Abstract XIAP is over-expressed in AML and may contribute to chemoresistance. We report an open-label randomized phase II trial of reinduction chemotherapy with and without the XIAP antisense ...oligonucleotide AEG35156 in patients with AML patients. The addition of AEG35156 to re-induction chemotherapy did not improve rates of remission. Therefore, alternate therapeutic strategies should be explored in these patients.
Abstract
Objective
Analysis of the efficiency and toxicity of cyclophosphamide‐based stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (
RMM
).
Methods
Peripheral blood stem cells (
...PBSC
s) were mobilized with high dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m
2
daily on days 1 and 2) and G‐
CSF
plus pre‐emptive/rescue plerixafor in
RMM
patients (first to third relapse) treated within the Re
LA
psE trial of the German‐Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (
GMMG
).
Results
Mobilization was initiated with high‐dose cyclophosphamide (HD‐CY) and G‐
CSF
in 30 patients. Fifteen patients received additional pre‐emptive/rescue administration of plerixafor. Stem cell collection was successful (≥2×10
6
CD
34+ cells per kg bw) in 77% (23/30 patients). Patients with prior high‐dose melphalan collected a significantly lower median total number of
PBSC
s than patients without prior high‐dose melphalan (3.3×10
6
vs 17×10
6
CD
34+ cells/kg bw). Toxicity of HD‐CY was frequent with 12 serious adverse events (
SAE
) in 37% of patients (11/30 patients). Infections accounted for the majority of
SAE
reports. In two patients,
SAE
s were lethal (septic shock).
Conclusions
These data proof feasibility of
PBSC
collection at relapse but emphasize the importance of collection and storage of additional
PBSC
transplants during first‐line treatment when mobilization is more efficient and less toxic.
Despite novel therapeutic agents, most multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually relapse. Two large phase III trials have shown significantly improved response rates (RR) of ...lenalidomide/dexamethasone compared with placebo/dexamethasone in relapsed MM (RMM) patients. These results have led to the approval of lenalidomide for RMM patients and lenalidomide/dexamethasone has since become a widely accepted second-line treatment. Furthermore, in RMM patients consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to significantly increase progression free survival (PFS) as compared to cyclophosphamide in a phase III trial. The randomized prospective ReLApsE trial is designed to evaluate PFS after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction, high-dose chemotherapy consolidation plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance compared with the well-established lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients.
ReLApsE is a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial in a planned study population of 282 RMM patients. All patients receive three lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles and--in absence of available stem cells from earlier harvesting--undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Subsequently, patients in arm A continue on consecutive lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles, patients in arm B undergo high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance until discontinuation criteria are met. Therapeutic response is evaluated after the 3(rd) (arm A + B) and the 5(th) lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycle (arm A) or 2 months after autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) and every 3 months thereafter (arm A + B). After finishing the study treatment, patients are followed up for survival and subsequent myeloma therapies. The expected trial duration is 6.25 years from first patient in to last patient out. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), RR, time to best response and the influence of early versus late salvage high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation on OS.
This phase III trial is designed to evaluate whether high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction improves PFS compared with the well-established continued lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients.
ISRCTN16345835 (date of registration 2010-08-24).
Background:
Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor with activity against several oncogenic kinases that may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In-vitro data and results ...from non-randomized clinical trials suggest that sorafenib might be an effective drug for the treatment of AML. We present the results of the randomized placebo-controlled SORAML trial testing sorafenib versus placebo as add-on to standard induction and consolidation treatment in AML patients ≤60 years.
Patients and Methods:
Between March 2009 and October 2011, 276 patients from 25 centers were enrolled in the SORAML trial (NCT00893373). The main eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed AML, age from 18 to 60 years and suitability for intensive therapy. The treatment plan for all patients included two cycles of induction with DA (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 days 3-5 plus cytarabine 100 mg/m2 cont. inf. days 1-7), followed by three cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation (3 g/m2 b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5). Patients without response after DA I received second induction with HAM (cytarabine 3 g/m2 b.i.d. days 1-3 plus mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 days 3-5). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was scheduled for all intermediate-risk patients in first complete remission with a sibling donor and for all high-risk patients with a matched related or unrelated donor. At study inclusion, patients were randomized to receive either sorafenib (800 mg/day) or placebo as add-on to standard treatment in a double blinded fashion. Block randomization at a ratio of 1:1 was performed within cytogenetic and molecular risk strata, allocation was concealed and treatment was double blinded. Study medication was given on days 10-19 of DA I+II or HAM, from day 8 of each consolidation until 3 days before the start of the next consolidation and as maintenance for 12 months after the end of consolidation. The primary endpoint of the trial was event-free survival (EFS) with an event being defined as either failure to achieve a complete remission (CR) after induction, relapse or death. Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), CR rate and incidence of adverse events (AE). We present the results of the final analysis of the primary endpoint EFS (intent to treat) after the occurrence of 134 events.
