Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or ...BRCA2 germline mutations.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and had had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib, at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.
Of 265 patients who underwent randomization, 136 were assigned to the olaparib group and 129 to the placebo group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo (median, 8.4 months vs. 4.8 months from randomization on completion of chemotherapy; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival showed that, regardless of subgroup, patients in the olaparib group had a lower risk of progression. Adverse events more commonly reported in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (by more than 10% of patients) were nausea (68% vs. 35%), fatigue (49% vs. 38%), vomiting (32% vs. 14%), and anemia (17% vs. 5%); the majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. An interim analysis of overall survival (38% maturity, meaning that 38% of the patients had died) showed no significant difference between groups (hazard ratio with olaparib, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.39; P=0.75).
Olaparib as maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival among patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Interim analysis showed no overall survival benefit. The toxicity profile of olaparib in this population was consistent with that in previous studies. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00753545.).
Olaparib has shown significant clinical benefit as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a
mutation. The effect of combining maintenance olaparib and ...bevacizumab in patients regardless of
mutation status is unknown.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade ovarian cancer and were having a response after first-line platinum-taxane chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients were eligible regardless of surgical outcome or
mutation status. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo for up to 24 months; all the patients received bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total. The primary end point was the time from randomization until investigator-assessed disease progression or death.
Of the 806 patients who underwent randomization, 537 were assigned to receive olaparib and 269 to receive placebo. After a median follow-up of 22.9 months, the median progression-free survival was 22.1 months with olaparib plus bevacizumab and 16.6 months with placebo plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.59; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.49 to 0.72; P<0.001). The hazard ratio (olaparib group vs. placebo group) for disease progression or death was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45) in patients with tumors positive for homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD), including tumors that had
mutations (median progression-free survival, 37.2 vs. 17.7 months), and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) in patients with HRD-positive tumors that did not have
mutations (median progression-free survival, 28.1 vs. 16.6 months). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of olaparib and bevacizumab.
In patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving first-line standard therapy including bevacizumab, the addition of maintenance olaparib provided a significant progression-free survival benefit, which was substantial in patients with HRD-positive tumors, including those without a
mutation. (Funded by ARCAGY Research and others; PAOLA-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477644.).
Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, although supporting evidence from randomized clinical trials ...has been limited.
We intraoperatively randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB through IV) who had undergone macroscopically complete resection and had normal lymph nodes both before and during surgery to either undergo or not undergo lymphadenectomy. All centers had to qualify with regard to surgical skills before participation in the trial. The primary end point was overall survival.
A total of 647 patients underwent randomization from December 2008 through January 2012, were assigned to undergo lymphadenectomy (323 patients) or not undergo lymphadenectomy (324), and were included in the analysis. Among patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, the median number of removed nodes was 57 (35 pelvic and 22 paraaortic nodes). The median overall survival was 69.2 months in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 65.5 months in the lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio for death in the lymphadenectomy group, 1.06; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.83 to 1.34; P = 0.65), and median progression-free survival was 25.5 months in both groups (hazard ratio for progression or death in the lymphadenectomy group, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.34; P = 0.29). Serious postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the lymphadenectomy group (e.g., incidence of repeat laparotomy, 12.4% vs. 6.5% P = 0.01; mortality within 60 days after surgery, 3.1% vs. 0.9% P = 0.049).
Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had undergone intraabdominal macroscopically complete resection and had normal lymph nodes both before and during surgery was not associated with longer overall or progression-free survival than no lymphadenectomy and was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications. (Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Austrian Science Fund; LION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00712218.).
Summary Background Maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ...ovarian cancer. We aimed to explore the hypothesis that olaparib is most likely to benefit patients with a BRCA mutation. Methods We present data from the second interim analysis of overall survival and a retrospective, preplanned analysis of data by BRCA mutation status from our randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study that assessed maintenance treatment with olaparib 400 mg twice daily (capsules) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and who had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system, stratified by time to progression on penultimate platinum-based regimen, response to the most recent platinum-based regimen before randomisation, and ethnic descent. The primary endpoint was PFS, analysed for the overall population and by BRCA status. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00753545. Findings Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 136 patients were assigned to olaparib and 129 to placebo. BRCA status was known for 131 (96%) patients in the olaparib group versus 123 (95%) in the placebo group, of whom 74 (56%) versus 62 (50%) had a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or tumour BRCA mutation. Of patients with a BRCA mutation, median PFS was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (11·2 months 95% CI 8·3–not calculable vs 4·3 months 3·0–5·4; HR 0·18 0·10–0·31; p<0·0001); similar findings were noted for patients with wild-type BRCA , although the difference between groups was lower (7·4 months 5·5–10·3 vs 5·5 months 3·7–5·6; HR 0·54 0·34–0·85; p=0·0075). At the second interim analysis of overall survival (58% maturity), overall survival did not significantly differ between the groups (HR 0·88 95% CI 0·64–1·21; p=0·44); similar findings were noted for patients with mutated BRCA (HR 0·73 0·45–1·17; p=0·19) and wild-type BRCA (HR 0·99 0·63–1·55; p=0·96). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib group were fatigue (in ten 7% patients in the olaparib group vs four 3% in the placebo group) and anaemia (seven 5% vs one <1%). Serious adverse events were reported in 25 (18%) patients who received olaparib and 11 (9%) who received placebo. Tolerability was similar in patients with mutated BRCA and the overall population. Interpretation These results support the hypothesis that patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation have the greatest likelihood of benefiting from olaparib treatment. Funding AstraZeneca.
