Abstract The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Guidelines Committee provides periodic reviews of new data to produce focused updates that address clinically important ...advances in AF management. This 2016 Focused Update deals with: (1) the management of antithrombotic therapy for AF patients in the context of the various clinical presentations of coronary artery disease; (2) real-life data with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (3) the use of antidotes for the reversal of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (4) digoxin as a rate control agent; (5) perioperative anticoagulation management; and (6) AF surgical therapy including the prevention and treatment of AF after cardiac surgery. The recommendations were developed with the same methodology used for the initial 2010 guidelines and the 2012 and 2014 Focused Updates. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards, individual studies and literature were reviewed for quality and bias; the literature review process and evidence tables are included in the Supplementary Material, and on the CCS Web site. The section on concomitant AF and coronary artery disease was developed in collaboration with the CCS Antiplatelet Guidelines Committee. Details of the updated recommendations are presented, along with their background and rationale. This document is linked to an updated summary of all CCS AF Guidelines recommendations, from 2010 to the present 2016 Focused Update.
Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an extremely common clinical problem with an important population morbidity and mortality burden. The management of AF is complex and fraught with many uncertain ...and contentious issues, which are being addressed by extensive ongoing basic and clinical research. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines Committee produced an extensive set of evidence-based AF management guidelines in 2010 and updated them in the areas of anticoagulation and rate/rhythm control in 2012. In late 2013, the committee judged that sufficient new information regarding AF management had become available since 2012 to warrant an update to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines. After extensive evaluation of the new evidence, the committee has updated the guidelines for: (1) stroke prevention principles; (2) anticoagulation of AF patients with chronic kidney disease; (3) detection of AF in patients with stroke; (4) investigation and management of subclinical AF; (5) left atrial appendage closure in stroke prevention; (6) emergency department management of AF; (7) periprocedural anticoagulation management; and (8) rate and rhythm control including catheter ablation. This report presents the details of the updated recommendations, along with their background and rationale. In addition, a complete set of presently applicable recommendations, those that have been updated and those that remain in force from previous guideline versions, is provided in the Supplementary Material.
Abstract The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) published the complete set of 2010 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Guidelines in the January, 2011 issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology . During its ...deliberations, the CCS Guidelines Committee engaged to a timely review of future evidence, with periodic composition of focused updates to address clinically important advances. In 2011, results were published from 3 pivotal AF trials: the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonist for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF), the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) study, and the Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Outcome Study Using Dronedarone on Top of Standard Therapy (PALLAS), comparing dronedarone with placebo in patients with permanent AF and additional cardiovascular disease risk-factor burden. Each of these large randomized trials provided clear results with major implications for AF management. Other important evidence that has emerged since the 2010 Guidelines includes findings about prediction instruments for AF-associated stroke and bleeding risk, stroke risk in paroxysmal-AF patients, risk-benefit considerations related to oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease, and risk/benefit considerations in the use of antiplatelet agents, alone and in combination with each other or with oral anticoagulants, in AF patients. The Guidelines Committee judged that this extensive and important new evidence required focused updating of the 2010 Guidelines with respect to stroke prevention and rate/rhythm control. This report presents the details of the new recommendations, along with the background and rationale.
Abstract Postoperative atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (POAF) are the most common complications of cardiac surgery that require intervention or prolong intensive care unit and total hospital ...stay. For some patients, these tachyarrhythmias have important consequences including patient discomfort/anxiety, hemodynamic deterioration, cognitive impairment, thromboembolic events including stroke, exposure to the risks of antiarrhythmic treatments, longer hospital stay, and increased health care costs. We conclude that prevention of POAF is a worthwhile exercise and recommend that the dominant therapy for this purpose be β-blocker therapy, especially the continuation of β-blocker therapy that is already in place. When β-blocker therapy is contraindicated, amiodarone prophylaxis is recommended. If both of these therapies are contraindicated, therapy with either intravenous magnesium or biatrial pacing is suggested. Patients at high risk of POAF may be considered for first-line amiodarone therapy, first-line sotalol therapy, or combination prophylactic therapy. The treatment of POAF may follow either a rate-control approach (with the dominant therapy being β-blocking drugs) or a rhythm-control approach. Anticoagulation should be considered if persistent POAF lasts >72 hours and at the point of hospital discharge. The ongoing need for any POAF treatment (including anticoagulation) should be reconsidered 6-12 weeks after the surgical procedure.
Sudden Cardiac Death Kuriachan, Vikas P., MD; Sumner, Glen L., MD; Mitchell, L. Brent, MD
Current problems in cardiology,
04/2015, Letnik:
40, Številka:
4
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Abstract Sudden death accounts for 300,000-400,000 deaths annually in the United States. Most sudden deaths are cardiac, and most sudden cardiac deaths are related to arrhythmias secondary to ...structural heart disease or primary electrical abnormalities of the heart. The most common structural disease leading to sudden death is ischemic heart disease. Nonischemic cardiomyopathy and other structural abnormalities such as arrhythmogenic ventricular dysplasia and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may also be causative. Patients without structural disease have a primary electrical abnormality, such as long-QT syndrome or Brugada syndrome. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is the main marker for sudden death in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In other conditions, other markers for structural heart disease and electrical abnormalities need to be considered. It is seen that β-blocker therapy is associated with a reduction in sudden cardiac death across a broad range of disorders. Nevertheless, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator remains the most effective treatment strategy in selected patients.
