Prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has shown excellent sensitivity for Gleason ≥7 cancers, especially when their volume is ≥0.5 mL. As a result, performing an mpMRI before ...prostate biopsy could improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by adding targeted biopsies to systematic biopsies. Currently, there is a consensus that targeted biopsies improve the detection of csPCa in the repeat biopsy setting and at confirmatory biopsy in patients considering active surveillance. Several prospective multicentric controlled trials recently showed that targeted biopsy also improved csPCa detection in biopsy-naïve patients. The role of mpMRI and targeted biopsy during the follow-up of active surveillance remains unclear. Whether systematic biopsy could be omitted in case of negative mpMRI is also a matter of controversy. mpMRI did show excellent negative predictive values (NPV) in the literature, however, since NPV depends on the prevalence of the disease, negative mpMRI findings should be interpreted in the light of a priori risk for csPCa of the patient. Nomograms combining mpMRI findings and classical risk predictors (age, prostate-specific antigen density, digital rectal examination, etc.) will probably be developed in the future to decide whether a prostate biopsy should be obtained. mpMRI has a good specificity for detecting T3 stage cancers, but its sensitivity is low. It should therefore not be used routinely for staging purposes in low-risk patients. Nomograms combining mpMRI findings and other clinical and biochemical data will also probably be used in the future to better assess the risk of T3 stage disease.
Whether multiparametric MRI improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and avoids the need for systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive patients remains controversial. We aimed to ...investigate whether using this approach before biopsy would improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients.
In this prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study, done at 16 centres in France, we enrolled patients aged 18–75 years with prostate-specific antigen concentrations of 20 ng/mL or less, and with stage T2c or lower prostate cancer. Eligible patients had been referred for prostate multiparametric MRI before a first set of prostate biopsies, with a planned interval of less than 3 months between MRI and biopsies. An operator masked to multiparametric MRI results did a systematic biopsy by obtaining 12 systematic cores and up to two cores targeting hypoechoic lesions. In the same patient, another operator targeted up to two lesions seen on MRI with a Likert score of 3 or higher (three cores per lesion) using targeted biopsy based on multiparametric MRI findings. Patients with negative multiparametric MRI (Likert score ≤2) had systematic biopsy only. The primary outcome was the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 or higher (csPCa-A), analysed in all patients who received both systematic and targeted biopsies and whose results from both were available for pathological central review, including patients who had protocol deviations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02485379, and is closed to new participants.
Between July 15, 2015, and Aug 11, 2016, we enrolled 275 patients. 24 (9%) were excluded from the analysis. 53 (21%) of 251 analysed patients had negative (Likert ≤2) multiparametric MRI. csPCa-A was detected in 94 (37%) of 251 patients. 13 (14%) of these 94 patients were diagnosed by systematic biopsy only, 19 (20%) by targeted biopsy only, and 62 (66%) by both techniques. Detection of csPCa-A by systematic biopsy (29·9%, 95% CI 24·3–36·0) and targeted biopsy (32·3%, 26·5–38·4) did not differ significantly (p=0·38). csPCa-A would have been missed in 5·2% (95% CI 2·8–8·7) of patients had systematic biopsy not been done, and in 7·6% (4·6–11·6) of patients had targeted biopsy not been done. Four grade 3 post-biopsy adverse events were reported (3 cases of prostatitis, and 1 case of urinary retention with haematuria).
There was no difference between systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy in the detection of ISUP grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer; however, this detection was improved by combining both techniques and both techniques showed substantial added value. Thus, obtaining a multiparametric MRI before biopsy in biopsy-naive patients can improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer but does not seem to avoid the need for systematic biopsy.
French National Cancer Institute.
Purpose
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) are novel techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia lower urinary tract symptoms ...(BPH-LUTS). The objective of this study was to describe and compare the functional results and complications of these two techniques at one year follow-up.