Summary Background In patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer, maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly improves progression-free survival ...versus placebo. We assessed the effect of maintenance olaparib on overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer, including those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations ( BRCA m). Methods In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial involving 82 sites across 16 countries, patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more courses of platinum-based chemotherapy and had responded to their latest regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated sequence to receive oral maintenance olaparib (as capsules; 400 mg twice a day) or a matching placebo by an interactive voice response system. Patients were stratified by ancestry, time to progression on penultimate platinum, and response to most recent platinum. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment by the use of unique identifiers generated during randomisation. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival. In this updated analysis, we present data for overall survival, a secondary endpoint, from the third data analysis after more than 5 years’ follow-up (intention-to-treat population). We did the updated overall survival analysis, described in this Article at 77% data maturity, using a two-sided α of 0·95%. As the study was not powered to assess overall survival, this analysis should be regarded as descriptive and the p values are nominal. We analysed randomly assigned patients for overall survival and all patients who received at least one dose of treatment for safety. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00753545. Findings Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 265 patients were randomly assigned to olaparib (n=136) or placebo (n=129). 136 patients had deleterious BRCA m. The data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 30, 2015. An overall survival advantage was seen with maintenance olaparib versus placebo in all patients (hazard ratio HR 0·73 95% CI 0·55–0·96; nominal p=0·025, which did not meet the required threshold for statistical significance p<0·0095; median overall survival was 29·8 months 95% CI 26·9–35·7 for those treated with olaparib vs 27·8 months 24·9–33·7 for those treated with placebo), and in patients with BRCA m (HR 0·62 95% CI 0·41–0·94 nominal p=0·025; 34·9 months 95% CI 29·2–54·6 vs 30·2 months 23·1–40·7). The overall survival data in patients with BRCA wild-type were HR 0·83 (95% CI 0·55–1·24, nominal p=0·37; 24·5 months 19·8–35·0 for those treated with olaparib vs 26·6 months 23·1–32·5 for those treated with placebo). 11 (15%) of 74 patients with BRCA m received maintenance olaparib for 5 years or more. Overall, common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib and placebo groups were fatigue (11 8% of 136 patients vs four 3% of 128) and anaemia (eight 6% vs one 1%). 30 (22%) of 136 patients in the olaparib group and 11 (9%) of 128 patients in the placebo group reported serious adverse events. In patients treated for 2 years or more, adverse events in the olaparib and placebo groups included low-grade nausea (24 75% of 32 patients vs two 40% of five), fatigue (18 56% of 32 vs two 40% of five), vomiting (12 38% of 32 vs zero), and anaemia (eight 25% of 32 vs one 20% of five); generally, events were initially reported during the first 2 years of treatment. Interpretation Despite not reaching statistical significance, patients with BRCA -mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy appeared to have longer overall survival, supporting the reported progression-free survival benefit. Clinically useful long-term exposure to olaparib was seen with no new safety signals. Taken together, these data support both the long-term clinical benefit and tolerability of maintenance olaparib in patients with BRCA -mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer. Funding AstraZeneca.
Primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking ...surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC-GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection.
To clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.
Primary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
TRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB-IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB-IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations.
Major inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB-IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy.
Overall survival.
772 patients.
Accrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024.
NCT02828618.
Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the survival effect of adjuvant therapy in stage II–III endometrial cancer based on peritoneal cytology results.
Methods
The National Cancer ...Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was retrospectively queried to examine 7467 women with stage II–III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, and with available peritoneal cytology results, from 2010 to 2016. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to assess the association between adjuvant therapy and all-cause mortality stratified by peritoneal cytology results.
