Sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) is a high-tannin, late-season invasive forb species that reduces biodiversity in tallgrass prairie ecosystems. The largest tallgrass prairie remnant exists in ...the Flint Hills of Kansas and Oklahoma, where the most common grazing management practice involves prescribed fire in early spring followed by intensive stocking with yearling beef cattle from April to July. Sericea has continued to spread under this management regime. From 2013 to 2016, in Kansas Flint Hills tallgrass prairie, we tested the effects of using spring burning with early-season steer grazing, followed by late-season sheep grazing (Steer+Sheep) compared to spring burning followed by steer grazing only (Steer) on sericea vigor, grassland birds, and pollinators. Density and nest success of Grasshopper Sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum) and Eastern Meadowlarks (Sturnella magna) were not negatively affected by Steer+Sheep relative to Steer treatments, whereas there was evidence of a negative effect in these same metrics for Dickcissels (Spiza americana). Abundance of butterflies and their nectar sources were similar between treatments but abundance of grassland specialist butterfly species was low, overall. Comprehensively, Steer+Sheep effectively controls the spread of sericea but may not create habitat for all tallgrass prairie wildlife species.
Two experiments were conducted during 2 yr to evaluate differences in ovulation potential and fertility in response to GnRH or hCG. In Exp. 1, 46 beef cows were given 100 μg of GnRH or 500, 1,000, ...2,000, or 3,000 IU of hCG. Ovulation incidence was not different between GnRH and any of the hCG doses, indicating that ovulatory capacity of at least 500 IU of hCG was equivalent to GnRH. In Exp. 2, beef cows (n = 676) at 6 locations were assigned randomly to a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Main effects were: 1) pre-timed AI (TAI) treatment (GnRH or hCG) and 2) post-TAI treatment (saline, GnRH, or hCG) to initiate resynchronization of ovulation in previously inseminated cattle. Blood samples were collected (d -21 and -10) to determine progesterone concentrations and assess cyclicity. Cattle were treated with a progesterone insert on d -10 and with 100 pg of GnRH or 1,000 IU of hCG. A PGFsub2α injection was given at insert removal on d -3. Cows were inseminated 62 h (d 0) after insert removal. On d 26 after first TAI, cows of unknown pregnancy status were treated with saline, GnRH, or hCG to initiate a CO-Synch protocol. Pregnancy was diagnosed 33 d after first TAI to determine pregnancies per AI (P/AI). Nonpregnant cows at 6 locations in yr 1 and 1 location in yr 2 were given PGFsub2α and inseminated 56 h later, concurrent with a GnRH injection. Five weeks later, pregnancy diagnosis was conducted to determine pregnancy loss after first TAI and pregnancy outcome of the second TAI. Injection of pre-TAI hCG reduced (P < 0.001) P/AI compared with GnRH, with a greater reduction in cycling cows. Post-TAI treatments had no negative effect on P/AI resulting from the first TAI. Serum progesterone was greater (P = 0.06) 7 d after pre-TAI hCG than after GnRH and greater (P < 0.05) after post-TM hCG on d 26 compared with saline 7 d after treatment in association with greater frequency of multiple corpora lutea. Compared with saline, injections of post-TAI GnRH and hCG did not increase second insemination P/AI, and inconsistent results were detected among locations. Use of hCG in lieu of GnRH is contraindicated in a CO-Synch + progesterone insert protocol. Compared with a breeding season having only 1 TAI and longer exposure to cleanup bulls, total breeding season pregnancy rate was reduced by one-third, subsequent calving distribution was altered, and 50% more AI-sired calves were obtained by applying 2 TAI during the breeding season. PUBLICATION ABSTRACT
Two experiments were conducted during 2 yr to evaluate differences in ovulation potential and fertility in response to GnRH or hCG. In Exp. 1, 46 beef cows were given 100 microg of GnRH or 500, ...1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 IU of hCG. Ovulation incidence was not different between GnRH and any of the hCG doses, indicating that ovulatory capacity of at least 500 IU of hCG was equivalent to GnRH. In Exp. 2, beef cows (n = 676) at 6 locations were assigned randomly to a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Main effects were: 1) pre-timed AI (TAI) treatment (GnRH or hCG) and 2) post-TAI treatment (saline, GnRH, or hCG) to initiate resynchronization of ovulation in previously inseminated cattle. Blood samples were collected (d -21 and -10) to determine progesterone concentrations and assess cyclicity. Cattle were treated with a progesterone insert on d -10 and with 100 microg of GnRH or 1,000 IU of hCG. A PGF(2alpha) injection was given at insert removal on d -3. Cows were inseminated 62 h (d 0) after insert removal. On d 26 after first TAI, cows of unknown pregnancy status were treated with saline, GnRH, or hCG to initiate a CO-Synch protocol. Pregnancy was diagnosed 33 d after first TAI to determine pregnancies per AI (P/AI). Nonpregnant cows at 6 locations in yr 1 and 1 location in yr 2 were given PGF(2alpha) and inseminated 56 h later, concurrent with a GnRH injection. Five weeks later, pregnancy diagnosis was conducted to determine pregnancy loss after first TAI and pregnancy outcome of the second TAI. Injection of pre-TAI hCG reduced (P < 0.001) P/AI compared with GnRH, with a greater reduction in cycling cows. Post-TAI treatments had no negative effect on P/AI resulting from the first TAI. Serum progesterone was greater (P = 0.06) 7 d after pre-TAI hCG than after GnRH and greater (P < 0.05) after post-TAI hCG on d 26 compared with saline 7 d after treatment in association with greater frequency of multiple corpora lutea. Compared with saline, injections of post-TAI GnRH and hCG did not increase second insemination P/AI, and inconsistent results were detected among locations. Use of hCG in lieu of GnRH is contraindicated in a CO-Synch + progesterone insert protocol. Compared with a breeding season having only 1 TAI and longer exposure to cleanup bulls, total breeding season pregnancy rate was reduced by one-third, subsequent calving distribution was altered, and 50% more AI-sired calves were obtained by applying 2 TAI during the breeding season.