Materials and methods
We performed a retrospective, monocentric study of all patients consecutively treated in our center with HoLEP or PAE for symptomatic or complicated BPH between January 2016 and December 2019. Data regarding patient and perioperative characteristics, follow-up biological results, functional questionnaires and uroflowmetry were collected from medical records.
Results
A total of 490 and 57 patients were treated with HoLEP and PAE, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. The operative time was significantly higher for PAE (
p
< 0.001) and hospitalization time longer after HoLEP (
p
= 0.0006). The urinary catheterization time was longer after PAE (
p
< 0.001). The prostatic volume treated was higher with HoLEP than with PAE (56% versus 26%,
p
< 0.001). The mean difference in IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP than after PAE: − 17.58 versus − 8 (
p
< 0.001). The mean difference in QoL-IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP: − 4.09 versus − 2.27 (
p
< 0.001). The rate of postoperative adverse events in the first three months was similar between the two groups:35% after HoLEP and 33% after PAE (
p
= 0.88).
Conclusions
HoLEP and PAE both significantly improved BPH-LUTS, with HoLEP having an advantage over PAE.
Objective
To train and to test for prostate zonal segmentation an existing algorithm already trained for whole-gland segmentation.
Methods
The algorithm, combining model-based and deep learning–based ...approaches, was trained for zonal segmentation using the NCI-ISBI-2013 dataset and 70 T2-weighted datasets acquired at an academic centre. Test datasets were randomly selected among examinations performed at this centre on one of two scanners (General Electric, 1.5 T; Philips, 3 T) not used for training. Automated segmentations were corrected by two independent radiologists. When segmentation was initiated outside the prostate, images were cropped and segmentation repeated. Factors influencing the algorithm’s mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and its precision were assessed using beta regression.
Results
Eighty-two test datasets were selected; one was excluded. In 13/81 datasets, segmentation started outside the prostate, but zonal segmentation was possible after image cropping. Depending on the radiologist chosen as reference, algorithm’s median DSCs were 96.4/97.4%, 91.8/93.0% and 79.9/89.6% for whole-gland, central gland and anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFMS) segmentations, respectively. DSCs comparing radiologists’ delineations were 95.8%, 93.6% and 81.7%, respectively. For all segmentation tasks, the scanner used for imaging significantly influenced the mean DSC and its precision, and the mean DSC was significantly lower in cases with initial segmentation outside the prostate. For central gland segmentation, the mean DSC was also significantly lower in larger prostates. The radiologist chosen as reference had no significant impact, except for AFMS segmentation.
Conclusions
The algorithm performance fell within the range of inter-reader variability but remained significantly impacted by the scanner used for imaging.
Key Points
•
Median Dice similarity coefficients obtained by the algorithm fell within human inter-reader variability for the three segmentation tasks (whole gland, central gland, anterior fibromuscular stroma)
.
•
The scanner used for imaging significantly impacted the performance of the automated segmentation for the three segmentation tasks
.
•
The performance of the automated segmentation of the anterior fibromuscular stroma was highly variable across patients and showed also high variability across the two radiologists
.
Objective
To assess PI-RADSv2.1 and PI-RADSv2 descriptors across readers with varying experience.
Methods
Twenty-one radiologists (7 experienced (≥ 5 years) seniors, 7 less experienced seniors and 7 ...juniors) assessed 240 ‘predefined’ lesions from 159 pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate MRIs. They specified their location (peripheral, transition or central zone) and size, and scored them using PI-RADSv2.1 and PI-RADSv2 descriptors. They also described and scored ‘additional’ lesions if needed. Per-lesion analysis assessed the ‘predefined’ lesions, using targeted biopsy as reference; per-lobe analysis included ‘predefined’ and ‘additional’ lesions, using combined systematic and targeted biopsy as reference. Areas under the curve (AUCs) quantified the performance in diagnosing clinically significant cancer (csPCa; ISUP ≥ 2 cancer). Kappa coefficients (
κ
) or concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) assessed inter-reader agreement.