Noninvasive Risk Assessment Early After a Myocardial Infarction: The REFINE Study Derek V. Exner, Katherine M. Kavanagh, Michael P. Slawnych, L. Brent Mitchell, Darlene Ramadan, Sandeep G. Aggarwal, ...Catherine Noullett, Allie Van Schaik, Ryan T. Mitchell, Mariko A. Shibata, Sajad Gulamhussein, James McMeekin, Wayne Tymchak, Gregory Schnell, Anne M. Gillis, Robert S. Sheldon, Gordon H. Fick, Henry J. Duff, for the REFINE Investigators A group of 322 patients underwent testing at 2 to 4 weeks and 10 to 14 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI). Only the assessment at 10 to 14 weeks after MI reliably identified patients at risk of the primary outcome (cardiac death or cardiac arrest). The combination of impaired heart rate turbulence, abnormal exercise repolarization alternans, and an ejection fraction < 0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI identified patients with over a 5-fold higher risk. Most patients at risk were identified, with good positive (23%) and negative (95%) predictive accuracy. This approach reliably identifies patients at risk of serious events when measured early after MI.
Catheter ablation is a promising therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its utility in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is uncertain. The objectives of this study were to ...perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing the rates of recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), and complications after AF catheter ablation in those with versus without LVSD and to summarize the impact of catheter ablation on the left ventricular ejection fraction. Seven observational studies and 1 randomized trial were included (total n = 1,851). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 27 months. In those with LVSD, 28% to 55% were free of AF or AT on follow-up after 1 AF catheter ablation, increasing to 64% to 96% after a mean of 1.4 procedures. The relative risk for recurrent AF or AT in those with versus without LVSD was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.8, p <0.001) after 1 procedure and 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.5, p = 0.2) after multiple procedures. No difference in complications was observed in patients with (3.5%) versus without (2.5%) heart failure (p = 0.55). After catheter ablation, those with LVSD experienced a pooled absolute improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.14, p <0.001). In conclusion, patients with and without LVSD had similar risk for recurrent AF or AT after catheter ablation, but repeat procedures were required more often in those with LVSD. Significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fractions after ablation were observed in those with LVSD. Randomized trials are needed given the limitations of present data.
Abstract The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Program has generated a comprehensive series of documents regarding the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) ...between 2010 and 2014. The guidelines provide evidence-based consensus management recommendations in a broad range of areas. These guidelines have proven useful in informing clinical practice, but often lack detail in specifications related to practical application, particularly for areas in which the evidence base is limited or conflicting. Based on feedback from the community, the CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee has identified a number of areas that require clarification to address commonly asked practical questions related to guidelines application. In the present article a number of such questions are presented and suggestions about how they can be answered are suggested. Among the issues considered are: (1) What duration of AF is clinically significant? (2) How are the risk factors in the CCS Algorithm for selecting anticoagulation therapy derived and defined? (3) How is valvular heart disease defined and how do different forms of valve disease affect the choice of anticoagulant therapy for AF patients? (4) How should we quantify renal dysfunction and how does it affect therapeutic choices? The response to these questions and the underlying logic are provided, along with an indication of future research needed where no specific approach can presently be recommended based on the literature.
Abstract Using data collected from 2 national atrial fibrillation (AF) primary care physician chart audits (Facilitating REview and EDucation to OptiMize stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation ...FREEDOM AF and CO-ordinated National Network to Engage physicians in the Care and Treatment of patients with Atrial Fibrillation CONNECT AF), we evaluated the frequency of, and factors associated with, the use of cardiovascular (CV) evidence-based therapies in Canadian AF outpatients with at least one CV risk factor or comorbidity. Among the 11,264 patients enrolled, 9,495 (84.3%) patients were eligible for one or more CV evidence-based therapies. The proportions of AF patients receiving all eligible guideline-recommended therapies were: 40.8% of patients with coronary artery disease, 48.9% of patients with diabetes mellitus, 40.2% of patients with heart failure, 96.7% of patients with hypertension, and 55.1% of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Factors that were independently associated with non-receipt of all indicated evidence-based therapies included sinus rhythm rather than AF at baseline and liver disease. In conclusion, although the majority of Canadian AF outpatients have CV risk factors or comorbidities, a substantial portion of these patients did not receive all guideline-recommended therapies. These findings suggest there is an opportunity to improve the quality of care for AF patients in Canada.
Abstract Background Canadian atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend that all AF patients be risk stratified with respect to stroke and bleeding, and that most should receive antithrombotic ...therapy. Methods As part of the Canadian F acilitating Re view and Ed ucation to O pti m ize Stroke Prevention in A trial F ibrillation (FREEDOM AF) chart audit, data were collected on 4670 patients ≥ 18 years old without significant valvular heart disease from the primary care practices of 474 physicians (February to September, 2011). Results Physicians did not provide an estimate of stroke and bleeding risk in 15% and 25% of patients, respectively. When risks were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in only 50% and 26% of patients, respectively. There were over- and underestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a large proportion of patients. Antithrombotic therapy included warfarin (90%); 24% of patients had a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) < 50%, 9% between 50% and 60%, 11% between 60% and 70%, and 56% had a TTR ≥ 70%. Conclusions In a large Canadian AF population, primary care physicians did not provide a stroke or bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of their AF patients. When estimates were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in less than half of the patients. Furthermore, there was under- and overestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of patients. As many as 1 in 3 patients receiving warfarin have their TTR < 60%. These findings suggest an opportunity to enhance knowledge translation to primary care physicians.
PDF
