Background: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens against cisplatin plus irinotecan (IP) in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer ...(NSCLC) by a non-inferiority design.
Patients and methods: A total of 602 patients were randomly assigned to one of four regimens: cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (IP) carboplatin AUC 6.0 min × mg/mL (area under the concentration–time curve) on day 1 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (TC); cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (GP); and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (NP).
Results: The response rate, median survival time, and 1-year survival rate were 31.0%, 13.9 months, 59.2%, respectively, in IP; 32.4%, 12.3 months, 51.0% in TC; 30.1%, 14.0 months, 59.6% in GP; and 33.1%, 11.4 months, 48.3% in NP. No statistically significant differences were found in response rate or overall survival, but the non-inferiority of none of the experimental regimens could be confirmed. All the four regimens were well tolerated.
Conclusion: The four regimens have similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles, and they can be used to treat advanced NSCLC patients.
Osimertinib is a potent, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The multi-arm phase Ib TATTON study (NCT02143466) was designed to assess the safety ...and tolerability of osimertinib in combination with other targeted therapies: selumetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor), savolitinib (MET-TKI), or durvalumab anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal antibody.
Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and disease progression on a prior EGFR-TKI were enrolled and allocated to dose-escalating cohorts combining osimertinib 80 mg orally (p.o.) once a day with selumetinib (25–75 mg p.o. twice a day; continuous or intermittent), savolitinib (600–800 mg p.o. once a day), or durvalumab (3–10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks).
At data cut-off (28 February 2018), 77 patients were enrolled and received osimertinib plus selumetinib (n = 36), savolitinib (n = 18), or durvalumab (n = 23). Most common adverse events (any grade), occurring in ≥20% of patients across dose groups, were: selumetinib arm—diarrhea (75%), rash (58%), nausea (47%); savolitinib arm—nausea (67%), rash (56%), vomiting (50%); durvalumab arm—rash (48%), vomiting (43%), diarrhea (39%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the selumetinib 25 mg (n = 1), 50 mg (n = 1), and 75 mg (n = 4) continuous-dose groups, savolitinib 600 mg (n = 1) and 800 mg dose groups (n = 2), and durvalumab 10 mg/kg (n = 1) dose group. The objective response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 26% to 59%), 44% (22% to 69%), and 43% (23% to 66%) in the selumetinib, savolitinib, and durvalumab arms, respectively.
Our results demonstrate the feasibility of combining osimertinib 80 mg with selumetinib or savolitinib at identified tolerable, active doses. A combination of osimertinib with durvalumab was not feasible due to increased reporting of interstitial lung disease. Osimertinib-based combination therapies represent a compelling approach now being further investigated.
NCT02143466.
•Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC received osimertinib 80 mg combined with selumetinib, savolitinib or durvalumab.•Feasible dosing strategies were identified for osimertinib plus selumetinib or savolitinib.•Osimertinib plus durvalumab was not feasible due to increased reporting of interstitial lung disease.•Responses were seen in all treatment arms, warranting further analysis of the feasible combinations identified.•Osimertinib-based combinations represent a compelling approach now being investigated broadly to further improve outcomes.
This international, randomized, double-blind phase III study (ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52) evaluated nivolumab with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment for nonsquamous ...non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Between June 2017 and July 2019, this study enrolled treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. They were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive nivolumab or placebo in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab/placebo with bevacizumab until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent radiology review committee (IRRC).
Overall, 550 patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan were randomized; of these patients, 273 and 275 received the nivolumab and placebo combinations, respectively. In the present preplanned interim analysis with a median follow up of 13.7 months, the IRRC-assessed median PFS was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (12.1 versus 8.1 months; hazard ratio 0.56; 96.4% confidence interval 0.43-0.71; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed across all patients with any programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels including PD-L1-negative patients. The IRRC-assessed objective response rates were 61.5% and 50.5% in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was comparable between the two arms; treatment-related adverse events leading to death were observed in five and four patients in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively.
The TASUKI-52 regimen should be considered a viable new treatment strategy for treatment-naïve patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.
•Nivolumab with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was evaluated as first-line therapy for nonsquamous NSCLC.•The nivolumab combination therapy provided superior PFS across all patients with any PD-L1 expression levels.•The median PFS of 12.1 months is the longest among all phase III studies for nonsquamous NSCLC without driver mutations.•No new safety signals were observed.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions need to be accurately and efficiently detected for ALK inhibitor therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the reference test. Although ...increasing data are supporting that ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is highly concordant with FISH, IHC screening needed to be clinically and prospectively validated.
In the AF-001JP trial for alectinib, 436 patients were screened for ALK fusions through IHC (n = 384) confirmed with FISH (n = 181), multiplex RT-PCR (n = 68), or both (n = 16). IHC results were scored with iScore.
