BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV)–6/11/16/18 vaccine reduces the risk of HPV-6/11/16/18–related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1–3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Here, its impact on ...CIN1–3/AIS associated with nonvaccine oncogenic HPV types was evaluated MethodsWe enrolled 17,622 women aged 16–26 years. All underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Pap testing at regular intervals for up to 4 years. HPV genotying was performed for biopsy samples, and histological diagnoses were determined by a pathology panel. Analyses were conducted among subjects who were negative for 14 HPV types on day 1. Prespecified analyses included infection of ⩾6 months’ duration and CIN1–3/AIS due to the 2 and 5 most common HPV types in cervical cancer after HPV types 16 and 18, as well as all tested nonvaccine types ResultsVaccination reduced the incidence of HPV-31/45 infection by 40.3% (95% confidence interval CI, 13.9% to 59.0%) and of CIN1–3/AIS by 43.6% (95% CI, 12.9% to 64.1%), respectively. The reduction in HPV-31/33/45/52/58 infection and CIN1–3/AIS was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.0% to 40.9%) and 29.2% (95% CI, 8.3% to 45.5%), respectively. Efficacy for CIN2–3/AIS associated with the 10 nonvaccine HPV types was 32.5% (95% CI, 6.0% to 51.9%). Reductions were most notable for HPV-31 ConclusionsHPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine reduced the risk of CIN2–3/AIS associated with nonvaccine types responsible for ∼20% of cervical cancers. The clinical benefit of cross-protection is not expected to be fully additive to the efficacy already observed against HPV-6/11/16/18–related disease, because women may have >1 CIN lesion, each associated with a different HPV type Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00092521, NCT00092534, and NCT00092482
BackgroundWe evaluated the impact of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine on infection and cervical disease related to 10 nonvaccine HPV types (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and ...59) associated with >20% of cervical cancers. The population evaluated included HPV-naive women and women with preexisting HPV infection and/or HPV-related disease at enrollment MethodsPhase 3 efficacy studies enrolled 17,622 women aged 16–26 years. Subjects underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Pap testing on day 1 and then at 6–12-month intervals for up to 4 years. HPV typing was performed on samples from enrollment and follow-up visits, including samples obtained for diagnosis or treatment of HPV-related disease. All subjects who received ⩾1 dose and returned for follow-up were included ResultsVaccination reduced the rate of HPV-31/33/45/52/58 infection by 17.7% (95% confidence interval CI, 5.1% to 28.7%) and of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1–3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) by 18.8% (95% CI, 7.4% to 28.9%). Vaccination also reduced the rate of HPV-31/58/59–related CIN1–3/AIS by 26.0% (95% CI, 6.7% to 41.4%), 28.1% (95% CI, 5.3% to 45.6%), and 37.6% (95% CI, 6.0% to 59.1%), respectively. Although a modest reduction in HPV-31/33/45/52/58–related CIN2 or worse was observed, the estimated reduction was not statistically significant ConclusionsThese cross-protection results complement the vaccine’s prophylactic efficacy against disease associated with HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18. Long-term monitoring of vaccinated populations are needed to fully ascertain the population-based impact and public health significance of these findings Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00092521, NCT00092534, and NCT00092482
Objectives To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine in preventing low grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasias and anogenital ...warts (condyloma acuminata).Design Data from two international, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised efficacy trials of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (protocol 013 (FUTURE I) and protocol 015 (FUTURE II)). The trials were to be 4 years in length, and the results reported are from final study data of 42 months’ follow-up.Setting Primary care centres and university or hospital associated health centres in 24 countries and territories around the world.Participants 17 622 women aged 16-26 years enrolled between December 2001 and May 2003. Major exclusion criteria were lifetime number of sexual partners (>4), history of abnormal cervical smear test results, and pregnancy.Intervention Three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (for serotypes 6, 11, 16, and 18) or placebo at day 1, month 2, and month 6.Main outcome measures Vaccine efficacy against cervical, vulvar, and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade I and condyloma in a per protocol susceptible population that included subjects who received all three vaccine doses, tested negative for the relevant vaccine HPV types at day 1 and remained negative through month 7, and had no major protocol violations. Intention to treat, generally HPV naive, and unrestricted susceptible populations were also studied.Results In the per protocol susceptible population, vaccine efficacy against lesions related to the HPV types in the vaccine was 96% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (95% confidence interval 91% to 98%), 100% for both vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (95% CIs 74% to 100%, 64% to 100% respectively), and 99% for condyloma (96% to 100%). Vaccine efficacy against any lesion (regardless of HPV type) in the generally naive population was 30% (17% to 41%), 75% (22% to 94%), and 48% (10% to 71%) for cervical, vulvar, and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade I, respectively, and 83% (74% to 89%) for condyloma.Conclusions Quadrivalent HPV vaccine provided sustained protection against low grade lesions attributable to vaccine HPV types (6, 11, 16, and 18) and a substantial reduction in the burden of these diseases through 42 months of follow-up.Trial registrations NCT00092521 and NCT00092534.
