Povsem drugacen pogled v prihodnost je seznam avtorjev, ki naj bi dobili svoje zbrano delo. Navedenih je 7 imen, ne da bi bila dodana kaksna utemeljitev. V Izhodiscih je zapisano zgolj: »Zbirka naj ...ohrani temeljne konceptualne znacilnosti, ki so ji bile dolocene ze ob zacetku, vendar naj ob tem odpravi morebitna vsebinska neravnovesja, tudi iz starejsih obdobij slovenske knjizevnosti« (Matija Ogrin 2011: 1). Z Janezom Damascenom Devom je pomaknjen zacetek izbiranja avtorjev proti sredini 18. stoletja. Ali je primerljiv s premikom od Vodnika k Linhartu, ki se je zgodil med Prijateljevim in Ocvirkovim izbiranjem najstarejsega avtorja, je vprasanje brez nedvoumnega odgovora, a zanimanje za barok kot obdobje, ko je bilo del obilja tudi kopicenje vednosti, se povecuje v zadnjih desetletjih. Manj prepricljiva oz. nujna je uvrstitev Urbana Jarnika, ce naj bi bila z njegovim opusom uravnotezena podoba prve polovice 19. stoletja v slovenski knjizevnosti. V seznamu slovenskih pesnikov in pisateljev, ki sta ga leta 1866 objavila Stritar in Jurcic v Slovenskem glasniku kot del napovedi za zbirko Klasje, ni omenjen, so pa omenjeni ustvarjalci, ki doslej se niso dobili svojega zbranega dela: Koseski, Cegnar, Erjavec, Trstenjak, Toman, Valjavec in Vilhar (Prijatelj 4, 1961: 153). Antoloski izbor iz del vseh teh ustvarjalcev bi bil upravicen v knjiznici Kondor, za kaj vec pa po danasnji presoji najbrz ni razloga. Preostalih 5 na novo uvrscenih avtorjev je objavljalo v 20. stoletju, za katero se ni dokoncano oblikovanje kanona in se ni mozno soglasje o reprezentativnih ustvarjalcih leposlovja (Darko Dolinar 2006: 7). Za znanstveno izdajo sta pomembni se dve omejitvi: z avtorsko zascito povezan dostop do objavljenih del in do zapuscine in razpolozljivost vzporednih besedil, zlasti pisem in drugega avtobiografskega gradiva, brez katerega bi bile Opombe v tej zbirki ob velik del svoje tehtnosti. Izbiranje avtorjev je kot vsako vrednotenje ideoloski poseg. Zato se z nekoliko odmaknjenega, danasnjega gledisca zdi povsem smiselno, da druga zalozba uvrsti v svoj program zanjo sprejemljive avtorje in jih objavi v urednisko domisljenih izda jah, po tej plati primerljivih z izdajami v zbirki Zbrana dela. Prej se zdi upravicen dvom, da morajo taksni avtorji dobiti zbrano delo v dveh zbirkah, kadar ni mogoce zagotoviti zadostne vsebinske ali uredniske razlike. France Bernik je leta 1989 v intervjuju za Vecer, ki ga je z njim opravil Marjan Kunej, omenil izdajanje zbranih oz. izbranih del pri Mohorjevi druzbi. To je ponovil leta 1994 v pogovoru s Kunejem za casopis Republika in v referatu, ki ga je imel na slavisticnem kongresu leta 2006 v Zagrebu. »Prav zato je ... Mohorjeva druzba v Celju po vojni - kot neko protiutez zbranim delom - zacela izdajati - in izdala - izbrana dela, ce tako recem katolisko usmerjenih pisateljev: Ksaverja Meska, Frana Detele, F. S. Finzgarja in Ivana Preglja. « (Kunej 1989: 30) Ob bibliografskih podatkih o izhajanju teh stirih izdaj se zazdi sklepna napoved Antona Ocvirka v jubilejnem prispevku leta 1965 kot nekaksen odgovor, saj je z njo razsiril seznam avtorjev, ki bodo uvrsceni v zbirko: »To pa se ni vse, saj imamo iz starejsih obdobij pred seboj se Valentina Vodnika ta je bil na seznamu ze leta 1946, iz novejsih pa Finzgarja, Kraigherja in med ekspresionisti zlasti Mirana Jarca in Slavka Gruma, ki se vsak po svoje uvrscata ob najznacilnejsega lirika, kar smo jih imeli v novejsi dobi, Srecka Kosovela.