Abstract
We present a major update of the HOCOMOCO collection that consists of patterns describing DNA binding specificities for human and mouse transcription factors. In this release, we profited ...from a nearly doubled volume of published in vivo experiments on transcription factor (TF) binding to expand the repertoire of binding models, replace low-quality models previously based on in vitro data only and cover more than a hundred TFs with previously unknown binding specificities. This was achieved by systematic motif discovery from more than five thousand ChIP-Seq experiments uniformly processed within the BioUML framework with several ChIP-Seq peak calling tools and aggregated in the GTRD database. HOCOMOCO v11 contains binding models for 453 mouse and 680 human transcription factors and includes 1302 mononucleotide and 576 dinucleotide position weight matrices, which describe primary binding preferences of each transcription factor and reliable alternative binding specificities. An interactive interface and bulk downloads are available on the web: http://hocomoco.autosome.ru and http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/hocomoco11. In this release, we complement HOCOMOCO by MoLoTool (Motif Location Toolbox, http://molotool.autosome.ru) that applies HOCOMOCO models for visualization of binding sites in short DNA sequences.
DNA methylation in promoters is closely linked to downstream gene repression. However, whether DNA methylation is a cause or a consequence of gene repression remains an open question. If it is a ...cause, then DNA methylation may affect the affinity of transcription factors (TFs) for their binding sites (TFBSs). If it is a consequence, then gene repression caused by chromatin modification may be stabilized by DNA methylation. Until now, these two possibilities have been supported only by non-systematic evidence and they have not been tested on a wide range of TFs. An average promoter methylation is usually used in studies, whereas recent results suggested that methylation of individual cytosines can also be important.
We found that the methylation profiles of 16.6% of cytosines and the expression profiles of neighboring transcriptional start sites (TSSs) were significantly negatively correlated. We called the CpGs corresponding to such cytosines "traffic lights". We observed a strong selection against CpG "traffic lights" within TFBSs. The negative selection was stronger for transcriptional repressors as compared with transcriptional activators or multifunctional TFs as well as for core TFBS positions as compared with flanking TFBS positions.
Our results indicate that direct and selective methylation of certain TFBS that prevents TF binding is restricted to special cases and cannot be considered as a general regulatory mechanism of transcription.
Differential methylation (DM) is actively recruited in different types of fundamental and translational studies. Currently, microarray- and NGS-based approaches for methylation analysis are the most ...widely used with multiple statistical models designed to extract differential methylation signatures. The benchmarking of DM models is challenging due to the absence of gold standard data. In this study, we analyze an extensive number of publicly available NGS and microarray datasets with divergent and widely utilized statistical models and apply the recently suggested and validated rank-statistic-based approach Hobotnica to evaluate the quality of their results. Overall, microarray-based methods demonstrate more robust and convergent results, while NGS-based models are highly dissimilar. Tests on the simulated NGS data tend to overestimate the quality of the DM methods and therefore are recommended for use with caution. Evaluation of the top 10 DMC and top 100 DMC in addition to the not-subset signature also shows more stable results for microarray data. Summing up, given the observed heterogeneity in NGS methylation data, the evaluation of newly generated methylation signatures is a crucial step in DM analysis. The Hobotnica metric is coordinated with previously developed quality metrics and provides a robust, sensitive, and informative estimation of methods' performance and DM signatures' quality in the absence of gold standard data solving a long-existing problem in DM analysis.
We present an update of EpiFactors, a manually curated database providing information about epigenetic regulators, their complexes, targets, and products which is openly accessible at ...http://epifactors.autosome.org. An updated version of the EpiFactors contains information on 902 proteins, including 101 histones and protamines, and, as a main update, a newly curated collection of 124 lncRNAs involved in epigenetic regulation. The amount of publications concerning the role of lncRNA in epigenetics is rapidly growing. Yet, the resource that compiles, integrates, organizes, and presents curated information on lncRNAs in epigenetics is missing. EpiFactors fills this gap and provides data on epigenetic regulators in an accessible and user-friendly form. For 820 of the genes in EpiFactors, we include expression estimates across multiple cell types assessed by CAGE-Seq in the FANTOM5 project. In addition, the updated EpiFactors contains information on 73 protein complexes involved in epigenetic regulation. Our resource is practical for a wide range of users, including biologists, bioinformaticians and molecular/systems biologists.
