In the matched analysis of an observational study, confounding on covariates X is addressed by comparing members of a distinguished group (Z = 1) to controls (Z = 0) only when they belong to the same ...matched set. The better matchings, therefore, are those whose matched sets exhibit both dispersion in Z and uniformity in X. For dispersion in Z, pair matching is best, creating matched sets that are equally balanced between the groups; but actual data place limits, often severe limits, on matched pairs' uniformity in X. At the other extreme is full matching, the matched sets of which are as uniform in X as can be, while often so poorly dispersed in Z as to sacrifice efficiency.
This article presents an algorithm for exploring the intermediate territory. Given requirements on matched sets' uniformity in X and dispersion in Z, the algorithm first decides the requirements' feasibility. In feasible cases, it furnishes a match that is optimal for X-uniformity among matches with Z-dispersion as stipulated. To illustrate, we describe the algorithm's use in a study comparing womens' to mens' working conditions; and we compare our method to a commonly used alternative, greedy matching, which is neither optimal nor as flexible but is algorithmically much simpler. The comparison finds meaningful advantages, in terms of both bias and efficiency, for our more studied approach.
Aims
Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin have been proposed as probe substrates for the organic anion‐transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B, but clinical data on their relative sensitivity and selectivity to ...OATP1B inhibitors are lacking. A clinical study was therefore conducted to determine their relative suitability as OATP1B probes using single oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) doses of the OATP1B inhibitor rifampicin, accompanied by a comprehensive in vitro assessment of rifampicin inhibitory potential on statin transporters.
Methods
The clinical study comprised of two separate panels of eight healthy subjects. In each panel, subjects were randomized to receive a single oral dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg) or pitavastatin (1 mg) administered alone, concomitantly with rifampicin (600 mg) PO or IV. The in vitro transporter studies were performed using hepatocytes and recombinant expression systems.
Results
Rifampicin markedly increased exposures of both statins, with greater differential increases after PO vs. IV rifampicin only for rosuvastatin. The magnitudes of the increases in area under the plasma concentration–time curve were 5.7‐ and 7.6‐fold for pitavastatin and 4.4‐ and 3.3‐fold for rosuvastatin, after PO and IV rifampicin, respectively. In vitro studies showed that rifampicin was an inhibitor of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, breast cancer resistance protein and multidrug resistance protein 2, but not of organic anion transporter 3.
Conclusions
The results indicate that pitavastatin is a more sensitive and selective and thus preferred clinical OATP1B probe substrate than rosuvastatin, and that a single IV dose of rifampicin is a more selective OATP1B inhibitor than a PO dose.
VAQTA™ (Hepatitis A Vaccine, inactivated HAVi; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is currently licensed for prevention of disease caused by hepatitis A virus in persons ≥12 months of age. This ...report summarizes statistical models developed to evaluate the long-term persistence and duration of detectable hepatitis A antibody (total antibody levels with no distinction on class) after receipt of HAVi in healthy children and adolescents (V251-023 and V251-035) and in healthy adults (V251-034). The statistical models presented, conducted separately for each of the three studies, are based on models that have been used in the literature to estimate the duration of antibody to protect against human papillomavirus (HPV) disease. In the absence of observed study data on hepatitis A antibody persistence for vaccine recipients over several decades, an extrapolation from a kinetic model of antibody decay was used to estimate the duration of detectable antibody. Extrapolation of observed antibody titers from postvaccination, Year 2.5–3.5, Year 5–6, and Year 10 in 165 children and adolescents who received HAVi at Day 0 and Week 24 in V251-023 suggests that detectable levels of antibody may persist after the second dose for many years. This model suggests that 25 to 50 years Postdose 1 in a two-dose series of HAVi, 99.4% of the study population will have detectable levels of hepatitis A antibody.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV-1. The C-EDGE CO-INFECTION study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of grazoprevir ...(MK-5172) plus elbasvir (MK-8742) in patients with HCV and HIV co-infection.
In this uncontrolled, non-randomised, phase 3, open-label, single-arm study, treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1, 4, or 6 infection and HIV co-infection, with or without cirrhosis, were enrolled from 37 centres in nine countries across Europe, the USA, and Australia. Patients were either naive to treatment with any antiretroviral therapy (ART) or stable on ART for at least 8 weeks. All patients received grazoprevir 100 mg plus elbasvir 50 mg in a fixed-dose combination tablet once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (HCV RNA <15 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). The primary population for efficacy analyses was all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02105662.
