Previous coronary artery bypass grafting increases predicted operative risk for conventional valve replacement, according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk algorithm. Additionally, the ...presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been demonstrated to increase procedural risk with conventional aortic valve replacement. Significant coexisting CAD requires preemptive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients under consideration for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study examined the impact of previous coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI on procedural outcomes and overall survival in patients having TAVI.
Two hundred and one high-risk patients were enrolled in two international feasibility studies from December 2005 to February 2008 for the treatment of aortic stenosis using TAVI. Thirty patients were excluded from analysis due to failure to successfully deploy the valve in the aortic annulus. Data were collected concurrently using an ad hoc database that included operative and long-term survival. Previous cardiovascular intervention prior to TAVI was used to identify the existence of concomitant CAD. Logistic regression along with Kaplan-Meier estimates were employed to establish the association between CAD and survival from TAVI.
Overall mortality after TAVI was significantly higher among the CAD group (35.7%) in contrast with the non-CAD patients (18.4%), p = 0.01. Logistic regression analysis found that patients who had CAD were 10.1 times more likely to die (95% confidence interval 2.1 to 174.8) within 30 days of the procedure than those who did not. Proportional hazards analysis established that the risk of dying at any point in time was 2.3 times higher among the patients with CAD (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 4.17). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrate improved long-term survival among patients without CAD.
Coexisting coronary artery disease negatively impacts procedural outcomes and long-term survival in patients undergoing TAVI, and implies that risk assessment and anticipated outcomes might be inaccurate due to stratification as isolated aortic valve replacement rather than AVR+CABG. Comparison of procedural outcomes, based on operative approach without controlling for unequal distribution of CAD in the cohorts, are likely invalid.
Objective Risk algorithms were used to identify a high-risk population for transcatheter aortic valve implantation instead of standard aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. We ...evaluated the efficacy of these methods for predicting outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Methods Data were collected on 638 patients identified as having isolated aortic valve replacement between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2006, using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. Long-term survival was determined from the Social Security Death Index or family contact. Operative risk was calculated using the STS Predicted Risk of Mortality, the EuroSCORE logistic and additive algorithms, and the Ambler Risk Score. Patients at or above the 90th percentile of risk (8.38% for STS, 33.47% for logistic, 12% for additive, 14.3% for Ambler) were identified as high risk. We then compared actual with predicted mortality and each algorithm’s ability to identify patients with the worst long-term survival. Results Operative mortality was 24 of 638 (3.76%). An additional 121 (19.0%) patients died during the follow-up study period (mean 4.2 ± 2.7 years). Overall mortality was 145 of 638 (22.7%). Expected versus observed mortality for the high-risk group by algorithm was 13.3% versus 18.8% for STS, 50.9% versus 15.6% for logistic, 14.0% versus 11.9% for additive, and 19.0% versus 13.4% by Ambler. Long-term mortality, per high-risk group, was 64.1% in the STS Predicted Risk of Mortality, 45.3% in the logistic, 45.2% in the additive, and 40.2% in Ambler Risk Score. Logistic regression showed that the STS algorithm was the most sensitive in defining the patients most at risk for long-term mortality. Conclusion The STS Predicted Risk of Mortality most accurately predicted perioperative and long-term mortality for the highest risk patients having aortic valve replacement.
Thirty-one states approved Medicaid expansion after implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Medicaid expansion on cardiac surgery volume ...and outcomes comparing one state that expanded to one that did not.
Data from the Virginia (nonexpansion state) Cardiac Services Quality Initiative and the Michigan (expanded Medicaid, April 2014) Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative were analyzed to identify uninsured and Medicaid patients undergoing coronary bypass graft or valve operations, or both. Demographics, operative details, predicted risk scores, and morbidity and mortality rates, stratified by state and compared across era (preexpansion: 18 months before vs postexpansion: 18 months after), were analyzed.
In Virginia, there were no differences in volume between eras, whereas in Michigan, there was a significant increase in Medicaid volume (54.4% 558 of 1,026 vs 84.1% 954 of 1,135, p < 0.001) and a corresponding decrease in uninsured volume. In Virginia Medicaid patients, there were no differences in predicted risk of morbidity or mortality or postoperative major morbidities. In Michigan Medicaid patients, a significant decrease in predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (11.9% 8.1% to 20.0% vs 11.1% 7.7% to 17.9%, p = 0.02) and morbidities (18.3% 102 of 558 vs 13.2% 126 of 954, p = 0.008) was identified. Postexpansion was associated with a decreased risk-adjusted rate of major morbidity (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.91; p = 0.01) in Michigan Medicaid patients.
Medicaid expansion was associated with fewer uninsured cardiac surgery patients and improved predicted risk scores and morbidity rates. In addition to improving health care financing, Medicaid expansion may positively affect patient care and outcomes.