Results:
Out of 276 enrolled patients, 267 received study treatment, 134 in the sorafenib arm and 133 in the placebo arm. Demographic and disease characteristics were equally distributed between the two arms; the incidence of FLT3-ITD was 17%. The median cumulative dose of administered study medication was similar in both arms. The CR rates were 59% versus 60% in the placebo versus sorafenib arm (p=0.764). After a median observation time of 36 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months in the placebo arm and 20.5 months in the sorafenib arm, corresponding to a 3-year EFS of 22% versus 40% (p=0.013). Median RFS after standard treatment plus placebo was 23 months and not yet reached after sorafenib treatment, corresponding to a 3-year RFS of 38% and 56%, respectively (p=0.017). The median OS had not been reached in either arm; the 3-year OS was 56% with placebo versus 63% with sorafenib (p=0.382). In 46 FLT3-ITD positive patients, no difference in EFS, but a trend for prolonged RFS and OS in favor of sorafenib was observed. The most common reported AEs Grade ≥3 were fever (40%), infections (22%) and bleeding events (2%). The risk for fever, bleeding events and hand-foot syndrome was significantly higher in the sorafenib arm while the incidence of all other AEs showed no significant differences.
Conclusions:
In younger AML patients, the addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy in a sequential manner is feasible and associated with antileukemic efficacy. We observed a higher incidence of infections and bleeding events under sorafenib. Whereas OS in both treatment arms was similar, sorafenib treatment resulted in a significantly prolonged EFS and RFS.
Display omitted
Off Label Use: sorafenib for treatment of aml. Serve:Bayer HealthCare: Research Funding. Ehninger:Bayer HealthCare: Research Funding.
▪
Introduction
Aberrant DNA methylation is a common feature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and increases with age. DNMT inhibitors such as Azacitidine (AZA) can induce meaningful responses and ...remissions in AML as monotherapy. The combination of AZA with standard chemotherapy (7+3) has not been tested in a randomized trial.
Patients and study design
The AML-AZA trial compared AZA directly followed by standard induction therapy, AZA followed by standard consolidation, and further Azacitdine maintenance with standard induction and consolidation without AZA in older patients with AML. All patients received standard Cytarabine (100 mg/sqm) and Daunorubicin (60 mg/sqm) induction (“7+3”) and up to two cycles of intermediate dose Cytarabine (1 g/sqm q12hr days 1, 3, 5) as consolidation therapy. AZA (75 mg/sqm for 5 days) preceded each therapy cycle in the AZA arm. In addition, AZA maintenance for up to 1 year was also scheduled for patients in the AZA arm. 105 patients were randomized to receive AZA plus Cytarabine plus Daunorubicin as induction therapy (AZA + 7+3) and 109 patients to receive 7+3 only (control group). Median age was 70 years in both treatment arms. Patient cohorts were well balanced with regard to blast counts in bone marrow, secondary versus de novo AML and molecular genetics risk group. More patients in the AZA + 7+3 arm (39/105; 37.1%) than in the control group (25/109; 22.9%) showed high risk cytogenetics (p=0.057). Event free survival (EFS) was the primary end point. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), complete remission (CR) rate, toxicity and different treatment response according to molecular markers.