« (Anton Ocvirk 1965: 28) Nastel je torej literarne vrste z nizom priimkov, hkrati pa s celotnim seznamom odgovoril na vprasanje, ki ga je postavil Andrijan Lah v naslov prispevka Na poti k torzu? v Jezik in slovstvu priblizno leto dni prej. Uresnicevanje te napovedi se je zacelo sele cez 10 let in dozivelo zadnjo izpolnitev v letu 2012. Pisanje znanstvenega prispevka se zacne z iskanjem ze objavljenih prispevkov o temi. Ko je predstava o obstojeci vednosti dovolj jasna, lahko s svojim prispevkom splezamo na ramena velikana iz nakopicenega znanja (Merton 1965). Ta prispevek je posvecen zbirki, ki velja za temeljno znanstveno knjizno zbirko: Zbrana dela slovenskih pesnikov in pisateljev. Smiselno se je zdelo, da z iskanjem studij zacnem v Slavisticni reviji, temeljni znanstveni reviji za slovenistiko, in po prispevkih, posvecenih zbirki, presodim razmerje med uredniskim oziroma zalozniskim trudom na eni strani in stroko, ki raziskuje slovensko literaturo, na drugi. Pred 20 leti sem to pocel prvic. Pomagal sem si z bibliografijo revije, ki jo je objavil Joze Munda leta 1977, in prelistal stevilke do 40. letnika leta 1992. Presenetilo me je, kako malo prispevkov sem nasel: samo 6 in enega, ki ga je spodbudila objava Trdinovih Spominov, vendar je bil posvecen drugi temi. Dva prispevka sta bila oceni posameznih knjig, eden bibliografska dopolnitev izdaje Preserna in trije prispevki Marje Borsnik so bili drobna dopolnila k izdaji Tavcarja. Vec prispevkov, namrec 9, sem za obdobje med letoma 1955 in 1992 nasel v reviji Jezik in slovstvo. Po vsebini so prevladovala porocila urednikov, ob njih pa so izsle tudi celovitejse ocene uredniskega dela. S takratnim iskanjem sem zelel preveriti obcutek, da je najvec prispevkov, posvecenih posameznim knjigam ali zbirki v celoti, v enakem obdobju izslo v stirinajstdnevniku Nasi razgledi. Pri tem so izstopale ocene Jozeta Pogacnika; prve je objavil v reviji Nasa obzorja, nato pa jih je 25 let sorazmerno redno objavljal v Nasih razgledih. To je bil tudi razlog, da je urednistvo izid 1000. stevilke pospremilo z objavo feljtona o znacilnostih in odmevu zbirke, kakor jih je bilo mogoce razbrati iz vseh prispevkov, ki sem jih nasel v Nasih razgledih in drugje.
Izhodišče študije je brošura, ki jo je pripravil Matija Ogrin, tretji glavni urednik zbirke Zbrana dela slovenskih pesnikov in pisateljev, kot oporo urednikom posameznih zbranih del. Ob nekaj ...primerih je nakazana zgodovina vrednotenja pisateljev in njihovega uvrščanja v zbirko. Opozorjeno je tudi na spreminjanje statusa urednikov takšnih izdaj. S tem je utemeljen predlog za izdelavo priročnika, ki bi vseboval analitične predstavitve doslej objavljenih knjig, podrobneje gradiva v Opombah in njihove zgradbe, torej znanstvenega dela vsake knjige.
