Atrial cardiomyopathy has been recognized as having important consequences for cardiac performance and clinical outcomes. The pathophysiological role of the left atrial (LA) appendage and the effect ...of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) upon LA mechanics is incompletely understood. We evaluated if changes in LA stiffness due to endocardial LAAO can be detected by LA pressure-volume (PV) analysis and whether stiffness parameters are associated with baseline characteristics. Patients undergoing percutaneous endocardial LAAO (
= 25) were studied using a novel PV analysis using near-simultaneous three-dimensional LA volume measurements by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and direct invasive LA pressure measurements. LA stiffness (dP/dV, change in pressure with change in volume) was calculated before and after LAAO. Overall LA stiffness significantly increased after LAAO compared with baseline (median, 0.41-0.64 mmHg/mL;
≪ 0.001). LA body stiffness after LAAO correlated with baseline LA appendage size by indexed maximum depth (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient
= 0.61;
< 0.01). LA stiffness change showed an even stronger correlation with baseline LA appendage size by indexed maximum depth (
= 0.70;
< 0.001). We found that overall LA stiffness increases after endocardial LAAO. Baseline LA appendage size correlates with the magnitude of increase and LA body stiffness. These findings document alteration of LA mechanics after endocardial LAAO and suggest that the LA appendage modulates overall LA compliance.
Our study documents a correlation of LA appendage remodeling with the degree of chronically abnormal LA body stiffness. In addition, we found that LA appendage size was the baseline parameter that best correlated with the magnitude of a further increase in overall LA stiffness after appendage occlusion. These findings offer insights about the LA appendage and LA mechanics that are relevant to patients at risk for adverse atrial remodeling, especially candidates for LA appendage occlusion.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular disorder, occurring in up to 10% of the general population. Although surgery is the established treatment for primary MR, many patients do not receive ...appropriate therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and treatment pattern of patients with severe MR evaluated at a tertiary medical center and determine factors associated with receiving surgery.
All patients with moderate-severe and severe MR undergoing transthoracic echocardiography from 2011 to 2016 were identified. Patients with prior mitral valve surgery were excluded. Treatment recommendations were classified as referral to cardiology, referral to cardiothoracic surgery (CTS), receiving mitral valve surgery or receiving MitraClip. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with referral to CTS or receiving surgery.
During the study period, 1918 transthoracic echocardiogram were performed and 412 patients with moderate-severe or severe MR were identified. One hundred sixty-six patients (40%) had primary MR and 246 patients (60%) had secondary MR. For those with primary MR, 75 patients (45%) received treatment (surgery, n = 60 and MitraClip, n = 15) and 91 patients (55%) did not receive treatment. One hundred patients (60%) were referred to CTS and 128 patients (77%) were referred to cardiology. Patients undergoing surgery were younger (62.6 ± 14.2 years vs 72.0 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), with a higher prevalence of heart failure (57% vs 40%, p = 0.044) and a lower prevalence of stroke (3% vs 24%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (54% vs 74%, p = 0.012), compared to patients not undergoing surgery, respectively. Ejection fraction (60.4 ± 10.9% vs 56.3 ± 11.6%, p = 0.034), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (53.2 ± 10.3 mm vs 48.7 ± 10.9 mm, p = 0.040) and effective regurgitant orifice area (0.5 ± 0.4 cm2 vs 0.3 ± 0.1 cm2) were higher in patients undergoing surgery, compared to patients not undergoing surgery, respectively. The most common reason for not receiving surgery was that MR was not addressed by the treating physician and lost to clinical follow-up. Over 50% of patients that did not receive surgery had at least 1 indication based upon current practice guidelines.
In contemporary clinical practice, less than half of patients with moderate-severe and severe primary MR received surgery and many were not referred for surgical consultation.
•Mitral regurgitation occurs in up to 10% of the general population.•Less than 50% of patients with indications received treatment for mitral regurgitation.•Predictors for referral to cardiothoracic surgery included age, presence of heart failure and history of hypertension.•Many patients with severe mitral regurgitation are not referred for surgery despite indications for treatment. The reasons for non-referral require further study.