Between June 11, 2014, and Aug 29, 2014, 218 patients were enrolled and received grazoprevir plus elbasvir for 12 weeks, all of whom completed follow-up at week 12. SVR12 was achieved by 210 (96%) of 218 patients (95% CI 92·9-98·4). One patient did not achieve SVR12 because of a non-virological reason, and seven patients without cirrhosis relapsed (two subsequently confirmed as reinfections). All 35 patients with cirrhosis achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were fatigue (29; 13%), headache (27; 12%), and nausea (20; 9%). No patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Two patients receiving ART had transient HIV viraemia.
This HCV treatment regimen seems to be effective and well tolerated for patients co-infected with HIV with or without cirrhosis. These data are consistent with previous trials of this regimen in the monoinfected population. This regimen continues to be studied in phase 3 trials.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Direct‐acting antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are generally safe; however, understanding the safety profile of each regimen is essential for their continued use. ...Safety data were pooled from 12 clinical trials of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that enrolled adult participants with HCV infection. Pooled analyses are presented for participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving EBR/GZR plus ribavirin (RBV) for 16‐18 weeks. Safety data are also presented for participants with comorbidities receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks in individual clinical trials (chronic kidney disease CKD stage 4/5, inherited blood disorders IBLD or receiving opioid agonist therapy OAT). Among 1743 participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, 1068 (61.3%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE) and 491 had AEs (28.2%) considered drug‐related. The most frequent AEs were headache (10.6%), fatigue (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (5.8%), nausea (5.1%) and diarrhoea (5.0%). Serious AEs were reported by 37 participants (2.1%), and 12 (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. In populations with CKD 4/5 or IBLD or receiving OAT, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving placebo. Some AEs occurred at higher frequencies in participants receiving RBV compared with those receiving EBR/GZR alone: fatigue (32.7% vs 8.7%); headache (21.6% vs 10.6%); and nausea (15.8% vs 5.1%). Safety was similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis. Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported in 0.7% participants. EBR/GZR is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infections, even those with challenging comorbidities such as CKD or IBLD and those receiving OAT.
Safety data from 12 clinical trials that enrolled 1743 adults with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection indicate that elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT)1 or GT4 infection. In populations with chronic kidney disease stage 4/5 or inherited blood disorders or receiving opioid agonist therapy, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving placebo. Safety was also similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis.
Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from ...bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.
We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.
We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 28·5% women and 460 71·5% men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 7·2% participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 10
/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.
Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).
Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.
Safety and immunogenicity data from 5 clinical trials conducted in the US in children 12-to-23 months old where HAVi was administered alone or concomitantly with other pediatric vaccines (M-M-R®II, ...Varivax®, TRIPEDIA®, Prevnar®, ProQuad®, PedvaxHIB®, and INFANRIX®) were combined. Among 4,374 participants receiving ≥ 1 dose of HAVi, 4,222 (97%) had safety follow-up and the proportions reporting adverse events (AE) were comparable when administered alone (69.4%) or concomitantly with other pediatric vaccines (71.1%). The most common solicited injection-site AEs were pain/tenderness (Postdose 1: 25.8%; Postdose 2: 26.1%) and redness (Postdose 1: 13.6%; Postdose 2: 15.1%). The most common vaccine-related systemic AEs were fever (≥ 100.4ºF, 12.2%) and irritability (8.1%). Serious AEs (SAEs) were observed at a rate of 0.4%; 0.1% were considered vaccine-related. No deaths were reported within 14 days following a dose of HAVi. These integrated analyses also showed that protective antibody concentrations were elicited in 100% of toddlers after two doses and 92% after a single dose, regardless of whether HAVi was given concomitantly with other vaccines or alone. These results demonstrate that HAVi was well-tolerated whether given alone or concomitantly with other vaccines, with a low incidence of vaccine-related SAEs. HAVi was immunogenic in this age group regardless of whether administered with or without other pediatric vaccines and whether 1 or 2 doses were administered. HAVi did not impact the immune response to other vaccines. These data continue to support the routine use of HAVi with other pediatric vaccines in children ≥ 12 months of age.
Highlights • This paper describes the safety of a 2-dose regimen of MMRV. • A 2-dose regimen of MMRV has an acceptable safety profile in children 12–23 months old. • These data support the current ...prescribing information for MMRV.
Highlights • Modified manufacturing process hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) studied in predialysis/dialysis patients. • 4 Doses at 0, 1, 6, and 8 months: group 1 got mpHBV; group 2 got a licensed ...hepatitis B vaccine. • Population needed more vaccinations to reach seroprotective levels compared to healthy persons. • Reduced seroprotection rates support routine screening and re-dosing in this population.
PDF