Choosing authors is like any kind of evaluation an ideological act. Therefore, from today's somewhat removed view, it seems totally logical that another publishing house includes in its plans authors ...that suit it and that they are published in editions of equivalent editorial quality to the editions in the series Complete Works. It is cause to wonder that such authors should have two sets of complete works when it is not possible to descry appreciable differences in content or editing. In a 1989 interview in Vecer conducted by Marjan Kunej, France Bernik mentioned the publication of complete and selected works by Mohorjeva druzba. He did the same in a 1994 conversation with Kunej for the newspaper Republika, and in a paper at the 2006 Slavic Congress in Zagreb: "For that reason, after the war Mohorjeva druzba in Celje-as a sort of counterbalance to the complete works-began to publish and finished publication of selected works of what I might call Catholic tending writers: Ksaver Mesko, Fran Detela, F. S. Finzgar, and Ivan Pregelj" (Kunej 1989: 30). Considering the bibliographic facts on the publication of these four editions, Anton Ocvirk's summary forecast in a 1965 anniversary article can be understood as a kind of answer. He expanded the list of authors to be included in the series: "And that is not all, because we also have in hand, from older periods, Valentin Vodnik (who was already in the list in 1946), and of modern writers Finzgar and Kraigher, and of the expressionists especially Miran Jarc and Slavko Grum, who will be included along with the most important poet of modern times, Srecko Kosovel" (Ocvirk 1965: 28). He thus used a series of names to list all of the genres, and with the full list he answered the question Andrijan Lah had put with the title of a Jezik in slovstvo article, "Na poti k torzu?" (And now the torso?) about a year prior. The realization of this prediction began only ten years later and was concluded in 2012. Anton Ocvirk decided that introductions were not appropriate for these scholarly editions. For this reason he placed the contents of Ivan Prijatelj's introductions immediately before the "Notes." The introductions now contained more detailed and better documented information on the genesis, publishing, and reception of each literary work. Because the book was now clearly divided into the first part, with the author's works, and second part, with notes, he could omit the word "editor's." The result of his changes was that editor offered the reader scholarly assistance: He adumbrated the author's texts with his own explanations to facilitate further research and interpretation. He also directed attention to specific relations between the person of the author, his production, and final achievements. The "Notes" as a title can be understood in this context as defining editor's texts as a supplementary, subordinate contribution. The smaller font size can be seen as a typographic means of underlining this unpretentious relationship. One could argue that the decision to use the title "Notes" (Opombe) was a mistake on Ocvirk's part, but also that he wished to stress the author-editor relationship I am describing. Ocvirk mentions representative writers in his introduction in the course of enumerating tasks for literary history and poetics. He limited himself to the most familiar names on a list that Slovenski porocevalec had printed on 19 March. It is disappointing that he did not link these tasks with writers who were new to the list of classics: Linhart, Mencinger, and Kosovel. The journal sections Zapiski in gradivo (Annotations and materials) and Knjizna porocila in ocene (Book news and reviews) contained items that show that the original function had to a great degree been maintained in the new journal. In the first issue, Marja Borsnik, who had edited the first volume of Anton Askerc's works in 1946, published and commented on letters from the poet to Fran Vidic. The opening of France Dobrovoljc's bibliographic article plainly affirms the journal's initial direction: "I am publishing several corrections and additions to Cankar's bibliography, found in the jubilee book Ivan Cankar, Voice of Our Times (SKZ 1946), for the purpose of facilitating the work of future editors of a new edition of Cankar's complete works" (Dobrovoljc 1948: 122). In 1951, Boris Merhar began editing Cankar's Izbrana dela (Selected works) in ten volumes, in collaboration with Dobrovoljc. Cankar's works only began appearing in the series Complete Works in 1967. Dobrovoljc published critical commentaries on the volumes in Nasi razgledi. The first issue of Slavisticna revija's slow composition is evident in the last item. Alfonz Gspan wrote a long review of Anton Slodnjak's publication of France Preseren in December 1946, and in April 1948 he added an addendum to it (Gspan 1948: 137).