Abstract Background >Vitamin D deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency in the United States. It is seldom measured or recognized, and rarely is treated, particularly in critically ill ...patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and impact of vitamin D deficiency in surgical intensive care unit patients. We hypothesized that severe vitamin D deficiency increases the length of stay, mortality rate, and cost in critically ill patients admitted to surgical intensive care units. Methods We performed a prospective observational study of vitamin D status on 258 consecutive patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Grady Memorial Hospital between August 2009 and January 2010. Vitamin D levels (25 OH2 vitamin-D3) were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as follows: severe deficiency was categorized as less than 13 ng/mL; moderate deficiency was categorized as 14 to 26 ng/mL; mild deficiency was categorized as 27 to 39 ng/mL; and normal levels were categorized as greater than 40 ng/mL. Results Of the 258 patients evaluated, 70.2% (181) were men, and 29.8% (77) were women; 57.6% (148) were African American and 32.4% (109) were Caucasian. A total of 138 (53.5%) patients had severe vitamin D deficiency, 96 (37.2%) had moderate deficiency, 18 (7.0%) had mild deficiency, and 3 (1.2%) of the patients had normal vitamin D levels. The mean length of stay in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit for the severe vitamin D–deficient group was 13.33 ± 19.5 days versus 7.29 ± 15.3 days and 5.17 ± 6.5 days for the moderate and mild vitamin D-deficient groups, respectively, which was clinically significant ( P = .002). The mean treatment cost during the patient stay in the surgical intensive care unit was $51,413.33 ± $75,123.00 for the severe vitamin D–deficient group, $28,123.65 ± $59,752.00 for the moderate group, and $20,414.11 ± $25,714.30 for the mild vitamin D–deficient group, which also was clinically significant ( P = .027). More importantly, the mortality rate for the severe vitamin D–deficient group was 17 (12.3%) versus 11 (11.5%) in the moderate group ( P = .125). Because no deaths occurred in the mildly or normal vitamin D–deficient groups, we compared the mortality rate between severe/moderate and mild/normal vitamin D groups ( P = .047). Conclusions In univariate analysis, severe and moderate vitamin D deficiency was related inversely to the length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit (r = .194; P = .001), related inversely to surgical intensive care unit treatment cost (r = .194; P = .001) and mortality (r = .125; P = .023), compared with the mild vitamin D–deficient group, after adjusting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities (myocardial infarctions, acute renal failure, and pneumonia); the length of stay, surgical intensive care unit cost, and mortality remained significantly associated with vitamin D deficiency.
The goal of this study is to establish the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin (HPRA) and clopidogrel (HPRC) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
CLI is ...associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular events. Unlike other patient populations with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, previous studies failed to demonstrate a benefit of antiplatelet therapy in patients with CLI.
From June 2014 to November 2016, we performed platelet reactivity studies for P2Y12 and thromboxane A2 (TXA2) inhibition in 100 CLI patients receiving daily treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. P2Y12 inhibition was measured by two assays: vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and VerifyNow P2Y12 assays. HPRC was defined as VerifyNow P2Y12 reactive units (PRU) >208 and VASP-platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI) >50%. TXA2 inhibition was measured with the VerifyNow aspirin test and HPRA was defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550.
Mean age was 67±11 years, 50% were male, 80% had diabetes mellitus, and 26% had chronic renal insufficiency. Thirty-three percent of patients had a PRU >208 and 46% a VASP-PRI >50%. HPRC was present in 26% of patients based on the criteria of both a PRU >208 and VASP-PRI >50%. HPRA was present in 25% of patients. The overall prevalence of HPR to ASA or clopidogrel was 35% and HPR to both drugs was present in 8% of patients. Clinical characteristics were similar between groups.
HPR to aspirin or clopidogrel is highly prevalent in patients with CLI. Nearly one in ten patients with CLI is a hyporesponder to both aspirin and clopidogrel.
Display omitted
The optimal stent for use in saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is still debatable. Multiple randomized trials have compared drug-eluting stents (DES) to bare metal stents (BMS) in SVG ...interventions with conflicting results.
Authors searched the online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DES to BMS in SVG percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to calculate the odds ratio for outcomes of interest.
