Elevated lipoprotein(a) Lp(a) is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk. However, treatment options for elevated Lp(a) are limited. Alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to ...proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by up to 62% from baseline in phase 3 studies, with adverse event rates similar between alirocumab and controls. We evaluated the effect of alirocumab on serum Lp(a) using pooled data from the phase 3 ODYSSEY program: 4,915 patients with hypercholesterolemia from 10 phase 3 studies were included. Eight studies evaluated alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), with possible increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 depending on LDL-C at week 8 (75/150 mg Q2W); the other 2 studies evaluated alirocumab 150-mg Q2W from the outset. Comparators were placebo or ezetimibe. Eight studies were conducted on a background of statins, and 2 studies were carried out with no statins. Alirocumab was associated with significant reductions in Lp(a), regardless of starting dose and use of concomitant statins. At week 24, reductions from baseline were 23% to 27% with alirocumab 75/150-mg Q2W and 29% with alirocumab 150-mg Q2W (all comparisons p <0.0001 vs controls). Reductions were sustained over 78 to 104 weeks. Lp(a) reductions with alirocumab were independent of race, gender, presence of familial hypercholesterolemia, baseline Lp(a), and LDL-C concentrations, or use of statins. In conclusion, in addition to marked reduction in LDL-C, alirocumab leads to a significant and sustained lowering of Lp(a).
Background Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Long-term effects of proprotein convertase ...subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition have not been thoroughly investigated in these patients. Objective We evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a PCSK9 inhibitor, vs placebo in patients with HeFH. Methods In total, 1257 patients with HeFH on maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapies from four 78-week ODYSSEY trials were analyzed. In FH I and II, patients with baseline LDL-C levels ≥70/100 mg/dL ( n = 735), depending on documented cardiovascular disease history, received placebo or alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W; with dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 if week 8 LDL-C was ≥70 mg/dL). Separately, data were pooled from HIGH FH (baseline LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL) and patients with HeFH from LONG TERM (baseline LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL), where patients received placebo or alirocumab 150 mg Q2W ( n = 522). Results At week 24, alirocumab reduced LDL-C levels by −48.8% (75/150 mg Q2W; placebo: +7.1%) and −55.0% (alirocumab 150 mg Q2W; placebo: +1.3%) (both P < .0001 vs placebo; intention-to-treat analysis). Least-squares mean LDL-C levels of 69.1 to 75.6 mg/dL (alirocumab 75/150 mg/dL Q2W; baseline: 141.3 mg/dL) and 72.2 to 82.3 mg/dL (alirocumab 150 mg Q2W; baseline: 168.4 mg/dL) were achieved at weeks 24 to 78 (on-treatment analysis). Additional beneficial effects were observed in other lipids. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar in the alirocumab (80.5%) and placebo groups (83.0%). Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with HeFH, alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C levels. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated.
Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of combination antithrombotic therapy on stroke and bleeding risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). ...Methods Post hoc analysis of 4,576 patients with AF (mean ± SD age, 70.1 ± 9.1 years; men, 66.5%) enrolled in the Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AMADEUS) trial were randomized to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) (n = 2,283) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) (n = 2,293). Of these patients, 848 (18.5%) received antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, etc) in addition to anticoagulation treatment (combination antithrombotic therapy). Results A total of 572 (15.3% per year) clinically relevant bleeding and 103 (2.6% per year) major bleeding events occurred. Patients receiving combination antithrombotic therapy had a 2.3- to 2.5-fold increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding events and major bleeding events, respectively, compared with those receiving anticoagulation therapy only. Multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, 95% CI) revealed that the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly increased by age 65 to 74 years (1.44, 1.14-1.82) and ≥ 75 years (1.59, 1.24-2.04, P = .001) and by combination antithrombotic therapy (2.47, 2.07-2.96, P < .0001). The same held true for major bleeding events, with analogous figures for age 65 to 74 years (2.26, 1.08-4.71) and ≥ 75 years (4.19, 1.98-8.87, P = .0004) and for combination antithrombotic therapy (2.23, 1.49-3.34, P < .0001). Combination antithrombotic therapy was not associated with a decrease in ischemic stroke risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only (11 1.4% per year vs 22 0.7% per year; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.94-4.30; P = .07). Conclusions Combination antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of clinically relevant bleeding and major bleeding in patients with AF and does not appear to reduce the risk of stroke.
PDF
