U radu se analizira problematika priznanja ženidbe (matrimonium) te s njom povezanih crkvenih odluka nastalih u Državi Vatikanskog Grada u RH. Najprije se općenito razlaže državni status i pravni ...poredak Države Vatikanskog Grada, uključujući i ured strok signenje ženidbenog prava, te se zatim posebno raščlanjuju praktični i teorijski aspekti priznanja ženidbe sklopljene u toj državi kao braka u RH. Nakon analize svih potencijalno relevantnih crkvenih odluka koje općenito mogu doći u obzir vezano uz ženidbu, rad se bavi pitanjem odluka o ženidbi iz Države Vatikanskog Grada u RH. S tim u vezi posebno je analiziran i problem primjene čl. 13. st. 4. Ugovora izmed strok signu Svete Stolice i Republike Hrvatske o pravnim pitanjima koji se dotiče pitanja priznanja učinaka odluka crkvenih sudova u RH. Rad je doprinos raspravi o suodnosu kanonskog prava i svjetovnog (civilnog) pravnog poretka s fokusom na hrvatsko pravo.
In this article the author analyses the problem of the philosophical background of the condictio claims in classical Roman law from three different aspects. First he deals with the issue of the ...apparent origins of the philosophical principles and concepts associated with condictio claims in sources such as ius naturale, aequitas, natura, etc. After dismissing the possibility of their postclassical origin, the focus of the analysis shifts to the possible influences of certain Greek philosophical schools on them, namely the Peripatetics and the Stoics. Finally, the actual reach of such influence is discussed.
Autor u radu analizira institut procuratoris revocatio iz Tripartita Stjepana Werböczyja, odnosno mogućnost opoziva odreðene radnje koju je poduzeo prokurator u sudskom procesu. Najprije izlaže samo ...ureðenje instituta u Tripartitu predstavljajući sve relevantne implikacije. Zatim daje pregledfunkcija koje su imali procesni zastupnici procurator i advocatus u rimskom pravu i rimskoj pravnoj tradiciji. Nakon toga bavi se opozivošću radnji tih zastupnika, posebno analizirajući revocatio (opoziv) u kontekstu procesnog zastupanja preko prokuratora te pravila o mogućnosti opoziva izjave advokata (error advocatorum) u rimskom pravu i rimsko-kanonskom procesu. Na tim temeljima naposljetku kritički vrednuje prisutnost rimske pravne tradicije u kontekstu instituta procuratoris revocatio u pravu Tripartita.
The author analyses the legis actio per condictionem procedure, as a basis for the development of unjustified enrichment claims (condictiones) in classical Roman law. He specifically deals with the ...origins of this procedure, which is still an unresolved issue in Romanist studies. He thoroughly analyses the basic characteristics of this procedure: the thirty-day time period (dies tricensimus) applied in the procedure and the usage of the terms condicere and condictio, upon which the name of this legis actio is based. Finally, he defines the terminological and conceptual interconnection of the legis actio per condictionem procedure with the ancient Roman procedure for a declaration of war, or the bellum iustum procedure. Due to certain common features of these two procedures, the author suggests a similar level of their immersion in the ancient Roman religious and legal concepts. That way, he contributes to the understanding of the origins of the legis actio per condictionem procedure, which in turn helps with the analysis of the unjustified enrichment claims (condictiones) in Roman law and its reception in general.
The first issue of the International Memorial Course Marko Petrak – Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems, organised by the Faculty of Law in Zagreb, was held at the Inter-University ...Centre in Dubrovnik from the 16th to 18th of October 2023. The course was organised in honour and memory of eminent professor and scholar, the late lamented Marko Petrak. The course was planned by the co-directors from different European universities (University of Zagreb; University of Trento; University of Warsaw; Jagiellonian University, Kraków; Autonomous University of Barcelona; University of Sarajevo), while the main organisers from the Faculty of Law in Zagreb were Professor Tomislav Karlović and Associate Professor Henrik-Riko Held. The course was attended by forty participants: students from various European countries (Slovenia, Poland, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, etc.) and eminent professors and scholars from various distinguished European universities and institutions (e.g. Trento, Torino, Ferrara, Macerata, Frankfurt am Main, Kraków, Warsaw, Ljubljana, etc.). The organizers and the participants were also joined by Marko Petrak’s mother, Professor Jelka Petrak (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb). During the course various topics were covered in three thematic blocks: Roman Legal Tradition, Methodology and Teaching of Roman Law in Contemporary World (first day), Roman Legal Issues (first and second day) and Medieval and Canon Law Contributions to the Roman Legal Tradition and vice versa (third day).
International Memorial Course Marko Petrak "Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems," held at the Inter-University Centre in Dubrovnik, Crotia, is discussed. The course was organized in ...honor and memory of eminent professor and scholar, the late lamented Marko Petrak. The course was planned by the co-directors from different European universities, while the main organizers from the Faculty of Law in Zagreb were Professor Tomislav Karlovie and Associate Professor Henrik-Riko Held. The course was attended by forty participants: students from various European countries and eminent professors and scholars from various distinguished European universities and institutions.