We determined the effects of administering hCG 7 d after a fixed-time AI (TAI) on ovarian response, concentrations of progesterone, and pregnancy rates in postpartum suckled beef cows. Cows at 6 ...locations received 100 μg of GnRH (Fertagyl, Intervet Animal Health, Millsboro, DE) and a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device (CIDR EAZI-Breed, Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY), followed in 7 d by 25 mg of PGF₂α (Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health) and CIDR removal. At 64 h after CIDR removal, cows received an injection of GnRH and AI (d 0), and then were stratified by days postpartum and parity and assigned randomly to 2 treatments administered 7 d after TAI: 1) 1 mL of saline (saline; n = 252); or 2) 1,000 IU of hCG (Chorulon, Intervet Animal Health; n = 254). Blood samples were collected on d -21, -10, and 33 relative to TAI (d 0) at all locations, on d 7 and 68 at 5 locations, and on d 14 at 1 location to determine concentrations of progesterone. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to determine pregnancy status on d 33 and 68 at all locations, to monitor response of follicles and corpora lutea (CL) in response to treatment at 1 location (n = 106) on d 7 and 14, and to determine the number of CL present in pregnant cows on d 33 in 3 locations (n = 130). Pregnant cows had greater (P < 0.05) concentrations of progesterone at the time of treatment (d 7) compared with nonpregnant cows (3.7 ± 0.1 vs. 2.6 ± 0.2 ng/mL, respectively). On d 14, hCG-treated cows had a greater (P < 0.05) volume of luteal tissue (12.1 ± 0.5 vs. 7.3 ± 0.5 cm³, respectively) and greater concentrations of progesterone (6.8 ± 0.4 vs. 5.4 ± 0.5 ng/mL, respectively) compared with saline-treated cows. A greater (P < 0.01) percentage of hCG-treated cows (90.6%) had multiple CL on d 14 compared with saline-treated cows (0%), and a greater percentage of pregnant cows treated with hCG (74.6%) had multiple CL on d 33 compared with saline-treated cows (3.0%). Pregnancy rates of hCG-treated cows (56.3%) tended (P = 0.07) to differ from those of saline-treated cows (50.0%). Concentrations of progesterone in pregnant hCG-treated cows were greater (P < 0.05; 7.7 ± 0.3 vs. 5.8 ± 0.3 ng/mL, respectively) on d 33 than for pregnant saline-treated cows, but were similar between treatments on d 68 (7.2 ± 0.3 vs. 6.7 ± 0.4 ng/mL, respectively). We conclude that treatment with hCG increased the volume of luteal tissue on d 14 and concentrations of progesterone on d 14 and 33 after TAI. Treatment with hCG tended to increase pregnancy rates at 5 of 6 locations from 1.1 to 27 percentage points (average = 10.2) compared with saline, but cumulative pregnancy rates determined on d 68 after TAI were similar between treatments.
