irreversible electroporation and induce cardiac cell death. Pulsed field ablation may have effectiveness comparable to traditional ...catheter ablation while preventing thermally mediated complications.
The PULSED AF pivotal study (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF) was a prospective, global, multicenter, nonrandomized, paired single-arm study in which patients with paroxysmal (n=150) or persistent (n=150) symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs were treated with pulsed field ablation. All patients were monitored for 1 year using weekly and symptomatic transtelephonic monitoring; 3-, 6-, and 12-month ECGs; and 6- and 12-month 24-hour Holter monitoring. The primary effectiveness end point was freedom from a composite of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic escalation through 12 months, excluding a 3-month blanking period to allow recovery from the procedure. The primary safety end point was freedom from a composite of serious procedure- and device-related adverse events. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the primary end points.
Pulsed field ablation was shown to be effective at 1 year in 66.2% (95% CI, 57.9 to 73.2) of patients with paroxysmal AF and 55.1% (95% CI, 46.7 to 62.7) of patients with persistent AF. The primary safety end point occurred in 1 patient (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 4.6) in both the paroxysmal and persistent AF cohorts.
PULSED AF demonstrated a low rate of primary safety adverse events (0.7%) and provided effectiveness consistent with established ablation technologies using a novel irreversible electroporation energy to treat patients with AF.
URL: https://www.
gov; Unique identifier: NCT04198701.
Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) is a promising new ablation modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This energy form employs a train of microsecond duration high amplitude electrical pulses ...that ablate myocardium by electroporation of the sarcolemmal membrane without measurable tissue heating. The ablation pulse waveform has multiple variable components that can affect ablation efficacy, thus each proprietary system has unique properties that cannot be generalized to other systems. Success with PFA depends upon the proximity of the electrode to the target tissue, but not necessarily upon contact. A unique feature of PFA is tissue specificity. Myocardium is very susceptible to irreversible injury whereas the esophagus, phrenic nerves, pulmonary veins, and coronary arteries are relatively resistant to injury. The tissue specificity of PFA may result in a wide therapeutic range and improved safety profile during atrial fibrillation ablation. Vein isolation can be achieved very rapidly (seconds) promising that PFA may reduce procedure time to 1 hour or less. This attractive new technology promises to be a major advance in the field of atrial fibrillation ablation.
Radiofrequency (RF) has become an accepted energy source for myocardial ablation but may result in discontinuous lesions and nontargeted tissue injury. We examined the feasibility and safety of ...lesion formation using high-amplitude, bipolar pulsed electric fields delivered from a multielectrode array catheter.
The purpose of this study was to compare duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to pulsed field ablation (PFA) in terms of acute electrical effects, 2-week lesion formation, and injury to nontargeted tissues.
Intracardiac ablations were performed in 6 pigs using a circular pulmonary vein ablation catheter. The energy source for ablation delivery was randomized to deliver either PFA or RFA to 3 atrial endocardial sites. Bipolar pace capture and electrogram amplitude measurements were recorded at each site. Histopathology and necropsies were performed after 2 weeks.
The circular pulmonary vein ablation catheter was used to deliver pulsed electric fields to produce cardiac lesions without skeletal muscle stimulation. Evaluating all ablations in each site, electrogram amplitudes were reduced to <0.5 mV in 67.5% of PFA vs 27.0% of RFA deliveries (P <.001). Bipolar cardiac capture was lost after 100% vs 92.0% of PFA vs RFA (P = .005). At 2 weeks, PFA resulted in consistent transmural and homogeneous replacement fibrosis devoid of lingering myocyte “sequesters.” RFA lesions showed a stronger inflammatory response extending to the epicardial fat, arterial injury, and thrombosis. Neither PFA nor RFA lesions showed endocardial thrombus.
Intracardiac PFA can be feasibly delivered from a circular catheter to create fibrotic lesions that have acute electrical effects, without injury to nontargeted tissue.
Display omitted
PDF