•Modular and largely passive hardware components aimed towards cost-effective, autonomous workcell reconfiguration.•A software backbone based on ROS, which provides modularity of all software ...components.•Fast programming of assembly tasks through kinesthetic guidance and script-based state machine description methods supported by visual programming interfaces.•Support for quick workcell reconfiguration by manipulating and exchanging the available hardware components, facilitated by a digital twin.
The manufacturing industry is seeing an increase in demand for more custom-made, low-volume production. This type of production is rarely automated and is to a large extent still performed manually. To keep up with the competition and market demands, manufacturers will have to undertake the effort to automate such manufacturing processes. However, automating low-volume production is no small feat as the solution should be adaptable and future proof to unexpected changes in customers’ demands. In this paper, we propose a reconfigurable robot workcell aimed at automating low-volume production. The developed workcell can adapt to the changes in manufacturing processes by employing a number of passive, reconfigurable hardware elements, supported by the ROS-based, modular control software. To further facilitate and expedite the setup process, we integrated intuitive, user-friendly robot programming methods with the available hardware. The system was evaluated by implementing five production processes from different manufacturing industries.
The edge transient-current technique (E-TCT) with high energy hadron beam Gorišek, Andrej; Cindro, Vladimir; Kramberger, Gregor ...
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment,
09/2016, Letnik:
831
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
We propose a novel way to investigate the properties of silicon and CVD diamond detectors for High Energy Physics experiments complementary to the already well-established E-TCT technique using laser ...beam. In the proposed setup the beam of high energy hadrons (MIPs) is used instead of laser beam. MIPs incident on the detector in the direction parallel to the readout electrode plane and perpendicular to the edge of the detector. Such experiment could prove very useful to study CVD diamond detectors that are almost inaccessible for the E-TCT measurements with laser due to large band-gap as well as to verify and complement the E-TCT measurements of silicon.
The method proposed is being tested at CERN in a beam of 120GeV hadrons using a reference telescope with track resolution at the DUT of few μm. The preliminary results of the measurements are presented.
A system for in-vivo tracking of 192 Ir source during high dose rate or pulsed dose rate brachytherapy treatment was built using 1 mm thick silicon pad detectors as image sensors and knife-edge lead ...pinholes as collimators. With source self-images obtained from a dual-pinhole system, location of the source could be reconstructed in three dimensions in real time. The system was tested with 192 Ir clinical source (kerma rate in air at 1 m 2.38 Gy/h) in air and plexi-glass phantom. The locations of the source were tracked from a distance of 40 cm in a field of view of 20 × 20 × 20 cm 3 . Reconstruction precision, defined as the average distance between true and reconstructed source positions, with data collected in less than 1 s with 22 GBq 192 Ir source was about 5 mm. The reconstruction precision was in our case mainly limited by imperfect alignment of detectors and pinholes. With perfect alignment the statistical error would allow precision of about 1 mm which could further be improved with larger detector placed at larger distance from the pinhole. However already the modest precision of few millimeters is sufficient for in-vivo detection of larger deviations from planned treatment caused by various misadministrations or malfunctioning of the brachytherapy treatment apparatus. Usage of silicon detectors offers a possibility for building a compact device which could be used as an independent online quality assurance system. In this paper details about sensors, readout system and reconstruction algorithm are described. Results from measurements with clinical source are presented.
Miniature micro-strip detectors made by implanting n-type readout strips on p-type silicon bulk (n
+–p) were irradiated with reactor neutrons up to fluences of 5×10
15
n
eq/cm
2. Their charge ...collection properties were measured with signals caused by fast electrons from
90Sr source and read out by SCT128A chip. Collected charge and detector current were measured up to high bias voltages (1400
V) at which signs of charge multiplication can be observed. Detectors were submitted to successive annealing steps at 60
°C up to total time of 5040
min. Increase of collected charge after long annealing times was measured at high bias voltages. A similar effect was observed in the leakage current, which at high voltages increased with reverse-annealing time. Reverse annealing leads to higher space charge concentrations and therefore to higher values of electric field near the p–n junction. The consequence is larger multiplication resulting in increase of collected charge and leakage current.