Background The impact of the prophylactic vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (HPV6/11/16/18) on all HPV-associated genital disease was investigated in a population ...that approximates sexually naive women in that they were “negative to 14 HPV types” and in a mixed population of HPV-exposed and -unexposed women (intention-to-treat group). Methods This analysis studied 17 622 women aged 15–26 years who were enrolled in one of two randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy trials for the HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine (first patient on December 28, 2001, and studies completed July 31, 2007). Vaccine or placebo was given at day 1, month 2, and month 6. All women underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing at day 1 and every 6–12 months thereafter. Outcomes were any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; any external anogenital and vaginal lesions; Pap test abnormalities; and procedures such as colposcopy and definitive therapy. Absolute rates are expressed as women with endpoint per 100 person-years at risk. Results The average follow-up was 3.6 years (maximum of 4.9 years). In the population that was negative to 14 HPV types, vaccination was up to 100% effective in reducing the risk of HPV16/18-related high-grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal lesions and of HPV6/11-related genital warts. In the intention-to-treat group, vaccination also statistically significantly reduced the risk of any high-grade cervical lesions (19.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.43, rate placebo = 1.76, difference = 0.33, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.13 to 0.54), vulvar and vaginal lesions (50.7% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.10, rate placebo = 0.20, difference = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.16), genital warts (62.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.44, rate placebo = 1.17, difference = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.87), Pap abnormalities (11.3% reduction; rate vaccine = 10.36, rate placebo = 11.68, difference = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.90), and cervical definitive therapy (23.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.97, rate placebo = 2.56, difference = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.83), irrespective of causal HPV type. Conclusions High-coverage HPV vaccination programs among adolescents and young women may result in a rapid reduction of genital warts, cervical cytological abnormalities, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In the longer term, substantial reductions in the rates of cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancers may follow.
Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been shown to provide protection from HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical, vaginal, and vulvar disease through 3 years. We provide an update on the ...efficacy of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine against high-grade cervical, vaginal, and vulvar lesions based on end-of-study data from three clinical trials. Additionally, we stratify vaccine efficacy by several baseline characteristics, including age, smoking status, and Papanicolaou (Pap) test results. A total of 18,174 females ages 16 to 26 years were randomized and allocated into one of three clinical trials (protocols 007, 013, and 015). Vaccine or placebo was given at baseline, month 2, and month 6. Pap testing was conducted at regular intervals. Cervical and anogenital swabs were collected for HPV DNA testing. Examination for the presence of vulvar and vaginal lesions was also done. Endpoints included high-grade cervical, vulvar, or vaginal lesions (CIN 2/3, VIN 2/3, or VaIN 2/3). Mean follow-up time was 42 months post dose 1. Vaccine efficacy against HPV 6/11/16/18-related high-grade cervical lesions in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations was 98.2% 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 93.3-99.8 and 51.5% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6), respectively. Vaccine efficacy against HPV 6/11/16/18-related high-grade vulvar and vaginal lesions in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations was 100.0% (95% CI, 82.6-100.0) and 79.0% (95% CI, 56.4-91.0), respectively. Efficacy in the intention-to-treat population tended to be lower in older women, women with more partners, and women with abnormal Pap test results. The efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against high-grade cervical and external anogenital neoplasia remains high through 42 months post vaccination.
