Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets ALK and ROS1 with preclinical activity against most known resistance mutations in ALK and ROS1. ...We investigated the antitumour activity and safety of lorlatinib in advanced, ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
In this open-label, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial, we enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less (≤1 for phase 1 only) from 28 hospitals in 12 countries worldwide. Lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (escalating doses of 10 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily in phase 1 only) was given orally in continuous 21-day cycles until investigator-determined disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response, assessed by independent central review. Activity endpoints were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01970865.
Between Jan 22, 2014, and Oct 2, 2016, we assessed 364 patients, of whom 69 with ROS1-positive NSCLC were enrolled. 21 (30%) of 69 patients were TKI-naive, 40 (58%) had previously received crizotinib as their only TKI, and eight (12%) had previously received one non-crizotinib ROS1 TKI or two or more ROS1 TKIs. The estimated median duration of follow-up for response was 21·1 months (IQR 15·2–30·3). 13 (62%; 95% CI 38–82) of 21 TKI-naive patients and 14 (35%; 21–52) of 40 patients previously treated with crizotinib as their only TKI had an objective response. Intracranial responses were achieved in seven (64%; 95% CI 31–89) of 11 TKI-naive patients and 12 (50%; 29–71) of 24 previous crizotinib-only patients. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertriglyceridaemia (13 19% of 69 patients) and hypercholesterolaemia (ten 14%). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in five (7%) of 69 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Lorlatinib showed clinical activity in patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases and those previously treated with crizotinib. Because crizotinib-refractory patients have few treatment options, lorlatinib could represent an important next-line targeted agent.
Pfizer.
Background
Programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression is associated with clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) treated with tyrosine kinase ...inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether PD‐L1 expression plays a role in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive lung ADC is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PD‐L1 in patients with ALK‐positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.
Materials and Methods
PD‐L1 expression was identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction was used for ALK variant detection, and immunofluorescence‐based multiplex staining was applied for exploring immune cells in tumor microenvironments.
Results
A total of 78 patients with ALK‐positive advanced ADC were enrolled in our study, of whom 52 received crizotinib. Compared with EGFR/ALK wild‐type tumors, PD‐L1 expression was lower in ALK‐positive ADC. ALK fusion variants were identified in 32 patients, and those with variant 3 and 5 (short variants) had higher PD‐L1 expression than those with other variants. The crizotinib objective response rate (ORR) and progression‐free survival (PFS) was better in tumors with negative PD‐L1 expression (ORR/PFS in PD‐L1 0% vs. 1%–49% vs. 50%–100%: 60.7%/11.8 months vs. 38.5%/6.5 months vs. 36.4%/4.0 months, p = .007/.022). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that PD‐L1 0% (vs. ≥1%) was an independent factor for longer PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.322, 95% confidence interval 0.160–0.650, p = .002). Multiplex IHC in three cases showed a varied extent of immune cell infiltrations in tumors with different PD‐L1 expression.
Conclusion
Positive PD‐L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with ALK‐positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.
Implications for Practice
Not all lung adenocarcinoma with sensitizing driver mutations experienced durable responses to small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Similar to the negative impact of programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant tumors treated with TKIs, this study demonstrated that positive PD‐L1 expression was also associated with worse response rate and shorter progression‐free survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib. Among different ALK fusion partners, tumors with short variants (V3 and V5) had higher PD‐L1 compared with long variants (V1, V2, and V6). Testing PD‐L1 before initiating crizotinib for ALK‐positive lung cancer could be a simple method to provide important prognostic information.
This article focuses on the effect of PD‐L1 on ALK‐positive lung adenocarcinoma and examines the association of pretreatment tumor PD‐L1 and clinical outcomes of patients receiving the first approved ALK inhibitor, crizotinib.
Besides being a predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapy in lung cancer in general, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is not so well correlated with treatment outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma ...(ADC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, as reported studies are inconclusive and seldom addressed the issues of response to treatment and resistance. The primary objective is to evaluate the association of PD-L1 and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy, resistance, and relevant clinical outcomes. The secondary objective is to further explore the tumour microenvironments of EGFR mutant tumours with different PD-L1 expression.
Using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, we retrospectively tested PD-L1 expression (Dako 22C3) in the pre-treatment tumours from advanced EGFR mutant lung ADC patients, of whom all were treated with TKIs. Multiplex IHC assay was applied for exploring immune cells in tumour microenvironments.