ALK fusion was positive in 137 patients and negative in 250 patients. Since the presence of cancer cells in the samples for RT-PCR was not confirmed, ALK fusion negativity could not be ascertained in 49 patients. IHC interpreted with iScore showed a 99.4% (173/174) concordance with FISH. All 41 patients who had iScore 3 and were enrolled in phase II showed at least 30% tumor reduction with 92.7% overall response rate. Two IHC-positive patients with an atypical FISH pattern responded to ALK inhibitor therapy. The reduction rate was not correlated with IHC staining intensity.
Our study showed (i) that when sufficiently sensitive and appropriately interpreted, IHC can be a stand-alone diagnostic for ALK inhibitor therapies; (ii) that when atypical FISH patterns are accompanied by IHC positivity, the patients should be considered as candidates for ALK inhibitor therapies, and (iii) that the expression level of ALK fusion is not related to the level of response to ALK inhibitors and is thus not required for patient selection.
JapicCTI-101264 (This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center).
When farmers undertake a new activity such as tourism activity, it is crucial that they enlarge or redefine their identity from that of a simple farm producer to a farm resource manager with a wider ...perspective. This paper evaluates how a farmer’s identity influences the efficiency of main activity, milk production by providing an emerging new educational tourism service. To approach this aim, based on an analytical framework, this paper classified farmer’s identity into two types: traditional identity that is oriented towards simple farm production and enlarged identity that is oriented towards viability of the educational tourism activity. The estimation result of stochastic frontier production function (SFPF) revealed that, although conventional technical inefficiency is overestimated when the identity effect is not considered, the female initiative on the tourism activity enhances the technical efficiency of milk production. Consequently, it is when policymakers try to design support measures to develop tourism-related farm diversification, the perspective of the support measures for capacity building should be widened to include identity issues.
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolongs survival versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We further characterized clinical benefit with this regimen in a large ...pooled patient population and assessed the effect of response on survival.
Data were pooled from four studies of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 227 Part 1, 817 cohort A, 568 Part 1, and 012). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were assessed. Landmark analyses of OS by response status at 6 months and by tumor burden reduction in responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab were also assessed.
In the pooled population (N = 1332) with a minimum follow-up of 29.1-58.9 months, median OS was 18.6 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 35%; median PFS was 5.4 months (3-year PFS rate, 17%). Objective response rate was 36%; median duration of response was 23.7 months, with 38% of responders having an ongoing response at 3 years. In patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, ≥1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%, 3-year OS rates were 30%, 38%, 30%, and 48%. Three-year OS rates were 30% and 38% in patients with squamous or non-squamous histology. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to the overall pooled population (median OS, 20.1 months; 3-year OS rate, 34%). In the pooled population, responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab at 6 months had longer post-landmark OS than those with stable or progressive disease; 3-year OS rates were 66%, 22%, and 14%, respectively. Greater depth of response was associated with prolonged survival; in patients with tumor burden reduction ≥80%, 50% to <80%, or 30% to <50%, 3-year OS rates were 85%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in the pooled population.
Long-term survival benefit and durable response with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in this large patient population further support this first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC.
•Pooled analyses from four 1L NIVO + IPI studies support the durable efficacy of this regimen for advanced NSCLC treatment.•Durable responses and long-term survival benefit with NIVO + IPI were observed across histologies/PD-L1 expression levels.•Patients who had a response at 6 months with 1L NIVO + IPI had improved post-landmark survival benefit.•Responders with higher tumor burden reduction from baseline derived long-term OS benefit.
Magnesium supplementation has been reported to have a nephroprotective effect on cisplatin-induced renal dysfunction, but little evidence exists regarding the effect of magnesium preloading before ...cisplatin administration. We started to include magnesium preloading (8 mEq) in cisplatin-containing treatment regimens in January 2011. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether magnesium preloading reduces cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.
We retrospectively reviewed 496 thoracic malignancy patients treated with cisplatin (≥60 mg/m²)-containing regimens as a first-time chemotherapy between January 2009 and December 2011. We compared the incidence of Grade ≥2 serum creatinine elevation according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, between magnesium preloading group (n = 161 32%) and non-magnesium preloading group (n = 335 68%) during the first cycle and all cycles.
The median number of administered cycles was four in both groups. The incidence of Grade ≥2 serum creatinine elevation in magnesium preloading group was significantly lower during both the first cycle and all cycles than in the non-magnesium preloading group (4.9 versus 19.1% during the first cycle, and 14.2 versus 39.7% during all the cycles). A multivariate analysis indicated that magnesium preloading significantly reduced cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity throughout the entire period from after the first administration (odds ratio: 0.262, 95% confidence interval: 0.106-0.596 during the first cycle, and odds ratio: 0.234, 95% confidence interval: 0.129-0.414 during all cycles).
Magnesium preloading before cisplatin administration significantly reduced cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.
PDF