Expanding therapies for aortic stenosis have focused on high-risk and inoperable patients, suggesting that an evaluation of outcomes of conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR and coronary ...artery bypass grafting (CABG) is timely and warranted.
Outcomes for 6,270 AVR (3,487) or AVR/CABG (2,783) procedures performed in Michigan (2008-2011) were analyzed using a statewide cardiothoracic surgical database. Hospital and surgeon volume-outcome relationships were assessed.
Independent predictors of early mortality (all p < 0.05) included age, female sex, predicted risk of mortality, and hospital volume, with a hinge point of a 4-year volume of 390 procedures (high-volume hospital HVH, 2.41% versus low-volume hospital LVH, 4.34%; p < 0.001). At this hinge point, observed to expected ratio (O/E) for operative mortality after AVR was lower in HVHs for patients with a predicted risk of mortality (PRoM) greater than 4.7%. In contrast, no surgeon-volume outcome relationship was identified, even when stratified by preoperative patient-risk profile. With respect to other measures, HVHs reported lower rates of prolonged ventilation (24.9% versus LVH, 30.9%; p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (46.1% versus LVH, 59.0%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (6.6% versus LVH, 9.0%; p = 0.01), and multisystem organ failure (0.7% versus LVH, 1.8%; p = 0.012).
This population-based analysis suggests that volume-outcome relationships exist for AVR. The predominant effect on mortality appears based on the setting of the procedure and occurs primarily in the high-risk patient. These results provide an opportunity to review approaches for high-risk patients undergoing AVR, including resource availability and system experience as the spectrum of treatment options expands to transcatheter therapies.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive algorithms can be used to help patients understand the risks in having a surgical procedure. However, elderly patients are frequently more concerned about ...the quality of their remaining life and whether they will return home. Currently, we have no predictors of which patients are likely to return to independent living after surgery. We followed patients discharged home or to an extended care facility to determine which patients were most likely to return home and be alive at one year.
This single-hospital, retrospective study followed 590 cardiac surgery patients (January 2008 to December 2009) for at least 1 year after discharge. Follow-up data were collected by contacting facilities, patients, and families, and Social Security Death Index searches.
At hospital discharge, 84.4% went home, 3.7% to rehab, 7.5% to skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and 4.4% to a long-term acute care facility (LTAC). Predictors for facility discharge include increasing age, female, dialysis, emergent status, procedures other than CAB, preoperative stroke, and moderate to severe tricuspid insufficiency. The most significant predictors of dying or still being in a facility at 1 year include being on dialysis, right heart failure, and having chronic lung disease. Considering perioperative complications, requiring prolonged ventilation decreases the odds of being home and alive at 1 year by 67%: one-year survival at home, 95.4%; rehabilitation, 63.6%; SNF, 52.3%; and LTAC, 30.8%.
Many patients discharged to extended care do not return to their previous lifestyle; only 30.8% of those requiring care in a LTAC facility are alive at home at 1 year.
In the setting of a statewide quality collaborative approach to the review of cardiac surgical mortalities in intensive care units (ICUs), variations in complication-related outcomes became apparent. ...Utilizing "failure to rescue" methodology (FTR; the probability of death after a complication), we compared FTR rates after adult cardiac surgery in low, medium, and high mortality centers from a voluntary, 33-center quality collaborative.
We identified 45,904 patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2010. The 33 centers were ranked according to observed-to-expected ratios for mortality and were categorized into 3 equal groups. We then compared rates of complications and FTR.
Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.6%, ranging from 1.5% in the low-mortality group to 3.6% in the high group. The rate of 17 complications ranged from 19.1% in the low group to 22.9% in the high group while FTR rates were 6.6% in the low group, 10.4% in the medium group, and 13.5% in the high group (p < 0.001). The FTR rate was significantly better in the low mortality group for the majority of complications (11 of 17) with the most significant findings for cardiac arrest, dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and pneumonia.
Low mortality hospitals have superior ability to rescue patients from complications after cardiac surgery procedures. Outcomes review incorporating a collaborative multi-hospital approach can provide an ideal opportunity to review processes that anticipate and manage complications in the ICU and help recognize and share "differentiators" in care.
In the past decade, minimally invasive approaches have been developed for aortic valve surgery. We reviewed our data to determine if the use of the PORT ACCESS technique has improved hospital ...morbidity and mortality.
Data were collected on 90 patients who had a replacement of their aortic valve using PORT ACCESS procedures (PORT ACCESS aortic valve replacement PAVR). This group was then matched 1:4 to a control group having aortic valve replacement surgery using a standard sternotomy approach.
