The impact of postoperative morbidity, and in particular infective complications on long-term outcomes, following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is not widely published.
To ...evaluate the effect of postoperative complications on disease recurrence and overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM.
All patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM from January 1993 and March 2007 were identified, and postoperative complications analyzed. Patients who died of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery were excluded form the study. Postoperative complications were graded using a validated system of classification. Complications were further classified into infective and noninfective complication groups and the primary end points of the study were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years.
A total of 705 patients underwent hepatic resection in the study period. Median follow-up was 38 months. Operative morbidity and mortality were 28% and 3.6%, respectively. The total number of patients was 197 (28%) with complications, and 508 (72%) without complications. The 5 year DFS and OS for those with and without complications were: 13% versus 26% (P < 0.001) and 24% versus 37% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed inflammatory response to tumor score, blood transfusion, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent factors associated with DFS, and inflammatory response to tumor, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent predictors for OS. Intra-abdominal and respiratory infection but not wound infections were associated with poorer long-term outcomes.
Postoperative complications influence long-term outcomes in hepatic resection for CRLM. Specifically, postoperative sepsis is an independent predictor of disease free and overall survival. Thorough preoperative optimization, meticulous surgical technique and careful management in the postoperative period may reduce the incidence of these complications and influence long-term outcomes.
To investigate the influence of clear surgical resection margin width on disease recurrence rate after intentionally curative resection of colorectal liver metastases.
There is consensus that a ...histological positive resection margin is a predictor of disease recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The dispute, however, over the width of cancer-free resection margin required is ongoing.
Analysis of observational prospectively collected data for 2715 patients who underwent primary resection of colorectal liver metastases from 2 major hepatobiliary units in the United Kingdom. Histological cancer-free resection margin was classified as positive (if cancer cells present at less than 1 mm from the resection margin) or negative (if the distance between the cancer and the margin is 1 mm or more). The negative margin was further classified according to the distance from the tumor in millimeters. Predictors of disease-free survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. A case-match analysis by a propensity score method was undertaken to reduce bias.
A 1-mm cancer-free resection margin was sufficient to achieve 33% 5-year overall disease-free survival. Extra margin width did not add disease-free survival advantage (P > 0.05). After the propensity case-match analysis, there is no statistical difference in disease-free survival between patients with negative narrow and wider margin clearance hazard ratio (HR) 1.0; 95% (confidence interval) CI: 0.9-1.2; P = 0.579 at 5-mm cutoff and HR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.96-1.3; P = 0.149 at 10-mm cutoff. Patients with extrahepatic disease and positive lymph node primary tumor did not have disease-free survival advantage despite surgical margin clearance (9 months for <1-mm vs 12 months for ≥1-mm margin clearance; P = 0.062).
One-mm cancer-free resection margin achieved in patients with colorectal liver metastases should now be considered the standard of care.
Despite indications for resection of colorectal liver metastases having expanded, debate continues about identifying patients that may benefit from surgery.
Clinicopathologic data from a total of 700 ...patients was gathered between January 1993 and January 2006 from a prospectively maintained dataset. Of these, 687 patients underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases.
The median age of patient was 64 years and 36.8% of patients had synchronous disease. The overall 5-year survival was 45%. The presence of an inflammatory response to tumor (IRT), defined by an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) or a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio of >5:1, was noted in 24.5% of cases. Only the number of metastases and the presence or absence of an IRT influenced both overall and disease-free survival on multivariable analysis. A preoperative prognostic score was derived: 0 = less than 8 metastases and absence of IRT; 1 = 8 or more metastases or IRT, and 2 = 8 or more metastases and IRT-from the results of the multivariable analysis. The 5-year survival of those scoring 0 was 49% compared with 34% for those scoring 1. None of the patients that scored 2 were alive at 5 years.
The preoperative prognostic score is a simple and effective system allowing preoperative stratification.
The aim of this study was to investigate variation in the frequency of resections for colorectal cancer liver metastases across the English NHS.
Previous research has shown significant variation in ...access to liver resection surgery across the English NHS. This study uses more recent data to identify whether inequalities in access to liver resection still persist.
All adults who underwent a major resection for colorectal cancer in an NHS hospital between 2005 and 2012 were identified in the COloRECTal cancer data Repository (CORECT-R). All episodes of care, occurring within 3 years of the initial bowel operation, corresponding to liver resection were identified.
During the study period 157,383 patients were identified as undergoing major resection for a colorectal tumor, of whom 7423 (4.7%) underwent ≥1 liver resections. The resection rate increased from 4.1% in 2005, reaching a plateau around 5% by 2012. There was significant variation in the rate of liver resection across hospitals (2.1%-12.2%). Patients with synchronous metastases who have their primary colorectal resection in a hospital with an onsite specialist hepatobiliary team were more likely to receive a liver resection (odds ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.35) than those treated in one without. This effect was absent in resection for metachronous metastases.
This study presents the largest reported population-based analysis of liver resection rates in colorectal cancer patients. Significant variation has been observed in patient and hospital characteristics and the likelihood of patients receiving a liver resection, with the data showing that proximity to a liver resection service is as important a factor as deprivation.