Authors studied six RCTs that included 1592 patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The mean follow up was 42 months. Patients mean age was the same in both groups: 70.3 years in the DES group (approximately 93.3% male) and 70.3 years in the BMS group (approximately 93.8% male). Vein graft age was 13.4 years in the DES PCI arm vs. 13.4 years in the BMS PCI arm. Four of the six trials reported data on embolic protection device use: 67% (303/452) in the DES arm vs. 67.9% (309/455) in the BMS arm. The primary outcome of long-term all-cause mortality was not different between DES vs. BMS (15.2% vs. 14.1%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67–1.88; P = 0.66). Secondary outcomes were also similar between DES and BMS: major adverse cardiovascular events (31.6% vs. 33.1%, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.45–1.38; P = 0.41); cardiac death (9% vs. 8.6%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.55–2.30; P = 0.75); myocardial infarction (8% vs. 9.5%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.47–1.51; P = 0.57); target lesion revascularization (16.4% vs. 14.4%, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.50–1.92; P = 0.95); and target vessel revascularization (19% vs. 19.4%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41–1.34; P = 0.33).
At a mean follow-up of 42 months, no difference was observed in clinical outcomes between DES and BMS in SVG interventions.
•DES results in similar outcomes as BMS in SVG PCI up to 42 months of mean follow up.•SVG PCI results in excess of 32% major adverse cardiovascular outcomes at 42 months.•Post CABG patients who undergo SVG PCI have a mortality rate of 15% at 42 months.
To test the hypothesis that in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and claudication, treated with maximal tolerated statin therapy, the addition of a monthly subcutaneous injection of ...evolocumab for 6 months improves treadmill walking performance.
Lipid lowering therapy improves walking parameters in patients with PAD and claudication. Evolocumab decreases cardiac and limb adverse events in patients with PAD; however, the effect of evolocumab on walking performance is not known.
We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare maximal walking time (MWT) and pain free walking time (PFWT) in patients with PAD and claudication treated with monthly subcutaneous injections of evolocumab 420 mg (n = 35) or placebo (n = 35). We also performed measurements of lower limb perfusion, brachial flow mediated dilatation (FMD), carotid intima media thickness (IMT), and serum biomarkers of PAD disease severity.
After six-months of treatment with evolocumab MWT increased by 37.7 % (87.5 ± 24 s) compared to 1.4 % (−21.7 ± 22.9 s) in the placebo group, p = 0.01. PFWT increased by 55.3 % (67.3 ± 21.2 s) in the evolocumab group compared to 20.3 % (8.5 ± 20.3 s) in the placebo group, p = 0.051. There was no difference in lower extremity arterial perfusion measurements. FMD increased by 42.0 ± 73.9 % (1.01 ± 0.7 %) in the evolocumab group and decreased by 16.29 ± 20.06 % (0.99 ± 0.68 %) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). IMT decreased by 7.16 ± 4.6 % (0.06 ± 0.04 mm) in the evolocumab group and increased by 6.68 ± 4.9 % (0.05 ± 0.03 mm) in the placebo group, (p < 0.001).
The addition of evolocumab to maximal tolerated statin therapy improves maximal walking time in patients with PAD and claudication, increases FMD, and decreases IMT.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) impairs quality of life by causing lower extremity intermittent claudication, rest pain, or amputation. Evolocumab is a monthly injectable monoclonal antibody medication that reduces cholesterol. In this study, we randomly treated patients with PAD and claudication, and on background statin therapy, with evolocumab or placebo, and found that evolocumab improves walking performance on a treadmill test by increasing maximal walking time. We also found that evolocumab decreases plasma MRP-14 levels, a marker of PAD severity.
•Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) impairs quality of life by causing lower extremity intermittent claudication, rest pain, or amputation.•Evolocumab is a monthly injectable monoclonal antibody medication that reduces cholesterol.•In this study, we randomly treated patients with PAD and claudication, and on background statin therapy, with evolocumab or placebo, and found that evolocumab improves walking performance on a treadmill test by increasing maximal walking time.•We also found that evolocumab decreases plasma MRP-14 levels, a marker of PAD severity.
Background
Data regarding efficacy of various stent and embolic protection device (EPD) combinations to prevent stroke during carotid artery stenting (CAS) is limited. We compared post‐procedure ...inpatient neurologic outcomes across various carotid stent‐EPD platforms recorded in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry.
