Summary Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents is the standard of care for treatment of native coronary artery stenoses, but optimum treatment strategies for ...bare metal stent and drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) have not been established. We aimed to compare and rank percutaneous treatment strategies for ISR. Methods We did a network meta-analysis to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence from relevant trials. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomised controlled trials published up to Oct 31, 2014, of different PCI strategies for treatment of any type of coronary ISR. The primary outcome was percent diameter stenosis at angiographic follow-up. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42014014191. Findings We deemed 27 trials eligible, including 5923 patients, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 60 months after the index intervention. Angiographic follow-up was available for 4975 (84%) of 5923 patients 6–12 months after the intervention. PCI with everolimus-eluting stents was the most effective treatment for percent diameter stenosis, with a difference of −9·0% (95% CI −15·8 to −2·2) versus drug-coated balloons (DCB), −9·4% (–17·4 to −1·4) versus sirolimus-eluting stents, −10·2% (–18·4 to −2·0) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents, −19·2% (–28·2 to −10·4) versus vascular brachytherapy, −23·4% (–36·2 to −10·8) versus bare metal stents, −24·2% (–32·2 to −16·4) versus balloon angioplasty, and −31·8% (–44·8 to −18·6) versus rotablation. DCB were ranked as the second most effective treatment, but without significant differences from sirolimus-eluting (–0·2% 95% CI −6·2 to 5·6) or paclitaxel-eluting (–1·2% –6·4 to 4·2) stents. Interpretation These findings suggest that two strategies should be considered for treatment of any type of coronary ISR: PCI with everolimus-eluting stents because of the best angiographic and clinical outcomes, and DCB because of its ability to provide favourable results without adding a new stent layer. Funding None.
Delayed endothelization and late vessel remodeling might stimulate thrombus deposition and DES thrombosis especially in "real-world" situations (1-2). ...a prolonged dual antiplatelet regimen has ...been advocated in these patients (1-2). ...our findings underscore the critical role of IVUS to guide repeated procedures in this challenging setting.
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons for Small-Vessel Disease Alfonso, Fernando, MD, PhD; Cárdenas, Alberto, MD; Cuevas, Cecilia, MD ...
Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
04/2013, Letnik:
61, Številka:
17
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Late loss is also significantly related to vessel size, which, in this study, was significantly smaller in the drug-eluting balloon (DEB) arm.
Objectives This study sought to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCD) managed with a conservative strategy. Background SCD is a rare, but ...challenging, clinical entity. Methods A prospective protocol, including a conservative management strategy, was followed. Revascularization was only considered in cases with ongoing/recurrent ischemia. Inflammatory/immunologic markers were systematically obtained. Results Forty-five consecutive patients (incidence 0.27%) were studied during a 6-year period. Of these, 27 patients (60%) had “isolated” SCD (I-SCD), and 18 had SCD associated with coronary artery disease (A-SCD). Age was 53 ± 11 years, and 26 patients were female. Most patients presented with an acute myocardial infarction. SCD had a diffuse angiographic pattern (length: 31 ± 23 mm). In 11 patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by intracoronary imaging techniques. Sixteen patients (35%) required revascularization during initial admission. One patient died after surgery, but no additional patient experienced recurrent myocardial infarction. No significant inflammatory/immunologic abnormalities were detected. At follow-up (median 730 days), only 3 patients presented with adverse events (1 died of congestive heart failure, and 2 required revascularization). No patient experienced a myocardial infarction or died suddenly. Event-free survival was similar (94% and 88%, respectively) in patients with I-SCD and A-SCD. Notably, at angiographic follow-up, spontaneous “disappearance” of the SCD image was found in 7 of 13 (54%) patients. Conclusions In this large prospective series of consecutive patients with SCD, a “conservative” therapeutic strategy provided excellent long-term prognosis. Clinical outcome was similar in patients with I-SCD and A-SCD. The natural history of SCD includes spontaneous healing with complete resolution.
Objectives This study sought to assess the effectiveness of a strategy of using drug-eluting stents (DES) with a different drug (switch) in patients with DES in-stent restenosis (ISR). Background ...Treatment of patients with DES ISR remains a challenge. Methods The RIBS-III (Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent) study was a prospective, multicenter study that aimed to assess results of coronary interventions in patients with DES ISR. The use of a different DES was the recommended strategy. The main angiographic endpoint was minimal lumen diameter at 9-month follow-up. The main clinical outcome measure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Results This study included 363 consecutive patients with DES ISR from 12 Spanish sites. The different-DES strategy was used in 274 patients (75%) and alternative therapeutic modalities (no switch) in 89 patients (25%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups, although lesion length was longer in the switch group. At late angiographic follow-up (77% of eligible patients, median: 278 days) minimal lumen diameter was larger (1.86 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.40 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.003) and recurrent restenosis rate lower (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.008) in the different-DES group. At the last clinical follow-up (99% of patients, median: 771 days), the combined clinical endpoint occurred less frequently (23% vs. 35%, p = 0.039) in the different-DES group. After adjustment using propensity score analyses, restenosis rate (relative risk: 0.41, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.21 to 0.80, p = 0.01), minimal lumen diameter (difference: 0.41 mm, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.62, p = 0.001), and the event-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96, p = 0.038) remained significantly improved in the switch group. Conclusions In patients with DES ISR, the implantation of a different DES provides superior late clinical and angiographic results than do alternative interventional modalities.
Objectives This study sought to investigate the clinical impact of the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during revascularization of patients with left main coronary artery (LM) disease with ...drug-eluting stents (DES). Background Whether the use of IVUS during the procedure adds a clinical benefit remains unclear. There is only 1 previous observational study, with relevant limitations, supporting the value of this strategy. Methods We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 registries of patients with LM disease treated with DES in Spain. A propensity score-matching method was used to obtain matched pairs of patients with and without IVUS guidance. Results A total of 1,670 patients were included, and 505 patients (30.2%) underwent DES implantation under IVUS guidance (IVUS group). By means of the matching method, 505 patients without the use of IVUS during revascularization were selected (no-IVUS group). Survival free of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 3 years was 88.7% in the IVUS group and 83.6% in the no-IVUS group (p = 0.04) for the overall population, and 90% and 80.7%, respectively (p = 0.03), for the subgroups with distal LM lesions. The incidence of definite and probable thrombosis was significantly lower in the IVUS group (0.6% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.04). Finally, IVUS-guided revascularization was identified as an independent predictor for major adverse events in the overall population (hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and in the subgroup with distal lesions (hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.90; p = 0.02). Conclusions The results of this pooled analysis show an association of IVUS guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention with better outcomes in patients with LM disease undergoing revascularization with DES.
PDF
