The cellular replicative DNA polymerases cannot initiate DNA synthesis without a priming 3′ OH. During DNA replication, this is supplied in the context of a short RNA primer molecule synthesized by ...DNA primase. The primase of archaea and eukaryotes, despite having varying subunit compositions, share sequence and structural homology. Intriguingly, archaeal primase has been demonstrated to possess the ability to synthesize DNA de novo, a property shared with the eukaryotic PrimPol enzymes. The dual RNA and DNA synthetic capabilities of the archaeal DNA primase have led to the proposal that there may be a sequential hand-off between these synthetic modes of primase. In the current work, we dissect the functional interplay between DNA and RNA synthetic modes of primase. In addition, we determine the key determinants that govern primer length definition by the archaeal primase. Our results indicate a primer measuring system that functions akin to a caliper.
DNA replication depends on primase, the specialised polymerase responsible for synthesis of the RNA primers that are elongated by the replicative DNA polymerases. In eukaryotic and archaeal ...replication, primase is a heterodimer of two subunits, PriS and PriL. Recently, a third primase subunit named PriX was identified in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. PriX is essential for primer synthesis and is structurally related to the Fe-S cluster domain of eukaryotic PriL. Here we show that PriX contains a nucleotide-binding site required for primer synthesis, and demonstrate equivalence of nucleotide-binding residues in PriX with eukaryotic PriL residues that are known to be important for primer synthesis. A primase chimera, where PriX is fused to a truncated version of PriL lacking the Fe-S cluster domain retains wild-type levels of primer synthesis. Our evidence shows that PriX has replaced PriL as the subunit that endows primase with the unique ability to initiate nucleic acid synthesis. Importantly, our findings reveal that the Fe-S cluster is not required for primer synthesis.
A dynamic multi-protein assembly known as the replisome is responsible for DNA synthesis in eukaryotic cells. In yeast, the hub protein Ctf4 bridges DNA helicase and DNA polymerase and recruits ...factors with roles in metabolic processes coupled to DNA replication. An important question in DNA replication is the extent to which the molecular architecture of the replisome is conserved between yeast and higher eukaryotes. Here, we describe the biochemical basis for the interaction of the human CTF4-orthologue AND-1 with DNA polymerase α (Pol α)/primase, the replicative polymerase that initiates DNA synthesis. AND-1 has maintained the trimeric structure of yeast Ctf4, driven by its conserved SepB domain. However, the primary interaction of AND-1 with Pol α/primase is mediated by its C-terminal HMG box, unique to mammalian AND-1, which binds the B subunit, at the same site targeted by the SV40 T-antigen for viral replication. In addition, we report a novel DNA-binding activity in AND-1, which might promote the correct positioning of Pol α/primase on the lagging-strand template at the replication fork. Our findings provide a biochemical basis for the specific interaction between two critical components of the human replisome, and indicate that important principles of replisome architecture have changed significantly in evolution.
Eukaryotic ribosome assembly involves a plethora of factors, which ensure that a correctly folded ribosome contains all ribosomal protein components. Among these assembly factors, Yar1 has recently ...emerged as a molecular chaperone for ribosomal protein rpS3 of the small ribosomal subunit (40S) in yeast. In complex with its chaperone, rpS3 is imported into the nucleus and protected from aggregation. How rpS3 and other ribosomal proteins are initially sequestered and subsequently integrated into pre-ribosomal particles is currently poorly understood. Here, we present the crystal structure of yeast rpS3 in complex with its chaperone Yar1 at 2.8Å resolution. The crystal structure rationalizes how Yar1 can protect rpS3 from aggregation while facilitating nuclear import and suggests a mechanism for a stepwise exchange of molecular partners that ribosomal proteins interact with during ribosome assembly.
Display omitted
•Yar1 is a molecular chaperone of ribosomal protein rpS3.•The structure of ribosomal protein rpS3 in complex with Yar1 is described.•The binding site of Yar1 overlaps with those of ribosomal proteins.•The nuclear localization signal of rpS3 is exposed upon binding of Yar1.•The mechanism by which Yar1 protects rpS3 and mediates nuclear import was revealed.
Regions of the genome with the potential to form secondary DNA structures pose a frequent and significant impediment to DNA replication and must be actively managed in order to preserve genetic and ...epigenetic integrity. How the replisome detects and responds to secondary structures is poorly understood. Here, we show that a core component of the fork protection complex in the eukaryotic replisome, Timeless, harbours in its C‐terminal region a previously unappreciated DNA‐binding domain that exhibits specific binding to G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA structures. We show that this domain contributes to maintaining processive replication through G4‐forming sequences, and exhibits partial redundancy with an adjacent PARP‐binding domain. Further, this function of Timeless requires interaction with and activity of the helicase DDX11. Loss of both Timeless and DDX11 causes epigenetic instability at G4‐forming sequences and DNA damage. Our findings indicate that Timeless contributes to the ability of the replisome to sense replication‐hindering G4 formation and ensures the prompt resolution of these structures by DDX11 to maintain processive DNA synthesis.
Synopsis
How eukaryotic replisomes detect and respond to DNA secondary structures is poorly understood. Here, cooperation of the fork protection complex subunit Timeless and the helicase DDX11 is found to bind and resolve G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA during replication.
Timeless, a core component of the replisome, contains a C‐terminal DNA binding domain with specificity for G4 secondary structures.
The DNA‐binding domain acts in partial redundancy with an adjacent PARP‐binding domain to maintain processive replication through G4s.
The ability of Timeless to maintain replication through G4s requires interaction with the DDX11 helicase.
Loss of Timeless or DDX11 leads to G4‐associated epigenetic instability and DNA damage
Cooperation of a helicase and a component of the fork protection complex allows eukaryotic replisomes to detect and respond to DNA secondary structures.
Nucleoside analogues are widely used in clinical practice as chemotherapy drugs. Arabinose nucleoside derivatives such as fludarabine are effective in the treatment of patients with acute and chronic ...leukemias and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Although nucleoside analogues are generally known to function by inhibiting DNA synthesis in rapidly proliferating cells, the identity of their in vivo targets and mechanism of action are often not known in molecular detail. Here we provide a structural basis for arabinose nucleotide-mediated inhibition of human primase, the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase responsible for initiation of DNA synthesis in DNA replication. Our data suggest ways in which the chemical structure of fludarabine could be modified to improve its specificity and affinity toward primase, possibly leading to less toxic and more effective therapeutic agents.
Human Timeless is involved in replication fork stabilization, S-phase checkpoint activation and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. In the cell, Timeless forms a constitutive heterodimeric ...complex with Tipin. Here we present the 1.85 Å crystal structure of a large N-terminal segment of human Timeless, spanning amino acids 1-463, and we show that this region of human Timeless harbours a partial binding site for Tipin. Furthermore, we identify minimal regions of the two proteins that are required for the formation of a stable Timeless-Tipin complex and provide evidence that the Timeless-Tipin interaction is based on a composite binding interface comprising different domains of Timeless.
PDF
