Current surgical results of acute type A aortic dissection in Japan are presented. According to the annual survey by the Japanese Association of Thoracic Surgery, 4,444 patients with acute type A ...aortic dissection underwent surgical procedures and the overall hospital mortality was 9.1% in 2013. The prevalence of aortic root replacement with a valve sparing technique, total arch replacement (TAR), and frozen stent graft are presented and strategies for thrombosed dissection or organ malperfusion syndrome secondary to acute aortic dissection are discussed.
Recent advances in surgery for thoracic aorta have been described, including data by the annual survey of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Current clinical problems in aortic root ...surgery, brain protection during aortic arch surgery, spinal cord protection during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, acute aortic dissection and endovascular stenting have been discussed.
Abstract Objective The present study aimed to determine the impact of the extent of graft replacement on early and late outcomes in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Methods Between October ...1999 and July 2014, 197 consecutive patients were surgically treated for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. The extent of graft replacement (hemiarch, partial, or total arch replacement) was mainly determined by the location of the primary entry. Early and late results were compared in patients after total arch replacement (n = 88) and combined hemiarch and partial arch replacement: non–total arch replacement (n = 109). Results The in-hospital mortality rates of the total arch replacement and non–total arch replacement groups were 10.2% and 14.7%, respectively ( P = .47). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation and visceral organ malperfusion as significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality, but not total arch replacement. During a mean follow-up period of 60 ± 48 months, the 5-year survivals in the total arch replacement and non–total arch replacement groups were 88.6% ± 4.2% and 83.8% ± 4.4%, respectively ( P = .54). Rates of distal aortic events (defined as freedom from surgery for distal aorta dilation or distal arch diameter expanding to 50 mm) at 5 years were significantly better in the total arch replacement group than in the non–total arch replacement group (94.9% ± 3.5% vs 83.6% ± 4.9%, P = .01). Conclusions The operative mortality of patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection treated by total arch replacement was acceptable with good long-term survival after both total arch replacement and non–total arch replacement. The frequency of distal aortic events might be reduced in patients after total arch replacement compared with non–total arch replacement.
The study objective was to report the clinical outcomes of open surgery for acute aortic dissection by using the Japan Cardiovascular Database.
Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 29,486 patients with ...acute aortic dissection who underwent open surgery were registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Database. Some 50% of patients were male. Age of patients at surgery was 59.8 ± 14.2 years; 61% of patients were aged less than 65 years, and 21% of patients were aged more than 75 years. Connective tissue disease was found in 1.2% of patients. Some 13% of patients had disturbed consciousness, and 12% of patients had cardiogenic shock. Some 11% of patients had moderate or severe aortic valve regurgitation, and 2.3% of patients had acute myocardial infarction. Some 94% of patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after diagnosis. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 74% of patients, hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 17.1% of patients, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 9.4% of patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 216 ± 90 minutes, and cardiac ischemic time was 132 ± 60 minutes. Lowest body temperature was 24.6°C ± 3.2°C. Replacement of the ascending aorta (zone I) was performed in 69% of patients, and total arch replacement (zone 0 to zone II, III-) was performed in 29% of patients. The aortic valve was replaced in 7.9% of patients and repaired in 4.4% of patients.
The 30-day mortality was 9.2%, and in-hospital mortality was 11%. The number of operations has increased through the study periods. The in-hospital mortality has been stable or in a decreasing trend. Major complications consisted of stroke in 12% of patients, new hemodialysis in 7.3% of patients, spinal cord ischemia in 3.9% of patients, and prolonged ventilation in 15% of patients.
Approximately 30,000 patients with acute aortic dissection in the recent 6 years (2013 - 2018) underwent open surgery according to the nationwide Japanese database. The number of operations has increased, and in-hospital mortality has been stable or in a decreasing trend. Although the early outcomes are acceptable, there is still room for improvement in patients with preoperative comorbidities.