Abstract The efficacy of the quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is thought to be mediated by humoral immunity. We evaluated the correlation between quadrivalent HPV vaccine-induced serum ...anti-HPV responses and efficacy. 17,622 women were vaccinated at day 1, and months 2 and 6. At day 1 and at 6–12 months intervals for up to 48 months, subjects underwent Papanicolaou and genital HPV testing. No immune correlate of protection could be found due to low number of cases. Although 40% of vaccine subjects were anti-HPV 18 seronegative at end-of-study, efficacy against HPV 18-related disease remained high (98.4%; 95% CI: 90.5–100.0) despite high attack rates in the placebo group. These results suggest vaccine-induced protection via immune memory, or lower than detectable HPV 18 antibody titers.
The current recommended infant vaccination schedules require many injections at multiple sites, which increase stress for infants and parents and may create challenges to vaccination compliance. ...Therefore, combination vaccines, which reduce the number of injections at each medical visit, can be an essential method to improve compliance. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational, liquid, hexavalent, pediatric vaccine at 2, 4, 6, and 12–14 months of age. In this multicenter, open-label controlled study, 756 infants were randomized in approximately equal numbers to receive 0.5mL intramuscular dose of diptheria–tetanus–pertussis–polio–Haemophilus influenzae type b+hepatitis B vaccine, or 1 of 3 double-blind investigational formulations. All formulations included a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) concentration of 10μg/0.5mL. The three hexavalent vaccine formulations used in this study contained either Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus toxoid PRP–T, 12μg or Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex PRP–OPMC, 3μg or 6μg): a minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate for each antigen was defined by the lower limit of a 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited vaccine-related injection-site reactions (pain, erythema, swelling) with increasing PRP–OMPC dose. No serious vaccine-related AEs were reported in the investigational groups. Both PRP–OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and poliovirus. The PRP–T formulation met the acceptability criterion for antibody responses to all antigens other than PRP at postdose 3. Postdose 4 responses were adequate for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well-tolerated. Both PRP–OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria of PRP–OMPC evaluation.
Background. A quadrivalent (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 virus-like-particle (VLP) vaccine has been shown to be 95%–100% effective in preventing cervical and genital disease ...related to HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18 in 16–26-year-old women naive for HPV vaccine types. Because most women in the general population are sexually active, some will have already been infected with ⩾1 HPV vaccine types at the time vaccination is offered. Here, we assessed whether such infected women are protected against disease caused by the remaining HPV vaccine types. Methods. Two randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the quadrivalent (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) HPV vaccine enrolled 17,622 women without consideration of baseline HPV status. Among women infected with 1–3 HPV vaccine types at enrollment, efficacy against genital disease related to the HPV vaccine type or types for which subjects were naive was assessed. Results. Vaccination was 100% effective (95% confidence interval CI, 79%–100%) in preventing incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 or cervical adenocarcinoma in situ caused by the HPV type or types for which the women were negative at enrollment. Efficacy for preventing vulvar or vaginal HPV-related lesions was 94% (95% CI, 81%–99%). Conclusions. Among women positive for 1–3 HPV vaccine types before vaccination, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine protected against neoplasia caused by the remaining types. These results support vaccination of the general population without prescreening.
Abstract Combination vaccines improve parental and provider satisfaction and schedule compliance by decreasing the number of injections. In a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, we ...compared four formulations of a liquid, hexavalent diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–inactivated poliovirus– Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate–hepatitis B virus (DTaP–IPV–Hib–HBV) vaccine in 708 infants immunized at 2, 3, 4, and 12–14 months of age. The formulations contained identical DTaP and IPV components, differing in the contents of Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus-toxoid PRP-T, 12 μg or Neisseria meningitidis outer-membrane-protein-complex PRP-OMPC, 3 μg or 6 μg), and in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg, 10 μg or 15 μg). A minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited injection-site reactions (pain, redness, swelling) with increasing PRP-OMPC and HBsAg concentration. Serious AEs reported by eight subjects were not considered to be vaccine related. All PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for postdose 3 immunogenicity for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Apart from the Hib response, the postdose 3 responses obtained with the PRP-T formulation met the acceptability criterion for each antigen. Postdose 4 responses were acceptable for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well tolerated. The three PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria, and the one with the lowest PRP-OMPC concentration was selected for further optimization of immunogenicity.
In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL/SILGARD) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the ...vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed.
18,174 women were enrolled into 3 clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for >or=1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing, and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment.
Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrolment.
These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences.
PDF
