Topotecan and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) were evaluated in a randomized, multicenter study of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who had relapsed at least 60 days ...after completion of first-line therapy.
Patients received either topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 21 days (n = 107) or CAV (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2, and vincristine 2 mg) infused on day 1 every 21 days (n = 104). Eligibility included the following: bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than or equal to 2, and adequate marrow, liver, and renal function. Response was confirmed by blinded independent radiologic review.
Response rate was 26 of 107 patients (24.3%) treated with topotecan and 19 of 104 patients (18.3%) treated with CAV (P = .285). Median times to progression were 13.3 weeks (topotecan) and 12.3 weeks (CAV) (P = .552). Median survival was 25.0 weeks for topotecan and 24.7 weeks for CAV (P = .795). The proportion of patients who experienced symptom improvement was greater in the topotecan group than in the CAV group for four of eight symptoms evaluated, including dyspnea, anorexia, hoarseness, and fatigue, as well as interference with daily activity (P< or =.043). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 37.8% of topotecan courses versus 51.4% of CAV courses (P<.001). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3/4 anemia occurred more frequently with topotecan, occurring in 9.8% and 17.7% of topotecan courses versus 1.4% and 7.2% of CAV courses, respectively (P<.001 for both). Nonhematologic toxicities were generally grade 1 to 2 for both regimens.
Topotecan was at least as effective as CAV in the treatment of patients with recurrent SCLC and resulted in improved control of several symptoms.
Objective: To assess the value of Cyfra 21-1, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) combined, all three together as prognostic factors in advanced stage non-small cell ...lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Patients and methods: Serum samples from untreated NSCLC patients were prospectively collected. All assays were performed using commercial kits blind to clinical information. Serum levels of CEA, NSE and Cyfra 21-1 higher than 10, 13 and 3.5
ng/ml, respectively, were considered as elevated.
Results: 264 patients (men, 87%), with Performans Status (PS) of 0/1 in 80% and stage IV disease in 65% were studied. Cyfra 21-1, CEA and NSE were elevated in 52.5%, 41.8% and 33.2% of patients, respectively. Median survival was 9 months (range, 1–77). Cyfra 21-1, age, PS, stage as well as the combination of the three markers together correlated with prognosis in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ⩾65 years (HR=1.3 1.02–1.70,
p=0.03), PS 2 (HR=4.3 3.13–6.11,
p<0.0001), Cyfra 21-1⩾3.5
ng/ml (HR=1.3 1.06–1.78,
p=0.01) and the combination of the three markers (HR=1.06 1.009–1.13,
p=0.02) remained prognostic determinants.
Conclusion: Combining Cyfra 21-1, NSE and CEA correlated with prognosis in a significant and independent manner.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as gefitinib emerged as an accepted treatment in second- or third-line setting in NSCLC. However, clinical surrogate markers ...of EGFR-TKI activity in NSCLC patients remain to be identified and we studied the prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 in this setting. Serum samples from 53 patients with NSCLC receiving gefitinib after failure of at least a platinum-containing regimen were prospectively collected from January 2002 to December 2003. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent negative impact on survival for a level of CYFRA 21-1 higher than 3.5 ng ml(-1) (HR=2.45, 95% CI 1.13-5.29; P=0.02). In conclusion, CYFRA 21-1 is a tool available to predict the survival of NSCLC patients receiving gefitinib as third-line therapy in an independent manner. In case of a CYFRA 21-1 level higher than 3.5 ng ml(-1), treatment with gefitinib needs further evaluation giving its relative poor effect on survival.
Background The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting after cisplatin chemotherapy (≥69 mg/m2) were compared in a multicentre, ...double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study. Patients and methods In all, 654 patients (of whom 619 were evaluable) received prophylactic granisetron plus dexamethasone before chemotherapy on day 0; on day 1 complete responders and non-responders were randomized separately to receive dexamethasone, 8 mg b.d. p.o., with either granisetron, 1 mg b.d. p.o., or matching placebo for six days. Results Over days 1–6 the complete response rates were 54.5% (dexamethasone group) and 52.1% (dexamethasone plus granisetron group). Response rates were higher over days 4–6 (71.8% and 70.7%, respectively) than over days 1–3 (60.4% and 57.9%, respectively). Significantly more patients who responded to antiemetic treatment during day 0 were responders over days 1–6 (63% vs. 17% P < 0.001). No other treatment-related differences were found. Adverse events tended to be minor, with constipation and headache the most common. Overall, there were no significant differences in the safety profiles of the two regimens, but constipation and abdominal pain were significantly more common in the dexamethasone plus granisetron group. Conclusions Granisetron plus dexamethasone did not appear to confer additional benefit over use of dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting following cisplatin chemotherapy. Control of acute nausea and vomiting, however, appeared to be an important factor influencing delayed nausea and vomiting.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and carboplatin in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A randomized phase II study was ...conducted by the Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie (GFPC) in 15 centers. The patients were randomized in either arm A (GC): gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8+carboplatin AUC 6 mg/(mLmin) on day 1; or in arm B (VP): vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 weekly+cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.
