Summary Background The risk of venous thromboembolism is high after total hip arthroplasty and could persist after hospital discharge. Our aim was to compare the use of rivaroxaban for extended ...thromboprophylaxis with short-term thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin. Methods 2509 patients scheduled to undergo elective total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned, stratified according to centre, with a computer-generated randomisation code, to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 31–39 days (with placebo injection for 10–14 days; n=1252), or enoxaparin 40 mg once daily subcutaneously for 10–14 days (with placebo tablet for 31–39 days; n=1257). The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic detected by mandatory, bilateral venography), non-fatal pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality up to day 30–42. Analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which consisted of all patients who had received at least one dose of study medication, had undergone planned surgery, and had adequate assessment of thromboembolism. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00332020. Findings The modified intention-to-treat population for the analysis of the primary efficacy outcome consisted of 864 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 869 in the enoxaparin group. The primary outcome occurred in 17 (2·0%) patients in the rivaroxaban group, compared with 81 (9·3%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction 7·3%, 95% CI 5·2–9·4; p<0·0001). The incidence of any on-treatment bleeding was much the same in both groups (81 6·6% events in 1228 patients in the rivaroxaban safety population vs 68 5·5% of 1229 patients in the enoxaparin safety population; p=0·25). Interpretation Extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than short-term enoxaparin plus placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism, including symptomatic events, in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Funding Bayer HealthCare AG, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC.
Summary Background Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is recommended for at least 10 days after total knee arthroplasty; oral regimens could enable shorter hospital stays. We aimed to test the ...efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. Methods In a randomised, double-blind, phase III study, 3148 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty received either oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, beginning 6–8 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 h, starting 12–24 h after surgery. Patients had mandatory bilateral venography between days 11 and 15. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any deep-vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause up to day 17 after surgery. Efficacy was assessed as non-inferiority of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin in the per-protocol population (absolute non-inferiority limit −4%); if non-inferiority was shown, we assessed whether rivaroxaban had superior efficacy in the modified intention-to-treat population. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00362232. Findings The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 67 (6·9%) of 965 patients given rivaroxaban and in 97 (10·1%) of 959 given enoxaparin (absolute risk reduction 3·19%, 95% CI 0·71–5·67; p=0·0118). Ten (0·7%) of 1526 patients given rivaroxaban and four (0·3%) of 1508 given enoxaparin had major bleeding (p=0·1096). Interpretation Oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 10–14 days was significantly superior to subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg given every 12 h for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. Funding Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development.
Abstract Background Long-term aspirin prevents vascular events but is only modestly effective. Rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin might be more effective than aspirin alone for vascular ...prevention in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). Both rivaroxaban and aspirin increase upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and this might be prevented by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Methods COMPASS is a double-blind superiority trial comparing rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice-daily in combination with aspirin 100mg once-daily or rivaroxaban 5mg twice-daily versus aspirin 100mg once-daily for prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients with stable CAD or PAD. Patients not taking a PPI were also randomized, using a partial factorial design, to pantoprazole 40mg once-daily or placebo. The trial was designed to have at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in each of the rivaroxaban-treatment arms compared with aspirin and to detect a 50% reduction in upper GI complications with pantoprazole compared with placebo. Results Between February 2013 and May 2016, we recruited 27,395 participants from 602 centers in 33 countries; 17,603 participants were included in the pantoprazole versus placebo comparison. At baseline, mean age was 68.2years, 22.0% were female, 90.6% had CAD, and 27.3% had PAD. Conclusion COMPASS will provide information on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, alone or in combination with aspirin, in the long-term management of patients with stable CAD or PAD, and on the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole in preventing upper GI complications in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Patients with AF carry a fivefold increased risk of stroke and the risk of death from AF-related stroke ...is doubled. Current management is often inadequate, leaving patients at risk for a potentially fatal or disabling event. The purpose of the GARFIELD registry is to evaluate the management and outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF at risk for stroke. Design The GARFIELD registry is an observational, multicenter, prospective study of patients with newly diagnosed AF and one or more additional risk factors for stroke. The aim is to enroll 55,000 patients at >1,000 centers in 50 countries. Enrollment will take place in five independent, sequential, prospective cohorts. An additional retrospective validation cohort of 5,000 patients with established AF and at least one additional risk factor for stroke will be conducted in parallel with cohort one. The study started in December 2009, with a planned recruitment period of 4 years and a minimum of 2-year follow-up for each patient. Summary The GARFIELD registry will provide valuable insights into the clinical management and related outcomes of AF patients throughout many regions of the world and across the spectrum of healthcare systems. By capturing data from unselected patients treated in everyday practice, the registry has the potential to identify best practices as well as deficiencies in available treatment options for specific patient populations and to describe how therapeutic strategies, patient care, and outcomes will evolve over time.
Advances in medical therapies leading to improved patient outcomes are in large part related to successful conduct of clinical trials that offer critical information regarding the efficacy and safety ...of novel interventions. The conduct of clinical trials in the United States, however, continues to face increasing challenges with recruitment and retention. These trends are paralleled by an increasing shift toward more multinational trials where most participants are enrolled in countries outside the United States, bringing into question the generalizability of the results to the American population. This manuscript presents the perspectives and recommendations from clinicians, researchers, sponsors, and regulators who attended a meeting facilitated by the Food and Drug Administration to improve upon the current clinical trial trends in the United States.
The burden of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is considerable and is projected to worsen. To date, there are no approved therapies available for reducing mortality or ...hospitalizations for these patients. The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex and includes alterations in cardiac structure and function, systemic and pulmonary vascular abnormalities, end-organ involvement, and comorbidities. There remain major gaps in our understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology. To facilitate a discussion of how to proceed effectively in future with development of therapies for HFpEF, a meeting was facilitated by the Food and Drug Administration and included representatives from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies. This document summarizes the proceedings from this meeting.
PDF