Nationwide analysis of acute AAD using the JCVSD 2013 to 2018. From left top to right bottom: patient enrollment, patient age at surgery, urgency of surgery, yearly number of surgery and hospital death, yearly number of postoperative complications, range of replacing aorta, aortic valve procedures, and mode of brain protection. CABG, Coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congestive heart disease; LV, left ventricle; VAD, ventricular assist device; SCI, spinal cord ischemia; HD, hemodialysis. Display omitted
Objectives Antegrade cerebral perfusion and hypothermic circulatory arrest, with or without retrograde cerebral perfusion, are 2 major types of brain protection that are used during aortic arch ...surgery. We conducted a comparative study of these methods in patients undergoing total arch replacement to evaluate the clinical outcomes in Japan, based on the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Methods A total of 16,218 patients underwent total arch replacement between 2009 and 2012. Patients with acute aortic dissection or ruptured aneurysm, or who underwent emergency surgery were excluded, leaving 8169 patients for analysis. For the brain protection method, 7038 patients had antegrade cerebral perfusion and 1141 patients had hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion. A nonmatched comparison was made between the 2 groups, and propensity score analysis was performed among 1141 patients. Results The matched paired analysis showed that the minimum rectal temperature was lower in the hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion group (21.2°C ± 3.7°C vs 24.2°C ± 3.2°C) and that the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac ischemia was longer in the antegrade cerebral perfusion group. There were no significant differences between the antegrade cerebral perfusion and hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion groups with regard to 30-day mortality (3.2% vs 4.0%), hospital mortality (6.0% vs 7.1%), incidence of stroke (6.7% vs 8.6%), or transient neurologic disorder (4.1% vs 4.4%). There was no difference in a composite outcome of hospital death, bleeding, prolonged ventilation, need for dialysis, stroke, and infection (antegrade cerebral perfusion 28.4% vs hypothermic circulatory arrest 30.1%). However, hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion resulted in a significantly higher rate of prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (>8 days: 24.2% vs 15.6%). Conclusions Hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion and antegrade cerebral perfusion provide comparable clinical outcomes with regard to mortality and stroke rates, but hypothermic circulatory arrest/retrograde cerebral perfusion resulted in a higher incidence of prolonged intensive care unit stay. Antegrade cerebral perfusion might be preferred as the brain protection method for complicated aortic arch procedures.
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) has been sparingly used for the successful treatment of massive and submassive pulmonary emboli. To date, all data regarding SPE have been limited to ...single-center experiences. The purpose of this study was to document short-term outcomes after SPE for acute pulmonary emboli (PE) at four high-volume institutions.
A retrospective review of multiple local Society of Thoracic Surgeons databases of adults undergoing SPE from 1998 to 2014 for acute PE was performed (n = 214). Demographic, operative, and outcomes data were collected and analyzed. Patients were summarily categorized as having either massive or submassive PEs based on the presence or absence of preoperative vasopressors.
A total of 214 patients with acute PE were treated by SPE. The mean age was 56.0 ± 14.5 years, and 92 (43.6%) patients were female. Of those, 176 (82.2%) PEs were submassive and 38 (17.8%) were massive. Fifteen (7.0%) patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures, with 10 (4.7%) having simultaneous valvular interventions and 5 (2.4%) undergoing concomitant bypass grafting. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used for all cases. Cardioplegic arrest was used for 80 (37.4%) patients. The median CPB and aortic cross clamp times were 71.5 (interquartile range IQR, 47.0-109.5) and 46.0 (IQR, 26.0-74.5), respectively. Notably, only 25 (11.7%) patients died in the hospital. Mortality was highest among the 28 patients who experienced preoperative cardiac arrest (9, 32.1%) CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the first multicenter experience with SPE for acute pulmonary emboli. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute massive and submassive PE is safe and can be performed with acceptable in-hospital outcomes; the procedure should be included in the multimodality treatment of life-threatening pulmonary emboli.
PDF