A total of 100 patients were randomized with stage IV or stage III NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion: 51 patients in arm A and 49 patients in arm B. A total of 190 cycles were administered in the GC arm and 172 cycles in the VP arm, with a median of four cycles per patient in each arm. The dose intensity was 84.9% for gemcitabine, 99.8% for carboplatin, 97.7% for cisplatin and 67.7% for vinorelbine. The objective response rates were 19.6% (95% CI, 9.8-33.1) for GC and 29.2% (95% CI, 17.0-44.1) for VP in an ITT analysis. The response duration was 169 days in arm A and 226 days in arm B. The TTP was similar with 140 days (GC) and 148 days (VP), respectively. Overall survival rates were 334 days in the GC combination and 304 days in the VP combination. Overall, the treatment was safe and toxicities observed were different in each arm: neutropenia was the most common toxicity in the VP treatment, whereas thrombocytopenia was more frequent in the GC combination. Anemia was similar in both arms. Non-haematologic toxicity was mild. One toxic death in arm A and three toxic deaths in arm B were observed.
In terms of response rate, the gemcitabine-carboplatin combination was not efficient enough to allow further phase III study. Survival data are in the same range as the standard arm. This chemotherapy is feasible and may represent an alternative to a standard cisplatin-based regimen, allowing treatment in an outpatient setting.
Gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity Barlési, Fabrice; Villani, Patrick; Doddoli, Christophe ...
Fundamental & clinical pharmacology,
February 2004, Letnik:
18, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Gemcitabine is a relatively new deoxycytidine analog (2′,2′‐difluorodeoxycytidine) with structural similarities to cytosine arabinoside (Ara‐C). Activity of gemcitabine is demonstrated in the ...treatment of many solid tumors, like pancreas, ovarian and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although gemcitabine is considered as a drug with a good safety profile, cases of gemcitabine‐induced severe pulmonary toxicity (GISPT) were reported as for Ara‐C. We performed a systematic review of reported cases on the GISPT. Twenty‐nine clinical trials especially interesting NSCLC patients (21) and 21 reported cases recording 40 patients were analyzed. The incidence of the GISPT varies from 0 to 5%. The clinical presentation is a subacute clinical syndrome and is frequently nonspecific. The predominant radiographic pattern on chest X‐ray are reticulo‐nodular interstitial infiltrates. It was postulated that the physio‐pathological mechanism of the GISPT was an inflammatory reaction of the alveolar capillary wall cytokine‐mediated, which created an abnormal permeability of its membrane. After the differential diagnosis were ruled out, the discontinuation of the drug and the early initiation of steroids and diuretics are the most frequently performed treatments. Under these conditions, the outcome was favorable in a delay of few days generally for a majority of patients but 20% of patients died. Some risk factors, as a previous pulmonary disease or a previous thoracic irradiation, for the occurrence of the GISPT were proposed. GISPT is rare but sometimes fatal. Its a necessity to increase awareness about it to enhanced an early and suitable management of patients developing such a toxicity after gemcitabine administration.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of previously untreated patients with metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 ...years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks. Paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) was infused over 3 hours, before carboplatin (area under the curve AUC 6; Calvert formula) infused over 1 hour, once every 3 weeks for six cycles maximum. Prednisolone, dexchlorpheniramine, and ranitidine were standard premedication. Response to treatment was assessed every two cycles, and nonresponding patients were withdrawn from the trial to receive standard chemotherapy.
Of the 50 patients entering the study, 48 and 46 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. The overall response rate was 65%, with complete responses in three patients. Five patients had stable disease (11%) and 11 patients experienced progressive disease (24%). Median survival was 38 weeks, and median duration of response was 20 weeks. One-year survival was 22.5%. For a total of 232 cycles, grade 3 and 4 toxicity was 33% for neutropenia, 3.5% for thrombocytopenia, and 4% for anemia. Four patients had neutropenic fever (one toxic death). Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly grade 1 and 2 paresthesia (21% of patients); grade 3 myalgia/arthralgia was observed in 6.5% of patients.
First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in metastatic SCLC achieved a response rate and survival similar to standard regimens. With 1-day administration and a tolerable toxicity profile, this combination merits further investigation.
The most satisfactory treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is combination chemotherapy-radiotherapy (CT-RT). The optimal treatment modalities remain to be ...determined.
