Abstract Background The term “post-COVID-19 condition” refers to the symptomatology that appears between four to twelve weeks after Covid-19 infection. These symptoms can persist for weeks or even ...months, significantly diminishing the quality of life for affected individuals. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation programs and/or respiratory muscle training on respiratory sequelae in patients with post-COVID condition. Methods The literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized clinical trials were included in which participants were aged 18 years or older. Articles were excluded if at least one of the therapies did not involve pulmonary rehabilitation or respiratory muscle training, if the participants were COVID positive, if studies lacked results, and finally, if interventions were conducted without supervision or at home. This review only encompasses supervised non-virtual interventions. This study adheres to the PRISMA statement and has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023433843). Results The outcomes obtained in the included studies are assessed across the following variables: Exercise capacity using the 6-minute walk test, Dyspnea, fatigue, Pulmonary function, Maximum inspiratory pressure, and Quality of life. Conclusion Despite the absence of a specific treatment at present, it was evident from this review that a well-structured pulmonary rehabilitation program that incorporates both aerobic and muscular strength exercises along with techniques and inspiratory muscle exercises was the most effective form of treatment.
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) provide accessible and engaging information for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy students. The objective of this research was to determine the usefulness ...in improving academic performance and empathy in health sciences undergraduates, and to test a hypothetical model through structural equation analysis. This research was carried out using a descriptive and quasi-experimental design. It was conducted in a sample of 381 participants: 176 used a MOOC and 205 did not. The results of the Student’s t-test showed statistically significant differences in academic performance between the groups in favor of those students who had realized the MOOC. Participants carried out an evaluation rubric after taking MOOC. Statistically significant differences in empathy were also obtained between the pre (X = 62.06; SD = 4.41) and post (X = 73.77; SD = 9.93) tests. The hypothetical model tested via structural equation modeling was supported by the results. Motivation for the MOOC explained 50% of the variance. The MOOC (participation and realization) explained 58% of academic performance, 35% of cognitive empathy and 48% of affective empathy. The results suggest an association between higher realization and participation in a MOOC and higher levels of academic performance, and cognitive and affective empathy.
Background
Cystic fibrosis causes mucus to build up in the lungs, digestive tract, and other areas. It is the most common chronic lung disease in children and young adults. It requires daily medical ...care. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation and telehealth were used, but it was after this that there was a boom in these types of assistance in order to continue caring for cystic fibrosis patients.
Objective
The objective is to evaluate the effect of telemedicine programs in people with cystic fibrosis.
Methods
For the search, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were used. Randomized controlled trials, pilot studies, and clinical trials have been included. The exclusion criteria have considered that the population did not have another active disease or that telemedicine was not used as the main intervention. This study follows the PRISMA statement and has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021257647).
Results
A total of 11 articles have been included in the systematic review. No improvements have been found in quality of life, forced expiratory volume, and forced vital capacity. Good results have been found in increasing physical activity and early detection of exacerbations. Adherence and satisfaction are very positive and promising.
Conclusions
Despite not obtaining significant improvements in some of the variables, it should be noted that the adherence and satisfaction of both patients and workers reinforce the use of this type of care. Future studies are recommended in which to continue investigating this topic.