A total of 153 Taiwanese patients were enrolled in our study, of whom a majority of cases were female (58.9%) and non-smokers (75.8%). The objective response rate (ORR) to EGFR TKI and progression-free survival (PFS) were better in patients with PD-L1 expression <50% (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% versus 1–49% versus ≥50%: 65.6%/12.5 months versus 56.4%/12.8 months versus 38.9%/5.9 months, P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that PD-L1 <50% was an independent prognostic factor for longer PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.433, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.250–0.751, P = 0.003). Furthermore, tumours with higher PD-L1 expression were less likely to develop a secondary T790M mutation (T790M+ in PD-L1 0% versus 1–49% versus ≥50%: 53.7% versus 35.7% versus 10%, P = 0.024). Multiplex IHC tests were applied in 15 cases and revealed a potential correlation between PD-L1, immune cells, and EGFR TKI responses.
Lower pre-treatment PD-L1 is associated with better ORR, PFS, and higher frequency of T790M resistance in EGFR TKI-treated lung ADC patients.
•Pre-treatment PD-L1 can predict TKI response in EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC).•Pre-treatment PD-L1 can predict acquired T790M in EGFR mutant lung ADC after TKI therapy.•PD-L1 negatively correlated with B cells, macrophages, and regulatory T cells in EGFR mutant ADC.•Abundant tumour-infiltrating B cell is associated with good TKI response in EGFR mutant ADC.•Pre-treatment PD-L1 may help select the most appropriate regimen for EGFR mutant ADC.
Background & Aims
Oral antiviral therapy may reduce the disease progression of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. We aimed to further investigate the efficacy of long‐term entecavir therapy in ...reduction of the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cirrhotic events and mortality in a large group of CHB‐related cirrhosis patients.
Methods
The C‐TEAM (Cirrhosis‐Taiwanese EntecAvir Multicenter) study was a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective–prospective cohort study in Taiwan. We enrolled treatment‐naïve patients with CHB‐related cirrhosis and baseline HBV‐DNA≥2000 IU/mL receiving long‐term entecavir therapy and compared the development of HCC, cirrhotic events and mortality with that of a historical untreated cohort.
Results
In total, 1315 entecavir‐treated and 503 untreated patients with cirrhosis were enrolled, with median treatment and follow‐up durations of 4 and 6 years respectively. Compared with the untreated cohort, entecavir therapy was associated with a 60% HCC risk reduction hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28‐0.57. Additionally, an older age, the male gender, HBeAg positivity, alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP)≥7 ng/mL before therapy were independent predictors of HCC development. Further analysis showed that entecavir therapy significantly reduced risks of variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and liver‐related and all‐cause mortality. These findings were confirmed by propensity score‐matched cohorts in sensitivity analysis. In patients under entecavir therapy, an older age, the male gender, HBeAg positivity, AFP level ≥7 ng/mL before therapy, and 1‐year virological response were predictive of HCC development.
Conclusions
Four‐year entecavir therapy significantly reduces the risk of HCC, cirrhotic events and mortality in patients with CHB‐related cirrhosis.
See Editorial on Page 1752
Second-line treatment options for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are limited. The phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study evaluated the safety and the efficacy of pembrolizumab for the ...treatment of HNSCC after long-term follow-up.
Multi-centre, non-randomised trial included two HNSCC cohorts (initial and expansion) in which 192 patients were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (initial cohort; N = 60) or 200 mg every 3 weeks (expansion cohort; N = 132). Co-primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1; central imaging vendor review).
Median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.2-32). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and grade 3/4 occurred in 123 (64%) and 24 (13%) patients, respectively. No deaths were attributed to treatment-related AEs. ORR was 18% (34/192; 95% CI, 13-24%). Median response duration was not reached (range, 2+ to 30+ months); 85% of responses lasted ≥6 months. Overall survival at 12 months was 38%.
Some patients received 2 years of treatment and the responses were ongoing for more than 30 months; the durable anti-tumour activity and tolerable safety profile, observed with long-term follow-up, support the use of pembrolizumab as a treatment for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.
Patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) previously treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeted therapy have aggressive disease and no ...available standard of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in this patient population.
In this global, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients aged 16 years and older with radioiodine-refractory DTC (papillary or follicular and their variants) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or matching placebo, stratified by previous lenvatinib treatment and age. The randomisation scheme used stratified permuted blocks of block size six and an interactive voice–web response system; both patients and investigators were masked to study treatment. Patients must have received previous lenvatinib or sorafenib and progressed during or after treatment with up to two VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients receiving placebo could cross over to open-label cabozantinib on disease progression confirmed by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (confirmed response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours RECIST version 1.1) in the first 100 randomly assigned patients (objective response rate intention-to-treat OITT population) and progression-free survival (time to earlier of disease progression per RECIST version 1.1 or death) in all patients (intention-to-treat ITT population), both assessed by BIRC. This report presents the primary objective response rate analysis and a concurrent preplanned interim progression-free survival analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03690388, and is no longer enrolling patients.