We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of the docetaxel-radiotherapy combination after induction chemotherapy with cisplatin-vinorelbine. The main endpoint was the objective response rate.
Patient with inoperable stage locally advanced NSCLC received induction chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on D1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 and D22. Patients with responses or stable disease then received concurrent RT-CT consisting of 25 mg/m2/week docetaxel and single-fraction radiotherapy (66 grays (Gy) in 33 fractions) over 6.5 weeks.
Fifty-six patients were enrolled from 1 July 2000 to 31 December 2001. Sixteen patients left the trial after induction chemotherapy, eight for progression, five for toxicity, and two for intercurrent events. One patient underwent surgery after induction chemotherapy. In total, 40 of the 56 patients received RT-CT. Twelve (30%) of these 40 patients experienced grade III or IV pulmonary or esophageal toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 46.4% (95% CI 33.0-60.2). The median time to progression was 6.2 months 1.1-26.0. The median survival time was 13 months 0.3-44.9 months. Nine patients progressed during RT-CT, six with brain metastases.
Weekly docetaxel with concurrent radiotherapy, following chemotherapy is acceptable. The tumor response rate is moderate. Further trials are required to determine the risk-benefit relationship of this treatment schedule, and the possible benefit of adding other cytotoxic drugs.
Background The aim of this study was to analyze SCLC patients beyond 30 months, particularly their outcome, their way of life, and factors which could influence relapses, second-primary cancers and ...death. Patients and methods Between January 1986 and May 1995, 263 SCLC patients who survived longer than 30 months were included from 52 French institutions. The analysis was performed on the 155 cases confirmed by a pathologic review. Results Physical, mental and psychological states were considered as normal at 30 months in respectively 70.3%, 87.7% and 67.7% of patients, not influenced by prophylactic cranial irradiation, number of chemotherapy cycles, CCNU or cisplatin. Therapeutic sequelae were neurological impairment (13%), pulmonary fibrosis (18%) and cardiac disorders (11%) at 30 months. Return to work was possible for 40% of patients in the first two years following diagnosis. Among 43 relapsing patients, 33 benefited from a second-line treatment. Their median survival was 12 months since retreatment, and seven patients have survived again longer than 30 months. Age > 60 at the time of diagnosis was found as an independent factor increasing the risk of relapse beyond 30 months (OR = 2.46, IC 95% (1.16–5.26), P = 0.01). The risk of relapse became less than 10% beyond five years. Twenty patients (13%) developed a second primary cancer in a mean time of 58.6 months. The risk of second primary cancer was increased by a number of chemotherapy cycles > 6 (OR = 3.25, IC 95% (1.08–9.8) P = 0.02) and by an age > 60 (OR = 2.92, IC 95% (1.07–7.97), P = 0.03). Five- and 10-year survival rates were respectively 68% and 44%. In these patients having reached a 30-month survival, three independent factors were predictive of a survival longer than five years: age ≤60 at the time of diagnosis (OR = 2.85, IC 95% (1.23–6.6), P = 0.01), chest radiotherapy (OR = 3.1, IC 95% (1.28–7.69), P – 0.006) and absence of relapse (OR = 4.5, IC 95% (1.75–12.5), P – 0.002). This study suggests that: 1) therapeutic sequelae are rather mild, allowing return to work in 40% of patients; 2) relapsing 30-month survivors can benefit from second-line treatment; 3) SCLC cure can be achieved with a 10-year follow-up.
Stenting is a relatively new option in the management of superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO), but available data often concern non-malignant and/or various malignant diseases.
The aim of this study ...was to assess the efficacy of vascular stenting as a first-choice treatment in SVCO in the exclusive setting of NSCLC.
Retrospective study of NSCLC patients with SVCO treated in the past year. Demographic data, disease characteristics, etiologic and palliative treatment (use of vascular stenting) were recorded as well as treatment outcome and survival.
17 patients were recruited. Eight had vascular stenting while 9 did not. Except for stenting, there was no difference between the two groups (median age 54 years; 80% men; 53% stage IIIB and 47% stage IV). Stenting (median length 60 mm) achieved complete resolution of SVCO more frequently (75 vs. 25%, p = 0.05) and faster (2 vs. 21 days, p = 0.002) without immediate or delayed complication. All patients with stents received anticoagulation therapy. Relapse rate after complete response (33 g, 50%, p = 0.6) was lower and time to relapse (6.5 g, 2 months) was longer for patients undergoing stenting, without reaching statistical significance. Median overall survival was not statistically different (8 and 5 months, p = 0.06).
This study demonstrated the effectiveness of vascular stenting for SVCO in NSCLC patients. The high response rate, quick effect and safety of vascular stenting make this palliative treatment a candidate as a potential standard procedure. The results, however, must be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial including quality of life assessment.
PDF