Results
Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 1662 (22.3%) women and was associated with non-endometrioid histology, higher tumor stage, and nodal metastasis (
p
< 0.05). In a propensity score-weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with negative peritoneal cytology (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.23–1.48). Adjuvant therapy types varied based on histology and peritoneal cytology results. In non-endometrioid histology, the combination of chemotherapy and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) was associated with improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy or WPRT alone irrespective of the peritoneal cytology results (
p
< 0.05). The combination of chemotherapy and WPRT was also associated with improved overall survival in women with endometrioid histology and malignant peritoneal cytology (
p
= 0.026). Women with endometrioid histology and negative peritoneal cytology represented the most common subpopulation (46.5%), and overall survival was similar regardless of which of the three adjuvant therapy modalities was used (
p
= 0.319).
Conclusions
Malignant peritoneal cytology is prevalent and prognostic in stage II–III endometrial cancer. This study found that the surgeon’s choice and benefit of adjuvant therapy for women with stage II–III endometrial cancer differed depending on the status of peritoneal cytology.
Abstract Objective Since almost two decades standard 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has been a platinum/taxane combination. More recently, this general strategy has been ...challenged because different types of AOC may not benefit homogenously. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is one of the candidates in whom efficacy of standard chemotherapy should be revised. Methods This study is an exploratory case control study of the AGO-metadatabase of 4 randomized phase III trials with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy without any targeted therapy. Patients with advanced FIGO IIIB IV low-grade serous ovarian cancer were included and compared with control cases having high-grade serous AOC. Results Out of 5114 patients in this AGO database 145 (2.8%) had LGSOC and of those thirty-nine (24.1%) had suboptimal debulking with post-operative residual tumor > 1 cm, thus being eligible for response evaluation. An objective response was observed in only 10 patients and this 23.1% response rate (RR) was significantly lower compared to 90.1% RR in the control cohort of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) (p < 0.001). Both, LGSOC and HGSOC patients who underwent complete cytoreduction had significantly better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to those with residuals after primary surgery, accordingly (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our observation indicates that low-grade serous cancer is not as responsive to platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy as high-grade serous AOC. In contrast, surgical debulking showed a similar impact on outcome in both types of AOC thus indicating different roles for both standard treatment modalities. Systemic treatment of low grade serous AOC urgently warrants further investigations.
Summary Background Angiogenesis is a target in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Nintedanib, an oral triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGF receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and ...fibroblast growth factor receptor, has shown activity in phase 2 trials in this setting. We investigated the combination of nintedanib with standard carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Methods In this double-blind phase 3 trial, chemotherapy-naive patients (aged 18 years or older) with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIB–IV ovarian cancer and upfront debulking surgery were stratified by postoperative resection status, FIGO stage, and planned carboplatin dose. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive voice or web-based response system to receive six cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL per min or 6 mg/mL per min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 ) in addition to either 200 mg of nintedanib (nintedanib group) or placebo (placebo group) twice daily on days 2–21 of every 3-week cycle for up to 120 weeks. Patients, investigators, and independent radiological reviewers were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01015118. Findings Between Dec 9, 2009, and July 27, 2011, 1503 patients were screened and 1366 randomly assigned by nine study groups in 22 countries: 911 to the nintedanib group and 455 to the placebo group. 486 (53%) of 911 patients in the nintedanib group experienced disease progression or death compared with 266 (58%) of 455 in the placebo group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nintedanib group than in the placebo group (17·2 months 95% CI 16·6–19·9 vs 16·6 months 13·9–19·1; hazard ratio 0·84 95% CI 0·72–0·98; p=0·024). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (diarrhoea: nintedanib group 191 21% of 902 grade 3 and three <1% grade 4 vs placebo group nine 2% of 450 grade 3 only) and haematological (neutropenia: nintedanib group 180 20% grade 3 and 200 (22%) grade 4 vs placebo group 90 20% grade 3 and 72 16% grade 4; thrombocytopenia: 105 12% and 55 6% vs 21 5% and eight 2%; anaemia: 108 12% and 13 1% vs 26 6% and five 1%). Serious adverse events were reported in 376 (42%) of 902 patients in the nintedanib group and 155 (34%) of 450 in the placebo group. 29 (3%) of 902 patients in the nintedanib group experienced serious adverse events associated with death compared with 16 (4%) of 450 in the placebo group, including 12 (1%) in the nintedanib group and six (1%) in the placebo group with a malignant neoplasm progression classified as an adverse event by the investigator. Drug-related adverse events leading to death occurred in three patients in the nintedanib group (one without diagnosis of cause; one due to non-drug-related sepsis associated with drug-related diarrhoea and renal failure; and one due to peritonitis) and in one patient in the placebo group (cause unknown). Interpretation Nintedanib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is an active first-line treatment that significantly increases progression-free survival for women with advanced ovarian cancer, but is associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events. Future studies should focus on improving patient selection and optimisation of tolerability. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim.
PDF