We determined the effects of administering hCG 7 d after a fixed-time AI (TAI) on ovarian response, concentrations of progesterone, and pregnancy rates in postpartum suckled beef cows. Cows at 6 ...locations received 100 μg of GnRH (Fertagyl, Intervet Animal Health, Millsboro, DE) and a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device (CIDR EAZI-Breed, Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY), followed in 7 d by 25 mg of PGF^sub 2α^ (Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health) and CIDR removal. At 64 h after CIDR removal, cows received an injection of GnRH and AI (d 0), and then were stratified by days postpartum and parity and assigned randomly to 2 treatments administered 7 d after TAI: 1) 1 mL of saline (saline; n = 252); or 2) 1,000 IU of hCG (Chorulon, Intervet Animal Health; n = 254). Blood samples were collected on d -21, -10, and 33 relative to TAI (d 0) at all locations, on d 7 and 68 at 5 locations, and on d 14 at 1 location to determine concentrations of progesterone. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to determine pregnancy status on d 33 and 68 at all locations, to monitor response of follicles and corpora lutea (CL) in response to treatment at 1 location (n = 106) on d 7 and 14, and to determine the number of CL present in pregnant cows on d 33 in 3 locations (n = 130). Pregnant cows had greater (P < 0.05) concentrations of progesterone at the time of treatment (d 7) compared with nonpregnant cows (3.7 ± 0.1 vs. 2.6 ± 0.2 ng/mL, respectively). On d 14, hCG-treated cows had a greater (P < 0.05) volume of luteal tissue (12.1 ± 0.5 vs. 7.3 ± 0.5 cm^sup 3^, respectively) and greater concentrations of progesterone (6.8 ± 0.4 vs. 5.4 ± 0.5 ng/mL, respectively) compared with saline-treated cows. A greater (P < 0.01) percentage of hCG-treated cows (90.6%) had multiple CL on d 14 compared with saline-treated cows (0%), and a greater percentage of pregnant cows treated with hCG (74.6%) had multiple CL on d 33 compared with saline-treated cows (3.0%). Pregnancy rates of hCG-treated cows (56.3%) tended (P = 0.07) to differ from those of saline-treated cows (50.0%). Concentrations of progesterone in pregnant hCG-treated cows were greater (P < 0.05; 7.7 ± 0.3 vs. 5.8 ± 0.3 ng/mL, respectively) on d 33 than for pregnant saline-treated cows, but were similar between treatments on d 68 (7.2 ± 0.3 vs. 6.7 7plusmn; 0.4 ng/mL, respectively). We conclude that treatment with hCG increased the volume of luteal tissue on d 14 and concentrations of progesterone on d 14 and 33 after TAI. Treatment with hCG tended to increase pregnancy rates at 5 of 6 locations from 1.1 to 27 percentage points (average = 10.2) compared with saline, but cumulative pregnancy rates determined on d 68 after TAI were similar between treatments. PUBLICATION ABSTRACT
Forty-eight steers were used to study the influence of feeding soybean oil (SO) on the conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of beef. Steers were fed either a control diet containing 954 g/kg of dry ...matter (DM) corn-based concentrate (CTL) or a control diet supplemented with SO at 20 (SO2) or 40 g/kg (SO4) of diet DM for 105 days. Adipose tissue samples were collected from the M. longissimus dorsi (LD) and from the M. semitendinosus (ST) on days 0 and 63 of the experiment. Adipose and muscle tissue samples were collected from the LD and ST immediately after slaughter. Feeding 40 g/kg of DM as SO increased the proportions of trans-C18:1 in beef lipid as compared to CTL and SO2 treatments. The C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer of CLA as a proportion of total fat was not different in adipose and muscle across treatments. Supplementing SO increased C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 CLA in adipose tissue of the LD. Supplementing high-grain finishing diets with SO is not an effective strategy to enhance the C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer of CLA in beef. Keywords: Beef; conjugated linoleic acid; soybean oil; fat; fatty acid
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of lipoic acid (LA) on beef LM steak bloom time, as well as to characterize bloom time in the CIE L*, a*, and b* color space over a 93-min ...period. Thirty-two Simmental steers were supplemented with LA for 21 d immediately before slaughter at levels of 0, 8, 16, or 24 mg of LA/kg BW (eight steers per treatment). Lipoic acid was mixed with liquid paraffin, allowed to solidify, prilled, and top-dressed over a standard finishing diet. Steers were slaughtered at the University of Missouri abattoir in four groups of eight (two steers per treatment) over a 2-wk period. After a 24-h chill at 4 degrees C, the right LM was removed from each carcass. One 2.54-cm steak was removed from the anterior portion of the LM, and its color characteristics (CIE L*, a*, and b*) were measured immediately with a standardized spectrocolorimeter. Color measurements were taken every 3 min thereafter for a total of 93-min. Hue angle (true red) and chroma (color saturation) were calculated from the color measurements. Addition of LA to the diet had no effect on bloom time (P = 0.67). When treatment means were analyzed, the addition of 24 mg of LA/kg BW to the diet resulted in higher (lighter) L* values (P < 0.05) compared with other treatments, whereas the addition of 16 mg of LA/kg BW to the diet caused lower hue angles (more true red; P < 0.05) when compared with other treatments. Addition of LA to the diet did not affect a* (P = 0.13) and b* (P = 0.18) values or chroma (P = 0.62). In the absence of treatment effects, bloom times for all treatments were pooled, and L* values did not change (P > 0.05) during the 93-min bloom time; however, a* and chroma values increased for 9 min and plateaued after 12 min (P < 0.01). Similarly, b* values increased (P < 0.01) for the first 6 min, and after 9 min, no further increase in yellowness was detected. Bloom time had little effect on hue angle, which stabilized after 3 min. Supplementing steers with the antioxidant LA for 21 d had no effect on the bloom time of beef LM; however, higher levels of supplemental LA affected L* values and hue angles of beef.
PDF