U ponedjeljak 17. siječnja 2022. godine, na tmuran i sumoran zimski dan, svega nekoliko mjeseci prije pedesetog rođendana, Marko Petrak napustio je ovaj svijet. Ovaj iznenadan i iznimno šokantan ...događaj snažno i bolno pogodio je mnoge – njegovu obitelj te zaista nebrojene prijatelje i kolege u cijeloj Hrvatskoj, od Zagreba do Konavala, ali i u cijeloj Europi i svijetu. U takvim trenucima riječi, zaista, kao ni tekstovi, ne mogu ni približno dočarati bol i težinu tog događaja za sve koji su ga poznavali i s njime živjeli ili surađivali. U korespondenciji koja je uslijedila neposredno nakon nemilog događaja s nekim njemu bliskim kolegama u inozemstvu mogu se istaknuti samo neki, možda teže prevodivi, izričaji koji su se koristili – am Boden zerstört ili perdita di equilibrio. No smrt je uvijek takva, a posebno kad nastupi, kako bi rekao otac Marka Petraka, veliki hrvatski pjesnik i akademik Nikica Petrak, koji nas je također nažalost napustio 2016. godine, “potpuno besmislena smrt iza ugla”. Naravno, kad umru veliki ljudi, velikani, kakav je nedvojbeno bio Marko Petrak, onda su bol i praznina na mnogim razinama utoliko veći. No Marko Petrak bio je mnogo više od velikog čovjeka. Naime, on je bio dobar čovjek. A dobri ljudi iza sebe ostavljaju dobra djela.
Odmah nakon diplomiranja na pravnom studiju upisao je poslijediplomski studij, koji je završio obranivši magistarski rad pod naslovom Error in substantia u rimskom pravu i suvremenom ugovornom pravu ...1997. godine. U tom smislu posebno se izdvaja njegov članak Rimsko pravo kao pozitivno pravo u Republici Hrvatskoj: prilog tumačenju Zakona о načinu primjene pravnih propisa donesenih prije 6. travnja 1941. godine.1 Ukratko, njegovi argumenti počivaju na tumačenju Zakona о načinu primjene pravnih propisa donesenih prije 6. travnja 1941. godine2 te Zakona o nevážnosti pravnih propisa donesenih prije 6. travnja 1941. godine i za vrijeme neprijateljske okupacije.3 Oba zakona predvid strok signaju poseban mehanizam za ispunjavanje pravnih praznina te uz ispunjenje odred strok signenih pretpostavki omogućuju suvremenu primjenu prava koje je vrijedilo na teritoriju suvremene RH prije Drugog svjetskog rata. Tako je, primjerice, Mladen Žuvela, poznati dugogodišnji sudac Vrhovnog i Ustavnog suda RH, na temelju navedene analize ustvrdio kako "...rimska pravna pravila mogu imati (imaju!) status izvora suvremenog hrvatskog pozitivnog prava".4 Na tom tragu Marko Petrák godinama je marljivo i temeljito istraživao sudsku praksu, domaću i med strok signunarodnu, te tamo pronalazio primjenu regula i terminologije pripadnih rimskom pravu te rimskoj i rimsko-kanonskoj pravnoj tradiciji. Navedenu analizu izdao je u jednom od najuglednijih romanističkih časopisa na svijetu Revue internationale des droits de l'antiquité.7 U istom kontekstu može se istaknuti njegova analiza u kojoj je liber Methodius, knjigu spomenutu u devetom poglavlju Ljetopisa popa Duklja nina, poistovjetio s Nomokanonom svetog Metoda (prva adaptacija i prijevod bizantskih zbirki kanonskog i civilnog prava na slavenski jezik) i u tom smislu ustvrdio kako su prvi kontakti Hrvata s rimskom pravnom tradicijom u srednjovjekovlju bili posljedica misionarskog djelovanja svetih Cirila i Metoda.8 S obzirom na ovako relevantne i izvorne doprinose, ne čudi što je Marko Petrák bio jedan od osnivača i poslije glavni tajnik Hrvatskog društva za bizantske studije te nacionalni predstavnik pri Med strok signunarodnoj asocijaciji za bizantske studije (International Association of Byzantine Stadies).
The author analyses bona fides, or possession in good faith, as a prerequisite of the canonical praescriptio acquisitiva and the adverse possession as set forth in contemporary Croatian law in their ...interrelationship. The problem stems from the fact that the Treaty between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia on legal matters, being an international treaty and thus having precedence over Croatian laws according to the Croatian constitution, in certain circumstances allows for a direct application of canon law within the Croatian legal system. The aim of this paper is to analyse whether this also applies to bona fides in adverse possession, and if so, in which way exactly. The canonical praescriptio in the context of the Roman legal tradition is analysed first in order to clarify certain terminological and conceptual discrepancies between canon law and Croatian law in this field. Bona fides regarding usucapio and praescriptio of Roman law and the Roman legal tradition is then particularly addressed. The central part of the paper deals with canonical bona fides, where it is specifically noted that it is a stricter standard in comparison to good faith as found in Croatian law. Canon law requires positive good faith throughout the whole required prescription period, meaning knowledge or a reasonable possibility of knowledge of having a right to possess, not infringing the right of another thereby. On the other hand, Croatian law requires knowledge or possibility of knowledge at the outset, while later on only acquired knowledge will render possession illicit. In addition, the Croatian standard of good faith is conceived more simply in comparison to the twofold canonical standard, i.e. only as the absence of knowledge or possibility of knowledge of not having a right to possess. Although both systems presume good faith, those differences may prove crucial if an interested party (owner of property being prescribed) offers evidence to the contrary. Finally, our analysis of the Treaty between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia on legal matters revealed that the canonical standard of bona fides should be applied whenever a juridical person of the Catholic Church in Croatia acquires property by means of adverse possession, but by all accounts also when any other person acquires Church property in the same way.
PDF