Between Feb 27, 2019, and Aug 18, 2020, 227 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 187 were enrolled from 164 clinics in 25 countries and randomly assigned to cabozantinib (n=125) or placebo (n=62). At data cutoff (Aug 19, 2020) for the primary objective response rate and interim progression-free survival analyses, median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 3·4–9·2) for the ITT population and 8·9 months (7·1–10·5) for the OITT population. An objective response in the OITT population was achieved in ten (15%; 99% CI 5·8–29·3) of 67 patients in the cabozantinib group versus 0 (0%; 0–14·8) of 33 in the placebo (p=0·028) but did not meet the prespecified significance level (α=0·01). At interim analysis, the primary endpoint of progression-free survival was met in the ITT population; cabozantinib showed significant improvement in progression-free survival over placebo: median not reached (96% CI 5·7–not estimable NE) versus 1·9 months (1·8–3·6); hazard ratio 0·22 (96% CI 0·13–0·36; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 71 (57%) of 125 patients receiving cabozantinib and 16 (26%) of 62 receiving placebo, the most frequent of which were palmar–plantar erythrodysaesthesia (13 10% vs 0), hypertension (11 9% vs 2 3%), and fatigue (ten 8% vs 0). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (16%) of 125 patients in the cabozantinib group and one (2%) of 62 in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths.
Our results show that cabozantinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival and might provide a new treatment option for patients with radioiodine-refractory DTC who have no available standard of care.
Exelixis.
Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation inhibitor of ALK and ROS1 tyrosine kinases with broad coverage of ALK mutations. In a phase 1 study, activity was seen in patients with ...ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, most of whom had CNS metastases and progression after ALK-directed therapy. We aimed to analyse the overall and intracranial antitumour activity of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
In this phase 2 study, patients with histologically or cytologically ALK-positive or ROS1-positive, advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate end-organ function were eligible. Patients were enrolled into six different expansion cohorts (EXP1–6) on the basis of ALK and ROS1 status and previous therapy, and were given lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily continuously in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response by independent central review, assessed in pooled subgroups of ALK-positive patients. Analyses of activity and safety were based on the safety analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib) as assessed by independent central review. Patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline by independent central review were included in the intracranial activity analyses. In this report, we present lorlatinib activity data for the ALK-positive patients (EXP1–5 only), and safety data for all treated patients (EXP1–6). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865.
Between Sept 15, 2015, and Oct 3, 2016, 276 patients were enrolled: 30 who were ALK positive and treatment naive (EXP1); 59 who were ALK positive and received previous crizotinib without (n=27; EXP2) or with (n=32; EXP3A) previous chemotherapy; 28 who were ALK positive and received one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with or without chemotherapy (EXP3B); 112 who were ALK positive with two (n=66; EXP4) or three (n=46; EXP5) previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without chemotherapy; and 47 who were ROS1 positive with any previous treatment (EXP6). One patient in EXP4 died before receiving lorlatinib and was excluded from the safety analysis set. In treatment-naive patients (EXP1), an objective response was achieved in 27 (90·0%; 95% CI 73·5–97·9) of 30 patients. Three patients in EXP1 had measurable baseline CNS lesions per independent central review, and objective intracranial responses were observed in two (66·7%; 95% CI 9·4–99·2). In ALK-positive patients with at least one previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP2–5), objective responses were achieved in 93 (47·0%; 39·9–54·2) of 198 patients and objective intracranial response in those with measurable baseline CNS lesions in 51 (63·0%; 51·5–73·4) of 81 patients. Objective response was achieved in 41 (69·5%; 95% CI 56·1–80·8) of 59 patients who had only received previous crizotinib (EXP2–3A), nine (32·1%; 15·9–52·4) of 28 patients with one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP3B), and 43 (38·7%; 29·6–48·5) of 111 patients with two or more previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EXP4–5). Objective intracranial response was achieved in 20 (87·0%; 95% CI 66·4–97·2) of 23 patients with measurable baseline CNS lesions in EXP2–3A, five (55·6%; 21·2–86·3) of nine patients in EXP3B, and 26 (53·1%; 38·3–67·5) of 49 patients in EXP4–5. The most common treatment-related adverse events across all patients were hypercholesterolaemia (224 81% of 275 patients overall and 43 16% grade 3–4) and hypertriglyceridaemia (166 60% overall and 43 16% grade 3–4). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (7%) of 275 patients and seven patients (3%) permanently discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Consistent with its broad ALK mutational coverage and CNS penetration, lorlatinib showed substantial overall and intracranial activity both in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and in those who had progressed on crizotinib, second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or after up to three previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thus, lorlatinib could represent an effective treatment option for patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in first-line or subsequent therapy.
Pfizer.
Treatment options for advanced thyroid cancer refractory to standard therapies are limited. The safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab were evaluated in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid ...cancer expressing programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
Patients with advanced thyroid cancer were enrolled in the nonrandomized, phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 trial conducted to evaluate safety and antitumor activity of the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. Key eligibility criteria were advanced papillary or follicular thyroid cancer, failure of standard therapy, and PD-L1 expression in tumor or stroma cells (assessed by immunohistochemistry). Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg was administered every 2 weeks up to 24 months or until confirmed progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.