Background Extensive resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most effective treatment, but high morbidity and poor prognosis remain concerns. Previous data have shown marked differences in ...outcomes between comparable Eastern and Western centers. We compared the outcomes of the management for hilar cholangiocarcinoma at one Japanese and one British institution with comparable experience. Methods Of 298 consecutive patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma evaluated at Hirosaki University Hospital, Japan and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK, 183 underwent radical resection. Clinicopathologic variables and postoperative outcomes were compared. Results Significant differences were not observed between the Hirosaki and Leeds cohorts in overall outcomes despite several differences in the patient characteristics. Although there was a difference in 90-day mortality (2.5% vs 13.6%, respectively), disease-specific 5-year survival rates were 32.8% and 31.9%, respectively ( P = .767). Multivariate analysis identified trisectionectomy (odds ratio = 2.32; P = .010), combined pancreatoduodenectomy (odds ratio = 7.88; P = .010), and perioperative blood transfusion (odds ratio = 1.88; P = .045) were associated with postoperative major complications, while preoperative biliary drainage associated with postoperative major complications, while preoperative biliary drainage (risk ratio = 2.21; P = .018), perioperative blood transfusion (risk ratio = 1.58; P = .029), lymph node metastasis (risk ratio = 2.00; P = .002), moderate/poorly differentiated tumor (risk ratio = 1.72; P = .029), microvascular invasion (risk ratio = 1.63; P = .046), and R1 resection (risk ratio = 1.90; P = .005) were risk factors for poor survival. Conclusion Disease-specific survival and prognostic factors were similar in both centers. Meticulous operative technique to avoid perioperative blood transfusion may improve long-term survival.
The past decade has been the foreground for a radical revolution in the field of preservation in abdominal organ transplantation. Perfusion has increasingly replaced static cold storage as the ...preferred and even gold standard preservation method for marginal-quality organs. Perfusion is dynamic and offers several advantages in comparison with static cold storage. These include the ability to provide a continuous supply of new metabolic substrates, clear metabolic waste products, and perform some degree of organ viability assessment before actual transplantation in the recipient. At the same time, the ongoing importance of static cold storage cannot be overlooked, in particular when it comes to logistical and technical convenience and cost, not to mention the fact that it continues to work well for the majority of transplant allografts. The present review article provides an overview of the fundamental concepts of organ preservation, providing a brief history of static cold preservation and description of the principles behind and basic components of cold preservation solutions. An evaluation of current evidence supporting the use of different preservation solutions in abdominal organ transplantation is provided. As well, the range of solutions used for machine perfusion of abdominal organs is described, as are variations in their compositions related to changing metabolic needs paralleling the raising of the temperature of the perfusate from hypothermic to normothermic range. Finally, appraisal of new preservation solutions that are on the horizon is provided.
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most commonly arises in patients with chronic liver disease. Data on outcomes after liver resection in patients with noncirrhotic, nonfibrotic, seronegative, ...referred to as a “normal” liver are limited. We aimed to investigate differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between patients presenting with HCC arising in “normal” liver (NLHCC) and that arising in “diseased” liver (DLHCC). Study Design All patients undergoing resection for HCC between 1994 and 2008 were assessed. Multivariable analysis of clincopathologic data from the NLHCC group was performed by comparing them with data from the group who had surgery for DLHCC during this period. Results During the 15-year study period, 142 patients underwent liver resection for HCC: 81 for NLHCC and 61 for DLHCC. NLHCCs were more often solitary but were larger and required more major resections. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between patients who had NLHCC or DLHCC, with overall and recurrence-free 5-year survivals of 60% and 51% in NLHCC and 55% and 33% in DLHCC, respectively. In patients with NLHCC, significant factors predicting overall survival were blood transfusion requirement (p = 0.003) and age (p = 0.009), and the only significant factor at predicting recurrence-free survival was presence of multiple tumors (p = 0.025). In contrast, in DLHCC, the only significant prognostic variables were a preoperative tumor biopsy (p = 0.017) or a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.001), both of which predicted a poorer recurrence-free survival. Conclusions HCC presenting in patients with a normal background liver parenchyma appears to present a different spectrum of the disease. However, excellent outcomes can be achieved after liver resection, although this often requires the use of advanced techniques due to late presentation.
To prospectively compare accuracy of dynamic contrast material-enhanced thin-section multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional (3D) dynamic ...gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging with optimized gradient-echo (GRE) sequence for depiction of hepatic lesions; surgery and histologic analysis were the reference standard.
Local ethics committee approval was granted, and written informed consent was obtained. Fifty-eight patients (45 men, 13 women; age range, 47-82 years) with hepatic metastases were imaged with multi-detector row CT (3.2-mm section thickness), 3D dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (2.5-mm effective section thickness), and SPIO-enhanced MR by using an optimized T2-weighted GRE sequence. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who identified and localized lesions with a four-point confidence scale. Accuracy of each technique was measured with alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results were correlated with findings at surgery with intraoperative ultrasonography or histopathologic examination. Statistical differences among techniques for each observer were measured.
Accuracy values for each observer for all metastases (n = 215) and 1.0-cm or smaller metastases (n = 80), respectively, follow: For CT, those for reader 1 were 0.82 and 0.65; for reader 2, 0.81 and 0.68. For gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.79; for reader 2, 0.90 and 0.76. For SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.83; for reader 2, 0.92 and 0.81. For all metastases for both observers, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were significantly more accurate than CT (P < .01). For metastases 1.0 cm or smaller and one observer, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were more accurate than CT (P < .01); for the other observer, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was more accurate than gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (P < .05) and CT (P < .02), but there was no significant difference between gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and CT (P = .2).
Accuracy for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was similar. Both techniques were significantly more accurate than CT.
PDF