Methods
We analyzed 13,786 consecutive CAS procedures in the VQI registry performed between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. The most commonly used stent‐EPD combinations (n = 5407) were included in the analysis. Post‐procedure inpatient neurologic outcomes included (1) ipsilateral stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and (2) any stroke/TIA. Multivariate generalized estimating equation regression analysis was performed, adjusting for age, sex, tobacco use, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, prior stroke/TIA, hypertension, history of carotid revascularization, and presence of a second ipsilateral stenosis >70%, to determine whether risk of outcomes differed according to device.
Results
Of 13,786 CAS procedures, Xact‐Emboshield (n = 2,438, 17.6%), Precise‐Angioguard (n = 1,480, 10.7%), Acculink‐Accunet (n = 829, 6.01%), and Acculink‐Emboshield (n = 660, 4.8%) were the most commonly used combinations, accounting for a total of 5,407 procedures. Inpatient event rates for ipsilateral stroke/TIA and any stroke/TIA were 1.9 and 2.7% in the Accunet‐Acculink, 3.0 and 3.2% in Acculink‐Emboshield, 3.2 and 4.1% in Precise‐Angioguard and 2.2 and 3.0% in Xact‐Emboshield. There was no evidence of difference in risk of ipsilateral stroke/TIA or any stroke/TIA across device combinations (P = 0.15 and P = 0.16, respectively).
Conclusion
CAS with current carotid stent‐EPD combinations is associated with low rates of inpatient stroke/TIA. There is no statistically significant difference in rates of inpatient stroke/TIA across device combinations.
Background High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist devices offers a treatment option for patients with severe symptoms, complex and ...extensive coronary artery disease, and multiple comorbidities. The extrapolation from clinical trial to real-world practice has inherent uncertainties. We compared the characteristics, procedures, and outcomes of high-risk PCI supported by a microaxial pump (Impella 2.5) in a multicenter registry versus the randomized PROTECT II trial (NCT00562016). Methods The USpella registry is an observational multicenter voluntary registry of Impella technology. A total of 637 patients treated between June 2007 and September 2013 were included. Of them, 339 patients would have met enrollment criteria for the PROTECT II trial. These were compared with 216 patients treated in the Impella arm of PROTECT II. Results Compared to the clinical trial, registry patients were older (70 ± 11.5 vs 67.5 ± 11.0 years); more likely to have chronic kidney disease (30% vs 22.7%), prior myocardial infarction (69.3% vs 56.5%), or prior bypass surgery (39.4% vs. 30.2%); and had similar prevalence of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and prior stroke. Registry patients had more extensive coronary artery disease (2.2 vs 1.8 diseased vessels) and had a similar Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. At hospital discharge, registry patients experienced a similar reduction in New York Heart Association class III to IV symptoms compared to trial patients. Registry patients had a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality (2.7% vs 4.6, P = .27). Conclusions USpella provides a real-world and contemporary estimation of the type of procedures and outcomes of high-risk patients undergoing PCI supported by Impella 2.5. Despite the higher risk of registry patients, clinical outcomes appeared to be favorable and consistent compared with the randomized trial.
Noninvasive and practical assessment of hemodynamics is a critical unmet need in the treatment of both chronic and acute cardiovascular diseases. Particularly, the ability to monitor left ventricular ...end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) noninvasively offers enormous benefit for managing patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Recently, we provided proof of concept that a new cardiac metric, intrinsic frequency (IF), derived from mathematical analysis of non-invasively captured arterial waveforms, can be used to accurately compute cardiovascular hemodynamic measures, such as left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), by using a smartphone. In this manuscript, we propose a new systems-based method called cardiac triangle mapping (CTM) for hemodynamics evaluation of the left ventricle. This method is based on intrinsic frequency (IF) and systolic time interval (STI) methods that allows computation of LVEDP from noninvasive measurements. Since the CTM method only requires arterial waveform and electrocardiogram (ECG), it can eventually be adopted as a simple smartphone-based device, an inexpensive hand-held device, or perhaps (with future design modifications) a wearable sensor. Such devices, combined with this method, would allow for remote monitoring of heart failure patients.