Twenty-two patients were enrolled: median age was 61 years; 59% were women; and 68% had papillary carcinoma. Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 7-34 months). Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 18 (82%) patients; those occurring in ≥15% of patients were diarrhea (n = 7) and fatigue (n = 4). One grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event occurred (colitis, grade 3); no treatment-related discontinuations or deaths occurred. Two patients had confirmed partial response, for an ORR of 9% (95% confidence interval CI, 1-29%); response duration was 8 and 20 months. Median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI, 2-14 months); median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 22 months to not reached).
Results of this phase Ib proof-of-concept study suggest that pembrolizumab has a manageable safety profile and demonstrate evidence of antitumor activity in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer in a minority of patients treated. Further analyses are necessary to confirm these findings.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02054806 . Registered 4 February 2014.
KEYNOTE‐012 was a phase Ib, multicohort study designed to investigate efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. Results from the subset of patients with recurrent/metastatic head ...and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) from the Asia‐Pacific region are reported. Patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, measurable disease (RECIST version 1.1), and ECOG performance status (PS) 0‐1 were eligible for enrollment in the HNSCC expansion cohort. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every 8 weeks. Co‐primary end‐points were safety and overall response rate (RECIST version 1.1, central review). Secondary end‐points included overall survival and response duration. Patients enrolled at any of the five centers throughout the Asia‐Pacific region were included in these analyses. Twenty‐six patients with HNSCC from the Asia‐Pacific region received pembrolizumab. The median age was 62 years, 65% of patients had ECOG PS 1, and 62% had received two or more prior therapies for recurrent/metastatic disease. Sixteen (62%) patients experienced a treatment‐related adverse event of any grade, including two (8%) patients who experienced one or more events of grade 3 severity. No treatment‐related deaths occurred. The overall response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval, 7%‐39%). After a median follow‐up of 12 months (range, 2‐21 months), a median response duration was not reached (range, 6 to 17+ months); four of five responses lasted ≥6 months. Median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.7‐17.7 months). Pembrolizumab was well tolerated and had durable antitumor activity in patients with HNSCC from the Asia‐Pacific region. (Trial registration no. NCT01848834.)
KEYNOTE‐012 was a phase Ib, multicohort study designed to investigate efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. Asia‐Pacific patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC were eligible for enrollment in the HNSCC expansion cohort and administered pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. These data suggest that pembrolizumab was well tolerated and had durable antitumor activity in patients with HNSCC from the Asia‐Pacific region.
Background
At an interim analysis (median follow‐up, 6.2 months; n = 187), the phase 3 COSMIC‐311 trial met the primary end point of progression‐free survival (PFS): cabozantinib improved PFS versus ...a placebo (median, not reached vs. 1.9 months; p < .0001) in patients with previously treated radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR‐DTC). The results from an exploratory analysis using an extended datacut are presented.
Methods
Patients 16 years old or older with RAIR‐DTC who progressed on prior lenvatinib and/or sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to oral cabozantinib tablets (60 mg/day) or a placebo. Placebo patients could cross over to open‐label cabozantinib upon radiographic disease progression. The objective response rate (ORR) in the first 100 randomized patients and the PFS in the intent‐to‐treat population, both according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by blinded, independent review, were the primary end points.
Results
At the data cutoff (February 8, 2021), 258 patients had been randomized (cabozantinib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88); the median follow‐up was 10.1 months. The median PFS was 11.0 months (96% confidence interval CI, 7.4–13.8 months) for cabozantinib and 1.9 months (96% CI, 1.9–3.7 months) for the placebo (hazard ratio, 0.22; 96% CI, 0.15–0.32; p < .0001). The ORR was 11.0% (95% CI, 6.9%–16.9%) versus 0% (95% CI, 0.0%–4.1%) (p = .0003) with one complete response with cabozantinib. Forty placebo patients crossed over to open‐label cabozantinib. Grade 3/4 treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 62% and 28% of the cabozantinib‐ and placebo‐treated patients, respectively; the most common were hypertension (12% vs. 2%), palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (10% vs. 0%), and fatigue (9% vs. 0%). There were no grade 5 treatment‐related events.
Conclusions
At extended follow‐up, cabozantinib maintained superior efficacy over a placebo in patients with previously treated RAIR‐DTC with no new safety signals.
In the randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 COSMIC‐311 study, cabozantinib significantly improved progression‐free survival versus a placebo at the initial data cutoff in patients with radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who had been treated previously with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–targeted therapy. After extended follow‐up in a larger intent‐to‐treat population, cabozantinib maintained its superiority versus a placebo with no new safety signals.
PDF