Results
Overall, 214 of 216 planned patients were enrolled into the AML-AZA trial. Due to a higher number of severe adverse events (SAE), AZA administration was stopped after recruitment of 214 patients whereas chemotherapy was continued as planned. Percentages of patients in the AZA arm with AZA doses as initially planned were as follows: 99% for first induction cycle, 72% for the second induction cycle. AZA as maintenance therapy for at least one cycle was delivered to 18% of patients in the AZA group. At least one SAE occurred in 51% of AZA + 7+3 patients compared to 31% of 7+3 patients (p=0.005). Cardiac disorders with CTCAE grade 3-5 occurred more frequently in the AZA + 7+3 arm (n = 15) than in the 7+3 arm (n = 6) (not significant). Leukopenia was prolonged by one day (median 23 vs 22 days) in the AZA + 7+3 group (p=0.043), whereas time of thrombocytopenia was not different. The early death rates at 30, 60 and 90 days did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Efficacy analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Median EFS as the primary endpoint was 6 months in both treatment arms (p=0.96). Median OS was 16 months for patients treated with AZA + 7+3 and 21 months for 7+3 (p=0.35). Median relapse free survival was 12 months in both treatment arms (p=0.95). 48 of 100 patients (48%) in the AZA + 7+3 arm achieved complete remission (CR) after induction therapy versus 57 of 109 patients (52%) in the 7+3 arm (p=0.58). DNMT3A exon 23 mutations were detected in 30 out of 162 analyzed patients. Exploratory analyses were performed to detect a potential interaction between AZA + 7+3 response and DNMT3A mutation status. Trends for improved EFS and OS were noted for AZA + 7+3 treatment in DNMT3A mutated patients.
Conclusion
AZA as addition prior to standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy does not prolong EFS and OS in unselected older AML patients and it is more toxic. However, a trend towards better efficacy in patients with DNMT3A mutation was observed and should be further explored.
Müller-Tidow:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Illumina: Research Support, Research Support Other. Kiehl:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brümmendorf:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Ehninger:GEMoaB GmbH: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties.
Bone marrow-derived stem cells may contribute to the regeneration of non-haematopoietic organs. In order to test whether an increase in circulating stem cell numbers improves impaired myocardial ...function we treated 16 male patients with chronic heart failure due to dilated (DCM; n = 7) or ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM; n = 9) with the stem cell mobilising cytokine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; four 10-day treatment periods interrupted by treatment-free intervals of equal length). Safety and efficacy analyses were performed at regular intervals. Peak CD34+ cell counts remained constant from cycle to cycle. Cardiac side effects in ICM patients included occasional episodes of dyspnea or angina and one episode of fatal ventricular fibrillation. Nine (4 DCM, 5 ICM) of 12 patients receiving four full G-CSF cycles experienced an improvement by one New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and a statistically significant increase in six-minute walking distance. By contrast, none of 8 ICM historical controls had a change in NYHA class during a similar time period. Statistically significant changes in echocardiographic parameters were not recorded. Sequential administration of G-CSF is feasible and possibly effective in improving physical performance in patients with chronic heart failure. Patients with ICM may be at risk of increased angina and arrhythmias.
Abstract 2180
Standard chemotherapy is curative only in a minority of older patients with AML and chemotherapy efficacy in this patient group has not improved in the last decade. Epigenetic ...alterations such as aberrant promoter DNA methylation occur frequently in AML patients and might provide novel targets for therapy improvement. The demethylating agent azacitidine is effective as a single agent in AML and MDS but does not lead to long term remissions. In the dose-finding part of the AML-AZA study, we analyzed the feasibility of two different doses of azacitidine added to standard 7+3 induction therapy in older patients (≥61 years) with AML.
Two cohorts with 6 patients each were treated with azacitidine either 37.5 or 75 mg/sqm for 5 days, followed by standard induction chemotherapy 7+3 (cytarabine 100 mg/sqm on days 6–12 and daunorubicin 45 mg/sqm on days 8–10). In patients without blast clearance on day 15, a second cycle of the same induction regime (azacitidine +7+3) was administered. Patients who achieved a complete remission received two cycles of consolidation therapy consisting of 5 days of azacitidine (same dose as for induction therapy) followed by intermediate-dose cytarabine (1g/sqm q12h days 6, 8 and 10).
