Entecavir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis D Kabaçam, Gökhan; Önder, F. Oğuz; Yakut, Mustafa ...
Clinical infectious diseases,
09/2012, Letnik:
55, Številka:
5
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Background. Hepatitis D virus (HDV) requires hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) to propagate infection and cause disease. Entecavir is a nucleoside analog with potent antiviral efficacy, and in the ...woodchuck animal model it also decreased hepatitis B virus (HBV) cccDNA and woodchuck surface antigen. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of entecavir in chronic hepatitis D (CHD). Methods. This single-center study was conducted in patients with compensated liver disease. All patients had to have detectable hepatitis HDV RNA and elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Entecavir was given at a dosage of 1 mg/d for 1 year. The primary end point was achievement of undetectable HDV RNA at the end of treatment. Results. Thirteen consecutive patients were assessed. All patients had detectable HDV RNA, and 8 had detectable HBV DNA at baseline. At the end of treatment, HBV DNA became undetectable in all patients (P = .001). No significant decline in HDV RNA, ALT, or quantitative HBsAg levels was observed. The primary end point of undetectable HDV RNA at the end of treatment was achieved in 3 patients who had significantly lower baseline HDV RNA levels than nonresponders (2.99 log10 copies/mL ± .70 vs 4.68 ± .97; P = .0185). In all 3 patients, ALT levels were also normal at the end of treatment. Conclusions. One year of entecavir treatment is ineffective in CHD. Any generalized beneficial effect of nucleoside/nucleotide analog treatment may necessitate prolonged treatment. Patients with CHD with HBV dominance, which is likely to occur in the later phases of CHD, may be a reasonable patient cohort in which to target nucleoside/nucleotide analog therapy.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for individuals with chronic liver disease. However, the response to standard doses of hepatitis B vaccines in such individuals has been poor. The ...aim of the present study was to assess the response to high‐dose short‐interval HBV vaccination in individuals with chronic liver disease of different aetiologies. A total two hundred and 24 subjects with chronic liver disease (138 chronic active hepatitis and 86 cirrhosis) and 26 healthy controls were vaccinated using a high‐dose (40 μg) short‐interval (monthly for 3 consecutive months) HBV vaccination schedule.
One hundred and thirty‐eight of the 224 subjects with chronic liver disease (62%) seroconverted to anti‐HBs antibody positivity (>10 mIU/mL) after the third dose of vaccine as compared with 24 of the 26 controls (92%) (P < 0.01). The response rate was reduced in individuals with cirrhosis (36/86, 42%), particularly in alcohol‐induced cirrhosis (2/17, 12%), as compared with individuals with chronic hepatitis (102/138, 74%) (P < 0.001). No significant HBV vaccination‐related adverse effects were seen in individuals with or without cirrhosis as well as in the controls.
High‐dose short‐interval HBV vaccination is safe and efficacious in individuals with chronic liver disease. The response to HBV vaccination is reduced in cirrhotics, particularly those with alcoholic cirrhosis. These data suggest that HBV vaccination should be accomplished early in an individual cause of chronic liver disease prior to the development of cirrhosis.