Models of transcription factor (TF) binding sites provide a basis for a wide spectrum of studies in regulatory genomics, from reconstruction of regulatory networks to functional annotation of ...transcripts and sequence variants. While TFs may recognize different sequence patterns in different conditions, it is pragmatic to have a single generic model for each particular TF as a baseline for practical applications. Here we present the expanded and enhanced version of HOCOMOCO (http://hocomoco.autosome.ru and http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/hocomoco10), the collection of models of DNA patterns, recognized by transcription factors. HOCOMOCO now provides position weight matrix (PWM) models for binding sites of 601 human TFs and, in addition, PWMs for 396 mouse TFs. Furthermore, we introduce the largest up to date collection of dinucleotide PWM models for 86 (52) human (mouse) TFs. The update is based on the analysis of massive ChIP-Seq and HT-SELEX datasets, with the validation of the resulting models on in vivo data. To facilitate a practical application, all HOCOMOCO models are linked to gene and protein databases (Entrez Gene, HGNC, UniProt) and accompanied by precomputed score thresholds. Finally, we provide command-line tools for PWM and diPWM threshold estimation and motif finding in nucleotide sequences.
Single-cell RNA-seq data contains a lot of dropouts hampering downstream analyses due to the low number and inefficient capture of mRNAs in individual cells. Here, we present Epi-Impute, a ...computational method for dropout imputation by reconciling expression and epigenomic data. Epi-Impute leverages single-cell ATAC-seq data as an additional source of information about gene activity to reduce the number of dropouts. We demonstrate that Epi-Impute outperforms existing methods, especially for very sparse single-cell RNA-seq data sets, significantly reducing imputation error. At the same time, Epi-Impute accurately captures the primary distribution of gene expression across cells while preserving the gene-gene and cell-cell relationship in the data. Moreover, Epi-Impute allows for the discovery of functionally relevant cell clusters as a result of the increased resolution of scRNA-seq data due to imputation.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a key role in many cellular processes including chromatin regulation. To modify chromatin, lncRNAs often interact with DNA in a sequence-specific manner forming ...RNA:DNA triple helices. Computational tools for triple helix search do not always provide genome-wide predictions of sufficient quality. Here, we used four human lncRNAs (MEG3, DACOR1, TERC and HOTAIR) and their experimentally determined binding regions for evaluating triplex parameters that provide the highest prediction accuracy. Additionally, we combined triplex prediction with the lncRNA secondary structure and demonstrated that considering only single-stranded fragments of lncRNA can further improve DNA-RNA triplexes prediction.
Transcriptional regulation of protein-coding genes is increasingly well-understood on a global scale, yet no comparable information exists for long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes, which were recently ...recognized to be as numerous as protein-coding genes in mammalian genomes. We performed a genome-wide comparative analysis of the promoters of human lncRNA and protein-coding genes, finding global differences in specific genetic and epigenetic features relevant to transcriptional regulation. These two groups of genes are hence subject to separate transcriptional regulatory programs, including distinct transcription factor (TF) proteins that significantly favor lncRNA, rather than coding-gene, promoters. We report a specific signature of promoter-proximal transcriptional regulation of lncRNA genes, including several distinct transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). Experimental DNase I hypersensitive site profiles are consistent with active configurations of these lncRNA TFBS sets in diverse human cell types. TFBS ChIP-seq datasets confirm the binding events that we predicted using computational approaches for a subset of factors. For several TFs known to be directly regulated by lncRNAs, we find that their putative TFBSs are enriched at lncRNA promoters, suggesting that the TFs and the lncRNAs may participate in a bidirectional feedback loop regulatory network. Accordingly, cells may be able to modulate lncRNA expression levels independently of mRNA levels via distinct regulatory pathways. Our results also raise the possibility that, given the historical reliance on protein-coding gene catalogs to define the chromatin states of active promoters, a revision of these chromatin signature profiles to incorporate expressed lncRNA genes is warranted in the future.
Abstract
The genomes of mammalian species are pervasively transcribed producing as many noncoding as protein-coding RNAs. There is a growing body of evidence supporting their functional role. Long ...noncoding RNA (lncRNA) can bind both nucleic acids and proteins through several mechanisms. A reliable computational prediction of the most probable mechanism of lncRNA interaction can facilitate experimental validation of its function. In this study, we benchmarked computational tools capable to discriminate lncRNA from mRNA and predict lncRNA interactions with other nucleic acids. We assessed the performance of 9 tools for distinguishing protein-coding from noncoding RNAs, as well as 19 tools for prediction of RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA interactions. Our conclusions about the considered tools were based on their performances on the entire genome/transcriptome level, as it is the most common task nowadays. We found that FEELnc and CPAT distinguish between coding and noncoding mammalian transcripts in the most accurate manner. ASSA, RIBlast and LASTAL, as well as Triplexator, turned out to be the best predictors of RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA interactions, respectively. We showed that the normalization of the predicted interaction strength to the transcript length and GC content may improve the accuracy of inferring RNA interactions. Yet, all the current tools have difficulties to make accurate predictions of short-trans RNA-RNA interactions—stretches of sparse contacts. All over, there is still room for improvement in each category, especially for predictions of RNA interactions.
PDF