Overall, 2 out of 6 patients at the 37.5 mg/sqm dose level and 4 out of 6 patients at the 75 mg/sqm level achieved a complete remission after induction therapy. Character and number of adverse events were similar to reported data from elderly AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. Among the 12 patients, the following 4 serious adverse events occurred: a severe hemolysis (most likely induced by fluorchinolone antibiotics) which resolved, a fatal apoplectic stroke and a fatal hepatorenal syndrome four days after the end of 7+3 chemotherapy at the 37.5 mg/sqm level, and a fatal pneumonia before 7+3 therapy could be initiated at the 75 mg/sqm level. The median duration of grade 4 leukopenia (CTCAE) was 26 days and the median duration of grade 4 thrombopenia was 22 days. Two patients went on for allogenic stem cell transplantation and were censored for survival analysis at the time of transplantation. Median event free survival was not reached after a median follow up of 5.5 months, and median overall survival was 8.1 months after a median follow up of 7 months.
Our data indicate that the combination of azacitidine with standard induction therapy is feasible in older patients with AML with a similar tolerability of 37.5 mg/sqm and 75 mg/sqm. As a result, 75 mg/sqm azacitidine was selected as the investigational arm of the currently recruiting randomized phase II study comparing standard chemotherapy in AML with versus without azacitidine (AML-AZA). The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00915252).
Off Label Use: use of Azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent, in adjunct to classic chemotherapy in elderly patients with AML. Koschmieder: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Abstract 2880
Blinatumomab (MT103) is a single-chain bispecific antibody construct with specificity for CD19 and CD3 belonging to the class of bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®). We have previously ...reported that blinatumomab delivered as single agent to patients with relapsed NHL and B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion over 4–8 weeks depleted peripheral B cells, expanded T effector cells, and resulted in clinical responses.
In this phase I study 52 patients (41 males, 11 females) have been treated, 21 with FL, 21 with MCL and 10 with other subtypes of lymphoma (MZL, SLL, LPL, CLL). Patients have received a median of 3 prior regimens (range 1 to 12). Ninety percent of the patients had prior exposure to rituximab and 45% to fludarabine. Patients were treated at a dose range from 0.5 to 90 μg/m2/d.
The most common adverse events (AEs) occurred early, were transient, reversible and did not require discontinuation of treatment. The most common clinical AEs regardless of causality were pyrexia (75%), headache (45%) and fatigue (37%). The most common laboratory abnormality AEs regardless of causality were lymphopenia (75%), leukopenia (57%), thrombocytopenia (39%), C-reactive protein increase (53%) and fibrin D dimer increase (37%).
The medically most important AEs that resulted in permanent discontinuation were CNS events. Signs and symptoms observed included kinetic tremor, speech impairment, disorientation, apraxia and seizure. All CNS events were fully reversible without sequelae and no pathological findings by MRI imaging were reported. Out of the 52 patients treated, 9 had to discontinue treatment permanently in the first cycle due to these CNS events. At a dose of 90 μg/m2/d two DLTs were observed which were CNS events during the DLT period of the first 2 weeks of treatment. Therefore 60μg/m2/d is the currently recommended dose.
A low B to T cell ratio (<1:8) determined by FACS analysis in peripheral blood was found to be a risk factor for CNS events. No CNS events requiring treatment discontinuation occurred in 32 out of 34 patients with a high B:T cell ratio (≥1:8) up to 60μg/m2/d. In the 18 patients with low B:T cell ratio, 7 had CNS events requiring treatment discontinuation. Patients with low B:T cell ratio were subsequently treated with an alternative dosing schedule in which reduced doses of either 5 and 15 μg/m2/d were sequentially administered for 1 week respectively followed by an increase to 60 μg/m2/d. First single-step dosing was applied. However, CNS events leading to treatment discontinuation were still observed. Therefore a double-step regimen was implemented; in the initial cohort of 3 patients with low B:T cell ratio there were no treatment discontinuations due to CNS events.
Overall 18 patients with FL or MCL were treated with constant or step dosing regimens at or reaching 60 μg/m2/d dose level. Eight out of the 9 patients with constant dosing showed an objective response by Cheson criteria. All responders had a high B:T cell ratio. One patient with a low B:T cell ratio was discontinued due to a CNS AE. Six out of 9 patients with low B:T cell ratio enrolled for step dosing showed an objective response. One patient (single step dosing) discontinued treatment because of a CNS AE and 2 patients discontinued because of tumor progression. As of June 15th 2010, response duration ranged from 1 to 30+ months. Median for response duration was 26 months with 5 out of 14 responses ongoing.