Results
At per-lesion analysis, inter-reader agreement on location and size was moderate-to-good (
κ
= 0.60–0.73) and excellent (CCC ≥ 0.80), respectively. Agreement on PI-RADSv2.1 scoring was moderate (
κ
= 0.43–0.47) for seniors and fair (
κ
= 0.39) for juniors. Using PI-RADSv2.1, juniors obtained a significantly lower AUC (0.74; 95% confidence interval 95%CI: 0.70–0.79) than experienced seniors (0.80; 95%CI 0.76–0.84;
p
= 0.008) but not than less experienced seniors (0.74; 95%CI 0.70–0.78;
p
= 0.75). As compared to PI-RADSv2, PI-RADSv2.1 downgraded 17 lesions/reader (interquartile range IQR: 6–29), of which 2 (IQR: 1–3) were csPCa; it upgraded 4 lesions/reader (IQR: 2–7), of which 1 (IQR: 0–2) was csPCa. Per-lobe analysis, which included 60 (IQR: 25–73) ‘additional’ lesions/reader, yielded similar results.
Conclusions
Experience significantly impacted lesion characterization using PI-RADSv2.1 descriptors. As compared to PI-RADSv2, PI-RADSv2.1 tended to downgrade non-csPCa lesions, but this effect was small and variable across readers.
Key points
Juniors characterized aggressive cancers less well than experienced seniors on prostate MRI.
Agreement between readers remained moderate even for experienced readers.
As compared to version 2, PI-RADSv2.1 descriptors tended to show improved specificity.
Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical ...treatment.
A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy (CT, oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971.
Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was −10.0 (95% confidence interval CI: −11.8 to −8.3) and −5.7 (95% CI: −7.5 to −3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (−4.4 95% CI: −6.9 to −1.9, p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9–13.5) and −2.8 (95% CI: −8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively.
In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months.
French Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from Merit Medical.
Background: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE ...and medical treatment. Methods: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy (CT, oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. Findings: Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was −10.0 (95% confidence interval CI: −11.8 to −8.3) and −5.7 (95% CI: −7.5 to −3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (−4.4 95% CI: −6.9 to −1.9, p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9–13.5) and −2.8 (95% CI: −8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively. Interpretation: In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months. Funding: French Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from Merit Medical.
Systemic embolisation occurs in 22% to 50% of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Up to 65% of embolic events (EE) involve the central nervous system which increases the mortality rate. ...Several echocardiographic studies have demonstrated higher embolic rates with the increase of vegetation (VEG) dimensions and mobility.
To define echocardiographic parameters which can help in identifying patients with a high risk of EE and to assess the value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in predicting EE in patients with IE.
236 patients (58% male, mean age 47.8+/-6) diagnosed with IE according to Duke criteria were followed for 3 years or until cardiac surgery. Echocardiographic parameters measured on VEG included the maximum length, thickness, the narrowest diameter, neck and mobility.
The rate of EE was 51.27% without any significant differences with respect to gender, age, fever, anaemia, VEG site or the presence of a significant regurgitation murmur. The univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between EE and IE caused by staphylococcus, IE of the right heart, and the length as well as mobility of VEG. The only independent predictors of EE were the maximum VEG length >15 mm and the increased mobility of VEG with a maximal displacement angle >60.7 degrees. In 23% of patients EE occurred after the initiation of antibiotic treatment. VEG in this group were big and very mobile (length >15 mm, maximal angle of displacement >65 degrees).
1. Vegetation dimension and mobility determined by TEE are important predictors of the embolic risk. 2. Significant echocardiographic predictors of embolic events included vegetation length >15 mm, neck/thickness ratio >0.69, and maximal angle of displacement of vegetation during cardiac cycle >60.7 degrees. 3. During antibiotic treatment, the embolic risk depends only on vegetation mobility and dimension.
PDF