The two groups had no statistically significant differences in preoperative risk factors. The perioperative and 30-day outcomes from the matched AVR and PAVR groups showed no mortalities in the PAVR group and 3.1% in the AVR group. Mean length of stay was shorter for PAVR patients (7.2 +/- 5.0 days; median 6 days) compared with the mean stay in the sternotomy group (8.5 +/- 9.5 days; median 6 days), PAVR patients also had statistically significant shorter intensive care unit stays, and time on ventilator. The number of patients needing ventilator support postoperatively was significantly lower in the PORT ACCESS group. Cross-clamp and perfusion times were longer in the PAVR group. No other morbidity was significantly different between groups, except for postoperative tamponade (higher in PAVR group).
In this analysis of matched patients, the patients having aortic valve replacement using PORT ACCESS procedures, spent a shorter time in the intensive care unit and had less need for postoperative ventilator usage (both number of patients using a ventilator and the mean time of use) in comparison with patients undergoing conventional sternotomy.
A volume-outcome association has been shown for cardiovascular procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting. The association of a volume-outcome relationship for aortic valve replacement ...procedures, however, has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the influence of surgeon volume on operative outcomes with isolated aortic valve replacement and aortic valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
One thousand six hundred thirty-five patients were identified as having either isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. Patients were divided into three equal terciles using their Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality scores. Data were retrieved on 14 surgeons with complete data records in our Society of Thoracic Surgery database covering a minimum 5-year period (mean, 8.9 ± 1.5 years; median, 10 years).
Clinically significant increases are seen in operative mortality, permanent stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay in the high-risk compared with low-risk groups. The low-risk patient group has the smallest observed to expected ratio, less than 50%, whereas in the high-risk group the ratio is greater than 1. Odds ratios demonstrate that as surgeon volume increases, outcomes improve correspondingly (ie, odds ratio <1). In low-risk patients, five of ten major complications demonstrated improved outcomes with increased surgeon volume; in medium and high-risk groups eight of ten were improved.
Surgeon volumes have a significant influence on operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting.
Background Advances in technology such as epicardial bipolar radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation, ganglionated plexi identification, and isolation and thoracoscopic left atrial appendage ...exclusion have enabled less invasive surgical options for management of atrial fibrillation. Methods We performed a prospective, nonrandomized study of consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing a video-assisted, minimally invasive surgical ablation procedure. The procedure consisted of bilateral, epicardial pulmonary vein isolation with bipolar radiofrequency, partial autonomic denervation, and selective excision of the left atrial appendage. Minimum follow-up was 1 year with long-term monitoring (24-hour continuous, 14-day event or pacemaker interrogation). Results Between March 2005 and January 2008, 52 patients (35 male), mean age 60.3 years (range, 42–79 years) underwent the procedure. The left atrial appendage was isolated in 88.0% (44/50). Average hospital stay was 5.2 days (range 3–10 days). There were no operative deaths or major adverse cardiac events. On long-term monitoring, freedom from atrial fibrillation/flutter/tachycardia was 86.3% (44/51) and 80.8% (42/52) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Antiarrhythmic drugs were stopped in 33 of 37 patients and warfarin in 30 of 37 of the patients in whom ablation was successful at 12 months. Freedom from symptoms attributed to atrial fibrillation/flutter/tachycardia was 78.0% (39/50) at 6 months and 63.8% (30/47) at 12 months. Conclusions Minimally invasive surgical ablation is effective in the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as evidenced by freedom from atrial arrythmias by long-term monitoring at 12 months. Measuring success using clinical symptoms underestimated clinical success as compared with long-term monitoring.
Because nonagenarians with aortic stenosis (AS) often present as frail with more comorbid conditions, long-term outcomes and quality of life are important treatment considerations. The aim of this ...report is to describe survival and functional outcomes of nonagenarians undergoing treatment for AS by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
This is a retrospective analysis of all patients aged 90 years or more undergoing treatment for AS between 2007 and 2013 at two centers. Outcomes were compared between SAVR and TAVR. Long-term survival was compared with an age- and sex-matched population from the Social Security Actuarial Life Table.
In all, 110 patients underwent treatment for isolated AS (20 SAVR and 90 TAVR). Mean age was 91.85 ± 1.80 years, and 50.9% were female. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons mean predicted risk of mortality was 11.11% ± 5.74%. Operative mortality was 10.9% (10.0% SAVR; 11.1% TAVR); 2.7% of patients had a stroke. The TAVR patients were more likely to be discharged home (75.9% versus 55.6% for SAVR, p = 0.032). Mean follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.5 years, with a 1-year and 5-year survival of 78.7% and 45.3%, respectively, which approximated the US actuarial survival. There was a significant improvement in quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 1 year compared with baseline.
Treatment of AS approximates natural life expectancy in select nonagenarians, with no significant difference in long-term survival between SAVR and TAVR. Importantly, patient quality of life improved at 1 year. With appropriate selection, nonagenarians with severe AS can benefit from treatment.
PDF