Table 1:Response evaluation in patients enrolled in 60 μg/m2/d cohorts.Dose Level CohortPatientsComplete ResponsePartial ResponseOverall ResponseFLMCLTotalFLMCLTotalFLMCLTotalFLMCLTotal60 μg/m2/d Constant6392134156285 or 15 then 60 μg/m2/d Single step3362021123145/15/60 μg/m2/d Double Step213000202202Total1171841572911314
These data confirm high single-agent activity of blinatumomab with long lasting remissions. Initial data with double step dosing demonstrate that this approach maintains clinical activity without discontinuations due to CNS AEs. Evaluation of safety and clinical efficacy of this uniform double step schedule including other subtypes of NHL is ongoing.
Scheele:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Zugmaier:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Nagorsen:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Klinger:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Schmidt:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Klappers:Micromet. Inc: Employment. Kufer:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Bargou:Micromet Inc.: Consultancy.
Abstract 1637
Blinatumomab (MT103) is a single-chain bispecific antibody construct with specificity for CD19 and CD3 belonging to the class of bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®).
A phase I trial with ...indolent and mantle cell lymphoma patients established a maximal tolerable dose (MTD) at 60 μg/m2/d. The trial was subsequently amended to evaluate blinatumomab in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients were treated by 4–8-week continuous i.v. administration with the following dosing regimen: first week at 5 μg/m2/d, second week at 15 μg/m2/d and for the remaining treatment period at 60 μg/m2/d. Two cohorts each with 6 DLBCL patients were enrolled. The two cohorts solely differed by the dose and schedule of corticosteroid medication administered at the beginning of blinatumomab infusion for mitigation of adverse events. In the first cohort 100 mg prednisolone was applied 1 hour prior to start; and in the second cohort patients received dexamethasone on days 1, 2, and 3. Three sequential patients received dexamethasone also 6–12 hours prior to start of infusion. Out of the twelve patients, 5 were male and 7 female. The median age was 57 years (range from 26 to 78 years). Patients had received a median of 4 prior regimens (range from 2–6). All patients had been exposed to rituximab. Eight of the 12 patients had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). International prognostic index (IPI) at screening ranged from 1 to 3 with a median of 2.
The most common clinical adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality (>30%) were pyrexia (81.8%), fatigue (54.5%), constipation (36.4%), headache (36.4%), tremor (36.4%) and weight increase (36.4%). The most frequent laboratory AEs regardless of causality (>30%) were hyperglycemia (63.6%), lymphopenia (54.5%), C-reactive protein increase (45.5%), gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (45.5%) and thrombocytopenia (36.4%). Most AEs occurred early and were reversible. Four of 12 patients discontinued infusion due to fully reversible CNS events, 2 of which qualified as dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Although just one DLT (reversible CNS event grade 3) occurred in the prednisolone cohort, a further cohort applying prophylactic dexamethasone was opened to optimize management of CNS events. A further refinement of the dexamethasone schedule, starting longer time prior to start of blinatumomab, was introduced after one early patient in the cohort receiving dexamethasone had experienced a reversible CNS event leading to discontinuation. All three patients treated in this manner completed the first blinatumomab cycle without discontinuations. Only one showed a grade 1 tremor, and no other CNS AEs were reported in these three patients.
Two of 12 patients were not exposed to 60 μg/m2/d due to early discontinuations and 1 patient is too early in treatment for response evaluation. Five out of the remaining 9 evaluable patients (56%) showed objective clinical responses (4 CR/CRu; 1 PR). Three out of the 5 patients with CR/CRu or PR had prior ASCT. Two patients achieved objective responses (1 CR, 1 PR) despite of discontinuation at 60 μg/m2/d. The median response duration is +182 days (longest current duration +428 days), with 4 out of 5 responses still ongoing.
Further evaluation of the last cohort will refine the recommended phase II dose, and the intensity and timing of dexamethasone comedication. The observation of lasting CRs after blinatumomab monotherapy in DLBCL patients is promising and warrants further exploration in a phase II study.
Krause:Micromet: Research Funding. Mackensen:Micromet Inc.: Research Funding. Topp:Micromet: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scheele:Micromet Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Nagorsen:Micromet Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Zugmaier:Micromet: Employment. Degenhard:Micromet Inc: Employment. Schmidt:Micromet AG: Employment. Kufer:Micromet Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Libicher:Micromet Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bargou:Micromet: Consultancy, Honoraria.
PDF
